Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2022 18:23:09 +0100
Source: debootstrap
Architecture: source
Version: 1.0.127+nmu1~bpo11+1
Distribution: bullseye-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
Changed-By: Luca Boccassi
On 10/3/22 02:23, Charles Plessy wrote:
Le Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 12:33:20AM +0200, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit :
I can live with an APT hook warning me if I have non-free but not
non-free-firmware, but I would prefer to even do without that.
In addition, how about distributing the firmware in both
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Plus, as Shengjing Zhu points out: we already expect people to manage
the sources.list anyway on upgrades.
We also try to avoid silent install problems that might or might not
result in a system that doesn't boot properly.
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 12:26:29PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:53:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> > >What's the plan for upgraded systems with an existing
> > >/etc/apt/sources.list.
> > >Will the new n-f-f section added on upgrades automatically(if non-free was
On Mon, Oct 03, 2022 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Not even replace "stable/updates" with "stable-security" during the upgrade
> from buster to bullseye ?
Hmm I don't recall but I suppose it just wasn't very memorable to do it.
At least it would have given an error fetching the
On 03/10/2022 at 01:00, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 08:21:31PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Plus, as Shengjing Zhu points out: we already expect people to manage
the sources.list anyway on upgrades.
People that just have 'stable' in their sources.list haven't had to
do
Steve McIntyre (2022-10-02):
> + ftpsync (?)
I don't think that's needed. Using buster's and more recently bullseye's
version, I have this locally:
drwxr-xr-x 4 mirror mirror 4096 Jul 19 04:16
/srv/mirrors/debian/dists/bookworm/non-free-firmware/by-hash/
which matches when dak's config
Colin Watson (2022-10-03):
> Done in debmirror 1:2.37. I guess we need to cherry-pick this to
> bullseye too? I know bullseye doesn't have non-free-firmware (which
> is fine, the new debmirror doesn't object), but most people running
> mirrors probably run stable rather than testing.
Thanks
On Sun, Oct 02, 2022 at 03:27:36PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> * Check/add support for the non-free-firmware section in various
> places:
> + debmirror (?)
Done in debmirror 1:2.37. I guess we need to cherry-pick this to
bullseye too? I know bullseye doesn't have non-free-firmware (which
9 matches
Mail list logo
