Hi,
This was mentioned on the IRC meeting last week, now I'm raising this
as an official request.
The content team has one need for secrecy which is to discuss
evaluation of talks. This makes sense and is not disputed by anybody.
However, with the new organization, a lot of matters fall in the
Margarita Manterola margamanter...@gmail.com writes:
However, with the new organization, a lot of matters fall in the hands
of the content team that really don't warrant any secrecy
(organization of sprints, conference schedule, call for proposals,
etc).
Many of us that are not in the
also sprach Margarita Manterola margamanter...@gmail.com [2015-02-24 16:45
+0100]:
However, with the new organization, a lot of matters fall in the hands
of the content team that really don't warrant any secrecy
(organization of sprints, conference schedule, call for proposals,
etc).
I'm
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 06:00:20PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Margarita Manterola margamanter...@gmail.com [2015-02-24 16:45
+0100]:
However, with the new organization, a lot of matters fall in the hands
of the content team that really don't warrant any secrecy
also sprach Eric Dantan Rzewnicki e...@zhevny.com [2015-02-24 19:29 +0100]:
As for having it on -team ... you have said many times in various
ways that we need to trust teams to do their work and make their
decisions, which I think I mostly agree with. I don't know if it's
the right way or
