retitle 673328 fix live-installer to properly detect errors during tar
extraction
thanks
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I had a similar problem and it's probably the same as #652946.
So instead of reassigning it and merging it, we will repurpose
this bug to track the problem
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Michael Tokarev wrote:
This whole hack is not needed anymore, and /run will
be created in a usual way during install process.
So this whole trick should be removed.
I agree. Here's the corresponding patch. It would be nice if someone
could commit it so that it gets
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Sam Hartman wrote:
If the live system includes the freeradius package, it fails to start
freeradius because /var/log/freeradius fails to exist. As best I can
tell something in the installer is clobbering /var/log because it's
missing a lot of directories and files present
Hi,
On Fri, 09 Mar 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
I'd appreciate if you could go ahead and push the xz strategies patch
for dpkg-deb to unstable. The conversion of d-i udebs to xz
compression blocks on this and should better not be delayed further.
The other components are ready / will be patched
Hi Otavio,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Otavio Salvador wrote:
It seems XZ support has been included in 1.0.21, as can be seen at:
Yeah but debian-installer doesn't have bzip2 and xz in the host so it's
not really useful... you saw the recent bugs when libacl used bz2
compression.
About the use of
(Moving to debian-boot@lists.debian.org where it's more appropriate)
On Fri, 18 Feb 2011, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
Hello,
During Squeeze installation process, since volatile archive was
replaced with squeeze-updates and error of unreachable archive occurs.
Of course installation process can be
reassign 608674 debconf
retitle 608674 debconf calls .config script with bad arguments when postinst
triggered is run
severity 608674 important
clone 608674 -1
reassign -1 cdebconf
thanks
On Sun, 02 Jan 2011, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
reassign -1 dpkg 1.15.8.7
Bug #608674
, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
2/ d-i should be modified to use --force-unsafe-io if it detects a dpkg
version = 1.15.8.6.
dpkg has become slower due to the usage of fsync() to ensure data
consistency in case of crashes/power failures.
In the context of d-i, a crash means restarting the installation
(Dropping bug report)
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010, Olaf van der Spek wrote:
Hence the fact that all file system developers, whether they were
btrfs developers or XFS developers or ext4 developers, made the joke
at the file system developers summit two years ago, that what the
application
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
c) extract(a.dpkg-new);
extract(b.dpkg-new);
extract(c.dpkg-new);
fsync(a.dpkg-new);
fsync(b.dpkg-new);
fsync(c.dpkg-new);
rename(a.dpkg-new, a);
rename(b.dpkg-new, b);
rename(c.dpkg-new, c);
(c)
Hi,
adding debian-devel, debian-boot, debian-kernel and Theodore Y. Ts'o in CC
because I'm fed up with this problem. Sorry for the massive crosspost, you
might want to follow up only on -devel and on the bug report.
Some clones/reassign should probably result from this discussion anyway.
On
Hi,
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010, Holger Levsen wrote:
Result: only mail server, SSH server and standart system are
available.
Unfortunately, that's expected result. As discussed on
So let's close this bug. There is no need and gain to keep this bug report
open (against general at least),
Hi,
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010, Modestas Vainius wrote:
On trečiadienis 20 Spalis 2010 22:33:34 Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 22:20:31 +0300, Modestas Vainius wrote:
Btw, how will I be able to enable --force-unsafe-io for dpkg when it's
run under apt/aptitude? Maybe environment
Hi,
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010, Don Armstrong wrote:
Anyway, I'd rather just make dpkg-dev special case udebs and not
output the field to the binary, even if I think that will imply lose
of automation and better integration among others, than a possible
solution shoved down the d-i team throat
Hi,
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010, Bastian Blank wrote:
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.81
Severity: grave
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 11:09:56PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
- Task reinstallation removed packages first.
The task installation must not remove packages without approval.
What task did you
Package: base-installer
Version: 1.106
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
I have a custom udeb for a debian derivative that installs supplementary
debian base systems and configures them as virtual machines or chroots.
However I want to install those in /target/srv/something and not in
/target
Package: tech-ctte
(a change in lintian is triggering my request)
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
following the instructions given by Frans in [1], I've written a tiny
check to ensure I wasn't missing any occurrences in the bunch of udebs
I'm currently adding. I guess it would be
tag 489006 patch
thanks
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
I would suggest to force install grub-pc when boot partition is on RAID
and replace (hd0) by (md0) for installation in MBR. Maybe we need a
supplementary check that ensures that (hd0) is part of (md0).
I might try to come up
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.06.2009, 15:43 +0200 schrieb Raphael Hertzog:
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote:
I think this shouldn't anymore happen with grub2.
It supports the Linux Software RAID.
Could you please try it? (grub-pc package
On Thu, 04 Jun 2009, Felix Zielcke wrote:
I think this shouldn't anymore happen with grub2.
It supports the Linux Software RAID.
Could you please try it? (grub-pc package)
How are we supposed to try it?
grub-install /dev/md0 ?
In any case, grub-installer still needs some modifications to do
On Sat, 23 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 07:14:34PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
Package: console-setup, console-data
Severity: serious
Hi,
console-setup and console-data both allow you to setup the
keyboard layout but they do not take each other settings
On Sun, 24 May 2009, Bastian Blank wrote:
This means that Debian will get uninstallable on the following CPUs:
- Intel i486,
There is new hardware sold today that is (only) compatible to the 486 SX
instruction set. But it runs at 300 MHz. So it would be a pity to loose
support for such
found 527641 1.35
found 527641 1.36
thanks
On Fri, 08 May 2009, Dave Witbrodt wrote:
I have set the severity of this bug report to serious because,
technically, it is a policy violation to overwrite user changes to file
in /etc;
This is the real problem this bug is about... so closing it with
notfound 527641 1.35
notfound 527641 1.36
retitle 527641 doesn't support/keep undefined FONT* parameters
close 527641 1.35
On Wed, 20 May 2009, Anton Zinoviev wrote:
If you have found the bug in versions 1.35 and 1.36, please provide more
information: is this reproduced behaviour, how did it
On Thu, 05 Feb 2009, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
What would dpkg do with the symlinks in the the unpack phase?
I have not tested it, but I would venture the same thing (calling tar,
ergo having the same problem) from when I last looked at it.
dpkg does not call tar, it has it own tar
Debian Etch :
http://www.ouaza.com/livre/admin-debian/
---BeginMessage---
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-01-14 at 19:29:58 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Joey Hess wrote:
Determining a file's type from its extension is weak and specific?
I'd say generally, yes. But it also depends
On Sun, 20 Apr 2008, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 07:37:02PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20080420 19:03]:
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 12:51:29AM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote:
So the mount binary of busybox works whereas the one
reopen 475783
reassign 475783 live-initramfs
retitle 475783 generated initrd fails mounting loopback device
thanks
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 09:28:29AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
Why aren't you reassigning it to klibc-utils instead?
Its neither
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
BTW, has anyone looked at how library symbols files interact with udeb:
lines in shlibs files? The symbols file tend to override the shlibs
files, and I wonder if this won't result in bad dependencies in udebs as
the libraries they depend on are
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Frans Pop wrote:
Symbols files are not used for udebs. So they won't affect dependencies
of udebs.
Not that I don't trust you about this, but just to make sure...
Do symbol files affect the way shlibs files are generated, or will those
remain unchanged?
Those
On Thu, 07 Feb 2008, Guillem Jover wrote:
If nobody has any objections, i'll follow Frans' advice and file a bug
against dpkg-dev.
Yes, makes sense. I've just fixed it in dpkg's git [0].
Except it will only work if the package uses 'Package-Type' and not
'X*-Package-Type'. We should maybe
Package: debian-installer-manual
Severity: normal
I tried to follow the instructions from section 4.4:
http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch04s04.html
Unfortunately syslinux is not usable with my USB key:
$ sudo syslinux /dev/sda1
syslinux: only 512-byte sectors are supported
And
Quoting Joey Hess:
15. Get ftp-master to remove kernel udebs for the old kernel version
from testing. This will *break* some old released install media
(floppy, netboot, not cdrom), but it's necessary before release.
Why is this necessary ? I'm a bit worried that rc1 netinst images do
Hi everybody,
I wanted to try d-i with qemu but it failed to detect the network card
(although I made sure that qemu had network support by using the -n
switch). Selecting the ne module by hand doesn't help either (I tried
several modules related to NE2K).
FYI, here's how I use qemu for d-i :
I
Quoting Steve McIntyre:
Guys,
We're still putting TRANS.TBL files in every directory on the
CDs. Surely by now we can just lose them? They're going to be wasting
space on all the images (especially important on netinst and business
card), and I'd bet that we're not bothered about supporting
[ removing debian-devel which is not really necessary but added
debian-boot ]
Quoting Goswin von Brederlow:
Test and pre kernels could be kept in sid exclusively.
They could, but for the moment they aren't and I have to live up with
that. :)
For non i386 the list of kernels differs widely
Le Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 08:42:39PM -0800, Blars Blarson écrivait:
Apparently you use debian-cd, which requires a local package mirror.
From my looking into it, debian-cd will need some minor tweeks to
build bootable sparc CDs. When I get it running, I'll submit
appropriate bugs.
Please
reassign 225075 installation-reports
thanks
Le Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 06:25:04PM +0100, Harald Dunkel écrivait:
Package: debian-cd
Version: unknown
Hi folks,
When I tried to install Debian using the X-Mas netinst
CD (Dec 24th) I got this error message:
Where did you download that CD ?
Le Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:45:41AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
Duh, I'm wrong, the PTS is working on master but the DNS (MX) are still
wrong... I asked debian-admin to update them and I hope the PTS will be
working today.
Everything is fixed now, you can safely redirect the CVS commit
Le Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:04:38PM -0500, Joey Hess écrivait:
Since the PTS is down, commit emails would be delayed or lost. I have
moved them to go directly to this mailing list, until the PTS comes back
up. If you were not subscribed to the commit emails on the PTS, this
will be some more
Le Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 07:35:44AM +0100, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
Le Mon, Dec 08, 2003 at 04:04:38PM -0500, Joey Hess écrivait:
Since the PTS is down, commit emails would be delayed or lost. I have
moved them to go directly to this mailing list, until the PTS comes back
up. If you were
Le Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 09:00:12PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan écrivait:
We can build two netinst sets for now if you want, but I'd rather build test
images with the last version of isolinux in debug mode before making a
decision on all this, anybody objects on building this kind of images
Le Thu, Nov 13, 2003 at 04:29:25PM -0500, Joey Hess écrivait:
I have just tried it and it works, even though the setup for
syslinux should be changed a bit to include the help screens and all that,
this should be done in debian-installer, as it is d-i who makes that image.
There are
Le Wed, Nov 12, 2003 at 11:54:19AM -0500, Joey Hess écrivait:
Yes, we will need at least two lists. The netinsts and business card may
be the same. There may also be minor variances for different architectures.
No problem, the lists are preprocessed by cpp and you can include/exclude
packages
Le Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 07:24:26PM -0500, Joey Hess écrivait:
debian-cd:
What kinds of images do you use/need from the debian-installer tree for
building CDs on the various architectures? There is both an initrd
image, and a CD boot floppy image, and I do not want to waste space in
the
Le Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:37:58AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait:
[Joey Hess]
I tried a few different mails to the bot but I cannot find the right
magic invocation to subscribe to d-i commit messages. Help?
Check for instance
Le Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:24:15PM +0200, Martin Sjögren écrivait:
The cvs version of anna now supports calling the retriever with a
'config' argument, and tries to load a list of udebs to automatically
install from /var/cache/anna/autoinst. Now we need:
How does that interact together ?
Le Thu, Mar 27, 2003 at 11:05:44AM +, Alastair McKinstry écrivait:
I don't know how to fix 2, but one idea I had for fixing 1 was to have
overrides in the netinst CD building, so ethdetect and friends would be
normally optional, but when put on a netinst CD, they'd be overridden to
Le Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 10:24:39PM -0200, André Luís Lopes écrivait:
Hi,
Sorry if it's a FAQ, but I wasn't able to figure out by myself where the
messages which were sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] are being sent now. I was
used to check this list daily looking for any changes within CVS
Le Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 11:51:17AM +0100, Richard Atterer écrivait:
Am I correct in assuming that these images are not suited at all for
installing woody?
Yes.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
[ Please put me in cc in your answer so that I have a copy at work too,
thanks ]
Hello,
i'm using mklibs at work here and I have a problem with it. One of the
binaries that I use (lilo-mtd) requires the symbol atexit and mklibs
doesn't manage to include it in the libc6 generated from the -pic
Le Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 01:37:04PM -0600, Adam DiCarlo écrivait:
Oh my. I didn't even realize that debian-installer wasn't a package.
Maybe I should burst out the debian-installer/* commits to their
actual source packages instead. That sounds like a better plan. The
only problem there is
Le Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 01:01:40AM +, Colin Watson écrivait:
Raphael, you'd have to add support for a debian-installer_cvs
pseudo-source-package to the PTS manually, I suppose. Would it work?
How? What would the web pages say for it?
Everything works automagically, I don't need any
Le Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 11:05:10AM +, Colin Watson écrivait:
Everything works automagically, I don't need any override. Anything
sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] is automatically forwarded to the subscribers
of entry xx who have the keyword cvs enabled.
Oh, I see. What about the virtual
Le Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 06:59:36PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
I can make the initrd available. The kernel is exactly what is in the
kernel-image-di package, but I suppose I can make it available redundantly
if you really need it.
Yes, please. If the kernel is the same on all boot images (as I
Le Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:15:11PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
Would you please also build nightly net images?
Well I've worked out a disgusting way to let a regular user build a d-i
floppy image, and so I will now be uploading daily builds of all
available image types, including 2.8 and
Le Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 11:41:55AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
Is that supposed to be access controlled so I can't list the directory
over the web?
Nope, it was just badly configured and .htaccess was not authorized.
It's fixed now.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://www.ouaza.com
Le Tue, Oct 08, 2002 at 12:23:45PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
NB2: Looks to me like the cdrom-retreiver looks for Packages in
dists/sid/suite/debian-installer/binary-*/Packages, which seems
a mite off (isn't sid a suite?) especially for sarge cdroms.
It would be good if
Le Sun, Sep 01, 2002 at 09:38:01AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait:
I know, but I'm still working on fixing it, and was just wondering if
I should make our current version available for a larger audience.
Oh, if you're sure that you're going to do it, then you can take over
the current CVS
Le Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 06:33:20PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait:
Is there anyone actually using the version in Debian CVS, or is it OK
for me to just replace it with the skolelinux version? The Skolelinux
version is not able to present a question about which device to use,
but will
Le Thu, Aug 15, 2002 at 01:48:10AM +0200, Giuseppe Sacco écrivait:
Checking in README-Users.it.m4;
/cvs/debian-boot/boot-floppies/README-Users.it.m4,v -- README-Users.it.m4
new revision: 1.5; previous revision: 1.4
done
cvs [server aborted]: can't chdir(/home/aph): No such file or directory
Le Sun, Jul 28, 2002 at 01:52:57AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait:
autopartkit 0.02n/a if used?[1][2]
It is used by Skolelinux.
And by debian-educ. :)
I've done a lot of changes to this package in the Skolelinux CVS. I
hope to merge this with the
Hi,
I was discussing with someone who wanted to install Debian with the
netinst CD prepared by Chris Lawrence. Like most of the people who are
given the choice, he decided to use the bf2.4 flavor ...
Unfortunately this flavor doesn't have the ne2k-pci module ! Such network
cards are so common
Le Fri, May 17, 2002 at 10:29:26AM +0200, Eduard Bloch écrivait:
Unfortunately this flavor doesn't have the ne2k-pci module ! Such network
Oh Raphael, I expected you to look first before believing everything...
Oh sorry ... I checked with dpkg -c on the package. :-)
Why didn't you put it
Le Fri, May 17, 2002 at 09:46:35AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
Of course, now that bf 3.0.23 has been tagged and uploaded, it's too
late for woody ... and we'll release as is. But please update everything
so that 3.0r1 will be ok.
In fact, it's too important to release as is. I suggest
Le Fri, May 17, 2002 at 11:35:36AM +0200, Eduard Bloch écrivait:
Since I favorite the idea of a real network-based installation.
Currently, there are drivers for very common PCI ethernet cards builtin,
so you can theoreticaly install with 2 floppies from the network. And
with an additional
Hi,
Le Mon, May 13, 2002 at 10:56:01PM +0200, Karsten Merker écrivait:
Hallo everybody,
will debian-cd 2.2.15 (still unreleased) be used for woody? Boot-floppies
3.0.23 are about to be released and as debian-cd 2.2.15 will bring us
bootable CDs on mipsel, I would like to change the
Le Fri, May 10, 2002 at 05:17:28PM +0100, Rob Bradford écrivait:
The Release notes may need to be updated at the same time.
Uhm, i didnt realise we releasing official cd images with isolinux.
Which section of the release notes is relevent?
Well, i just checked, you don't speak of
Package: install-doc
Version: N/A; reported 2002-05-05
Severity: normal
The section describing the various install CDs and what they boot needs
to be updated (for i386).
We realized that the isolinux multiboot method seems to fail on most
SCSI cdrom readers. So, that means that SCSI users
I received this installation report by private mail. He has a problem
using an http proxy during the installation.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël Hertzog -+- http://strasbourg.linuxfr.org/~raphael/
Formation Linux et logiciel libre : http://www.logidee.com
---BeginMessage---
I tried an install from
Le Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 11:36:11AM +0200, Eduard Bloch écrivait:
Philip?
Well, debian-cd did not release afaik, so they still could set this
argument at least for the multiboot CD. Others require the change in BFs
and a new release, of course.
It has already been done last WE ...
| LABEL
Le Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Chris Tillman écrivait:
Also it would be fine if we could give some guidance about how to make that
choice - type of system, connected hardware, age? I guess the differences
are already covered for vanilla/compact/idepci, but how about bf2.4? Which
Le Sat, Apr 13, 2002 at 07:44:42PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
1: multiboot
2: vanilla
3: compact
4: idepci
5: bf2.4
[...]
Sounds excellent to me. I'm excited to try it, I've never even seen
the ISO boot in action.
Can you update the installation manual if it hasn't already
Le Fri, Apr 12, 2002 at 04:11:43PM +0200, Eduard Bloch écrivait:
Btw, I would suggest this order:
1: Multiboot
3: idepci
2: bf2.4
4: compact
5 and rest: vanilla
So people with broken BIOSes have luck with the next CD-ROM.
I will probably do this (as suggested by aj) :
1: multiboot
2:
Le Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 03:45:11PM -0700, Debian Boot CVS Master écrivait:
Add disksize argument to loadlin command lines.
BTW, I noticed that you removed the cdrom argument from the loadlin
call. I guess it's not needed. In fact I think it's a good idea to put
it back and to add it to the
Hi,
I'm forwarding this report since it contains information that may be
valuable for you too... if you plan to make yet another bf upload
before the release.
The cat:: missing command is an error which someone else already
reported to debian-cd when using the bf24 flavor.
Cheers,
--
Raphaël
Le Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 11:53:56AM +0200, Christian Leber écrivait:
The same with gentoo, they have even managed to fit a 2.4 kernel on
their first and only CD.
But I have at least one Computer (i386, from end of 1996) where isolinux
fails.
What kind of failure ? It doesn't boot at all ? It
Le Fri, Apr 05, 2002 at 04:50:50PM -0800, David Kimdon écrivait:
aph and I were just talking on irc, how about :
cd1: idepci; cd2 scsi; cd3: bf2.4; cd4: vanilla
That gives us language chooser on the first CD, a big plus, while
still giving us 2.2 as 'default'. IMO leaving the language
Le Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 07:17:58AM -0800, Jim Westveer écrivait:
Hi,
- --
Question:
Would there be any objections to setting the default
boot kernel on woody CD#1 to the bf2.4 flavor ???
I guess it's a bit late for this change since it probably means that we
have to update the
Le Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:47:55PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen écrivait:
[Raphael Hertzog]
Doing install in a language that is included with the language pack but
that is not on the boot floppy itself.
OK, then I believe it does not work.
Checking my freshly built CD, I see
Le Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 11:43:08PM +0100, Eduard Bloch écrivait:
changed. debian-cd needs to update this file or, even better,
generate the list dynamically.
I see, the basedebs list is hardcoded and should be updated as soon as
possible. Raphael (or whoever), could you fix this before
Le Fri, Mar 01, 2002 at 06:23:40PM -0800, David Kimdon écrivait:
One things that came up in the BTS is that the debian-cd package
currently doesn't need to manipulate the *.bin images that
boot-floppies makes for it. If I understand correctly what we are
discussing here the debian-cd package
Le Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:40:14PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 01:22:11PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
The following script checks for validity of priority/section (and
I think this is what should be done, please tell me if something looks wrong) :
for A in
Le Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:42:44PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa écrivait:
By the way, shouldn't the task file creation be automated ?
The task files are not meant to be automatically created. We should
do that for the file listing the packages required by debootstrap
but even automating it is not
Le Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 03:08:03AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
How do you expect us to set that argument ?
Merely by editing the syslinux.cfg file I guess, during the build.
Yes but to do that, I need to mount the image with the loopback. And
for this you need to be root ... debian-cd
Le Fri, Dec 14, 2001 at 01:09:26AM -0500, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
Package: debian-cd
My testing with install from woody based on a 3.0.17 CD which bbennet
was kind enough to suppy me with lead me to discover that the official
CD-rom sets do *not* set the 'cdrom' bootargument !
How do you
Le Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 12:45:18AM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
In the past few months, something has made insmod grow 15k. I'm talking
about the insmod in modutils-basic. Do you have any clue what might be
making it get so much bigger? I hope depmod wasn't accidentially
included in that build
Le Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 04:58:53PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
Looks interesting, but I'll let it sit for a while since we're not
aiming at cdrom installs quite yet.
Hopefully it won't be too far away ... once you have a working network
installer, it'll be a matter of hours to have a working
Le Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:06:38PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
1. Identifying available media, and deciding which to use.
2. Identifying existing partitions, and deciding what to do with
them (delete them, keep them unchanged, resize them).
3. Deciding how many
Le Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 01:25:26AM -0300, Carlos Barros écrivait:
This is the boot-i386 that I change to set the *.txt and font.psf of
the rescue.bin image right before the inclusion in the CD.
The file is debian-cd/tools/woody/boot-i386
Hope you like it.
Unfortunately no, I don't
Le Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 03:22:46PM +1000, Anthony Towns écrivait:
Why don't you reassign it then ? You've got luck that I've seen this mail
here ... i'm the submitter and never got a direct answer. :-(
This is #110552 then?
Yes. I cced the bug report on debian-boot without using the
Package: deboostrap
Version: 0.1.15.2
Severity: important
I tried a woody cdrom install with the boot floppies 3.0.13 (on i386).
But it failed at the debootstrap stage. The error code returned by
debootstrap was 2 and the error log displayed :
debootstrap: arithmetic expression: syntax error:
Hi people,
i also got hit by this error, the problem is just that the
azerty/fr-latin0 keymap is not included in the keymaps.tgz
that is used.
Please include it. If you don't have enough space, remove fr-latin1
in favor of fr-latin0 and make sure that fr-latin1 is no more
proposed in the menu.
Le Thu, Aug 23, 2001 at 07:03:56PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo écrivait:
I think split floppy images of base make the most sense. It seems
that we all agree on this point.
Split floppy 1.44k images of base would cover the case where someone
wants to install on a machine that has only floppy and
Le Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:10:42PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
I had hoped that the first working debian-installer would be able to do
network installs, and it's not too far away. I think actually that the
peices it's missing are all required for the cdrom installer
(partitioning, debootstrap
Le Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 08:58:14PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
strip -R .comment -R .note, it saves about 500k on the scsi directory.
(eventually I heard that compiling them with -Os could help too but that'd
need more work for you Herbert)
Wow! We need this.
Is this done on the
Le Sat, Aug 11, 2001 at 09:15:00PM -0400, Joey Hess écrivait:
But launching an external program would break the nice encapsulation of the
UI. Was that already discussed ?
Yes, this is a problem of course. Debconf may come in handy for feeding
in pre-determined partition setups, and it
Le Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 07:20:09PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog écrivait:
ide-probe-mod is not automatically included, it must be added to this
list.
Ok, sorry, here's yet another change. Since libdetect won't work without
ide-disk I need to add it and there's no point in integrating all the IDE
Le Wed, Aug 01, 2001 at 10:35:29AM +0200, Romain BEAUGRAND écrivait:
You should try using syslinux 1.48-2.
And indeed, with the syslinux in potato, it does work. I've submitted a
grave bug report against syslinux.
Now I get those messages from the kernel :
| Warning: Unable to open an initial
Le Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 07:45:56PM +1000, Herbert Xu écrivait:
cdrom-modules-kver-udeb
. all modules that are in kernel/driver/cdrom/ :
aztcd.o cdu31a.o gscd.o mcd.o optcd.o sjcd.o
cdrom.o cm206.o isp16.o mcdx.o sbpcd.o sonycd535.o
. ide-cd
. isofs
ide-probe-mod
101 - 200 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
