Processed: your mail

2018-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 872059 +pending Bug #872059 [debootstrap] No longer creates /dev/console. Added tag(s) pending. > tags 872577 +pending Bug #872577 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Handle existing /dev Added tag(s) pending. > tags 698677 +pending Bug #698677

Processed: your mail

2018-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 563647 +pending Bug #563647 [debootstrap] debootstrap: manpage neglects complete path for --unpack-tarball Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 563647:

Processed: reassign 894673 to wnpp, reassign 894231 to installation-reports

2018-04-03 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 894673 wnpp Bug #894673 [adapta-gtk-theme] RFP:RequestForPackage: adapta-gtk-theme Warning: Unknown package 'adapta-gtk-theme' Bug reassigned from package 'adapta-gtk-theme' to 'wnpp'. No longer marked as found in versions

nobootloader_1.52_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2018-04-03 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:19:21 +0200 Source: nobootloader Binary: nobootloader Architecture: source Version: 1.52 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

network-console_1.77_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2018-04-03 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:55:09 +0200 Source: network-console Binary: network-console Architecture: source Version: 1.77 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Accepted nobootloader 1.52 (source) into unstable

2018-04-03 Thread Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 18:19:21 +0200 Source: nobootloader Binary: nobootloader Architecture: source Version: 1.52 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By:

Processing of nobootloader_1.52_source.changes

2018-04-03 Thread Debian FTP Masters
nobootloader_1.52_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: nobootloader_1.52.dsc nobootloader_1.52.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Processing of network-console_1.77_source.changes

2018-04-03 Thread Debian FTP Masters
network-console_1.77_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: network-console_1.77.dsc network-console_1.77.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)

Accepted network-console 1.77 (source) into unstable

2018-04-03 Thread Christian Perrier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 06:55:09 +0200 Source: network-console Binary: network-console Architecture: source Version: 1.77 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team

Bug#563647: debootstrap: manpage neglects complete path for

2018-04-03 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:14:15 +0100 Justin B Rye wrote: > Yes, this is an improvement if it might use HTTPS, though not if it > will always use HTTP. debootstrap work depends on mirror and it use both HTTP and HTTPS by default. > But you missed the equivalent text in

Bug#563647: debootstrap: manpage neglects complete path for

2018-04-03 Thread Justin B Rye
Hideki Yamane wrote: >> If I was doing a pedantic review of every bit of debootstrap's >> documentation and output I'd suggest replacing "http(s)" with >> "HTTP(S)" throughout, but there's no point doing that just here. > > I can find only one "via http" word, as below. Is it okay? Well, I was

Bug#563647: debootstrap: manpage neglects complete path for

2018-04-03 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi, On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 12:30:34 +0100 Justin B Rye wrote: > > Could you review below messages in deboostrap manpage, please? > > Looks good to me. Thanks! > If I was doing a pedantic review of every bit of debootstrap's > documentation and output I'd suggest

Bug#563647: debootstrap: manpage neglects complete path for

2018-04-03 Thread Justin B Rye
Hideki Yamane wrote: > Could you review below messages in deboostrap manpage, please? Looks good to me. > > On Wed, 21 Mar 2018 17:36:07 +0900 Hideki Yamane > wrote: >> Here's a proposed patch for it. >> >> diff --git a/debootstrap b/debootstrap >> index

Bug#563647: debootstrap: manpage neglects complete path for

2018-04-03 Thread Hideki Yamane
--unpack-tarball Message-Id: <20180403194408.2fe90c84d510e7c600c25...@iijmio-mail.jp> In-Reply-To: <20180321173607.98899f6a4719754b42d41...@iijmio-mail.jp> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.7.0 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

2018-04-03 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:53:45 +0200 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > +if [ -e /usr/bin/apt-config ]; then > > In case like this, you usually use "-x" to ensure it's also executable. Thanks :) -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

2018-04-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Tue, 03 Apr 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > +if [ -e /usr/bin/apt-config ]; then In case like this, you usually use "-x" to ensure it's also executable. > +eval $(apt-config shell AUTOPROXY Acquire::http::ProxyAutoDetect) > +if [ -z "$http_proxy" ] && [ -x "$AUTOPROXY" ]; then > +

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

2018-04-03 Thread Hideki Yamane
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 11:20:43 +0200 Raphael Hertzog wrote: > In most postinst snippets, it is used like this: > > if which apt-config >/dev/null 2>&1; then > > I don't see the need for a sub-shell. I've tried which command on NetBSD, it failed. So just check "test -e"

Re: debootstrap 1.0.93+nmu5

2018-04-03 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Fri, 30 Mar 2018, Hideki Yamane wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 14:24:27 +0200 > Raphael Hertzog wrote: > > debootstrap can be run on a non-Debian system and should not assume that > > apt-config is available. I would suggest to protect this code with > > a check of the