(2/3) Reiser4 version 4.0.1 -enabled patches for Debian Installer
components and/or userland utilities:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> Niltze, all-
>
> I have been building iterations of Debian-Installer (d-i) enhanced
> with Reiser4 4.0.1 kernel, disk
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 07:41 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:39:35 +0100
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
> > The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the fifth alpha
> > release of the installer for Debian 9 "Stretch".
> >
> >
> > Important change in
Your message dated Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:56:01 -0800
with message-id <20160111085601.ga2...@jirafa.cyrius.com>
and subject line Fixed
has caused the Debian Bug report #793426,
regarding Root partition maximum is too small in 'multi' recipes
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
(3/3) Reiser4 version 4.0.1 -enabled patches for Debian Installer
components and/or userland utilities:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> Niltze, all-
>
> I have been building iterations of Debian-Installer (d-i) enhanced
> with Reiser4 4.0.1 kernel, disk
(1/3) Reiser4 version 4.0.1 -enabled patches for Debian Installer
components and/or userland utilities:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> Niltze, all-
>
> I have been building iterations of Debian-Installer (d-i) enhanced
> with Reiser4 4.0.1 kernel, disk
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 809476 flash-kernel
Bug #809476 [linux] Linux 4.4-rc6 fails to boot on QNAP TS-109
Bug reassigned from package 'linux' to 'flash-kernel'.
No longer marked as found in versions 4.4~rc6-1~exp1.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of
apt-setup_0.108_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.108.dsc
apt-setup_0.108.tar.xz
apt-cdrom-setup_0.108_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.108_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.108_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:09:35 +0100
Source: apt-setup
Binary: apt-setup-udeb apt-mirror-setup apt-cdrom-setup
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1:0.108
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install
partman-nbd_0.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
partman-nbd_0.33.dsc
partman-nbd_0.33.tar.xz
partman-nbd_0.33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
partman-nbd_0.33_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
partman-nbd_0.33.dsc
partman-nbd_0.33.tar.xz
partman-nbd_0.33_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:03:40 +0100
Source: tzsetup
Binary: tzsetup-udeb
Architecture: source all
Version: 1:0.82
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> Le Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:31:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
>>
>> I started a discussion on the debian-backports mailing list. Let's see how
>> it
>> goes.
>>
>>
On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 00:14 -0500, Brian Gupta wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 28, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Charles Plessy wrote:
> > Le Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 10:31:14PM +0900, Charles Plessy a écrit :
> >>
> >> I started a discussion on the debian-backports mailing list. Let's see
> >> how it
>
apt-setup_0.108_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
apt-setup_0.108.dsc
apt-setup_0.108.tar.xz
apt-cdrom-setup_0.108_all.udeb
apt-mirror-setup_0.108_all.udeb
apt-setup-udeb_0.108_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 06:53:13 +0100
Source: partman-nbd
Binary: partman-nbd
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.33
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
tzsetup_0.82_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
tzsetup_0.82.dsc
tzsetup_0.82.tar.xz
tzsetup-udeb_0.82_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org)
tzsetup_0.82_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
tzsetup_0.82.dsc
tzsetup_0.82.tar.xz
tzsetup-udeb_0.82_all.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
On Tue, 5 Jan 2016 19:19:41 +0100 Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Just my +1
>
> Francesco Poli, on Tue 05 Jan 2016 19:00:30 +0100, wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Anyway, the things will work even without such checks, so maybe your
> > > proposed solution can be used unchanged after all...
> >
> > Hello
(Bonus) Reiser4 version 4.0.1 -enabled patch for Debian Linux kernel
packaging:
On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Jose R R wrote:
> Niltze, all-
>
> I have been building iterations of Debian-Installer (d-i) enhanced
> with Reiser4 4.0.1 kernel, disk and filesystem
Hi Philip,
On Sun, 10 Jan 2016, Philip Hands wrote:
> BTW would you happen to know if the example for checksums on CDs is
> relevant any more?
>
> - if you're booting a remastered CD:
> preseed/file=/cdrom/preseed.cfg
> preseed/file/checksum=5da499872becccfeda2c4872f9171c3d
>
> which
Raphael Hertzog writes:
> Hi Philip,
>
> On Sun, 10 Jan 2016, Philip Hands wrote:
>> BTW would you happen to know if the example for checksums on CDs is
>> relevant any more?
>>
>> - if you're booting a remastered CD:
>> preseed/file=/cdrom/preseed.cfg
>>
Adam Wilson, on Mon 11 Jan 2016 19:04:40 +0300, wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:39:45 +0100
> Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > Adam Wilson, on Mon 11 Jan 2016 18:32:53 +0300, wrote:
> > > This
> > > (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-compat.en.html#s-arches)
> > >
Adam Wilson, on Mon 11 Jan 2016 18:32:53 +0300, wrote:
> This (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-compat.en.html#s-arches)
> is somewhat misleading then, as it seems to give the impression that Debian's
> i386 will run on actual 386es, which is not the case. Shouldn't this be
>
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:22:21 +0100
Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Adam Wilson (2016-01-11):
> > This is somewhat off-topic, but why was ReiserFS support removed
> > from d-i? I am a big fan of Reiser3 personally, but I use XFS now.
>
> In linux's changelog:
> |
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:39:45 +0100
Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Adam Wilson, on Mon 11 Jan 2016 18:32:53 +0300, wrote:
> > This
> > (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-compat.en.html#s-arches)
> > is somewhat misleading then, as it seems to give the impression
> >
On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 16:39 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Adam Wilson, on Mon 11 Jan 2016 18:32:53 +0300, wrote:
> > This
> > (http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-faq/ch-compat.en.html#s-arches)
> > is somewhat misleading then, as it seems to give the impression that
> > Debian's
> > i386
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016 10:48:30 +
Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 07:41 +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> > On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:39:35 +0100
> > Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >
> > > The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the fifth
base-installer_1.160_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
base-installer_1.160.dsc
base-installer_1.160.tar.xz
base-installer_1.160_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.160_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 07:01:58PM +0300, Adam Wilson wrote:
> Why was Reiser3 phased out? It wasn't *grossly* unstable or anything,
> and despite lack of maintenance it was still a good little filesystem
> that could have stayed for longer.
I had plenty of silent data corruptions with reiser 3.6
base-installer_1.160_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
base-installer_1.160.dsc
base-installer_1.160.tar.xz
base-installer_1.160_all.udeb
bootstrap-base_1.160_i386.udeb
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)
Adam Wilson (2016-01-11):
> Why was Reiser3 phased out? It wasn't *grossly* unstable or anything,
> and despite lack of maintenance it was still a good little filesystem
> that could have stayed for longer.
>
> And why UFS? It may be obsolete, but I should think it would be
>
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 07:20:53 +0100
Source: base-installer
Binary: base-installer bootstrap-base
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 1.160
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > [ Initially a debian-boot vs. debian-www topic but I think
> > vote.debian.org might be having a similar issue. ]
> >
> > Holger Wansing
Hi,
Holger Wansing (2016-01-11):
> Holger Wansing wrote:
> > I have just committed this for the german d-i errata:
> >
> >
> > --- errata.wml 28 Oct 2015 20:18:01 - 1.117
> > +++ errata.wml 5 Dec 2015 22:08:26 -
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7
34 matches
Mail list logo