Ok I found the solution : i did a minimal install (without desktop env.)
and installed Gnome AND Xorg manually with Apt-get.
It seems that only Gnome was installed with the netinstall cd.
--
-- Jean Arnaud
-- Projet SARDES
-- INRIA Rhône-Alpes / LSR-IMAG
-- Tél. : +33 (0)4 76 61 52 80
--
To
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 20:17, Thomas Steffen wrote:
BTW: what happened to the many plans of running 32bit binaries without
a chroot?
In my experience, a chroot environment is a mayor PITA, and it is the
one main reason that I would not recommend a 64bit system yet expect
for the most
Andrew Robinson wrote:
Tried using xfs. I have more fonts now in open office, and the Andale
Mono is now available, but that didn't help
What is interesting, is that the fonts are correct in the actual
contant (in oocalc, the fonts in the cells are fine). It is only the
windowing fonts (menu
Użytkownik Gnu-Raiz [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
I mean almost all the software that one needs is able to run in amd64
with ia32libs.
Gnu_Raiz
yeah.. almost, and that's the problem: almost.
To tell you the truth, I have also an i386 version of Debian installed,
because I sometimes need it (for
Użytkownik A J Stiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
On Tuesday 29 August 2006 20:17, Thomas Steffen wrote:
The fact is simple: any piece of software which will not compile cleanly on a
pure 64-bit system IS BROKEN.
Yeah... I would definitely agree with that!
Tomek Kazmierczak
--
To
On Wed, 2006-08-30 at 09:17 +0100, A J Stiles wrote:
[...]
The exception to the rule-of-thumb is OpenOffice.org. Although it is Free
Software, it is riddled with elementary mistakes, starting from the
assumption that the processor uses a 32-bit word length and a 32-bit address
space, which
Jan De Luyck escribió:
On Wednesday 30 August 2006 00:18, Gnu-Raiz wrote:
I think the real question should be what programs don't run with
ia32libs, that can only be run in 32 bit chroot?
I can only think of two really Open Office 2, and Firefox with flash
plugin. Mostly the later because
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?
[1] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383344
Thanks,
- Alexander
--
GPG messages preferred. | .''`. ** Debian
Alexander Sack wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?
[1] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383344
Thanks,
- Alexander
No, I can't reproduce it.
Manolo Díaz wrote:
Alexander Sack wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?
[1] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383344
Thanks,
- Alexander
No, I
Hi
Add wine to the list, and maybe other non-free software like skype.
I downloaded skype static library and installed on my amd64 part. It works
perfectly except for the dead acute when chatting. The specific Icelandic
characters did not work when I used it in chroot.
Hope somebody is
On 8/30/06, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?
[1] - http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=383344
I don't use thunderbird
On 8/30/06, A J Stiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mixed 32 and 64 bit systems are a PITA however you implement them, be it
through a chroot {the Debian way} or having separate /lib and /lib64
directories {the R*d H*t way}. And there should be no need to have them
anyway.
I agree that the
Is there some trick to playing DVD's under amd64?
I have a new HP xw9300, dual 2.5 GHz cpus, 6 GB RAM, KDE -- everything
appears to work as expected -- except playing DVD's ;
Inserting a DVD in the drive prompts some autoload process to pop up a
window, asking me what I want to do with the media
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Jambor wrote:
On 8/30/06, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?
[1] -
Thanks a lot for confirming that it works properly - at least for some
:).
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:57:40PM +0200, Andreas Fester wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Jambor wrote:
On 8/30/06, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please confirm
On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:03PM +0200, Francesco Pietra wrote:
Sent again: The external scsi HD was not connected when the accident occurred
Hi Erik:
Thanks for your attention.
Main board: Tyan K8WE S2895
SATA II controllers nForce Pro 2200.
Added graphic card Pixel view 6600 256M
Hi,
I have to do a new debian installation next days and downloaded one of
the netinstall iso-images (beta3) from the debian website.
My problem is, that I need a wlan-module which is not yet packaged for
debian, the rt2570-wlan-module.
Now I thought if it's possible, to build this module
Użytkownik Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. How to use 32 bit programs in debian etch testing amd64?
When I want to run any 32bit application that uses external libraries I get
an
error message telling that the libraries cannot be found. And I don't know
just updated thunderbird to get the version in the bug (I'm using
testing) and it does not segfault.
seems to work ok so far.
Alexander Sack wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, Aug 30, 2006 at 09:57:40PM +0200 Andreas Fester said:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Jambor wrote:
On 8/30/06, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible?
On 8/30/06, A J Stiles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To deny access to the source code of a program shows nothing but contempt for
users, and we should not tolerate this blatant abuse.
Yes, we should not... But there still are companies that make us
(opensource software users) addicted to their
Andreas Fester wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Jambor wrote:
On 8/30/06, Alexander Sack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can someone please confirm if this bug [1] is reproducible? If not, could
someone please follow instructions in the bug to produce a debug
backtrace?
23 matches
Mail list logo
