On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 09:29:36AM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:05:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't
you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive
would reject because it doesn't know about m68k?
Yes, indeed. We can upload to
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:08:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't
you have to do a source+m68k upload, which presumably the main archive
would reject because it
Stephen R Marenka step...@marenka.net writes:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 06:08:51PM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 02:54:48PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
Yes please. How does one go about uploading m68k-only packages? Don't
you have to do a source+m68k upload, which
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
[...]
The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters:
[...]
vmelilo-installer
vmelilo-installer is specific to a rather rare m68k subarch. It should
not be
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
[...]
The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by porters:
[...]
vmelilo-installer
vmelilo-installer is specific to
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 10:05:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
Wouter Verhelst wou...@debian.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 07:32:56PM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
[...]
The following was not uploaded because they need to be done by
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
Packages that has translation-only or really trivial changes
I worked on those today. After all, many of them had no upload since
September 2008 and thus has numerous translation updates.
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
Packages that looks OK for upload
~
I uploaded:
partconf
partman-auto
partman-auto-lvm
(those yesterday)
partman-crypto
partman-ext3
partman-jfs
partman-md
partman-partitioning
partman-reiserfs
Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Remaining:
libdebian-installer
I know there's a trick to build it...:-)...but needs to find it again.
Uploaded
localechooser
I need to ponder whether I include the parts that are part of
console-setup switch. I think I will as
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009, Luk Claes wrote:
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
And that it actually works?
I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed-updates
talking to myself again...
Luk Claes wrote...
Feel free to test with the version in proposed-updates to really make
sure it's fixed.
I'm not completely sure how to do this. From what I can gather from [1]
I need to build my own installer image, which I'll have a go at.
I initially
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello folks,
Here goes the updated list with the still missed packages. Since first
message a total of 34 packages were upload and I'd like to thank people
who worked on it.
Please take a look on the remaining packages and process them if you're
the
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
Packages that looks OK for upload
~
I uploaded a few, namely:
apt-setup
auto-install
clock-setup
finish-install
installation-report
iso-scan
kickseed
lilo-installer
lowmem
signature.asc
Description:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
main-menu
The following changes are afar from trivial:
* After the debconf priority was lowered because of an error, return to the
default priority in one step when next a component runs successfully.
* Instead of lowering the debconf
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
More uploads done:
main-menu
mdcfg
mountmedia
nobootloader
partconf
partman-auto
partman-auto-lvm
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
And that it actually works?
I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
See also #532840, which might be related.
Hopefully this can be sorted out before 5.0.2 goes out.
Thanks
Vince
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Vincent McIntyre wrote:
Can someone check that choose-mirror is the correct version please?
And that it actually works?
I reopened #517644 but have had no response after 3+ weeks.
Well, reopening was strange as a fixed version was in proposed-updates
at that time, though as there are no CD
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@ossystems.com.br):
Hello Christian,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been
mentioned in my mail. Trivial changes above do *only* apply to
Packages that looks OK for upload
~
I had a look down to iso-scan
apt-setup
Has trivial changes (merge from Ubuntu which we can assume safely tested)
auto-install
The changes there are longstanding ones by Phil Hands:
* check for dhcp preseed
Am Dienstag, den 09.06.2009, 07:15 +0200 schrieb Christian Perrier:
Packages that looks OK for upload
~
grub-installer
Trivial changes
What about my patch for grub-installer I sent yesterday?
Can this be included in the next upload or would it be better to
Quoting Felix Zielcke (fziel...@z-51.de):
grub-installer
Trivial changes
What about my patch for grub-installer I sent yesterday?
Can this be included in the next upload or would it be better to wait?
Otavio already said on IRC that it's okay for him but I should wait for
more
Hello Christian,
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote:
[...]
To make it clear: grub-installer changes should not have been
mentioned in my mail. Trivial changes above do *only* apply to
installation-report that was following grub-installer in Otavio's
* Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org [2009-06-06 18:31]:
Packages that looks OK for upload
~
I uploaded the following packages:
arcboot-installer
colo-installer
nobootloader
sibyl-installer
These need some attention:
linux-kernel-di-mips-2.6
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
localechooser
I have pending changes for the console-setup switch (patch attached),
which are basically aimed at installing c-s on the target system in
*all* cases where we were previously configuring the console with kbd
and kbd console fonts.
Hello Martin,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Martin Michlmayrt...@cyrius.com wrote:
* Otavio Salvador ota...@debian.org [2009-06-06 18:31]:
Packages that looks OK for upload
~
I uploaded the following packages:
arcboot-installer
colo-installer
Hello Christian,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:31 AM, Christian Perrierbubu...@debian.org wrote:
Quoting Otavio Salvador (ota...@debian.org):
PS: one should notice that, if we validate these changes, we could
soon drop a few hacks we currently have in finish-install and
unconditionnally install
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello folks,
I've been finally able to take a more careful look at our repository and
make up a list of packages that I believe we ought to upload.
Please, if you're one of responsable by the package and you agree with
me please go ahead and upload
28 matches
Mail list logo
