debootstrap_1.0.81~bpo8+1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into jessie-backports

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 02:34:39 +0200 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.81~bpo8+1 Distribution: jessie-backports Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System

Bug#750586: website design

Good day I'm Thomas Allen,am hearing impaired.i would love to know if you can handle website design for a new company and also if you do, you accept credit cards? kindly get back to me ASAP so i can send you the job details. Regards

Re: Future of ttf-cjk-compact

On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 19:07:38 +0900 Kenshi Muto wrote: > Well, I would like to drop ttf-cjk-compact rather than keeping in > debian-boot and VCS, and would like to call better solution. Now droid font replaces ttf-cjk-compact, it seems that it is time to file RM request. If

Re: Update backport for debootstrap 1.0.81

On May 21, 2016 7:48 PM, "Cyril Brulebois" wrote: > It took longer than expected (D-I Stretch Alpha 6 wasn't working > exactly immediately), but I've just uploaded a debootstrap backport > to jessie-backports, after checking it seems to work for yakshavy. You mean yakkety? :P

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.81~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

debootstrap_1.0.81~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.81~bpo8+1.dsc debootstrap_1.0.81~bpo8+1.tar.gz debootstrap_1.0.81~bpo8+1_all.deb debootstrap-udeb_1.0.81~bpo8+1_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Re: Update backport for debootstrap 1.0.81

Cyril Brulebois (2016-05-14): > Vagrant Cascadian (2016-05-13): > > Anyone have time to update the backport for debootstrap 1.0.81? > > > > One obvious feature that may be useful is support for newer Ubuntu > > releases. > > (Letting debian-boot@ know.) >

Re: stretch installer question

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 12:13:10PM -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote: >Is the package selection section of the stretch installer as broken in all >versions as it is in the x86_64 version of firmware testing iso? I preserved >logs but once installation was finished and system rebooted, ssh was nowhere

Re: Bug#824885: override: debconf-i18n:localization/important

Ansgar Burchardt (2016-05-20): > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > [ For after the d-i alpha currently in preparation ] > > Please consider demoting debconf-i18n from required to important. > debconf now only recommends it instead of having a strict dependency >

Re: Status of https preseed support?

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 02:47:20PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > For instance, instead of "auto url=https://example.org/;, > perhaps just "auto s=example.org"? I want preseeding from signed git tags! :) Signed with a key in the Debian keyring would be a nice start… auto

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 12:09:06AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [...] Sure, we can come up with a new way to do it, but > my point is that we are using this feature of tasksel today, and there > is no alternative I know of that is equally robust and well integrated > into the installer.

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

[Cyril Brulebois] > There's no udebs involved in what I summarized for Blends. Exactly. I suspect using udebs to enable blends is be a better idea than making the Blends tasksel tasks priority standard. > Also: If pkgsel changes the way it calls tasksel, debian-edu udebs can > certainly

Status of https preseed support?

wget now provides a wget-udeb, linked against libssl-udeb, to support https URLs. What's the next step needed for d-i preseeding to support https? I'm interested in helping to make sure this goes in prior to the next stable release. If possible, I'd also like to see preseed pass an extra HTTP

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

[Cyril Brulebois] > I'm very much not happy with tasksel's picking up whatever people have > managed to get into a basic system, and I would very much prefer if it > would only look at its own debian-tasks.desc when running from the > installer. Any objections? Yes. Debian Edu uses the current

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

Petter Reinholdtsen (2016-05-21): > [Cyril Brulebois] > > I'm very much not happy with tasksel's picking up whatever people have > > managed to get into a basic system, and I would very much prefer if it > > would only look at its own debian-tasks.desc when running from the > >

Debian Installer Stretch Alpha 6 release

The Debian Installer team[1] is pleased to announce the sixth alpha release of the installer for Debian 9 "Stretch". Important changes in this release of the installer == * This release fixes the package installation issue which appeared

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

Cyril Brulebois (2016-05-21): > I'm very much not happy with tasksel's picking up whatever people have > managed to get into a basic system, and I would very much prefer if it > would only look at its own debian-tasks.desc when running from the > installer. Any objections? As a

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

"blend" is. OK; so that's not just me. > We've worked hard for years to improve the installation experience and I > fear the new tasksel selection will add a lot of confusion for users. For now, I've added a mention about the new (possibly temporary) behaviour regarding taskse

Re: Bug#758116: Allow to select Blends selection during installation - just "DE", "Web server", "Mail server" is NOT enough

* Christian Perrier [2016-05-18 07:25]: > I still remember Joey's objections about *not* having users forced > to choose between desktop environmentsbecause, contrary to what > the average geek thinks, most people have no idea about what is a > desktop environment. So,

Bug#824954: flash-kernel: please provide a way to integrate with GRUB

Package: flash-kernel Version: 3.66 Severity: wishlist Hi, I have an ODROID XU4 (a SBC based on Exynos5422). Since I'm one of those PC people that would like everything to work like my PC does, I use GRUB on it (plus, it gives me a nice boot menu when I can choose older kernels or rescue mode,

Upcoming stable point release (8.5)

Hi, The next point release for "jessie" (8.5) is scheduled for Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into jessie-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Cheers, Julien

Upcoming oldstable point release (7.11)

Hi, The next (and last) point release for "wheezy" (7.11) is scheduled for Saturday, June 4th. Processing of new uploads into wheezy-proposed-updates will be frozen during the preceding weekend. Cheers, Julien

Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable

Version: 0.58+rm Dear submitter, as the package partitioner has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/824880 The

Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable

We believe that the bug you reported is now fixed; the following package(s) have been removed from unstable: partitioner | 0.58 | source, mips --- Reason --- ROM; obsolete -- Note that the package(s) have simply

Bug#273880: marked as done (relies on DEBIAN_FRONTEND values)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #273880, regarding relies on DEBIAN_FRONTEND values to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#218601: marked as done (selected disk should advance as disks are partitioned)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #218601, regarding selected disk should advance as disks are partitioned to be marked as done.

Bug#220118: marked as done (partitioner: should integrate with autopartkit)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #220118, regarding partitioner: should integrate with autopartkit to be marked as done. This

Bug#230511: marked as done (confusing if shown filesystems exist or get created)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #230511, regarding confusing if shown filesystems exist or get created to be marked as done. This

Bug#224904: marked as done (partitioner: Managing smartarray and probably other block devices)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #224904, regarding partitioner: Managing smartarray and probably other block devices to be marked

Bug#234312: marked as done (Please mention hd{a,b,c} etc names of harddisks)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #234312, regarding Please mention hd{a,b,c} etc names of harddisks to be marked as done. This

Bug#231137: marked as done (partitioner: Does not allow backing up)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #231137, regarding partitioner: Does not allow backing up to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#218598: marked as done (partconf and partitioner use varying ways of describing the same disks)

Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2016 17:14:42 + with message-id and subject line Bug#824880: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #218598, regarding partconf and partitioner use varying ways of describing the same disks to be

stretch installer question

Is the package selection section of the stretch installer as broken in all versions as it is in the x86_64 version of firmware testing iso? I preserved logs but once installation was finished and system rebooted, ssh was nowhere to be found on the new system. I may be able to copy the

Re: 8.5 and 7.11 planning

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 20:20:28 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > Hi, > > with wheezy EOL, we should get a final point release out. In order to > avoid version skew, it'd be good to have a jessie point release around > the same time, so if that works for everyone let's do them both on the > same

Re: [RFC] Call for review of GNU/screen support for D-I (was Re: Merge orion5x/kirkwood to flavour marvell and marvell-qnap)

Dear Rick, Thanks for your testing report! On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rick Thomas wrote: > > Hi Roger, > > I got a chance to try it on my SheevaPlug. > > Executive summary: It worked as advertised and all the features you mentioned > seem to work (except I didn’t try