Kjell Braden aff...@pentabarf.de (2014-11-06):
On 06.11.2014 03:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Yeah, that looks like a good idea, thanks. Did you actually test it?
No. What would be the simplest way to test this? Rebuild and patch
the netcfg binary into the initrd?
Build a patched netcfg, put
On 06.11.2014 03:22, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Yeah, that looks like a good idea, thanks. Did you actually test it?
No. What would be the simplest way to test this? Rebuild and patch the
netcfg binary into the initrd?
BTW: It looks like ntpservers have a max value as well but array
boundary
On 06.11.2014 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Kjell Braden aff...@pentabarf.de (2014-11-06):
I've been using the xen netboot images for amd64.
I've included a patched netcfg in xen netboot images for amd64, built
against jessie and against sid (the kernel ABI changed recently), they
are
Kjell Braden aff...@pentabarf.de (2014-11-06):
On 06.11.2014 12:50, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Kjell Braden aff...@pentabarf.de (2014-11-06):
I've been using the xen netboot images for amd64.
I've included a patched netcfg in xen netboot images for amd64, built
against jessie and against sid
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.108+deb7u2
Tags: patch
When passed more than three nameservers, netcfg can segfaults in
nm_write_static_ipvX due to a missing array bounds check. The attached
patch (against current git master) should fix the issue.
Cheers
From
Control: found -1 1.122
Control: tag -1 confirmed
Kjell Braden aff...@pentabarf.de (2014-11-06):
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.108+deb7u2
Tags: patch
When passed more than three nameservers, netcfg can segfaults in
nm_write_static_ipvX due to a missing array bounds check. The attached patch
Processing control commands:
found -1 1.122
Bug #768218 [netcfg] netcfg segfaults when passed four or more nameservers
Marked as found in versions netcfg/1.122.
tag -1 confirmed
Bug #768218 [netcfg] netcfg segfaults when passed four or more nameservers
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
768218: http
7 matches
Mail list logo
