On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:49:11PM +0200, Daniel Lange wrote:
>> Dear team,
>> Please contribute your ideas / changes / amendments within the next two
>> or three weeks. Edrz extended the deadline to 16.11.2015 so
On 20/10/2015 22:01, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:27:54AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
For the record. I am completely opposed to these changes and put forth
as an alternative the text of the original delegation from 2011. [1]
I agree with this, and with the objections to the
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:27:54AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
> For the record. I am completely opposed to these changes and put forth
> as an alternative the text of the original delegation from 2011. [1]
I agree with this, and with the objections to the process by which this
proposal has been
On 10/20/2015 01:01 PM, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 07:27:54AM -0400, Brian Gupta wrote:
>> For the record. I am completely opposed to these changes and put forth
>> as an alternative the text of the original delegation from 2011. [1]
>
> I agree with this, and with the
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:49:11PM +0200, Daniel Lange wrote:
> Dear team,
> Please contribute your ideas / changes / amendments within the next two
> or three weeks. Edrz extended the deadline to 16.11.2015 so that we
> should have sufficient time for discussion. I hope that we can come up
Am 20.10.2015 um 06:32 schrieb Eric Dantan Rzewnicki:
It's impossible for me to have extended a deadline that had not yet been
announced. I don't consider it appropriate for the drafters to set a
deadline nor for me to do so.
[discussion about SMTP on Debian.org]
2015-10-18 20:37 BTW