On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
On 04/02/15 22:59, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Could frame this differently? The normal framing (above) often ends up
with an assumption that everyone must eat meat, with only a limited
set-aside for vegetarians. This results in overconsumption
also sprach Richard Hartmann richih.mailingl...@gmail.com [2015-02-05 19:49
+0100]:
Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want
to talk about summit specifically? OTOH, what if we use something else
in a few years?
Then
Dear teams, and I guess specifically you leaders…
We are now approaching the time when the budget for DC15 needs to be
prepared and approved. Therefore, it would be really useful if you
could spend a bit of time thinking about what you'll need, so that
we can take that into account.
We're fully
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
skip meat one day, I really don't agree with your
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
list infrastructure anyway.
Yes.
I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
Fine by
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 2:29 AM, Martín Ferrari tin...@debian.org wrote:
Lacto-ovo-vegetarian is by definition a dietary restriction, no matter
how you frame it.
I agree.
No restriction means that catering can use any reasonably common
ingredients. Personally, I do not think that this means
Don Armstrong d...@debian.org writes:
On Tue, 03 Feb 2015, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Don Armstrong d...@debian.org wrote:
1) name of the psuedopackage
Presumably, that's summit.debconf.org in this case.
Correct.
2) a short description of what the
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote:
I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front desk, etc want
to talk about summit specifically? OTOH, what if we use
Daniel Kahn Gillmor dijo [Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:25:37AM -0500]:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
skip meat one day, I really don't agree with your proposal.
Can you think of a better
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:27:30PM +0100, Laura Arjona Reina wrote:
Hi everybody
El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió:
I would change the perspective: tell cooks the things they can add to
the menu.
What about this proposal?
Diet:
- Not applicable
- Vegan
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:59:03PM -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Could frame this differently? The normal framing (above) often ends up
with an assumption that everyone must eat meat, with only a limited
set-aside for vegetarians. This results in overconsumption of meat: it
forces
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 5:21 PM, Nattie Mayer-Hutchings
nat...@debconf.org wrote:
[X] Subscribe to announcement list default: Yes
Please make this mandatory. Add
We are committed to your privacy and will not spam you. Yet, we want
to make sure that we can reach you in case anything really
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 11:01:09AM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org wrote:
I think the best would be to create a new list for this on
lists.debian.org. We want to move all the debconf lists to the Debian
list infrastructure
Hi everybody
El 05/02/15 a las 17:25, Daniel Kahn Gillmor escribió:
So i'm amending my earlier proposal to this:
Dietary restrictions:
- Not applicable
- No dietary restrictions Default
- Lacto-Ovo Vegetarian (dairy and eggs OK)
- Vegan (strict vegetarian)
On Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 07:49:32PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:04 PM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com wrote:
I suggest debconf-sum...@lists.debian.org.
Not a slightly broader debconf-infra@l.d.o ?
I pondered that as well. But what if bursaries, front
Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net writes:
On Thu 2015-02-05 03:13:46 -0500, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 02/05/2015 02:29 AM, Martín Ferrari wrote:
While I am in the group that sometimes wished they could eat the
vegetarian dish, because it looked tastier, or because they wanted to
On 05/02/15 18:49, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
I think this is right(er), although still pointless IMO. I do not
believe (most) people expect to eat meat at every meal. I think it
would be easier to agree with our caterer to provide meat for
approximately half of the days. I don't think it'd be seen
On Thu 2015-02-05 13:47:14 -0500, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
I fail to see why you think that the current proposed wording of no
dietary restrictions implies that every meal will have meat.
I think this because i've seen it happen very often.
Many conference meals i've been at include explicit
19 matches
Mail list logo
