On 6/18/23 15:19, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Besides that it would also have been clear from actually reading the IRC
> log which incidentially also says
Good to know what the expectations for participation are.
>> This is the same GPLv3 package that Red Hat just dropped support for?
>
> As I
On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3 and
>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about how
>> he
>> regretted the move and the damage it had done to the project,
>>
On 6/18/23 03:45, Rene Engelhard wrote:> Am 18.06.23 um 10:32 schrieb Rene
Engelhard:
I don't really like sweeping it under the carpet again and would
actually pursue the "getting those architectures removed from unstable"
way pointed out and (implicitely) approved/suggested by the
On 05/08/2013 03:19:23 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:44 AM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
whereas the EOMA initiative is at the complete opposite end of the
spectrum. and products based around the EOMA standards, although
there is a cost overhead
On 05/06/2013 03:55:11 PM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 9:01 PM, Rob Landley r...@landley.net wrote:
You realize that nobody except Samsung and Apple is currently
making money
in the smartphone space, right?
ok, ok - substitute tablet or laptop or media
On 05/06/2013 07:08:44 AM, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton wrote:
I suppose that ARM multi-platform will never cover all ARM CPUs, but
the more it covers, the easier and cheaper it will be to work with
new
hardware and ARM.
no. no, no no and wrong. absolutely dead wrong. you're
6 matches
Mail list logo
