Package: console-setup
Version: 1.226
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Since the upgrade to 1.226, I can't open my LUKS root FS beause of broken
initramfs.
I can still boot under 6.6.11 since its initramfs is not updated with latest
tools.
I compared both initramfs and found different
Hi,
Am 14. Februar 2024 09:09:34 MEZ schrieb Cyril Brulebois :
>Besides, I'm very much not sure it's a good idea to have standard be
>listed first. I'd expect people to want to turn desktop environment
>on/off, and be accustomed to have that first. Do we really want to break
>finger memory? Being
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> fixed 953861 1.0.134
Bug #953861 [debootstrap] debootstrap: buildd variant uselessly includes libgcc1
Marked as fixed in versions debootstrap/1.0.134.
>
End of message, stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 942875 moreinfo
Bug #942875 [debootstrap] debootstrap does not overwrite existing files even if
adviced to do
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> fixed 953861 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1
Bug #953861 [debootstrap] debootstrap: buildd variant uselessly
What command are you using to run debootstrap?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This fails on a number of host/target combinations, but not all of them.
A mips64el target, for example, fails every time.
Would the maintainer(s) prefer separate bugs for each arch? The fault(s)
may not lie in the debootstrap package.
debootstrap 1.0.134
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> found 731859 1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1
Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails
Marked as found in versions debootstrap/1.0.128+nmu2+deb12u1.
> fixed 731859 1.0.134
Bug #731859 [debootstrap] debootstrap: variant=fakechroot fails
This should be fixed in the next release.
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/-/commit/7e5923030e331f466ec1b56d875b023a274e9220
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
If that's the case then this is working as intended.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
This is an old one! Does this still occur?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
cp needs the fully-qualified path - not just $0/progname
I've tested this on Bash, Dash, Zsh and Tcsh on Linux and FreeBSD and
${0} already expands to the fully-qualified path. It never expands to
${0}/progname as that would always fail. Can you give and example of
where this fails?
Also
Is this fixed? An s390x chroot can be debootstrapped now but is that due
to a workaround or has this bug been fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> notfound 1006454 1.0.123+deb11u2
Bug #1006454 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Ubuntu 20 creation fails on passwd
configuration
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #1006454 to the same values
previously set
>
End of message, stopping
In Buster+ libsystemd0 gets pulled in but other than that it seems to
work okay. Is this fixed?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> merge 819300 891009
Bug #819300 [debootstrap] should provide default HTTPS mirrors for non-Debian
releases too
Unable to merge bugs because:
severity of #891009 is 'normal' not 'wishlist'
Failed to merge 819300: Did not alter merged bugs.
>
Isn't this what happens now? If I run a foreign debootstrap it completes
automatically on version 1.0.123+deb11u2.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Seems to work fine here running "debootstrap focal focal".
What exact command are you running?
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> i.e. is the the file-loss triggered only by the bad path in the
> dpkg-divert call or is it triggered by the upgrade of dpkg between
> both dpkg-divert calls?
>
> I thought it was the latter... and that would explain why OpenQA is not
> affected, it
Hi Holger,
Am Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 11:43:35PM +0100 schrieb Holger Wansing:
> I would like to push a proposal here on this longstanding topic:
Thanks a lot for supporting this long standing topic which actually
bothers me than 20 years. But Debian is not only about technique it is
also about
(Adding Colin as one of the debian-installer-utils comaintainers)
Hi,
On Tue, 13 Feb 2024, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I also see that https://openqa.debian.net/ has recent successes. dpkg
> migrated to trixie about two weeks ago. I would have expected that this
> breaks an d-i. Do you have an
Hi,
Debian FTP Masters (2024-01-27):
> [ Arnaud Rebillout ]
> * Fix task ordering, and make 'apt install' more deterministic.
That's probably a good idea but seeing how standard that's always been
at the very bottom suddenly pops up at the very top, I think it would
have warranted a slightly
21 matches
Mail list logo
