Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:17:08 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#356939: fixed in shadow 1:4.0.14-9
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html
, and I have already completed step 1.
I strongly
Le mardi 14 mars 2006 à 21:01 -0500, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project.
If this is a joke, it's not funny. I happen to prefer Andrew Suffield's
humour.
--
.''`. Josselin Mouette/\./\
: :' :
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20
may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20
correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always seen him apologies when he=20
did so (I can provide links if you
FYI,
so nazli fonts are the right ones!
regards,
Davide
Messaggio originale
Da: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Data: 15/03/2006 13.34
A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ogg: mini.iso and Farsi
Hi David,
This is to let you know that a few days ago I checked the mini iso and the
Farsi text was perfect, nice and
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006, Andres Salomon wrote:
Hi,
Hi!
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project.
Hahaha oh wow. You got it the wrong way, you should only do that
_after_ someone posts http://zoy.org/~sam/ftwcal.jpeg to d-d-a. Now I
have no
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html,
and I have already completed step 1.
This
Mike Bird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your accusation fails to allege sufficient facts to constitute
an allegation of defamation.
The facts have previously been discussed elsewhere. I replied merely to
point out that Sven does not always apologise for his behaviour.
Rather than wasting list
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
#include hallo.h
* Andres Salomon [Tue, Mar 14 2006, 09:01:09PM]:
harm upon another developer in a public forum, and then a week later
publically insults/taunts a developer (one of the Release Managers,
even), behind his back. This is incredibly childish, aggressive
behavior, and should not
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways
of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion process:
http://squishy.cc/svenl.txt
This is a lot from two weeks
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 12:24:55PM +1100, Lachlan Patrick wrote:
Well, the question I wanted it to ask was which partition
should /boot go onto? AFAI recall that question wasn't
asked. I had two other ext2 partitions, so I was just
surprised that the command to format /dev/hda6 was also
taken
Package: installation-reportsBoot method:
CDSarge 3.1r1
Date: Last two weeksMachine: Custom built
Processor: 2 x PII 450Memory:
384megPartitions: /dev/sda1 as root, /dev/sdb-g as RAID 5 at
/varOutput of lspci and lspci -n:Base System Installation
Checklist:[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 09:01:09PM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
Some might argue that we should just kick him from the channel and
remove his commit access to the debian-kernel project, but that does not
solve the problem of him abusing other teams, as well as his abusive
mailing list posts.
Pierre Habouzit writes:
I strongly oppose to such an expulsion.
So do I.
--
John Hasler
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 10:39:46PM -0700, Martin Chase wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: 2006-02-20 version 31r1 from a random mirror
Date: 2006-03-14 12:00 UTC
Machine: random, consumer-grade, desktop parts
Processor: varied
Memory: varied
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 08:35:36AM -0700, Charles wrote:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD Sarge 3.1r1
Date: Last two weeks
Machine: Custom built
Processor: 2 x PII 450
Memory: 384meg
Partitions: /dev/sda1 as root, /dev/sdb-g as RAID 5 at /var
Output of lspci and lspci
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 15:05, Andres Salomon a écrit :
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 11:25 +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
Le Mer 15 Mars 2006 03:01, Andres Salomon a écrit :
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther
removed from the project. The process is outlined here:
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 2006.03.15 downloaded from
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
Date: 2006.03.15.
Comments/Problems:
The installation finished, X works, but I've got no kde.
apt-get install kde doesn't
On Wed, 2006-03-15 at 05:00, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20
may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20
correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always seen him
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2006-03-15 18:30 (GMT +1)
Machine: HP NX8220
Processor: Pentium M (740) 1,7Ghz
Memory: 512 MB
Partitions: df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred
Base System Installation Checklist:
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:51:04 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#357068: Install issues with latest version of Sarge
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 01:00:19PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Sven may sometimes be a bit overpresent in some trolls, he also=20
may answer too quick, without having read the mail he answers to=20
correctly enough. But AFAICT, I've always
On 3/14/06, Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I am going through the expulsion process to have Sven Luther removed
from the project. The process is outlined here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/08/msg5.html,
and I have already completed step 1.
[ Andres,
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason
for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a
printk that was not strictly necessary, which i think for someone like you or
the
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:10PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 05:56:05PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
I was a bit short on you, because you started to make noise about the reason
for the refusal being a #include being wrongly placed in the patch, and a
printk that
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 09:40:15AM -0500, Andres Salomon wrote:
The DAM has accepted the request; please send seconds directly to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cc'ing me as well.
For the people who seem to think that there are more constructive ways
of dealing w/ this issue rather than the expulsion
also sprach Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]:
It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically:
The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the
people that with a reason or not wants to see it delayed. The
minute after the release team
On 14/03/2006 Andres Salomon wrote:
Sven's behavior has always been combative (and some might argue
hostile), but this is beyond what is acceptable. He threatens bodily
harm upon another developer in a public forum, and then a week later
publically insults/taunts a developer (one of the
Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will be bumped. I
Andres Salomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I strongly oppose to such an expulsion.
It amazes me that people oppose expulsion, but are perfectly happy to
allow the DAMs to decide whether or not a NM is to be let into the
project. Why do we trust the DAM's judgement in one scenario but not
the
martin f krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
also sprach Gustavo Franco [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006.03.15.1512 +0100]:
It seems that the project is splitting in two groups basically:
The people that wants to work together and release Etch, and the
people that with a reason or not wants to see it
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:48:45 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#284425: fixed in rootskel 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:21 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#322381: fixed in cdebconf 0.98
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:42 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#353687: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:48:45 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#353942: fixed in rootskel 1.30
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:42 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#354097: fixed in debian-installer-utils 1.24
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case
Your message dated Wed, 15 Mar 2006 13:47:21 -0800
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#356845: fixed in cdebconf 0.98
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.24.dsc
linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6_1.24.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.15-1-486-di_1.24_i386.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.15-1-486-di_1.24_i386.udeb
debian-installer-utils_1.24_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer-utils_1.24.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.24.tar.gz
di-utils-shell_1.24_all.udeb
di-utils-reboot_1.24_all.udeb
di-utils-exit-installer_1.24_all.udeb
rootskel_1.30_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
rootskel_1.30.dsc
rootskel_1.30.tar.gz
rootskel_1.30_i386.udeb
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.30_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear Friends,
First of all i apologise for my poor english (portuguese :-))
I follow de dev lists of debian for several months now, my knowlege in
linux whas not so good so i never applyed to be a developper and also
my time isnt much :-(.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
snip/
So far, I have never took the time to study the detail of the expulsion
process, so sorry if this mail is inappropriate. But be sure that I will
do everything I can as a DD to stop Sven's expulsion.
Here another DD
I spent some time working on collecting / stripping a nice set
of fonts for the g-i.
This is (was) the idea (see [1]):
*** ttf-dejavu
- Cyrillic scripts
*** ttf-freefont
- Latin
- Latin-other
- hi
- pa_IN
- bn
- he
- vi
- el
*** ttf-cjk-compact-udeb
- CJK
*** ttf-farsiweb (nazli)
-
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the ABI will be bumped. I can't speak
for d-i.
i had some
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Hi Moritz,
On Wednesday, 15 Mar 2006, you wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 15 March 2006 00:15, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The update is built and tested, it'll appear soon. It contains three
ABI changing security fixes, so the
On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:00, Davide Viti wrote:
This is (was) the idea (see [1]):
Looks good to me. Could you add the glyph ranges needed in the different
fonts (except freefont)?
Please also consider if some common codepoints, like for numbers, general
punctuation and maybe accents
Since we're on the subject, I've found some weirdness
in the translations:
1
---
Albanian (which is listed among the latin languages)
po file (sq.po) uses U0401 Ё twice (see [1])
U+0401: CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER IO
I found out that there's a glyph tha looks the same
in the latin range:
U+00CB
cdebconf_0.98_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
cdebconf_0.98.dsc
cdebconf_0.98.tar.gz
cdebconf-priority_0.98_all.udeb
cdebconf_0.98_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0_0.98_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.98_i386.deb
cdebconf-udeb_0.98_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer_0.39_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
libdebian-installer_0.39.dsc
libdebian-installer_0.39.tar.gz
libdebian-installer4_0.39_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-dev_0.39_i386.deb
libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 01:23:47AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:00, Davide Viti wrote:
This is (was) the idea (see [1]):
Looks good to me. Could you add the glyph ranges needed in the different
fonts (except freefont)?
I'm collecting suche ranges; I'll post them as
On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:54, Davide Viti wrote:
Since we're on the subject, I've found some weirdness
in the translations:
Nice work :-)
1
---
I can't read Albanian, but looks to me that this should be changed.
Yes, this is a translation mistake.
2
---
U2013 - EN dash (37
Accepted:
debian-installer-utils_1.24.dsc
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.24.dsc
debian-installer-utils_1.24.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/debian-installer-utils/debian-installer-utils_1.24.tar.gz
di-utils-exit-installer_1.24_all.udeb
to
Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.98_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.98_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.98_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.98_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.98_all.udeb
to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.98_all.udeb
Accepted:
rootskel-bootfloppy_1.30_i386.udeb
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.30_i386.udeb
rootskel_1.30.dsc
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.30.dsc
rootskel_1.30.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/rootskel/rootskel_1.30.tar.gz
rootskel_1.30_i386.udeb
to
On Thursday 16 March 2006 02:11, Davide Viti wrote:
I'm considering to strip font files specifying the ranges to include
rather than the ranges that we want to exclude, what do you think about
this?
For freefont exclusion (ranges we know are covered by other fonts and
ranges for which we know
Accepted:
libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.39_i386.udeb
libdebian-installer-extra4_0.39_i386.deb
to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.39_i386.deb
Accepted:
acpi-modules-2.6.15-1-486-di_1.24_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/acpi-modules-2.6.15-1-486-di_1.24_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-486-di_1.24_i386.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-i386-2.6/cdrom-core-modules-2.6.15-1-486-di_1.24_i386.udeb
Hi Frans,
OK, I grabbed the latest (March 14th) etch network installer from the
link location below. I ran the installer with debconf/priority=medium as
requested. The CDROM detection worked, as did detection of the sunhme
(happy meal) network cards. There was one non-fatal error: during the
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.11_powerpc.changes uploaded successfully to
localhost
along with the files:
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.11.dsc
linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6_1.11.tar.gz
kernel-image-2.6.15-1-powerpc-di_1.11_powerpc.udeb
nic-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-di_1.11_powerpc.udeb
Accepted:
affs-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-di_1.11_powerpc.udeb
to
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-powerpc-2.6/affs-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-di_1.11_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.6.15-1-powerpc-miboot-di_1.11_powerpc.udeb
to
Package: installation-reports
Version: 2.12
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks the whole system
*** Please type your report below this line ***
-- Package-specific info:
Boot method: CD
Image version:
-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 20060315 (three installation two separate partitions, one repeat, testing)
Machine: Sony Vaio PCG-FX805
Processor: AMD Athlon K something
Memory:
Partitions: df -Tl
FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda6 reiserfs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.15
severity 357187 important
Bug#357187: installation-report: etch beta2 install not recognize keyboard mouse
Severity set to `important'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Abstract
Please can't we all just get along? Ok, I'm not quite that naive, but
I would like to see (or proof of previous attempts at) conciliation
before such a highly political approach as a formal expulsion request to
a personnel issue.
Further
[Jutta, could you please help us? - see question below]
On 3/16/06, Davide Viti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Albanian (which is listed among the latin languages)
po file (sq.po) uses U0401 Ё twice (see [1])
U+0401: CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER IO
I found out that there's a glyph tha looks the same
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:54, Davide Viti wrote:
Since we're on the subject, I've found some weirdness
in the translations:
Nice work :-)
Nothing to add to Frans comments which I fully agree with.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, Mar 15, 2006 at 10:33:27PM -0500, Mitchell Laks wrote:
snip/
no keyboard or mouse
I now have same problem with new etch installer!
It is a problem with the new debian kernel or with udev.
Or hardware that can't handle the initialisation.
When you see the Debian swirl
severity 357187 normal
thanks
Please do not overflate severity for installation reports.
I downloaded fresh etch beta install disk 3/15.
checked md5sum.
burned.
checked md5sum on burned copy by dd if=/dev/hdc bs=$blocksize count=$count
conv=notrunc,noerror |md5sum
a la url
on the whole a very smooth installation, a few notes
* it found and installed over wireless pcmcia card,
however postinstall wireless card was not set up for use
I leave this opened in case this could be reassigned to a d-i package.
This is actually the only item I find relevant to the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
severity 357187 normal
Bug#357187: installation-report: etch beta2 install not recognize keyboard mouse
Severity set to `normal'.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
On Thursday 16 March 2006 01:44, Geert Stappers wrote:
When you see the Debian swirl and the 'boot:' prompt,
then hit a function key, e.g. F1, and read the instructions.
It says something like 'noapci' 'no_thingy',
boot with that option and please report your milage.
I booted as ordered
72 matches
Mail list logo
