[Jeff Licquia]
I will be ready.
Good.
Just so we're all on the same page, this is my understanding of the
needed discover 2 package renames:
discover2-udeb - discover-udeb
discover2-data-udeb - discover-data-udeb
Correct.
Unless I hear otherwise, I will upload discover 2 packages
discover1_1.5-6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1_1.5-6.dsc
discover1_1.5.orig.tar.gz
discover1_1.5-6.diff.gz
discover1-udeb_1.5-6_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-6_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-6_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-6_i386.deb
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5.tar.gz
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-5_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 02:48:21AM -0500, David Nusinow wrote:
I've attached a patch to the d-i build system that'll
have to be applied when both uploads are made to unstable.
Now that Petter has uploaded the new disover version, this patch needs
to be applied. Since the svn archive no longer
Hi Jeremie!
I downloaded the images.
The first thing I noticed was that the root.img was more than
1.440 MB long.
The second thing that I noticed was that fdformat and
superformat don't work on powerpc hardware, so I can't create a
1.920 MB formatted floppy to put root.img onto. For example,
Accepted:
discover1-udeb_1.5-6_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-6_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-6.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-6.diff.gz
discover1_1.5-6.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-6.dsc
discover1_1.5-6_i386.deb
to
Accepted:
discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-5_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data-udeb_1.2004.02.08-5_all.udeb
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1-data/discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5.dsc
discover1-data_1.2004.02.08-5.tar.gz
to
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:17:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239144: fixed in discover1 1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:17:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238913: fixed in discover1 1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:17:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238664: fixed in discover1 1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:17:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238595: fixed in discover1 1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:32:38AM +0100, Pip Oomen wrote:
On the debian-boot mailing list I noticed you are working on the
ppc/newworld installer and I was wondering what the current status is
for the nightly builds. Should it install now? Any point in burning a
netinst image?
Well, not
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:17:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238026: fixed in discover1 1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 03:17:04 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238360: fixed in discover1 1.5-6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reopen 74081
Bug#74081: boot-floopies: leaves no kernel-image package
Bug#3905: base disks still install part packages
Bug#64430: should install kernel from package instead of
On Tue, 2004-03-23 at 04:42, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:11:05PM +0100, Alessandro Polverini wrote:
Package: installation-reports
snip/
Root Size/partition table:
/dev/rd/c0d0p1 : ext3, 3Gb, /
/dev/rd/c0d0p2 : swap, 512M
/dev/rd/c0d0p3 : reiserfs, 15Gb,
(continuing on list)
Ok. I am downloading the nightly build (march 22nd) of the netinst image
now and will report back afterwards.
Kind regards,
Pepijn Oomen.
Sven Luther wrote:
The best would be for you to do an installation report, which you can
find at :
Is there any chance for the first stage status page (D.
Barbier's page) to recover soon?
Eddy
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance Tax Center - File online. File on time.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
_tmp.tar.bz2
Description: _tmp.tar.bz2
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 5
model : 7
model name : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions
stepping: 0
cpu MHz : 300.684
cache size : 64 KB
fdiv_bug: no
hlt_bug : no
f00f_bug: no
coma_bug: no
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:44:44 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238359: Please send /proc/cpuinfo contents
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it
Hi Colin,
Thanks for your report.
Looking at your patch, you removed mac_kbd.c from powerpc.
I'd prefer to do the following: check in mac-kbd.c:
fd = open(/proc/sys/dev/mac_hid/keyboard_sends_linux_keycodes, O_RDONLY);
if ((fd 0) || (read(fd,c, 1) != 1)) {
di_info
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:26:21AM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeremie!
I downloaded the images.
Cool.
The first thing I noticed was that the root.img was more than
1.440 MB long.
The second thing that I noticed was that fdformat and
superformat don't work on powerpc hardware, so I
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:07:17AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Hi Colin,
Thanks for your report.
Looking at your patch, you removed mac_kbd.c from powerpc.
I'd prefer to do the following: check in mac-kbd.c:
fd = open(/proc/sys/dev/mac_hid/keyboard_sends_linux_keycodes,
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 22:59, Joey Hess wrote:
README.html has a link to install/doc/install-en.html
Meanwhile, there are only index.en.html and INSTALLATION-HOWTO in
that directory.
joey:/mntgrep install-en.html README.html
zsh: exit 1 grep install-en.html README.html
Sorry, the
Until now I was sure that Depends: control field of udebs is used in same
way as Depends: control field of norman debs.
However, seems it is not.
I just got an error while running make build_cdrom_isolinux in
installer/build. Yesterday it worked. Nothing was changed at my side since
yesterday.
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 06:00:09AM +0100, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
Joey Hess wrote:
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
mips (and AFAICSany other arch with multiple subarch specifications
for a package) needs a not-yet-written patch for the subarch check
in libdebian-installer and a new upload.
Is
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 12:36:45PM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I'm trying to do a 3.0 HTTP install and the process goes fine until
the installer tries to access raff.debian.org (which appears to be down)
and the install stops. Just thought I'd let you know, if you didn't
already.
yaboot-installer_0.0.15_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
yaboot-installer_0.0.15.dsc
yaboot-installer_0.0.15.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_0.0.15_powerpc.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
Josip Rodin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 11:19:46AM +0100, Martin Schulze wrote:
I'm trying to do a 3.0 HTTP install and the process goes fine until
the installer tries to access raff.debian.org (which appears to be down)
and the install stops. Just thought I'd let you know, if you
Accepted:
yaboot-installer_0.0.15.dsc
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.15.dsc
yaboot-installer_0.0.15.tar.gz
to pool/main/y/yaboot-installer/yaboot-installer_0.0.15.tar.gz
yaboot-installer_0.0.15_powerpc.udeb
to
On 20.III.2004 at 08:10 Andrew Pollock wrote:
Disk setup: 1 IDE disk, /dev/hda, previously partitioned thusly:
/dev/hda1 Windows 200060G
/dev/hda2 Linux (type 82) 500M
/dev/hda3 Linux swap 500M
/dev/hda4 Linux LVM (type 8e) Lotsa
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reopen 239019
Bug#239019: Debian Installer Installation Report
Bug reopened, originator not changed.
reassign 239019 grub-installer
Bug#239019: Debian Installer Installation Report
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 238970 -1
Bug#238970: Install report (success)
Bug 238970 cloned as bug 239557.
reassign -1 partman
Bug#239557: Install report (success)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
retitle -1 Too many key-presses,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Package: base-config
Version: 2.17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I created default mirror patch for apt-setup.
This checks debian-installer/country value and choices his/her country
first as mirror list.
This patch looks dirty, but this is because
On Mar 23, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I uploaded it at http://www.bofh.it/~md/debian/, please check it and let
me know if I can upload it.
Am I blind, or did you forget to upload the actual udeb?
Oops... done. Anyway:
debian/module-init-tools-udeb
|-- DEBIAN
| `-- control
|-- etc
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
clone 238970 -2
Bug#238970: Install report (success)
Bug 238970 cloned as bug 239561.
reassign -2 partman
Bug#239561: Install report (success)
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'.
retitle -2 100 as a partition size should
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 03:26:21AM -0500, Rick Thomas wrote:
Hi Jeremie!
I downloaded the images.
The first thing I noticed was that the root.img was more than
1.440 MB long.
Sorry, I completely forgot this issue! We'll have to move some stuff to
the driver floppies.
I decided to try
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
On Mon, Mar 22, 2004 at 11:29:59AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 03:01:11PM +0100, Jeremie Koenig wrote:
I've got building oldworld floppies (patch to the build/ directory,
and packages for miBoot and my
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 239560 pending
Bug#239560: base-config: Set default mirror site patch
Tags were: patch
Tags added: pending
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:08:43 +0200
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#238970: Install report (success)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hallo,
Thanks Christian Dennis for your info.
In the mean time I have downloaded all materials you suggested.
Parlin Arief, I will read few of the stuffs first before I continue translating.
Setyo
--
Fachgebiet Seeverkehr
Institut für Land- und Seeverkehr
Technische Universität Berlin
tag 237529 pending
thanks
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:22:51AM +0100, Florian Effenberger wrote:
processor : 0
vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
cpu family : 5
model : 7
model name : AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions
stepping: 0
cpu MHz : 300.684
cache
I suppose that the following has happened. Your original
configuration contains active LVM volumes. This means that the kernel
is using /dev/hda4 and as a result the kernel is unable to reread the
partition table.
If I am right, the following should work:
1. Before you repartition, go
This will be fixed by the next base-installer upload.
Thanks for the quick response.
Thanks for the quick fixing ;-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
After looking for a while I found that yesterday the versioned dependency
was 'libdebian-installer4 (= 0.19)' and was satisfied by
libdebian-installer4 installed on host. I could build the image after I
upgraded libdebian-installer4 on the host.
However, this
[snip]
I continue an change the size value into 512 MB and select Continue.
You discovered a bug in the partitioner --
it had to check that 512mb is more than the maximal allowed value.
If the new size is bigger than the maximum possible size (because is
either exceeds the size of the drive
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: March 22nd Installer downloaded from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/powerpc/
uname -a: The result of running uname -a on a shell promptNot sure how to do this,
just a dumb Mac user?
Date: March 22nd 2004 10AM
Method:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: beta 3 with base from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux (none) 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
unknown (from shell in installer)
Date: March 23, 2004
Method:
I've temporarily(?) set up anonymous svn access on alioth at a high
port. The uri to the repo is: svn://svn.debian.org:3691/d-i/trunk
I've used this to get my trees back on the web and working again, so
hourly updated snapshots of the the repo can be browsed at either of
these urls:
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 20-03-2004 from
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
uname -a: Linux bigben 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 unknown (Time
and date is not correct on this machine)
Date: Tue
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 10:07:17AM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
Looking at your patch, you removed mac_kbd.c from powerpc.
I'd prefer to do the following: check in mac-kbd.c:
fd = open(/proc/sys/dev/mac_hid/keyboard_sends_linux_keycodes, O_RDONLY);
if ((fd 0) ||
Denis Barbier wrote:
It shouldn't be marked as seen until the package is configured, I'll
have a look.
I don't think that hack works very well. Consider a program like
hw-detect that asks questions and is run by multiple menu items. It
still has to worry about seen flag setting under the
On 23.III.2004 at 15:39 Stefan Tibus wrote:
In my opinion the installer should feature a classical partitioner
and provide optional support for lvm within this partitioner. The
need to switch between two different tools is not very user(or
admin)-friendly.
Yes. The LVM support needs to be
d-i beta 3 used version 2.4.24 of the alpha kernel.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 239172 hw-detect
Bug#239172: debian-installer: multiple hardware detection forgets parameters
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'.
End of
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
I've uploaded discover1 and discover1-data to unstable. Everything
should be ready for you. :)
It's there. If I've screwed anything up, let me know.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You reported a hang during hardware detection in the debian installer a
while ago. I think that may have been fixed due to the upgrade to the
2.4.25 kernel in beta 3 of the installer. Can you try it again with beta
3?
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 23.III.2004 at 16:21 Laurens Blankers wrote:
If the new size is bigger than the maximum possible size (because is
either exceeds the size of the drive or there is an overlap problem with
another partition) you could display a dialog asking the user to either
cancel the operation or resize
Rahmat M. Samik-Ibrahim wrote:
On Sat, 2004-03-20 at 22:59, Joey Hess wrote:
README.html has a link to install/doc/install-en.html
Meanwhile, there are only index.en.html and INSTALLATION-HOWTO in
that directory.
joey:/mntgrep install-en.html README.html
zsh: exit 1 grep
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 238600 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic
Bug#238600: debian-installer system error configuring tulip card (Alpha Platform)
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 238341 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-generic
Bug#238341: debian-installer hangs on qlogicisp (Alpha Platform)
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to
partman_28_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman_28.dsc
partman_28.tar.gz
partman_28_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
ddetect_0.78_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
ddetect_0.78.dsc
ddetect_0.78.tar.gz
hw-detect_0.78_all.udeb
ethdetect_0.78_all.udeb
hw-detect-full_0.78_all.udeb
archdetect_0.78_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To
On 23.III.2004 at 06:21 Matt Kraai wrote:
I just changed the CPU detection logic to use the vendor_id and
cpu family fields. If you would send the contents of
/proc/cpuinfo, I could check that your CPU will still be detected
correctly.
Here they are:
processor : 0
vendor_id :
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 238305 netcfg
Bug#238305: can not configure exim4-config due to unconfigured hostname
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `netcfg'.
End of message, stopping
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 236387 hw-detect
Bug#236387: hw-detect-full hungs due to mussing modules
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `hw-detect'.
End of message, stopping processing
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:59:54 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line e100 module
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Accepted:
archdetect_0.78_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/archdetect_0.78_i386.udeb
ddetect_0.78.dsc
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.78.dsc
ddetect_0.78.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ddetect_0.78.tar.gz
ethdetect_0.78_all.udeb
to pool/main/d/ddetect/ethdetect_0.78_all.udeb
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):
hw-detect-full_0.78_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says
standard.
hw-detect_0.78_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says standard.
Either the
Accepted:
partman_28.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_28.dsc
partman_28.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_28.tar.gz
partman_28_i386.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman/partman_28_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 232415 libdebian-installer
Bug#232415: mkinitrd fails on cciss drive hardware
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `libdebian-installer'.
End of message,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 222724 discover
Bug#222724: cdrom mounting all inconsistent and screwey
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `discover'.
End of message, stopping processing
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
reassign 238364 arcboot-installer
Bug#238364: No boot loader (arcboot) is installed (mips)
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `arcboot-installer'.
End of message,
On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 01:49:52PM +0300, Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
I looked at Packages file that describes udebs, and found that there is NO
udeb with Package field set to 'libdebian-installer4'.
Although there is libdebian-installer4-udeb that Provides:
libdebian-installer4, versuioned
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:02:03 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#239172: fixed in ddetect 0.78
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Nikita V. Youshchenko wrote:
After looking for a while I found that yesterday the versioned
dependency
was 'libdebian-installer4 (= 0.19)' and was satisfied by
libdebian-installer4 installed on host. I could build the image after I
upgraded libdebian-installer4 on the host.
However,
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
merge 239430 238712 239445
Bug#238712: Sarge Netinstall Beta 3: partition menu doesn't show which partition is
being edited
Bug#239430: active_partition menu to show information about the non-editable
properties of the partition
Bug#239445:
Quoting Kenshi Muto ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Package: base-config
Version: 2.17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I created default mirror patch for apt-setup.
This checks debian-installer/country value and choices his/her country
first as mirror list.
This patch looks dirty, but this is
partman-target_13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-target_13.dsc
partman-target_13.tar.gz
partman-target_13_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
tag 238776 + fixed
quit
This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 12:39:13 -0500
Source: partman-target
Binary: partman-target
Architecture:
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:26:37 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Accepted:
partman-target_13.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_13.dsc
partman-target_13.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_13.tar.gz
partman-target_13_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-target/partman-target_13_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
tag 238776 + fixed
Bug#238776: fstab generation omits entries for floppy, cdrom
Tags were: d-i
Tags added: fixed
quit
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 238472 discover1
Bug#238472: installation-reports: default base system reboots automatically
Bug reassigned from package `discover' to `discover1'.
reassign 178944 discover1
Bug#178944: discover: depends on mounted /usr
Bug reassigned from
[...]
- Allow resizing of a virtual partition.
- When the end of a partition before a virtual partition moves also move
the beginning of the virtual partition. So if you start out with this
[...]
If this causes you a lot of work (and I think it does) I have an easier
solution:
Yes, it
Quoting Eddy Petrisor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Is there any chance for the first stage status page (D.
Barbier's page) to recover soon?
New translations commited.
Yes, there is a chance that Denis status pages come back to life as
Joey added the support for anon svn checkout on a high port.
We
Should every directory that has child directories in which you can type
'dpkg-buildpackage' have svn:ignore properties to ignore
*.{dsc,changes,tar.gz,udeb,deb,build,upload} in the same way packages/
does? If so, I can go through and add them, as it will make the output
of 'svn status' much less
This bugreport is related to #236533
See: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=236533
Maybe the two could be merged?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 13:48:14 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line 03/20/04 version of new installer with Lilo?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
There is one doc in ./doc/manual/en that has a broken revision comment.
I have not checked any of the other languages, but as EN is the 'master'...
Can you fix this?
TIA.
$ svn diff -r 11579 using-d-i/using-d-i.xml
Index: using-d-i/using-d-i.xml
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
reassign 229333 discover
Bug#229333: discover2-udeb: segfault
Bug reassigned from package `discover2-udeb' to `discover'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:28:47 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line FWD: Fixed in NMU of partman-target 13
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi!
I Can't install Sarge with netinst iso (i tried with twice versions :
100Mo and 30Mo iso)
If i try to do the MD5 checksum in the install menu, it says that files
are corrupted.
The PCMCIA package doesnt install it self correctly. I was unable to
install debian (helped by two friends who use
On 23.III.2004 at 19:52 Laurens Blankers wrote:
I am not sure how to interpeted your reply. Does it take too much time to
implement, time you don't have. Or it takes a lot of time but you are
going to implement it.
I don't know which one of these is true. It depends on how many other
more
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1
tags 218360 - d-i
Bug#218360: Installation fails with Kernel panic: I have no root and I want to scream.
Tags were: d-i
Tags removed: d-i
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:50:40 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:53:51 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in beta 3 or earlier (probably much earlier)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:50:40 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:12:10 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed in d-i beta 3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Tue, 23 Mar 2004 15:05:06 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing old report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
1 - 100 of 197 matches
Mail list logo
