Hi Diederik,
You're probably right that it deserves a separate bug, but I was trying
to avoid wasting the translators time by doing this in two steps, and
forcing them to do the work twice.
I cannot say that I have read the stuff in these dialogs (except when
editing them) for at least 20 years,
On Thursday, 29 February 2024 23:13:55 CET Holger Wansing wrote:
> > in which I'm recommending setting no password for root, which then gives
> > the initial user 'sudo' membership[1].
>
> What about the "Allow login as root?" question (only shown in expert mode),
> which is asked directly before
Hi,
Philip Hands wrote (Thu, 29 Feb 2024 20:53:10 +0100):
> Depending upon whether we think it's worth using translators' time on
> this subject, we can then select one or both commits, and finally close
> these bugs.
I think it would be worth it to generate some work for translators here, yes.
On 29/02/2024 at 08:51, Frank Weißer wrote:
Comments/Problems: 2nd NIC gets eth0 on reboot, 2nd NIC gets eth1 :-(
eth* names are no persistent and may change at any boot.
But ethernet interface should get predictable names like enpXsY or enoX.
In /proc/interrupts we can see enp1s0.
Pascal Hambourg writes:
> On 25/02/2024 at 01:17, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>>
>> I just did an installation with the 2024-02-24
>> debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso image. I forget the exact wording
>> used, but when setting up a user, d-i printed advice that user passwords
>> should be changed
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 1065033 src:pam
Bug #1065033 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Fails for *sid* with `cannot move
/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpam.so.0 as its destination exists as a symlink`
Bug reassigned from package 'debootstrap' to 'src:pam'.
No longer marked
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist
(Please provide enough information to help the Debian
maintainers evaluate the report efficiently - e.g., by filling
in the sections below.)
Boot method: USB
Image version:
7 matches
Mail list logo
