On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:38:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Erik Dykema wrote:
Hi-
Thanks for the links to the other automatic installation packages.
Looking at what they do, they confirm that what I think I want to do is
use the actual debian-installer, as suggested where you wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:13:32PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
Package: base-config
Version: 2.12
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
When using locale el_GR.UTF-8, all the strings are truncated up to a
certain column. It doesn't matter whether I run this from normal
console, jfbterm or
At Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:30:37 -0800,
Matt Kraai wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 12:26:04PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Matt Kraai:
How about making anna configure packages that do not have menu
items?
I think that is a good idea. Only problem I can anticipate is that if
something w/o a
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 09:28:06 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line autopartkit_0.77(unstable/sparc): FTBFS
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hello,
yesterday I managed to install sarge with the image
gluck.d.o/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040223/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
i choose nobootloader, which failed.
Today I read that a newer version on nobootloader was uploaded :-)
however, Configure the network returns without doing
Christian Perrier wrote:
- dictionaries-common : 1s 1d 0u 0n
- dictionaries-common : 1s 1d 0u 0n
- dictionaries-common : 1s 1d 0u 0n (bug?)
- dictionaries-common : 1s 1d 0u 0n
Joey Hess wrote:
In the case of disctionaries-common, there exist debconf variables taken
from
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:17:47PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:08:30PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I just fixed a thinko in nobootloader, which causes it to always fail.
Please upload the new version.
Done.
BTW, i wonder if it would be good to provide more
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 10:07:06AM +0100, Erich Waelde wrote:
Hello,
yesterday I managed to install sarge with the image
gluck.d.o/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040223/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
i choose nobootloader, which failed.
Today I read that a newer version on nobootloader was
Hi
Does anyone know why the
debian/dists/sarge/main/debian-installer/binary-*/Packages[.gz]
are no longer updating? The latest versions include debootstrap-udeb_0.2.26
which installs lilo but not libdevmapper1.00, thus breaking d-i from the
archive.
Regards
Jonathan Quick
PS:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:27:51AM +0100, Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
The noise disappears after loading the module 'dmasound_pmac'.
Can this be loaded by the installer somehow?
Mmm, at what point does the problem appear exactly ? Would this be
solved by providing this module in the initrd, and
bterm-unifont_0.004_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
bterm-unifont_0.004.dsc
bterm-unifont_0.004.tar.gz
bterm-unifont_0.004_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
bterm-unifont_0.004_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or the override file is incorrect. If you think
the override is correct and
Accepted:
bterm-unifont_0.004.dsc
to pool/main/b/bterm-unifont/bterm-unifont_0.004.dsc
bterm-unifont_0.004.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/bterm-unifont/bterm-unifont_0.004.tar.gz
bterm-unifont_0.004_all.udeb
to pool/main/b/bterm-unifont/bterm-unifont_0.004_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 23.II.2004 at 20:39 Joey Hess wrote:
We need to decide quite soon whether to go with partman or not. It's
almost too late already to make that change.
Probably it is better to wait for the comming beta and then take this
decision? If we have the install-reports it will be much easier to
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:42:49AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:17:47PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:08:30PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I just fixed a thinko in nobootloader, which causes it to always fail.
Please upload the new version.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 05:09:51PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Stephen R Marenka wrote:
How about I create a new type called nativehd or something?
With i386's hd-media, only the cdrom iso is loopback mounted, the
initrd, kernel, and bootloader can all be on the HD the same way.
Agreed, but
Hello,
I have tried the beta2 installer using the 2 floppies image. It fails on
my laptop after loading the root floppy.
I can see a big white box filling the entire screen except for a blue
line between two black lines on the right edge. Virtual terminals at
alt-f2,3,4 are empty black
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 09:38:43PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
Erik Dykema wrote:
Hi-
Thanks for the links to the other automatic installation packages.
Looking at what they do, they confirm that what I think I want to do is
use the actual debian-installer, as suggested
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:39:24AM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:42:49AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 08:17:47PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:08:30PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
I just fixed a thinko in
On Wednesday 25 February 2004 10:09, Denis Barbier wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 03:13:32PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis
wrote:
Package: base-config
Version: 2.12
Severity: normal
Tags: l10n
When using locale el_GR.UTF-8, all the strings are truncated up
to a certain column. It
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:47:04AM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
bterm-unifont_0.004_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
Either the package or
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 01:05:48PM +0200, Jonathan Quick wrote:
Does anyone know why the
debian/dists/sarge/main/debian-installer/binary-*/Packages[.gz]
are no longer updating? The latest versions include debootstrap-udeb_0.2.26
which installs lilo but not libdevmapper1.00, thus
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:21:57PM +0200, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Some (other) things we should do before the release:
1. Support machines with 32 mb ram. Two solutions:
- make anna not to install some non-necessary packages (bterm-font ?)
I've uploaded a bterm-unifont package that changes
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:45:34AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
netcfg (0.47) unstable; urgency=low
* Joey Hess
- Use three dots in ellipses for consistency.
- Link libiw statically. This is temporary, until there is a libiw-udeb.
Joeyh, can you comment on this ?
yesterday, i
partman_11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_11.dsc
partman_11.tar.gz
partman_11_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
partman-auto_4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-auto_4.dsc
partman-auto_4.tar.gz
partman-auto_4_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
partman-basicfilesystems_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicfilesystems_10.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_10.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_10_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
partman-basicmethods_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-basicmethods_6.dsc
partman-basicmethods_6.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_6_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
partman-ext3_8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-ext3_8.dsc
partman-ext3_8.tar.gz
partman-ext3_8_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
partman-partitioning_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-partitioning_6.dsc
partman-partitioning_6.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_6_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
partman-target_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_6.dsc
partman-target_6.tar.gz
partman-target_6_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Accepted:
partman-partitioning_6.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_6.dsc
partman-partitioning_6.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-partitioning/partman-partitioning_6.tar.gz
partman-partitioning_6_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-basicfilesystems_10.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_10.dsc
partman-basicfilesystems_10.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicfilesystems/partman-basicfilesystems_10.tar.gz
partman-basicfilesystems_10_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-auto_4.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_4.dsc
partman-auto_4.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_4.tar.gz
partman-auto_4_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_4_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution
Accepted:
partman_11.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_11.dsc
partman_11.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_11.tar.gz
partman_11_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_11_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Accepted:
partman-basicmethods_6.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_6.dsc
partman-basicmethods_6.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-basicmethods/partman-basicmethods_6.tar.gz
partman-basicmethods_6_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
partman-target_6.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_6.dsc
partman-target_6.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_6.tar.gz
partman-target_6_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_6_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:25:40PM +0100, Thomas Poindessous wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 11:45:34AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
netcfg (0.47) unstable; urgency=low
* Joey Hess
- Use three dots in ellipses for consistency.
- Link libiw statically. This is temporary, until
just filing a success report - the 'current' (2/24?) sarge bootcdimage
managed to install on my SATA-disks-only dell gx270. i'd been fighting it
for most of a week. i chose to try it one more time after seeing new
stuff roll into the archive last night - the 2/17 images had not worked.
one
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:03:18PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
- Link libiw statically. This is temporary, until there is a libiw-udeb.
Joeyh, can you comment on this ?
yesterday, i did a change to build/debian/control to add a dependance
for libiw27. Please revert this
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: 2.4.22
Date: 2004-02-25
Method: network
Machine: Shuttle XPC
Processor: P4
Memory:1024Mb
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda6
Output of lspci:
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial
Anexo proibido
Por medidas de segurança esse servidor recusou o seu anexo
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Assunto: stolen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:04:03AM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
1) Have the installer look in a pre-designated filesystem place for the
pre-seed file (I.e. '/di/tools/preseeder/preseed.deb' below). This
would be useful for automated CD-ROM installs, grab the
Anton Zinoviev wrote:
Probably it is better to wait for the comming beta and then take this
decision? If we have the install-reports it will be much easier to
decide.
Unless it's default for the next beta, we will not get any install
reports about it though. Do you mean make it default to see
Thomas Poindessous wrote:
yesterday, i did a change to build/debian/control to add a dependance
for libiw27. Please revert this change if you need.
I plan to revert it as soon as the new netcfg enters the archive.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I got the same error using the beta2 installer from:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Is there any way to bypass it?
--
Antonio-Blasco Bonito
Phone: +39 050 315-2958
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Istituto di Scienza e Tecnologie dell'Informazione
Antonio A.A. wrote:
I have tried the beta2 installer using the 2 floppies image. It fails on
my laptop after loading the root floppy.
I can see a big white box filling the entire screen except for a blue
line between two black lines on the right edge. Virtual terminals at
alt-f2,3,4 are
just filing a success report - the 'current' (2/24?) sarge bootcdimage
managed to install on my SATA-disks-only dell gx270. i'd been
fighting it for most of a week. i chose to try it one more time after
seeing new stuff roll into the archive last night - the 2/17 images
had not
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:04:03AM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
1) Have the installer look in a pre-designated filesystem place for the
pre-seed file (I.e. '/di/tools/preseeder/preseed.deb' below). This
would be useful for automated CD-ROM
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:47:04AM -0500, Debian Installer wrote:
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
bterm-unifont_0.004_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: 2.4.24-1-686-smp
Date: 2004-02-25
Method: network
Machine: Custom made server with LSI Logic RAID Controller
Processor: Pentium IV 3.2Ghz, hypertreading enabled
Memory: 2Gb
Root Device: HW RAID /dev/sda1
Root
reopen 228837
thanks
I wrote:
dictionaries-common package with experimental support for this has been uploaded to Debian. Note
that it will not be fully functional until all the ispell dictionaries and wordlist packages are
migrated to the new .config format that will delegate all the dirty
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: Beta2
uname -a: Linux debian 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
** Disclaimer: The installer failed horribly and did not install any kernel
image at all. The kernel was install manually afterwards.
** Second
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
http://marenka.net/~stephen/di/
boot/dest-20040223-0205/mac/netboot-initrd.gz
http://marenka.net/~stephen/di/
cds/daily/dibase-m68k-20040224-0851.iso
uname -a: Linux debian 2.2.25 #1
On 25.II.2004 at 12:04 Joey Hess wrote:
Unless it's default for the next beta, we will not get any install
reports about it though. Do you mean make it default to see how it does?
I suppose that there will be some reports even if it is not default
provided it is visible in the main-menu.
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20040102, downloaded from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/images/bootfloppy-image.img
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell prompt
Date: 2004-02-25 18:59u (CET)
Method: Downloaded
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:19:54PM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=lines we have seen before/
Then it's not necessary to include the code stuff in the preseeder
udebs, because that functionality (scripting etc.) is totally handled
by cfengine.
My
Joey Hess wrote:
Sounds like it could be a frame buffer problem. In fact, it sounds like
[...]
boot: linux debian-installer/framebuffer=false
Yes, it was the framebuffer. It works this way.
If the instalation system is text only, what is the framebuffer used for?
Thanks,
Antonio A.A.
--
To
I got the same error using the beta2 installer from:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta2/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
Is there any way to bypass it?
Check out
http://dione.no-ip.org/~alexis/STABLE/advocacy/ahdg/ahdg/node3.html#SECTION0035
It will get you a
Antonio A.A. wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Sounds like it could be a frame buffer problem. In fact, it sounds like
[...]
boot: linux debian-installer/framebuffer=false
Yes, it was the framebuffer. It works this way.
If the instalation system is text only, what is the framebuffer used for?
Geert Stappers wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 12:19:54PM -0500, Erik Dykema wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip what=lines we have seen before/
Then it's not necessary to include the code stuff in the preseeder
udebs, because that functionality (scripting etc.) is totally handled
by cfengine.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 229314 debootstrap-udeb
Bug#229314: Please use a better granularity for progress bar update
Bug reassigned from package `base-installer' to `debootstrap-udeb'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 229062 normal
Bug#229062: wrong kernel image, reboot fails
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
severity 231109 normal
Bug#231109: Progress bar stops at 75% then waits for a while then finishes
Severity set to `normal'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 231109 debootstrap-udeb
Bug#231109: Progress bar stops at 75% then waits for a while then finishes
Bug reassigned from package `base-installer' to `debootstrap-udeb'.
End
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:58:34 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:57:55 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:47:40 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:49:46 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:54:29 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 13:55:58 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing, fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Updated to sarge-i386-netinst.iso 24-Feb-2004 13:50 107M
Partitioning seems to work now but network setup doesn't.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Antonio A.A. wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Sounds like it could be a frame buffer problem. In fact, it sounds like
[...]
boot: linux debian-installer/framebuffer=false
Yes, it was the framebuffer. It works this way.
If the instalation system is text only, what is the framebuffer used for?
For
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 08:05:54PM +0100, Antonio A.A. wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Sounds like it could be a frame buffer problem. In fact, it sounds like
[...]
boot: linux debian-installer/framebuffer=false
Yes, it was the framebuffer. It works this way.
If the instalation system is text
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 212920 wishlist
Bug#212920: recovery from failed runs
Bug#218606: debian-installer: debootstrap error during the install
Bug#220550: base-installer: should take into account that deboostrap is not idempotent
Severity set to `wishlist'.
thanks
package: debian-installer
version: woody
http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/woody/main/disks-i386/current/images-1.44/bf2.4/driver-5.bin
keeps giving me the unavailable msg page unavialable, page cannot be
found
--
songbird
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
base-installer_0.055_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_0.055.dsc
base-installer_0.055.tar.gz
base-installer_0.055_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Hi
Joey Hess schrieb:
- discover 2
udebs exist, but there are space and testing issues.
As some of you may have noticed I did not work much on this in
particualr and on debian-installer in general in the last weeks. Until
the end of March most of my time will be filled with learning
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 03:55:14PM +0200, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote:
[...]
BTW I do not remember, is el_GR.UTF-8 the locale you want by
default for Hellenic users, or was it set so to work around
problems with iso-8859-7?
It's the default. Everyone's moving to utf-8 gradually and
Accepted:
base-installer_0.055.dsc
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.055.dsc
base-installer_0.055.tar.gz
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.055.tar.gz
base-installer_0.055_i386.udeb
to pool/main/b/base-installer/base-installer_0.055_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:32:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#218606: fixed in base-installer 0.055
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:32:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#218606: fixed in base-installer 0.055
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Joey Hess schrieb:
Thomas Arendsen Hein wrote:
Package: debian-installer
Version: N/A; reported 2004-02-24
Severity: wishlist
When booting from CD you don't have enough time to read about the
boot options 'install', 'install-safe', 'expert' and 'expert-safe'.
Of course you can press a key to
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:32:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#212967: fixed in base-installer 0.055
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:32:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#221430: fixed in base-installer 0.055
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:32:05 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#233168: fixed in base-installer 0.055
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Package: installation-reports
INSTALL REPORT
Debian-installer-version:
This is a Debian installation CDROM, built on 20040103.
Downloaded from debian.org.
For install: uname -a:
Linux pluto 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
After install: uname
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 06:37:43PM +0100, Agustin Martin Domingo wrote:
reopen 228837
thanks
I wrote:
dictionaries-common package with experimental support for this has been
uploaded to Debian. Note that it will not be fully functional until all
the ispell dictionaries and wordlist
After I have started the intallation process using boot disks, I
successfully partition my hard drive, then initilise and mount my partitions
without any serious trouble.
However, when it comes to installing my kernel and drivers it asks from what
medium I wish to install. I am installing by
Hey,
Check it out Buy X.anax, Va.lium, Soma, Meridia,
Tramadol, Bontril, Adipex, C.ialis and much more.
No medical questions asked, or its free.
Discreet Ordering
Fast Shipping
No prior order needed
Quick and easy order form
check it out here
http://qw2ssqz.com/p12
off
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, and deciding one way or the other on partman will help, since
we can drop the other one to a low priority and out of memory.
Well, I think partman rocks. Notably, a lot of people working on extra
architectures and subarchitectures appear to be hoping that
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 07:45:47PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree, and deciding one way or the other on partman will help, since
we can drop the other one to a low priority and out of memory.
Well, I think partman rocks. Notably, a lot of people working on
linux-kernel-di_0.38_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di_0.38.dsc
linux-kernel-di_0.38.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386-di_0.38_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.4.24-1-386-di_0.38_i386.udeb
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.38_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.38_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.38_powerpc.udeb
to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.38_powerpc.udeb
On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 09:41:57PM +0100, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
- discover 2
udebs exist, but there are space and testing issues.
As some of you may have noticed I did not work much on this in
particualr and on debian-installer in general in the last weeks. Until
the end of March
Did you know That the normal cost for
Super Vkiagra is $20, per d0se?
We are running a h0t special ||
T0DAY Its only an amazing 3 d0llarz
Shipped world wide!
http://medspro.net/sv/index.php?pid=evaph6163
http://medspro.net/sv/index.php?pid=evaph6163
allergy horsehair
* Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-02-26 01:45]:
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I agree, and deciding one way or the other on partman will help, since
| we can drop the other one to a low priority and out of memory.
|
| Well, I think partman rocks. Notably, a lot of people working on extra
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
