The fundraising team has been in discussions with the local canton about
receiving a subsidy or sponsorship
Sometimes Government agencies only give this type of money if they feel
there is a risk that the event will go to another region/city
On this basis alone, I think we should allow these
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:43:16AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
The fundraising team has been in discussions with the local canton about
receiving a subsidy or sponsorship
As far as I know, we didn't ask formally the canton so far but only an
office which depends on the canton.
I am
On 27/11/12 10:12, Raphaël Walther wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 08:43:16AM +, Daniel Pocock wrote:
The fundraising team has been in discussions with the local canton about
receiving a subsidy or sponsorship
As far as I know, we didn't ask formally the canton so far
Hi,
(dropping cc:s as everyone is subscribed...)
I tried to inniate a conversation with Moray and Gunnar last night, but sadly
failed, so here are my thoughts only.
My general comment is, that I have not seen any new arguments in the last
seven days or so. (I also spoke with Ana on Sunday
Hi Moray, hi Gunnar,
I think we need to get together and decide what we as chairs want to do.
Can we please either discuss this via (private) mail (between ourselves) or on
some irc channel? I'm happy to share our discussion after the fact, but I
would like a sole discussion between us three,
Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au writes:
The fundraising team has been in discussions with the local canton about
receiving a subsidy or sponsorship
Sometimes Government agencies only give this type of money if they feel
there is a risk that the event will go to another region/city
I
I've spent the morning digging into the budget, contract, bylaws, and
asking clarifications to Philipp (on IRC, due to time constraints) who
has been very kind and helpful. I'll provide an answer to the budget
approval later on today. But first, I'd like to address a couple of
budget-related
Answering this email because I have been named.
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:39:51PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
My general comment is, that I have not seen any new arguments in the last
seven days or so. (I also spoke with Ana on Sunday for more than an hour, and
while I learned several
On Dienstag, 27. November 2012, Ana Guerrero wrote:
you
started the discussion trying to find out what is my bigger problem with
the intention of trying to calm down that.
I'm glad you know my intentions better than I do./sarcasm
Based on this assumption I dont think I have to reply much to
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:51 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
I think we need to get together and decide what we as chairs want to do.
Can we please either discuss this via (private) mail (between ourselves) or
on
some irc channel? I'm happy to share our discussion after the fact, but I
would
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:39 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
4.) Le Camp has luxury options (if you manage to share a car)
Plenty of hotels are in 20km range of Le Camp, which amounts to 30min driving
at most. Considering most people (who dont work at home) have a longer daily
communte to work,
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:39 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Or maybe, if Le Camp agrees once again to delay the signing, people
will believe those who say that Le Camp is a nice trustworthy
organisation
This is either misunderstanding people's concerns or a straw man
argument: no one is saying
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 11:47:15PM +0100, Philipp Hug wrote:
As the DPL has the final oversight how Debian spends it's money and
how the Debian brand is used, I'm also asking him for approval of the
budget
As mentioned before, I dug into the budget, related documents, some
debconf-team
På Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:01:41 +0100, skrev Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org:
I am unhappy that new concerns are being raised at this stage.
However, unfortunately I *did* see new information from these latest
discussions.
[...]
And I had simply assumed that there was a bathroom per one or two
Hi Hermann,
On Dienstag, 27. November 2012, Herman Robak wrote:
Drastical solution: Sex-segregated houses.
please stop posting solutions. we are here to look for problems.
scnr,
Holger
___
Debconf-team mailing list
Hi
Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org writes:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:39 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Or maybe, if Le Camp agrees once again to delay the signing, people
will believe those who say that Le Camp is a nice trustworthy
organisation
This is either misunderstanding people's
Hi Holger,
As I just told you on IRC, I refrained from posting because I
mistakenly understood your request to comment between us rather than
on the list as a request to wait for some further information or
opinion from you... And I carried on with $otherstuff. As you now
requested explicit
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:16:12PM +0100, Herman Robak wrote:
På Tue, 27 Nov 2012 15:01:41 +0100, skrev Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org:
I am unhappy that new concerns are being raised at this stage.
However, unfortunately I *did* see new information from these latest
discussions.
[...]
And
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 04:24:04PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
Moray Allan mo...@sermisy.org writes:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 12:39 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
Or maybe, if Le Camp agrees once again to delay the signing, people
will believe those who say that Le Camp is a nice trustworthy
On 27/11/12 11:39, Holger Levsen wrote:
And as for personal privacy (as opposed to hacking privacy), Interlaken would
only provide this for the rich, who can afford there own hotel room. For
Actually, it is Switzerland as a whole that only provides for the rich.
It is complete nonsense
Hi,
in several mails (not only the quoted mail) people were talking about
qualitative measures in terms of failure vs. success and we now even
try to apply a quantitaive measure:
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 03:45:13PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
E.g. (note, numbers are *entirely hypothetical*):
On 27/11/12 19:42, Andreas Tille wrote:
What I want to say is: There is neither any objective nor most probably
any subjective measure to declare a DebConf a success or failure. The
only thing we can really measure is the surplus / dept a DebConf
created. I also would not fully agree that
22 matches
Mail list logo
