installation-report_2.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
installation-report_2.17.dsc
installation-report_2.17.tar.gz
save-logs_2.17_all.udeb
installation-report_2.17_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Accepted:
installation-report_2.17.dsc
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.17.dsc
installation-report_2.17.tar.gz
to pool/main/i/installation-report/installation-report_2.17.tar.gz
installation-report_2.17_all.deb
to
finish-install_2.1_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
finish-install_2.1.dsc
finish-install_2.1.tar.gz
finish-install_2.1_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.19
severity 373699 important
Bug#373699: debian-installer: installation will not complete
Severity set to `important' from `grave'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please
Accepted:
finish-install_2.1.dsc
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.1.dsc
finish-install_2.1.tar.gz
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.1.tar.gz
finish-install_2.1_all.udeb
to pool/main/f/finish-install/finish-install_2.1_all.udeb
Announcing to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 368294 partman
Bug#368294: debian-installer: go back continue are the same if ROOT(/) not
selected
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `partman'.
severity
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 373699 finish-install
Bug#373699: debian-installer: installation will not complete
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `finish-install'.
merge 373699 373567
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
severity 373699 grave
Bug#373699: debian-installer: installation will not complete
Severity set to `grave' from `important'
merge 373699 373567
Bug#373567: etch d-i i386 beta 2
I'm failing to see the problem with there not being a modules.dep if
there are no modules on the image to load. A modules.dep will be created
later in the install when there are modules.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Package: busybox
Version: 1:1.1.3-1
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~cat foo
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/1
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/2
/usr/lib/finish-install.d/4
/usr/lib/prebaseconfig.d/6
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~for n in 3 4 5; do echo busybox $n; busybox sort -n -k$n
-t/ foo; echo gnu
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
On 6/14/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eddy Petrişor wrote:
Hello all,
I have
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:36:36 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:58:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 351612 debian-installer-manual
Bug#351612: debian-installer: Appendix D needs to describe how to make secure
apt happy
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:58:34 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:18:32 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 299745 installation-reports
Bug#299745: Drivers for newer G5 PowerMacs missing
Bug#292951: not detecting cdrom on iMac G5
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:13:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 259007 installation-reports
Bug#259007: [i386][beta4][netinst] Fails to detect PCMCIA network cards
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to `installation-reports'.
End of
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:27:01 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line think this is fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
severity 250823 wishlist
Bug#250823: user not prompted to insert pcmcia hardware
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:17:51 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Another question is whether removing it breaks anything else. I remember
there have been some non-obvious dependencies between other things and
usbutils.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:01:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line long fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
severity 275108 wishlist
Bug#275108: better resource range guessing via dmidata
Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
retitle 225802 disk device names not persistant from install to target system
Bug#225802: FWD: Re: Sarge netinst: wrong sequence of SCSI drives
Changed Bug title.
End of message,
On 6/15/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The fix given in #372773 is working for me, too. This seems weird, the
G-I daily worked fine for me around the 18th of May. Is this due to
directfb 0.9.24?
uhm.. afaik daily images are still built with DFB 0.9.21: migration to
DFB
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:08:11 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing old bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:28:03 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing, fixed by new kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 310887 installation-reports
Bug#310887: Does not mount non-root partitions before fs check if other drivers
required
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:20:24 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
severity 279195 minor
Bug#279195: issues when booting 2.4 to install 2.6
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:06:27 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line think this is fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:24:04 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line long fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
severity 283452 wishlist
Bug#283452: needs a way in expect mode to prompt user to make sure all hardware
and modules they want are found and loaded
Severity set to `wishlist' from
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 361774 installation-guide
Bug#361774: debian-installer-guide: which floppies to prepare
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer-manual' to `installation-guide'.
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:21:52 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 231432 installation-reports
Bug#231432: debian-installer-demo: Installer doesn't detect my IDE drive anymore
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to `installation-reports'.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
retitle 295134 disk device names not persistant from install to target system
Bug#295134: USB FDU in same namespace as harddisk breaks bootloaders
Changed Bug title.
End of message,
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:16:06 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 250471 installation-reports
Bug#250471: missing eth1 on Sparc64
Bug reassigned from package `hw-detect' to `installation-reports'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
retitle 308565 disk device names not persistant from install to target system
Bug#308565: usb devices cause misconfiguration of RAID
Changed Bug title.
End of message, stopping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 07:26:31AM -, Debian Wiki wrote:
Dear Wiki user,
You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on Debian Wiki for
change notification.
The following page has been changed by JoeyHess:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
package debian-installer
Ignoring bugs not assigned to: debian-installer
tags 228808 + pending
Bug#228808: installation: gtk frontend
There were no tags set.
Tags added: pending
Geert Stappers wrote:
'''Current issues'''
+ * [14 Jun 06] finish-install has broken installations using etch d-i,
+including beta2 businesscard, floppy, and netboot installs,
+and recent full CD/DVD builds.
| [EMAIL
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:48:56 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing ancient report
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:35:32 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 275581 installation-reports
Bug#275581: Module conflict causes system hanging when CDROM is accessed
Bug reassigned from package `cdrom-detect' to `installation-reports'.
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:34:33 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closong this bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
merge 247960 258316 267168 259264 262140
Bug#247960: CD cache should be deactivated
Bug#258316: installation-reports (Installation Fail caused by CDrom drive)
Bug#259264: Install does
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
merge 247960 258316 267168 259264
Bug#247960: CD cache should be deactivated
Bug#258316: installation-reports (Installation Fail caused by CDrom drive)
Bug#259264: Install does not
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 255369 installation-reports
Bug#255369: installation-reports: TC1 cannot insmod network modules -
installation cycles
Bug reassigned from package `ethdetect' to
Hi all:I have checked the iso with installgui option . The rendering is OK. But on the 1st lines of each page of the install process, the top glyphs are cut and not displayed properly. I have attacted a screenshot and mark it with a black circle. The marked word sud look like:
गर्नुहोस्Hope you
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 256067 installation-reports
Bug#256067: Installation failure
Bug reassigned from package `ethdetect' to `installation-reports'.
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:01:45 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed..
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 255779 installation-reports
Bug#255779: Segmentation fault after choosing wrong network driver
Bug reassigned from package `ethdetect' to `installation-reports'.
End of
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
tags 211032 - pending
Bug#211032: choose-mirror: add optional netselect support to choose-mirror?
There were no tags set.
Bug#231668: choose-mirror: Please use apt-spy for automatic
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:59:28 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:56:00 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
merge 247960 258316 267168 259264 262140 314163
Bug#247960: CD cache should be deactivated
Bug#258316: installation-reports (Installation Fail caused by CDrom drive)
Bug#259264:
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
reassign 242182 installation-reports
Bug#242182: ethdetect: d-i fails to configure Realtek 8139 or VIA VT6103
Bug reassigned from package `ethdetect' to `installation-reports'.
End
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
merge 268950 243857
Bug#243857: problem with 2 cds if one is not a d-i cd
Bug#268950: booting of cd for installation fails to mount with a DVD in another
drive.
Merged 243857 268950.
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
severity 298382 minor
Bug#298382: DVD Installer Detect Network Hardware displays list of IDE
modules.
Severity set to `minor' from `normal'
End of message, stopping processing here.
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 05:04:09 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line seems outdated
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jun 2006 04:58:26 -0400
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.20
merge 247960 258316 267168
Bug#247960: CD cache should be deactivated
Bug#258316: installation-reports (Installation Fail caused by CDrom drive)
Bug#267168: Successful cdrom-detect (w/
This looks like a bug that was fixed some time ago in GTKDFB mainline
source tree.
As soon as GTKDFB 2.8.17 gets packaged, we'll be able to see wheter the
bug has been solved or not.
Attilio
Paras pradhan wrote:
Hi all:
I have checked the iso with installgui option . The rendering is OK.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#300603: choose-mirror: Should not test for root in clean target,
which was filed against the choose-mirror package.
It has been closed by Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Their
[ Sorry for the delay, it seems my last message was lost ]
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 01:46:02PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Robert Millan [ackstorm] wrote:
scsi-extra-modules includes dpt_i2o module, but this is only available on
32bit
platforms. On 64bit, there's no mechanism in d-i to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:59:18PM +0545, Paras pradhan wrote:
Hi all:
I have checked the iso with installgui option . The rendering is OK. But on
the 1st lines of each page of the install process, the top glyphs are cut
and not displayed properly. I have attacted a screenshot and mark it
Georgian seems to be working ok
I noticed Georgian was not among the languages supported by the spellchecker and
fixed that too:
Thanks.
I created screenshots for all supported languages:
Very helpful indeed.
ATM we're using freefont: sorry for not updating the Wiki accordingly: just
Currently none of the partman-auto-lvm recipies allows swap to be placed
on a lvm volume by not setting the $lvmok{ } flag for it.
I'm wondering what the reasons are for this?
In general it should be beneficial to have as many partitions as possible
on LVM (e.g. to allow one to reallocate space
Ok here is the image file. I don't know if it is ok or not, but have a look at it.ftp://202.79.37.177/pub/worddiff.pngThat is the just a example and not typed using the same font that is used in
di.just wanted to tell what the problem looks like.Thanks.Paras.On 6/15/06, Wouter Verhelst [EMAIL
On Thursday 15 June 2006 15:27, David Härdeman wrote:
Currently none of the partman-auto-lvm recipies allows swap to be
placed on a lvm volume by not setting the $lvmok{ } flag for it.
This has been discussed on this list fairly recently.
One major reason seems to be to allow resume swap after
On Thu, June 15, 2006 15:47, Frans Pop said:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 15:27, David Härdeman wrote:
Currently none of the partman-auto-lvm recipies allows swap to be
placed on a lvm volume by not setting the $lvmok{ } flag for it.
This has been discussed on this list fairly recently.
I'm
On Thu, June 15, 2006 15:27, David Härdeman said:
Currently none of the partman-auto-lvm recipies allows swap to be placed
on a lvm volume by not setting the $lvmok{ } flag for it.
I'm wondering what the reasons are for this?
And I forgot to mention, that the reason that I'm asking is that
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:07, David Härdeman wrote:
I'm guessing you meant this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/10/msg01082.html
Yes, that's the one (though I thought it was more recent; time flies...).
One major reason seems to be to allow resume swap after
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:07, David Härdeman wrote:
I'm guessing you meant this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/10/msg01082.html
Yes, that's the one (though I thought it was more recent; time flies...).
One
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:07:55AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
Geert Stappers wrote:
snip/
Does that mean that a build with finish-install as a local-udeb
has the problem fixed? Please confirm or recomment a version(builddate)
to use. (please CC me on this one)
Unless you're building
Thanks, Paras.
The image you attached is not Georgian. I think it is Thai :)
Georgian Unicode range is 10d0 - 10f0.
Here is a sample Georgian text:
წვიმა და წვიმის წვეთები ხშირი
წყდებოდა როგორც მწყდებოდა გული
და მე ვტიროდი ვით მეფე ლირი
ლირი ყველასგან მიტოვებული
Accepted:
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3.dsc
to pool/main/s/s390-sysconfig-writer/s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3.dsc
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3.tar.gz
to pool/main/s/s390-sysconfig-writer/s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3.tar.gz
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3_s390.udeb
to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:46:32PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:35:53PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 16:07, David Härdeman wrote:
I'm guessing you meant this thread:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2005/10/msg01082.html
Yes, that's the one
On Thursday 15 June 2006 17:53, David Härdeman wrote:
The question is which arches do not use initramfs-tools?
All arches use initramfs-tools by default. However yaird is an option too.
pgp4e4vUKjSZs.pgp
Description: PGP signature
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3_s390.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3.dsc
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3.tar.gz
s390-sysconfig-writer_0.3_s390.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 06:00:56PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote:
On Thursday 15 June 2006 17:53, David Härdeman wrote:
The question is which arches do not use initramfs-tools?
All arches use initramfs-tools by default. However yaird is an option too.
Yes, but does that mean that d-i must
On Thursday 15 June 2006 18:28, David Härdeman wrote:
Yes, but does that mean that d-i must guarantee that every possible
setup will work even if the user later changes the initramfs generation
tool?
Maybe not, but that is not really relevant as selection of yaird is also
an option _during_
Hi all,
I think that the situation with my commit access to the d-i svn repo is
getting burdersome and over ridiculous.
I have in the past few weeks made every effort to be nice to Frans, both on irc,
and in mailing list, the only exception that could be considered as anything
but nice would be
No, I'm afraid the screen quality of ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts
(especially BPG Glaho in that package) is much better. Georgian
portion of Freenfont does not conain any seirous hinting and the
Georgian looks pretty bad. And, of course, first impression is very
important :)
So, actually, we
That doesn't really help; all I see are six square, indicative of
nonexistant letters.
Actually, if you have the right font, you would have seen properly
written Devanagari script:)
But, of course, *showing* us the important topic was important and you
were right by asking for the
On Sunday 11 June 2006 20:04, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
I'm unable to reproduce this with 0.102 in a normal (ie. non-d-i)
environment:
I can still reproduce the problem during an installation though...
configdb is here set up to be my normal debconf database (so I have
some source data to
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 05:48:58PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
No, I'm afraid the screen quality of ttf-bpg-georgian-fonts
(especially BPG Glaho in that package) is much better. Georgian
portion of Freenfont does not conain any seirous hinting and the
Georgian looks pretty bad. And, of
Quoting Christian Perrier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
So, actually, we should really request for a udeb for that
font. Davide, doyou take care of this (after checking whether we
didn't *already* request for one...:))
Already done: #356333.
We might need to add some puch for Matthew to add this
choose-mirror_2.02_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
choose-mirror_2.02.dsc
choose-mirror_2.02.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.02_all.udeb
choose-mirror-bin_2.02_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Accepted:
partman-lvm_38.dsc
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_38.dsc
partman-lvm_38.tar.gz
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_38.tar.gz
partman-lvm_38_all.udeb
to pool/main/p/partman-lvm/partman-lvm_38_all.udeb
Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Thank you for
Accepted:
apt-cdrom-setup_0.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-cdrom-setup_0.11_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-mirror-setup_0.11_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.11_all.udeb
to pool/main/a/apt-setup/apt-setup-udeb_0.11_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.11.dsc
to
Accepted:
choose-mirror-bin_2.02_i386.udeb
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror-bin_2.02_i386.udeb
choose-mirror_2.02.dsc
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.02.dsc
choose-mirror_2.02.tar.gz
to pool/main/c/choose-mirror/choose-mirror_2.02.tar.gz
choose-mirror_2.02_all.udeb
apt-setup_0.11_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.11.dsc
apt-setup_0.11.tar.gz
apt-setup-udeb_0.11_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.11_all.udeb
apt-cdrom-setup_0.11_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
partman-lvm_38_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-lvm_38.dsc
partman-lvm_38.tar.gz
partman-lvm_38_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
(please only public answers. No /msg on IRC))
Sven, There are (were?) people in the D-I team who are (were?) still
hoping that one way to solve this situation can be found.
Up to today, I was still in the mood of putting some hope that you
would understand that your current conflict with
Do not ignore me please,
I found your email somewhere and now decided to write you.
I ama coming to your place in few weeks and thought we
can meet each other. Let me know if you do not mind.
I am a nice pretty girl. Don't reply to this email.
Email me direclty at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
