Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It would be nice if you could clarify why do you believe it is
nonsense.
No thanks. I see no reason why _I_ should make that effort.
Please stop that hostility.
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Improve udeb migration
--
The release team is working on a migration script which, among other
tasks, will implement dedicated features for udeb migration. It is not
clear yet whether that script (or the udeb part) would need to
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of alternatives.
I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will be
gone by June.
This is a heads up mail for the D-I
Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Luk Claes (l...@debian.org):
Improve udeb migration
--
The release team is working on a migration script which, among other
tasks, will implement dedicated features for udeb migration. It is not
clear yet whether that script (or the
In general followup to this and mostly because I think we don't need a
flamewar here, I've amended the meeting report to:
==
A proposal was made to upload the installation guide more often, which
Otavio volunteered for. However, post-meeting, Frans Pop
On Monday 06 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
I think s/uploads/updates + uploads/ is what they had in mind. I also
think the part about translation updates is only to not wait for them,
not to just skip them.
Yes, I understood that. And IMHSHO that would be a serious mistake: an
empty change for
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of alternatives.
I think that last part is debatable.
I do not have time to manage the
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
In general followup to this and mostly because I think we don't need a
flamewar here, I've amended the meeting report to:
==
A proposal was made to upload the installation guide more often, which
Otavio
On Mon Apr 06 08:55, Frans Pop wrote:
This is a heads up mail for the D-I team.
I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
discussed on d-devel, especially since it impacts more than just D-I. I
suspect there are quite a few packages that make some sort of
Ping.
RAID 1 array exists.
RAID 1 array is partitionable.
RAID 1 array has had an ext3 fs on it 2 years.
Partman sees RAID 1 array.
Partman sees RAID 1 array partition.
Partman does not see any filesystem.
Debian not installable unless I delete data?
The only solution is to erase half the
Matthew Johnson mj...@debian.org writes:
On Mon Apr 06 08:55, Frans Pop wrote:
This is a heads up mail for the D-I team.
I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
discussed on d-devel, especially since it impacts more than just D-I. I
suspect there are
On Mon Apr 06 11:07, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So lets get grub2 working everywhere. :) A worthy goal.
Sure, but don't remove lilo until we're happy that grub2 does work
everywhere.
Matt
--
Matthew Johnson
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
[...]
This is not about preferring my way, but about properly discussing
changes with the current de facto maintainer and official RM instead of
blundering blindly about and making random changes without any
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will
be gone by June.
Has the package already been offered for adoption? Preferably with an
overview of its current (upstream)
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Hey, let's make one thing clear OK; You're de facto the maintainer and
the RM of the installer manual and I fully agree with that but please
realise that the manual is part of Debian Installer project.
Sure, but that does not change anything.
Hi Frans,
On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
[1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one aspect of
doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something that you really
*must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to explain what it is in this
thread.
that's
On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
[1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one aspect
of
doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something that you really
*must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to explain what it is in this
thread.
that's hillarious.
On Monday 06 April 2009, Holger Levsen wrote:
On Montag, 6. April 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
[1] No, I'm not just talking here. There really is at least one
aspect of doing uploads that is totally non-obvious, but something
that you really *must* be aware of. And no, I'm not going to explain
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of alternatives.
I think that last part is debatable.
I do not have time
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 06:42 +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of alternatives.
I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 10:44 -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
[...]
I do not have time to manage the removal at this point, but it will
be gone by June.
Has the package already been offered for
William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for removal anyway due to being unmaintained upstream and
the widespread availability of
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:13:32AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
And, I think this should be mentioned as a release goal (dropping
lilo). Either high priority if we have install paths depending on
lilo, or normal priority otherwise.
I agree here too. I think these install paths could be
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:40 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
William Pitcock wrote:
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:26 +0200, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting William Pitcock (neno...@dereferenced.org):
lilo is due for
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 08:53 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 10:13:32AM -0500, William Pitcock wrote:
And, I think this should be mentioned as a release goal (dropping
lilo). Either high priority if we have install paths depending on
lilo, or normal priority
debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.deb
debian-installer-images_20070308etch4_ia64.tar.gz
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Quoting Frans Pop (elen...@planet.nl):
I'm not sure where the original mail comes from, but IMO this should be
From lilo package BTS which I was tracking for l10n purposes. So I
just happened to notice William's answer to a bug report and thought
it would be good for this to be discussed in
Mapping oldstable to oldstable-proposed-updates.
Accepted:
debian-installer-images_20070308etch4_ia64.tar.gz byhand
debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.deb
to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20070308etch4_ia64.deb
Changes: debian-installer (20070308etch4) oldstable; urgency=low
.
win32-loader_0.6.11_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
win32-loader_0.6.11.dsc
win32-loader_0.6.11.tar.gz
win32-loader_0.6.11_all.deb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Accepted:
win32-loader_0.6.11.dsc
to pool/main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.11.dsc
win32-loader_0.6.11.tar.gz
to pool/main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.11.tar.gz
win32-loader_0.6.11_all.deb
to pool/main/w/win32-loader/win32-loader_0.6.11_all.deb
Override entries for your package:
Your message dated Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:17:03 +
with message-id e1lqujb-0005nw...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#520999: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #520999,
regarding [INTL:kk] Kazakh debconf templates translation
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:17:03 +
with message-id e1lqujb-0005nu...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#517174: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #517174,
regarding win32-loader: FTBFS: error: exdll.h: No such file or directory
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Mon, 06 Apr 2009 19:17:03 +
with message-id e1lqujb-0005ny...@ries.debian.org
and subject line Bug#522653: fixed in win32-loader 0.6.11
has caused the Debian Bug report #522653,
regarding win32-loader: [INTL:ru] Russian program translation update
to be marked as done.
This
This one time, at band camp, William Pitcock said:
The only way it is feasible to do so is to drop all of the Debian
patches. Without this, upstream is not cooperative with us.
Why is this?
--
-
| ,''`.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05-04-2009 23:20, Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 06 April 2009, Otavio Salvador wrote:
[...]
As you can see on the meeting minutes nobody has objected to it...
I think that's primarily because nobody had an opinion on it as so far
nobody has
Hi,
Can openssl 0.9.8g-16 be hinted to testing?
It fixes a security issue.
It has a udeb.
Kurt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Monday 06 April 2009, Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) wrote:
[...] I'm unsure if he trust me enough to do an upload if
needed (or if D-I Team also sees me as the backup guy for
D-I Manual).
trust is the wrong word here.
Currently I would not like you to do a release without me being
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version: 5.00 NetInst
Date: April 6, 2009
Machine: VirtualBox VM running on Compaq Presario SR2038X on Windows Vista
Processor: AMD Athlon64 X2
Memory:356 MB allocated
Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please
Your message dated Tue, 7 Apr 2009 04:50:36 +0200
with message-id 200904070450.38699.elen...@planet.nl
and subject line Re: Bug#522864: installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #522864,
regarding installation-reports
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
On Monday 06 April 2009, Samuel Thibault wrote:
(I don't do this that often either; grep in existing docs is your
friend.)
Yes, it doesn't work very well in the installation guide, but it does
in the release notes indeed.
Well, it works for me even for the manual :-)
Here is an updated
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009, Matthew Johnson wrote:
On Mon Apr 06 11:07, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
So lets get grub2 working everywhere. :) A worthy goal.
Sure, but don't remove lilo until we're happy that grub2 does work
everywhere.
And that we have something resembling acceptable, up-to-date
42 matches
Mail list logo
