Bug#816887: libncursesw5: background color of mutt's message is black

On 2016-03-06 18:35 +0900, Kusanagi Kouichi wrote: > Package: libncursesw5 > Version: 6.0+20151017-1 > Severity: normal > > Since ncurses 6.0+20151017-1, background color of mutt's message is > black. Downgrading libncursesw5 to 6.0+20150810-1 fixes the issue. I'm afraid I can't follow you here.

Bug#816102: camlimages: diff for NMU version 1:4.2.0-1.1

Control: tags 816102 + patch Control: tags 816102 + pending [Replace XX with correct value] Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for camlimages (versioned as 1:4.2.0-1.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/5. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. Regards. diff -Nru

Bug#818726: dpkg-maintscript-helper failures when upgrading from jessie

Package: dpkg Version: 1.18.4 Severity: normal Hi dpkg maintainers, I am doing upgrade tests of the texlive package from jessie to sid, and I see the following output: Preparing to unpack .../musixtex_1%3a1.20.ctan20151216-3_all.deb ... dpkg-query: package 'musixtex' is not installed Use

Bug#818607: lintian: python-script-but-no-python-dep refers to removed package: dh_pysupport or dh_pycentral

Package: lintian Version: 2.5.42.1 Severity: normal The information for python-script-but-no-python-dep contains the section: N:If you are using debhelper, adding ${python:Depends} to the Depends N:field and ensuring dh_pysupport or dh_pycentral are run during the build N:should take

Bug#651410: aptitude: in dependency resolutions, aptitude should favor library removal

Hi Vincent, 2011-12-08 11:53 Vincent Lefevre: Package: aptitude Version: 0.6.4-1.2 Severity: normal The dependency resolution is suboptimal, even buggy. For instance: # aptitude install evolution The following NEW packages will be installed: libgnome-desktop-3-2{a} The following packages

Bug#818725: picard-tools: FTBFS in unstable

Package: src:picard-tools Version: 1.138+dfsg.1-1 Severity: serious picard-tools fails to build in a clean unstable environment with the following error: compile-picard: [mkdir] Created dir: /tmp/picard-tools-1.138+dfsg.1/classes [javac] /tmp/picard-tools-1.138+dfsg.1/build.xml:494:

Bug#818447: sdcc: FTBFS: convert: Unable to read font

Package: sdcc Version: 3.5.0+dfsg-1 Severity: serious This package fails to build in unstable: > sbuild (Debian sbuild) 0.68.0 (15 Jan 2016) on dl580gen9-02.hlinux ... > +checking for package algorithm2e [algorithm2e]... no > +checking for package fancyvrb [fancyvrb]... yes > +checking for

Bug#818373: ITP: vo-aladin

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 package: wnpp Owner: Paul Sladen Severity: Wishlist * Package Name: vo-aladin * Version: 9.013 * Upstream Author: Pierre Fernique, Strasbourg astronomical Data Center (CDS) * URL:

Bug#818318: git: CVE-2016-2324 and CVE-2016-2315 (currently unpublished) server and client RCE

On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:37:27AM +, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2016-03-16 at 17:16 -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Ben Hutchings wrote: >>> I intend to NMU git to fix these bugs in unstable, as they make most of >>> my development activity unsafe. >>> >>> git maintainers, please let me

Bug#818111: noise in the noise source package creation step

Holas, On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 11:40:10AM -0600, Gunnar Wolf wrote: > Sorry, I got mixed up WRT some details, as I was writing from > memory. What I have now is: (...) > debian-keyring$ diffoscope > ../build-area/old/debian-keyring_2016.03.xx_amd64.changes >

Bug#802509: libboost-coroutine-dev: The boost-coroutine library is only compiled as a static library

Correction: - libboost-context1.58-dev (= ${binary:Version}) + libboost-context1.58-dev (= ${binary:Version}), + libboost-coroutine1.58.0 (= ${binary:Version}) Not sure what effect (= ${binary:Version}) has on a *-dev package.

Bug#783732: status

What's the status of mailman3 for Debian? Has there been any work done, and if so, where? -- .''`. martin f. krafft @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems

Bug#818701: RFS: webvirtmgr/4.8.9-3 [put in ITP, ITA, RC, NMU if applicable]

control: tag -1 moreinfo [disclaimer: I don't sponsor new packages for new people, so even if what I highlight below is fixed I won't sponsor this, sorry!] Hi Oliver, Thanks for your interested in making Debian grow! For a start, you failed to fill correctly the RFS template.. Starting

<    1   2   3   4