On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 10:14:20AM +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
* on ia64 and mips:
aegis (= 4.24-5.1) build-depends on debhelper (= 5) {debhelper (= 7.4.2)}
debhelper (= 7.4.2) depends on dpkg-dev (= 1.14.19) {dpkg-dev (= 1.15.4)}
dpkg-dev (= 1.15.4) depends on perl-modules
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 08:51:04PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 05:03:01PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
I'll make GCC 4.6 the
default after the release of GCC 4.5.3, expected later this week, at
least on amd64, armel, i386 and powerpc.
If you do the switch, please
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 11:07:42AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 02:12:25 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Julien Cristau wrote:
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:01:41 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
libdw1 (DWARF parser for elfutils)
FTBFS on kfreebsd, needs a bug
On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 09:06:31PM +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 06/22/2013 07:26 PM, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote:
* sparc: no working nflog (mild concern); no stable kernels in stable
(compiling clisp for instance crashes the kernel reliably on smetana). We
need to run sparc with oldstable
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 10:12:38PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 20:07, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
FAIL: run-disasm-x86.sh
===
In file included from command-line:0:0:
/usr/include/stdc-predef.h:30:26: fatal error:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:30:16AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2013-11-10):
We could work around that by a porter building it outside of sbuild
and doing a binNMU. It's not a permanent solution, but it would at
least allow elfutils' other RC bug
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 11:50:06PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 10/11/13 22:59, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
FAIL: run-native-test.sh
FAIL: dwfl-bug-fd-leak
On 10/11/13 23:17, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
Was that with sbuild or similar chroot environment? These look like the
original
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 03:32:09PM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote:
- The other failures look like issues with the /proc interface
on the install. Does the /proc interface follow the Linux kernel
/proc interface that some of the tests rely on?
Yes. But as there's no standard
Can I suggest that if you file a few bugs and add some information in it so
that maybe someone can look at it? If it only affects one architecture, send a
mail to that list asking for help.
Kurt
On June 18, 2023 11:37:55 PM GMT+02:00, Rob Landley wrote:
>On 6/18/23 14:58, Rene Engelhard wrote:
>>> Three years ago Samba maintainer Jeremy Allison lamented that "Both GPLv3
>>> and
>>> the AGPL have been rejected soundly by most developers" and talked about
>>> how he
>>> regretted the
On Tue, Jun 20, 2023 at 05:52:44AM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am 19.06.23 um 23:29 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> > > The pragmatic option would be to run only a smoketest for build success
> > > on architectures not tested by upstream.
> >
> > And have Format->Character in Impress crash
11 matches
Mail list logo
