Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Accepted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 03:33:27 +
Source: debian-installer
Architecture: source
Version: 20230515
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team
debian-installer_20230515_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
debian-installer_20230515.dsc
debian-installer_20230515.tar.xz
debian-installer_20230515_source.buildinfo
Greetings,
Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)
On Sun, 2023-05-14 at 19:40 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> This works for me with all the QEMU graphics devices. But I haven't
> tested on real hardware.
Now tested successfully on 2 custom desktops:
- Asus P8Z68-V LX motherboard, Intel Core i5 2500 CPU, integrated GPU
- ASRock B450 PRO4,
Control: tag -1 patch
On Sun, 2023-05-14 at 00:21 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
[...]
> So I suppose there's a regression in either efifb or fbdev_drv.
I'm not spotting any functional changes in fbdev or the submodules it
depends on between bullseye and bookworm. So this implicates either
efifb
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 patch
Bug #1036019 [debian-installer] debian-installer: Broken X display with QEMU
under UEFI with cirrus and std graphics
Added tag(s) patch.
--
1036019: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036019
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Sun, May 14, 2023 at 12:58:47AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Ernesto,
>
> Ernesto Alfonso (2023-05-13):
> > I'm attempting to setup Debian on a Dell Inspiron All-in-One system,
> > either as dual boot or replacing the existing windows 10 OS.
> >
> > The installer hangs after entering
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-14):
> Also, I should note that while my focus was on netboot-gtk mini.iso
> (because it's much quicker to rebuild/tweak than a netinst image), I'm
> replicating those results with the netinst images:
[…]
> - Bookworm RC 1 has a “text-like” GRUB, all good.
> - Bookworm
Hi,
Richard Hector (2023-05-14):
> Hopefully this is the right, or close enough, place ...
>
> Given that EFI is common, should dosfstools now be a standard package,
> so that we can fsck the partition when required?
>
> Happy to file as a bug, if I know what to file it against.
I'm not
Hi,
Hopefully this is the right, or close enough, place ...
Given that EFI is common, should dosfstools now be a standard package,
so that we can fsck the partition when required?
Happy to file as a bug, if I know what to file it against.
Cheers,
Richard
9 matches
Mail list logo
