Re: [Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

also sprach martin f krafft [2017-05-15 15:57 +0200]: > I think you are referring to the currently valid CoC: > > https://debconf.org/codeofconduct.shtml Ftr, since there's some confusion… this is the current CoC. The original proposal is available here:

Re: [Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

also sprach Giacomo Catenazzi [2017-05-15 15:37 +0200]: > I also don't like such list. First, who will enforce it? DPL? > Anti-harassment or organizers? This — incidence response — is in part what we have to define. Someone needs to have the power to enforce the rules, attendees

Re: [Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

[using this mail to reply Martin, so that I have all CC] > El 15/05/17 a las 15:07, martin f krafft escribió: >> The original proposal listed a number of potential consequences to >> offences, among other more concrete incidence response processes. >> >> What's the reason you didn't include those

[Debconf-team] Fwd: Re: Revision of DebConf CoC

Resending CC'ing anti-harassment, so the anti-harassment team has the whole thread. Regards Mensaje reenviado Asunto: Re: [Debconf-team] Revision of DebConf CoC Fecha: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:22:32 +0200 De: Laura Arjona Reina Responder a: larj...@debian.org