On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 08:25:35PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Bob Proulx wrote:
| Giacomo Mulas wrote:
|
|Now the questions: should I use the standard debian bug tracking system to
|report amd64 bugs? I am uncertain, since it is not (yet) an official port.
|
MHO: Yes.
I would say that
On Sat, Jan 15, 2005 at 01:43:16AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Christian Thalinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
setup.data/image/TeamSpeak.bin
linux-gate.so.1 = (0x)
libX11.so.6 = /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib/libX11.so.6
(0x55579000)
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 11:53:01AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Anders Boström [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR == Kurt Roeckx [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
KR On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
As I wrote in my original question is /debian-pure64
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 09:07:19AM -0500, Per Bojsen wrote:
The pvm_dev package has some problems with man pages. I am getting
numerous errors such as the following from the mandb cron job:
mandb: can't open /usr/share/man/man3/pvm_kill.3: No such file or directory
mandb: warning:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2005 at 03:13:49PM -0800, Theodore Kisner wrote:
I just switched my laptop from the gcc-3.4/4.0 branch back to pure64. In the
process I noticed that the /usr/X11R6/lib64 - /usr/X11R6/lib symlink
disappeared. Not sure if it's something I did wrong, and of course no big
deal
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 11:39:02AM +0100, Egon Willighagen wrote:
Hi all,
where can I see the status of the packages:
- atlas3-3dnow
- atlas3-sse
- atlas3-sse2
(I would like to speed up my r-base calculations some more...)
The atlas3 package itself builds perfectly but those 3
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:47:27AM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
did you try to rebuild 'db3' in pure64 recently with the
'export LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.24' line uncommented?
In the gcc-3.4 archive this does not work,
which is the reason why I commented it out.
I would be interested if
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:39:01PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Andreas Bath is working on all db versions to get them working
properly. I expect him to upload any day now. I'd just wait for
him.
That's Andreas Barth of course.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 04:17:50PM -0500, Dale E. Martin wrote:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 unstable main contrib
non-free
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 testing main contrib
non-free
/debian-pure64 only contains testing/sarge and /pure64
On Wed, Oct 13, 2004 at 07:59:32PM -0400, Don Hayward wrote:
I'm trying to build the mythtv package from the source deb. I get
this error when the mythtv lib is being assembled:
/usr/bin/ld:
/usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.5/../../../../lib64/liblirc_client.a(lirc_client.o):
relocation
On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 05:51:58PM +0200, Sebastian Steinlechner wrote:
Well, official sarge is going to be released soon. amd64 sarge is
actually a symlink to sid, afaik (correct me if I'm wrong). As for
installation, there are debian installer CD images available for amd64.
Generic, i.e.
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:21:39PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Guys,
I'm looking at putting together full CD/DVD copies of AMD64 to sell
alongside other Debian arches. I have a full local mirror from alioth
to start with, and I'm looking at support in debian-cd. I've not seen
anything
On Sun, Oct 24, 2004 at 11:45:16PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
I did however patch debian-cd, but I never really got it working
properly. Maybe I just don't know how to use it.
I'll try to dig up the changes I've made to it tomorrow and send
them to you.
Cool, thanks. I'll try and
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:51:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it appears there's a problem with TLS. I should note that this
problem started happening when libc6 was updated a couple of weeks ago.
I noticed that moved a lot of libraries from /lib/tls to /lib, so it
seems that that's
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 11:32:58AM +0200, Hendrik Tews wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to install amd64 into a chroot. base-config failed at
some state because of a missing /proc filesystem. After fixing
that I run base-config again, but it did not install any
packages. Then I tried tried tasksel
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 01:13:23PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
I tried to reinstall my PC using
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso
of today. But it failed because the sata_sil module was not
autodetected. Is it possible that
On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 03:27:13PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
For verification I have mounted the initrd. pci.lst says
[...]
10953512ide sata_silSilicon Image Serial ATARaid
Controller [ CMD/Sil 3512 ]
The last line is about my device. But shouldn't it be
On Thu, Jul 22, 2004 at 02:12:55PM +0200, Andreas Richter wrote:
Hi,
since my last apt-get update upgrade (yesterday) i have some problems
to compile programms against libstdc++. the following error occour:
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc-lib/x86_64-linux/3.3.4/libstdc++.a(ios.o):
relocation
On Fri, Jul 23, 2004 at 08:48:12PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
Hi!
Now that the technical comitte has ruled in favour of 'amd64' for the debian
archname (DEB_HOST_ARCH variable), I wonder what will happen with the other
dpkg-architecture variables, which are actualy much more important
On Sat, Jul 24, 2004 at 03:42:34PM -0400, David Dumas wrote:
When I try to synchronize my laptop (running debian i386 unstable)
with my desktop (running debian amd64 unstable) the unison process on
the desktop segfaults just before starting to update files.
Is anyone else experiencing this
On Mon, Aug 02, 2004 at 06:55:30PM +0200, Miham KEREKES wrote:
We partitioned the system to have a simple root and boot partition
(though this should be the same partition) and we set the remaining
2T-1G space to LVM. To cut the long story short, the installer hung,
the last thing I see is
On Wed, Aug 11, 2004 at 03:48:41PM +0200, Philipp Frauenfelder wrote:
- Netboot did not work. I got an error message can't open an
initial console after the kernel came up. Then it crashed.
I have no idea what went wrong with that build but todays build
doesn't seem to have the problem.
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:04:59AM +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Hi
Are any of the currently available installers based on 2.6.8?
Not yet. There currently isn't a kernel image with 2.6.8
available yet but work is in progress.
(A better question would perhaps be How can I find out if any
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:04:59AM +0100, Martin A. Brooks wrote:
Are any of the currently available installers based on 2.6.8?
Today's build is using the 2.6.8-1 kernel.
I'm not really sure on how good that kernel is though.
Kurt
On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 02:51:33PM +0200, Andreas Knüpfer wrote:
hi,
as it seems, there is no gdb available in the gcc-3.4 archive!
I've just uploaded a version of gdb. It was failing to build
because of #264692.
Kurt
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 08:46:19AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
[...]
I can fix the exim4
problem by manually chrooting to the target system, adding a real entry to
apt/sources.list and installing libgnutls11.
Are you trying to install pure64 sid? It really should install
libgnutls11
On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:16:15AM +0200, Sebastian Steinlechner wrote:
#define __USE_XOPEN // this is superfluous, but the same occurs without
Never ever use any of the __ defines. They are internal to the
c library. Use the proper _ define like setting _XOPEN_SOURCE
to 500 or something.
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:24:02PM +0200, Bibiche wrote:
Hi,
My Linux kernel 2.8.1 doesn't boot. The three last log lines before panic are
:
pivot_root : No such file or directory
2.8.1 /sbin/init : 426 cannot open dev/console : No such file
kernel panic : Attempted to kill init!
I
On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 11:11:12AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote:
A Dijous 02 Setembre 2004 21:03, Kurt Roeckx va escriure:
On Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 08:24:02PM +0200, Bibiche wrote:
Hi,
My Linux kernel 2.8.1 doesn't boot. The three last log lines before panic
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 08:33:20AM -0400, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
I would grab the floppies for i386 sarge and install that, then
debootstrap amd64, or get the netinstall or hdmedia install for amd64
fro the ports-status page and install that. netbooting is generally not
that hard to get
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 04:45:49PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Michelle Konzack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please, can anyone tell me, why there are no
Floppy-Disks for the debian-installer ?
Just space reasons. 1.44MB just aren't enough.
-rw-r--r--1 root root
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 02:24:56PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
... specifically the latest axiom build.
I've been lazy in filing the bug for it.
I'll send the log off list.
Kurt
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 10:17:19PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I have tried it with one memory Module (2 GByte) and it does not work.
The Kernel does not find the second CPU
You're using (or enabled) SMP right?
I have installed the kernel-source-2.4.27_2.4.27-2_all.deb
That's a source
On Tue, Sep 07, 2004 at 11:48:07PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
I have build it from there because the kernel-image
was not working for me
Which kernel image is that?
Why are you using a 2.4 kernel on amd64 anyway? Support for
x86_64 isn't that good in 2.4 and I don't know about any
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 06:17:15PM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote:
OK, thanks! Would be interested if each of your failed attempts was
with gcl-2.6.5-1, and if you succeed now with gcl 2.6.5-2. If so,
then there is a problem with binutils 2.15 on amd64.
I did notice that it now was downloading
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 01:32:37AM +0300, Kyuu Eturautti wrote:
I know it's a bit off-subject, but I'd like to point out the very painful
USB keyboard problem with Grub at least on AMD64 which was discussed a bit
earlier. Imo, it's a far too large issue to be ignored in some cases. I
wish
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 10:16:54PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2004 at 03:51:48PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it appears there's a problem with TLS. I should note that this
problem started happening when libc6 was updated a couple of weeks ago.
I noticed that moved
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 08:13:48PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Did you note that there are some Packages.gz files from
4 days ago, while the up-to-date Packages.gz.new are
waiting to be renamed?
This seems to have been caused by the new archive key. The
secret keyring had a size of 0. The
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 05:21:45PM +0100, Tobias Koeck wrote:
Hi everybody
Debian alioth mirror doesnt work, does anybody have a mirror with the
netinstall iso?
The problem has been fixed now. See the howto for a list of
mirrors.
Kurt
On Sat, Nov 06, 2004 at 07:27:27PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Does anybody know where to find some vncserver 4.0 debs?
vnc4server and xvnc4viewer?
Kurt
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 12:24:28PM +0100, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Andreas Jochens wrote:
On 04-Nov-10 11:21, Mattias Wadenstein wrote:
Would it be hard to give legacy support for old-style linux threads? This
has turned up several times as a serious issue now..
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:11:13PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Programs which have been compiled and linked for the use with
linuxthreads should usually also work with nptl at runtime. This is
exactly what happens on i386 if you run any 2.6 kernel. An i386
system uses the nptl thread
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 02:09:30PM -0800, kristian kvilekval wrote:
Are there any online stats or recommendations
when to use pure64 vs. gcc-3.4 repositories?
I've noticed that some pure64 missing applications (evolution2)
are showing up in the gcc-3.4.
evolution 2.0.2-3 is in pure64 since
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:33:23PM +0100, Tuure Y. Döring wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 14:49 +0200, Slava Risenberg wrote:
I have the same problem
Same problem here. Neither migrating of old address book nor creation of
a new one is possible.
Maybe bug
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:56:15PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2004 at 01:33:23PM +0100, Tuure Y. Döring wrote:
On Sat, 2004-11-13 at 14:49 +0200, Slava Risenberg wrote:
I have the same problem
Same problem here. Neither migrating of old address book nor creation
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 02:39:03AM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote:
Hi.
I'm a long-term Debian user/admin/advocate, I use the stable version of
Debian GNU/Linux on several tens of production servers. During next few
month I will be deploying several AMD64 machines (dual-Opteron) and I'd
love to
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 08:04:31PM +0100, Jan Houstek wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
We will atleast have a released version of the sarge repository, with
updates if there are, and security updates.
That's good news. Any chance this port will become a part of the official
On Mon, Nov 15, 2004 at 03:23:43PM +, Colin Yates wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to debootstrap debian from alioth pure64 but it is moaning
that it cannot download console-tool-libs. I have also tried
ftp.de.debian.org with the same result.
There doesn't seem to exist anything like a
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 05:19:30PM +, Colin Yates wrote:
Downloaded from (can't remember exact path) but
people.debian/something/debootstrap from a couple of days ago.
Unfortunately debootstrap --version doesn't work :(
Did you install it as a debian package? Then what does dpkg -l
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 02:27:37PM -0500, Félix-Antoine Bourbonnais wrote:
Is it possible to apply the patch on the debian package to solve the
problem for this version (3.3.1) ?
My bug description:
---
Package: korganizer
Version: 4:3.3.0-3
Did you already try the 4:3.3.1-3 version?
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 02:40:30AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Bill Allombert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello debian-amd64,
I wanted to check whether my packages worked on amd64 and after much
puzzling because I could not rebuild packages available on alioth.
I finally get
On Mon, Nov 29, 2004 at 02:45:22PM +1300, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
I'm currently running:
evolution
2.0.2-3
evolution-data-server
1.0.2-3.0.0.1.amd64
What version of libdb4.1 do you have? Should be
4.1.25-17.0.0.1.amd64.
Kurt
On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:49:31PM -0500, Kevin B. McCarty wrote:
Hi list,
Cernlib upstream (in the person of Ian Mclaren) has made a new release
which they claim will fix problems with various Cernlib components on
64-bit architectures. I've just finished packaging it (version
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 12:38:49PM +, R. Rodriguez wrote:
Hi. Yesterday i solved the /lib64 conflict by --force-overwritng. Today,
another update was available to base-files... and it FAILED, and now i can't
even start the machine cause no INIT
What can i do?? :(
You need to
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 02:15:09PM +, R. Rodriguez wrote:
Already tried with ubuntu, but when i try to chroot (chroot /mnt/hda3) it
dumps:
Just do this:
cd /mnt/hda3
ln -s lib lib64
Kurt
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 04:42:41PM -0500, eric leth wrote:
'' The debootstrap program exited with an error
(return value 1).
They broken the pppoeconf package. This will give the following
error:
dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of pppoeconf:
pppoeconf depends on gettext (=
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 09:05:24AM -0500, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
You are recomending using force-overwrite? That's just icky. :) I
thought we got past package problems requiring that kind of brute force
when potato was in the works.
This was only a temperary solution. There have been put
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 08:20:40PM -0600, Mark Nipper wrote:
While trying to build vlc here at home, I got this:
---
gcc -Wsign-compare -Wall -pipe -o libopengl_plugin.so
libopengl_plugin_a-opengl.o `top_builddir=../.. ../../vlc-config --libs
plugin opengl`
/usr/bin/ld:
On Fri, Dec 24, 2004 at 08:00:42PM -0600, Mark Nipper wrote:
Anyway, I found the problem. In /usr/lib I had:
---
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Dec 23 21:47 libGL.so - libGL.so.1.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 17 Dec 14 16:21 libGL.so.1 - libGL.so.1.0.6629
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 586K Dec
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 02:44:43AM +0100, César Fernández Rodríguez wrote:
We're thinking about to buy a pair of amd64 for our enterprise, we want to
migrate from the old-fashioned adobe premiere to the post-modern cinelerra
hehe...
Now seriously, has anybody tested cinelerra in an amd64
On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 08:26:59PM -0600, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 01:05:36AM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
I personally don't care for Intel CPUs but if someone is willing to
test on that platform (which AFAICT gcc 3.3 does not support) and
provide a configuration
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 03:44:33PM +0100, Magne Rodem wrote:
Hi,
I've got some questions regarding sarge and the amd64 archive residing on
alioth. I have the following lines in sources.list:
deb http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-pure64 sarge main contrib
non-free
deb-src
On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 12:26:44PM +0100, Christian Thalinger wrote:
What version of libdb4.1 do you have? Should be
4.1.25-17.0.0.1.amd64.
I've now the same problem since i have upgraded to
Setting up libdb4.1 (4.1.25-17.0.0.1.amd64) ...
Setting up evolution-data-server
On Sat, Jan 01, 2005 at 05:49:21AM +0900, Sanzo Miyazawa wrote:
Although I could see /http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-amd64
yesterday, now /http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/debian-amd64 has
disappeared.
Is there a trouble or is this an intentional change?
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 10:16:08PM +0100, Steffen Schwigon wrote:
Hi!
I suppose the mirror
http://mirror.phy.bnl.gov/debian-amd64/dists/sarge/
isn't sarge but sid.
Yes, that's the pure64 archive, and it only has sid in it atm,
and sarge is a symlink to sid.
Kurt
On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:11:28AM +1300, Andrew Ruthven wrote:
I've rebooted my computer several times in the last almost 2
months that my addressbook has been broken. Including just now
after doing an update upgrade after my Christmas holiday.
This all works perfectly on the pure64
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 02:13:03PM +, Johan Groth wrote:
Have you tried http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/sarge? :)
That no longer exists and is a rather empty directory.
You probably want to try /debian-pure64 instead.
Kurt
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 04:35:28PM +0100, Anders Boström wrote:
As I wrote in my original question is /debian-pure64 not updated. Last
update was 20041215.
Goswin seems to be rather sick at the moment. You will have to
wait until he's back.
I can't do anything about this until he's back.
On Fri, Jan 07, 2005 at 09:14:31PM -0800, David Liontooth wrote:
Something went wrong with the dependencies for libflac6 on amd64.
On i386 the package installs with no protests; in amd64 it requires
the uninstallation of kdemultimedia, jack, and lots of others. Could
the problem be
On Sat, Jan 08, 2005 at 07:55:10PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
About the xine-ui problem: What would you suggest to
do? Should I file a bug against xine-ui?
I really doubt it's a bug in xine-ui so I see no point in filing
a bug for it.
Kurt
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:47:31PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Raul Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 09:53:56AM -0500, Pete Harlan wrote:
Multiarch, bi-arch, some people want them, that's great, but they're
simply offtopic with respect to the amd64 port.
On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:52:40PM +, Ludovic watteaux wrote:
vlc: Depends: libflac4 but it is not installable
E: Broken packages
Maby vlc must use libflac6 in place of libflac4.
There was a transistion from libflac4 to libflac6 a few weeks
ago. Unfortuantly, the package failed to build
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 04:04:14PM -0800, Larry Doolittle wrote:
Let me assure everyone before I start that I'm really happy with
debain pure64. Fast and solid.
Most of the time, when I see a package ready to download with
apt-get upgrade, I can go to packages.debian.org, and find out
what
On Thu, Feb 03, 2005 at 05:54:35PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
From what I heart you won't feel the difference. The advantage of a
64bit kernel lies in having more than 3GB address space (more than 4GB
for 64bit) programs and the possibility of more than 4GB physical ram
alltogether.
I guess other people might be interested in this too.
Kurt
---BeginMessage---
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 01:24:26AM +0100, Sven Mueller wrote:
Kurt Roeckx wrote on 03/02/2005 18:24:
Actually, you can use 4GB of address space for userspace.
For 32bit userspace or also for 64bit userspace
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:19:17PM +1100, Ed Murray wrote:
Just thought I post the result of some problems with MythTV to the
list.
It appears that there are still some problems with AMD64 the libc library?
Ed.
Hi Kyle. I forwarded on your patch to a guy on the Debian AMD64 List.
It
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:42:31AM +0100, Gasper Zejn wrote:
If i use autoconf ; automake ; autoreconf on source (I'd supposedly
have to do this on cvs source) the autoreconf pops the following error:
aclocal.m4: 374: `jm_MAINTAINER_MODE' is obsolete; use `AM_MAINTAINER_MODE'
aclocal:
On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 10:54:08AM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
I installed this symlink:
/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 - /emul/amd64-linux/lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
You should create that in /lib64 and not in /lib.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Thu, Feb 17, 2005 at 12:09:30AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Second message since the first was of no interest to anyone.
The libqt3c102-mt and libqt3c102 are broken on alioth.
I wish I had access to the repository to put the recompiled binaries but
I have not.
Can someone please
On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 07:31:03PM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been following the debian-amd64-howto and have elected to install the
distro via the chroot method as I have a brand new machine with a blank
hdd plus I need to boot with a custom 64-bit
On Sat, Feb 19, 2005 at 12:25:20AM -0800, Toshikazu Aiyama, Ph.D. wrote:
Apparently it failed during module installation. I attach
/var/log/messages.
You're trying to install the gcc-3.4/gcc-4.0 port. That only
works when you're using the debootstrap from the gcc-3.4 archive.
Kurt
--
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:37:34PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
Hopefully, the name change from 'gcc-3.4' to 'gcc4' will not cause too
much trouble for mirrors and current users. For some time the old name
'gcc-3.4' should be still available as a symlink to 'gcc4'.
If you can give us a
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 07:58:12PM +0100, Andreas Jochens wrote:
If nobody else comes up with a different proposal and
no other problems occur, I would like to change the
name on 2005-03-15 (three weeks from now).
An exact hour would be nice too.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 12:24:00AM +0100, clement wrote:
hi all,
libc6-dev: Dépend: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-20) but
2.3.2.ds1-20.0.0.1.pure64 should be installed
Run:
apt-get install libc6=2.3.2.ds1-20
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 12:02:26PM -0500, Bharath Ramesh wrote:
I am using debian-amd64 port on my athlon box.
I am trying to use F_SETSIG in one of my project. Whenever I compile it
I get an error `F_SETSIG' undeclared error. Anyone seen this error, or
no how to fix it.
You will need to
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 12:29:52PM +0100, Filippo Carone wrote:
Hi everybody,
I have octave and octave-forge installed, but on updates it happens
octave being updated before octave-forge. To install octave-forge it
seems compulsory for it to match the octave version, but it is
sometimes
On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 09:45:31PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote:
What is a bit odd is mtr-tiny. I got version .58-1.0.0.1.pure64
installed while both sid and sarge should already be at .67-1.
mtr does not build on amd64, which is why it's patched. Neither
the maintainer nor upstream has applied
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 07:12:52PM +, Erik Norman wrote:
Hello!
I want to suggest to change/add an answer to
debian-amd64@lists.debian.org, instead of being forced to add it myself
everytime. It has already happened that I have answered just to who
wrote the mail, not to the mailing
On Fri, Mar 04, 2005 at 11:13:28AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
Do any of you know if this is a known problem?
- Forwarded message from Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Simon Marlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:03:31 -
To: John Goerzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 11:47:31AM -, Simon Marlow wrote:
$ cat bug.c
register void * R1 __asm__(%r13);
extern void g(void);
static void f(void) {
R1 = g;
goto *R1;
}
$ gcc -S -O bug.c
$
And take a look at the generated assembly for the function f:
f:
.LFB2:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 09:15:01AM -0800, David Brown wrote:
gcc 3.3.4 on AMD64 appears to generate correct code when the dummy call is
present. Ick.
It generates the following code here:
subq$8, %rsp
movl$g, %r13d
movl$0, %eax
calldummy
On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 03:37:13PM -0800, Charles Leggett wrote:
Has anyone managed to build valgrind for an amd64 platform?
valgrind still is an i386 only thing.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, Mar 13, 2005 at 01:25:38PM +0100, T.J. Zeeman wrote:
I've tried to do this a few times over the past hour or so and every
time it came up the same. Is the disk full again perhaps?
The disk was full again yes? Do you still have the problem?
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:58:18PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
It would be nice if someone could re-build the whole archive since
this would give the box some good stress testing.
I'm not sure why you're asking this? Is it because it's an
Intel? Do you think it's going to behave
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 10:15:50PM +, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
I know most of the AMD64 work has already been done on AMD hardware,
and I'm grateful for that work. But I obtained this EM64T box for
Debian so we can *test* whether Debian works rather than just assume
it will.
We got
On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 02:33:29PM -0800, Alex Perry wrote:
I think it would be great to have a pure64 AMD64 machine rebuild its own
packages, reinstall them, then rebuild the whole archive.
In parallel, have an EM64T machine do exactly the same thing - also for
the current state of the
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 05:57:42PM -0500, Tong wrote:
Hi,
Since about 99% of packages have been ported to AMD64, I'm wondering where
I can obtain a list of packages that are not available in AMD64 yet.
PS. I found 2 files on alioth, but I didn't find the ooffice there:
On Fri, Mar 18, 2005 at 06:43:38PM -0500, Javier Kohen wrote:
What packages in main provide java2-compiler? Practically every package
that's waiting for a dependency blames that one.
None provide it. Those packages are also all in contrib for that
reason. They are provided by packages as
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 08:34:14PM +0200, Niklas Ögren wrote:
no. pure64 and the gcc-3.4 branches are entirely separate (and
incompatible).
I would recommend using the pure64 branch. The gcc-3.4/gcc4 is more like
experimental. You should not mix packages from these.
For the pure64:
Am
On Tue, Mar 29, 2005 at 11:22:36PM +0200, Niklas Ögren wrote:
My sources.list:
deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/pure64 testing main non-free contrib
deb-src http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/pure64 testing main non-free contrib
Change that to:
deb http://bach.hpc2n.umu.se/debian-pure64 testing main
1 - 100 of 291 matches
Mail list logo
