debootstrap_1.0.95_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:28:26 +0900 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.95 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.95_amd64.changes

debootstrap_1.0.95_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.95.dsc debootstrap_1.0.95.tar.gz debootstrap-udeb_1.0.95_all.udeb debootstrap_1.0.95_all.deb debootstrap_1.0.95_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Bug#894415: marked as done (debootstrap: 11: .: Can't open /debootstrap/debian-common)

Your message dated Sat, 31 Mar 2018 05:04:23 + with message-id and subject line Bug#894415: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.95 has caused the Debian Bug report #894415, regarding debootstrap: 11: .: Can't open /debootstrap/debian-common to be marked as done.

Accepted debootstrap 1.0.95 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 13:28:26 +0900 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.95 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 15:19:52 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Great, thanks. Please push the tags for the previous uploads too? Now pushed :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp

Re: Driver for Debian GNU/Linux 7.5.0

On Fri, 2018-03-30 at 22:11 +0200, elladar...@gmx.net wrote: > Good evening, > > I installed Debian on an old Laptop. The Installation asks for two dates > "rt2870.bin" and "ipw220-bss.fw". > I could't find them to download. Can you send them to me? If you want, you > can tell me how much I

Driver for Debian GNU/Linux 7.5.0

Good evening, I installed Debian on an old Laptop. The Installation asks for two dates "rt2870.bin" and "ipw220-bss.fw". I could't find them to download. Can you send them to me? If you want, you can tell me how much I have to pay. Best regards Rolf Vidal --- Ich habe diese Nachricht mit

Processed: reopen 894415

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reopen 894415 Bug #894415 {Done: Hideki Yamane } [debootstrap] debootstrap: 11: .: Can't open /debootstrap/debian-common 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be

debootstrap_1.0.94_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 21:41:52 +0900 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.94 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Bug#894415: marked as done (debootstrap: 11: .: Can't open /debootstrap/debian-common)

Your message dated Fri, 30 Mar 2018 13:20:40 + with message-id and subject line Bug#894415: fixed in debootstrap 1.0.94 has caused the Debian Bug report #894415, regarding debootstrap: 11: .: Can't open /debootstrap/debian-common to be marked as done.

Processing of debootstrap_1.0.94_amd64.changes

debootstrap_1.0.94_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debootstrap_1.0.94.dsc debootstrap_1.0.94.tar.gz debootstrap-udeb_1.0.94_all.udeb debootstrap_1.0.94_all.deb debootstrap_1.0.94_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running

Accepted debootstrap 1.0.94 (source all) into unstable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2018 21:41:52 +0900 Source: debootstrap Binary: debootstrap debootstrap-udeb Architecture: source all Version: 1.0.94 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:24:27 +0200 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > debootstrap can be run on a non-Debian system and should not assume that > apt-config is available. I would suggest to protect this code with > a check of the existence of apt-config. You're right. Then, how about

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

Hi, Hideki Yamane (2018-03-30): > On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:07:28 +0200 > Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I don't really get why you serial-NMU debootstrap instead of just pushing to > > the repository and adding yourself as an uploader? > > I was not aware

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 18:07:28 +0200 Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I don't really get why you serial-NMU debootstrap instead of just pushing to > the repository and adding yourself as an uploader? I was not aware that I can push it to repo. Now I've added myself to uploaders and

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

Hi, On Wed, 28 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > From: Michael Vogt > Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 15:36:58 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH 09/13] try to auto-detect proxy if available > > --- a/debootstrap > +++ b/debootstrap > @@ -49,6 +49,17 @@ PRIVATEKEY="" >

Bug#894442: Installation was successfully at Acer Asire One

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB Drive Image version: Self-made ISO image with current installer from testing Date: 2018-03-30 Machine: Netbook Acer Aspire One 532h Processor: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N450 @ 1.66GHz Memory: 1GB

Bug#894428: Installation was successfully with Daily build

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Package: installation-reports Boot method: USB Drive Image version: Self-made ISO image with current installer from testing Date: 2018-03-30 Machine: Self-made Desktop PC with AMD A10 Processor: AMD A10-5700 APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics Memory: