05.03.2024 03:36, Steven Shiau :
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.134
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
As mentioned here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065394#28
For the moment on Mar/5/2024 in the Debian Sid repository, libuuid1 "Provides:
libuuid1t64 (= 2.39.3-9)",
Package: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.134
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
As mentioned here:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065394#28
For the moment on Mar/5/2024 in the Debian Sid repository, libuuid1
"Provides:
libuuid1t64 (= 2.39.3-9)", and an exact version of
On Monday, 4 March 2024 22:30:57 CET Holger Wansing wrote:
> > https://wiki.debian.org/Passwords doesn't exist (yet), but it's an easy to
> > remember URL and we'd have all the space we need to give proper advise?
>
> Would need to check if that fits in the relevant screens (I want to avoid
>
Hi,
Diederik de Haas wrote (Mon, 04 Mar 2024 15:57:10
+0100):
> On Monday, 4 March 2024 10:43:59 CET Holger Wansing wrote:
> > >Regarding the password advice, I ended up concluding that it's pretty
> > >unlikely that anything we say at this point will have any effect on
> > >people's behaviour,
Hi,
Holger Wansing wrote (Mon, 04 Mar 2024 10:43:59 +0100):
> Hi,
>
> Am 4. März 2024 06:17:31 MEZ schrieb Philip Hands :
> >I found that there were some phrases that I was avoiding for various
> >reasons, a couple of which I see you've used, so I'll say why I was avoiding
> >them and see if I
On Monday, 4 March 2024 10:43:59 CET Holger Wansing wrote:
> >Regarding the password advice, I ended up concluding that it's pretty
> >unlikely that anything we say at this point will have any effect on
> >people's behaviour, but then I'm probably just an old cynic. Also, I
> >failed when trying
Bastian Blank (2024-03-04):
> On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> > be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> > cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part
[ Remove -arm and -release }
Hi
On Sun, Mar 03, 2024 at 09:01:06PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Maybe have it marked Not-For-Us on armel, also requesting the binary to
> be dropped there? And maybe poke the ftp team to have installer-armel/
> cleaned up? (The “disabling daily builds” part
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 09:52:14AM +0100, Gerardo Ballabio wrote:
> Gianluca Renzi wrote:
> > The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems
> > (kernel and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products
> > embedded systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are
Hi,
Am 4. März 2024 06:17:31 MEZ schrieb Philip Hands :
>I found that there were some phrases that I was avoiding for various
>reasons, a couple of which I see you've used, so I'll say why I was avoiding
>them and see if I have a persuasive argument for doing so.
>
>"allow/deny login/access as
Gianluca Renzi wrote:
> The same here. We never used the d-i but we are using Debian systems (kernel
> and root file system) as daily bases of our line of products embedded
> systems. Hundred of thousands of boards are using Debian since Debian Lenny
> 5.0. From armel to armhf 32 bit systems.
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
