Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.32-5-orion5x does not fit in flash

2011-02-21 Thread Benoît Knecht
Hi, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Marcus Better mar...@better.se [2011-01-15 21:07]: I now get the kernel does not fit in flash problem with the squeeze kernel: linux-image-2.6.32-5-orion5x 2.6.32-30 update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-5-orion5x The RootFS1 doesn't

Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.32-5-orion5x does not fit in flash

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org [2011-02-21 13:27]: I have the same issue when trying to upgrade my Qnap TS-209. Did anyone find a solution for this? Do you have btrfs-tools installed? This was the cause of Marcus' problems because btrfs-tools causes modules to be put into the ramdisk

Re: flashing fails due to size issue during upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jeffrey B. Green j...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 13:53]: # /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf # replace most with dep MODULES=dep Anyone out there know of any pitfalls in this approach?? I.e. are all the crucial modules included in the initrd? Yeah, it should work fine. Make sure to make

Re: flashing fails due to size issue during upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Jeffrey B. Green j...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 11:22]: One of my slugs is still in the process of upgrading but I noticed that during the setting up of the 2.6.32-5 kernel that the flashing failed due to (output message): I believe some other people are running the 2.6.32-5 kernel on their

Re: QNAP TS-209: kernel 2.6.32-5-orion5x does not fit in flash

2011-02-21 Thread Benoît Knecht
Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Benoît Knecht benoit.kne...@fsfe.org [2011-02-21 13:27]: I have the same issue when trying to upgrade my Qnap TS-209. Did anyone find a solution for this? Do you have btrfs-tools installed? This was the cause of Marcus' problems because btrfs-tools causes

Re: Dmelicious Young Beauty Shucking

2011-02-21 Thread John Gentry
jg produced by ipad -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-arm-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/9b13c7b0-43a9-47d4-83f5-f8d605f7f...@sbcglobal.net

Re: flashing fails due to size issue during upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Jeffrey B. Green
On 02/21/2011 11:18 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Jeffrey B. Greenj...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 13:53]: # /etc/initramfs-tools/initramfs.conf # replace most with dep MODULES=dep Anyone out there know of any pitfalls in this approach?? I.e. are all the crucial modules included in the initrd?

Re: flashing fails due to size issue during upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Björn Wetterbom
So what's the bottom line of this for the average user? Should I take any precautionary measures before upgrading my slug to Squeeze (I will of course follow the instructions in the release notes)? Is it clear why Jeffrey's ramdisk didn't fit in the flash? Regards Björn On Feb 21, 2011 8:39 PM,

Re: flashing fails due to size issue during upgrade

2011-02-21 Thread Jeffrey B. Green
On 02/21/2011 11:22 AM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Jeffrey B. Greenj...@kikisoso.org [2011-02-18 11:22]: One of my slugs is still in the process of upgrading but I noticed that during the setting up of the 2.6.32-5 kernel that the flashing failed due to (output message): I believe some other

Should I upgrade uboot on my new OpenRD Ultimate?

2011-02-21 Thread Rick Thomas
Do I need to upgrade uboot on my brand-new OpenRD Ultimate? It currently has 3.4.16. If so, do I just follow the instructions at http://www.cyrius.com/debian/kirkwood/sheevaplug/uboot-upgrade.html or is there a special binary needed for the Ultimate? Thanks! Rick -- To

Re: Should I upgrade uboot on my new OpenRD Ultimate?

2011-02-21 Thread xavier grave
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 21/02/2011 22:53, Rick Thomas a écrit : Do I need to upgrade uboot on my brand-new OpenRD Ultimate? It currently has 3.4.16. It depends on what you intend to do. At lab, we have two OpenRD Ultimate. The first run without any problem with an

Re: Should I upgrade uboot on my new OpenRD Ultimate?

2011-02-21 Thread Rick Thomas
xavier grave wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le 21/02/2011 22:53, Rick Thomas a écrit : Do I need to upgrade uboot on my brand-new OpenRD Ultimate? It currently has 3.4.16. It depends on what you intend to do. At lab, we have two OpenRD Ultimate. The first run

Re: Bug#594179: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?

2011-02-21 Thread Hector Oron
Hello, 2011/2/21 Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com: That leaves two remaining questions:  - can each Debian arch have a distinct toolchain?  If not, why not   (since it would be very convenient to use)? The short answer seem to be no, GCC upstream does not like the idea to have different

Re: Bug#594179: dpkg armhf patch acceptance status?

2011-02-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 01:20:03AM +, Hector Oron wrote: Yet another thought, Debian architecture maps to MAtuples, which then sets defaults on the toolchain via specs file. Does it change something if we use (armel) libgcc1 with armhf specs file, rather than have a libgcc1 defaulting for

Please rebuild robustbase and then fportfolio

2011-02-21 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Background: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613934 armel build of r-cran-fportfolio (source: fportfolio) failed as it could not load the Build-Depends r-cran-robustbase (source: robustbase). Could someone please schedule a rebuild of robustbase on armel, followed by a rebuild