* Steve Langasek vor...@debian.org [2012-11-06 21:19]:
At the risk of repeating myself: we should not provide late travel
sponsorship, *at all*. It's an inefficient use of funds. If we can't
provide travel sponsorship in a timely manner, *don't* provide travel
sponsorship - save the money
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:08:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
At the risk of repeating myself: we should not provide late travel
sponsorship, *at all*. It's an inefficient use of funds. If we can't
provide travel sponsorship in a timely manner, *don't* provide travel
sponsorship - save
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 11:25:37AM +0100, Ana Guerrero wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:08:02PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
At the risk of repeating myself: we should not provide late travel
sponsorship, *at all*. It's an inefficient use of funds. If we can't
provide travel sponsorship
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 07:34:51PM -0400, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote:
I'd propose that we have a bigger amount of raters for travel $ allocation.
And
people from the core teams (orga, travel sponsorship etc) would just provide
the guidelines for them, but not join the raters' team. If we
