aboot-installer_0.0.21_alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
aboot-installer_0.0.21.dsc
aboot-installer_0.0.21.tar.gz
aboot-installer_0.0.21_alpha.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
What is the preferred place to report issues about g-i ?
Historically, we used to report bugs related to the g-i against the
cdebconf-gtk-udeb package
P.S.
Where to get the graphical installer?
i386 std images should already include the GUI, while AMD64 and PPC
Excuse me if this is the wrong place to send the e-mail, but I don't see
any place better of this.
As reported in the bug report, the last installer of Etch doesn't
recognize the aic-9405w and so I wasn't able to see and format my scsi disk.
Then, I try to install a ubuntu-server in the
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 18:17:07 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#367228: fixed in srm-reader 0.10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
On 5/22/06, Davide Viti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- ttf-thai-tlwg_0.4.4-3.tgz
I can't remember where I got it from, but I remember
the site contained unofficial udebs; the wiki ([2])
says that an udeb has been uploaded on 19th April but
apt-cache search shows no results.
On 2006-04-19 17:58:53
On 5/22/06, Davide Viti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:30:01AM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On a related topic, the powerpc g-i daily build maintained by Colin
had an cyrillic display issue. No cyrillic characters were displayed.
Missing ttf-dejavu font?
ttf-dejavu is not
On 5/22/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 04:58:22PM +0300, Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 5/22/06, Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having GTKDFB 2.8.17, whose DFB backend is much more stable than the old
one found in GTKDFB 2.0.9, available as udeb may allow
In my tests the ppc build made on the 18th did not show any cyrillic glyphs.
I think this is a ppc G-I build issue. I was hoping Colin will see the
email and reply.
can you reproduce it with the latest build?
Do you have screenshots, or take any if it reproduces?
if it happens, can you see if
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 23:28:37 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368435: tasksel: fails to upgrade with aptitude
dist-upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 23:28:37 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368435: tasksel: fails to upgrade with aptitude
dist-upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Your message dated Mon, 22 May 2006 23:28:37 -0500
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368435: tasksel: fails to upgrade with aptitude
dist-upgrade
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this
Quoting Thomas Schoepf ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
package: tasksel-data
version: 2.45
severity: minor
This package provides the tasks for 'tasksel' to use to provide a simple
interface for users who want to pick general tasks for installation on
their Debian GNU/Linux system.
provides ... to
Probably is best to use cdebconf-gtk-udeb and add a usertag; ?fonts
maybe?
I did this suggestion to Frans but his advice was that this is not
worth it. cdebconf-gtk-udeb has few enough bugs for us to not deeply
care about usertagging them
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[ keeping the cross-post and please keep it cross-posted ]
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
issues related to the kernel[1].
We discussed the following topics:
snip/
* Non-free
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:10:54AM +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
[ keeping the cross-post and please keep it cross-posted ]
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
hey,
Frans Pop assembled an informal BoF at DebConf to discuss cross-team
issues related to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) writes:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:30:54PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas J. Koenig) writes:
Today I tried out the current debian installer testing-i386-netinst
(daily build) on my tiny network where I have a server running
On 5/22/06, Davide Viti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- ttf-thai-tlwg_0.4.4-3.tgz
I can't remember where I got it from, but I remember
the site contained unofficial udebs; the wiki ([2])
says that an udeb has been uploaded on 19th April but
apt-cache search shows no results.
On 2006-04-19
On 5/23/06, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:30:01AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
snip/
On a related topic, the powerpc g-i daily build maintained by Colin
had an cyrillic display issue. No cyrillic characters were displayed.
Missing ttf-dejavu font?
I
On 5/23/06, Eddy Petrişor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/06, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have noted this on the wiki GUI page on Friday. (Translators, please
do NOT report your issues there!)
What is the preferred place to report issues about g-i ?
BTS, cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Package: partman
Severity: critical
Justification: causes serious data loss
I burned a D-I image for a friend (the latest weekly Debian CD as of Mar
12 15:12) and chose to play with it a bit to see if it was clearly
broken in some obvious way or likely okay for out purposes.
Once I had verified
Eddy Petrişor ha scritto:
On 5/23/06, Geert Stappers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 10:30:01AM +0300, Eddy Petri??or wrote:
snip/
On a related topic, the powerpc g-i daily build maintained by Colin
had an cyrillic display issue. No cyrillic characters were displayed.
Package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Severity: wishlist
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 12:11:55PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
In my tests the ppc build made on the 18th did not show any cyrillic glyphs.
I think this is a ppc G-I build issue. I was hoping Colin will see the
email and reply.
can you reproduce
Il giorno lun, 22/05/2006 alle 23.11 +0200, Geert Stappers ha scritto:
P.S.
Where to get the graphical installer?
I built it from svn source, I bet you can do the same. ;)
Bye
sc
--
Stefano Canepa aka sc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stefanocanepa.it
Three great virtues of a programmer:
- Forwarded message from Michele Bendazzoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 09:02:38 +0200
From: Michele Bendazzoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#367499: installation-reports: Not recognize adaptec aic-9405w
sas/sata controller
partman-crypto_4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-crypto_4.dsc
partman-crypto_4.tar.gz
partman-crypto_4_i386.udeb
partman-crypto-dm_4_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_4_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
(new) partman-crypto-dm_4_all.udeb optional debian-installer
Add to partman support for dm-crypt encryption
(new) partman-crypto-loop_4_all.udeb standard debian-installer
Add to partman support for loop-AES encryption
partman-crypto_4.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_4.dsc
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
I am coming ato your place in few weeks andb thought we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nicbe pretty girl. Don't replya to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
Accepted:
tasksel-data_2.47_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel-data_2.47_all.deb
tasksel_2.47.dsc
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.47.dsc
tasksel_2.47.tar.gz
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.47.tar.gz
tasksel_2.47_all.deb
to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.47_all.deb
Announcing to
Your message dated Tue, 23 May 2006 18:47:08 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#368440: fixed in tasksel 2.47
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:52:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Perhaps we disable new kernel features for etch 1/2? e.g., limit new
feature to new hardware support. For example, we wouldn't want to
turn on something as
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 10:46:44PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 01:09:45PM -0500, dann frazier wrote:
Kernel udeb creation process (possibly using k-p?)
-
If we build all of the *existing* udebs from a single source, we
On Tue, May 23, 2006 at 09:47:08AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 11:38:46PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2006 at 01:52:47PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
Perhaps we disable new kernel features for etch 1/2? e.g., limit new
feature to new hardware
On Tue, 2006-05-23 at 21:54 +0200, Geert Stappers wrote:
Please confirm that you mean 'MaY' (and not 'MaRch')
Sorry. Timestamp from the wrong iso. May 14 16:24 is the timestamp
from the one in question.
Please tell us more about what you did.
I played around some in the disc, but the
33 matches
Mail list logo
