On 2022-05-26, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Thanks for doing the rebuild testing!
> Relevant part (hopefully):
Would it be at all possible to update your script to compress and attach
data over a certain size? This
在 2022/5/27 01:03, xiao sheng wen(肖盛文) 写道:
> Hi Bastian,
>
> Thanks for your investigate for murmurhash license.
>
> 在 2022/5/26 22:23, Bastian Germann 写道:
>> Plus points: File a bug on Debian's nginx pkg which notifies them that
>> src/core/ngx_murmurhash.c and
>>
Source: nginx
Severity: minor
Hi,
>From https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010242#32 ,
I know that the murmurhash License should be public-domain.
https://salsa.debian.org/nginx-team/nginx/-/blob/master/debian/copyright#L16
may need to update to Public-domain.
Thanks!
--
Source: qtchooser
Severity: wishlist
It was determined from
https://salsa.debian.org/qt-kde-team/qt/qtchooser/-/merge_requests/2 and
a downstream Ubuntu bug on Qt6 not working that QtChooser is dead
upstream on purpose.
If it is dead upstream on purpose and should NOT work with Qt6, could
Package: android-platform-system-tools-hidl
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm, sid
android-platform-system-tools-hidl build-depends on android-libcrypto-utils-dev.
android-libcrypt-utils-dev is built from the android-platform-system-core source
package which was recently removed from testing at
Package: nvidia-cudnn
Version: 8.2.4.15~cuda11.4
Severity: minor
X-Debbugs-Cc: sac...@scaledteam.ru
If you deny license agreement, it installs and then it impossible to delete.
Pre-removal scripts returns 1. I managed to delete package through dirty hack,
but i think it worth to mention that bug
Package: quiterss
Version: 0.19.4+dfsg-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: frank.dietr...@gmx.li
Dear Maintainer,
the package misses a dependency to "libqt5multimedia5-plugins".
When enabling a notifications sound for new news, the sound is not played.
The default notification sound file
Hi,
For recommends, since TC is voted for "We advise the policy maintainers to
consider
how to clarify ...", here is a reference information for drafting such
clarification
clause.
Whereas the original concern of this bug was the use of recommends by
metapackage,
the underlining issue is
A subclass of such issues affects punctuation.
For example, a straight apostrophe ' sometimes becomes an apostrophe ’
in the libxmlada package.
There are several links in the smartquotes section of
https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/configuration.html
Easy work-around:
smartquotes=False
Yeah, I initially thought this was a problem with the debian/testing64 box,
since debian/bullseye64 running on a bullseye host comes up cleanly. The
problem lies with the Debian vagrant version and its way of invoking
Net::SSH.
I think that reassigning this report is the right course of action,
Here's my fix:
https://github.com/faiproject/fai/commit/fe9ceb75893d5becb7d284133909ae5994088c65
--
regards Thomas
Am 30.06.2021 um 18:15 teilte Jochen Sprickerhof mit:
Hi,
texlive-latex-extra contains invoice.sty which depends on siunitx
from the texlive-science package but does not declare a dependency.
Without texlive-science installed:
We can't bundle everything together using "depends". I suggest
Am 26.05.2022 um 14:46 teilte Axel Stammler mit:
Hi,
this package used to provide:
- /usr/bin/pdfjoin
- /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/scripts/pdfjam/pdfjoin
These two files are even still listed if a search is done on the Debian site:
Package: binkd
Version: 1.1a-111-1
Severity: wishlist
Hello,
Would it be possible to have binkd configured --with-af-force so that the soft
per-node IPv4/IPv6 preference flags "-46" and "-64" can be used for node
entries in the binkd configuration?
This would allow the IPv4/IPv6 preference to
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 10:13:03PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Thank you! Feel free to speed up if you want
Thanks, rescheduled for immediate upload.
> /Simon
cu
Adrian
Control: fixed 1011930 5.0.7-1
It seems that the fix is present since v5.0.7.
Thanks,
Boyuan yang
On Thu, 26 May 2022 17:15:37 -0400 Boyuan Yang wrote:
> Package: fcitx5-lua
> Severity: important
> Version: 5.0.3-1
>
> According to my communication with fcitx5 upstream, current version of
>
Package: fcitx5-lua
Severity: important
Version: 5.0.3-1
According to my communication with fcitx5 upstream, current version of
fcitx5-lua does not function at all due to a bug in liblua library
detection.
Upstream has fixed this bug in
On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 05:34:02AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch
wrote:
> passwdqc 2.0.2-1 is marked for autoremoval from testing on 2022-06-30
>
> It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs:
> 1011146: nvidia-graphics-drivers-tesla-470: CVE-2022-28181, CVE-2022-28183,
>
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 10:09:56PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>...
> Chance has it that some Release
> Team members have been discussing internally about viewing the key package
> set differently already, because there are more potential boundaries to draw
> in the current set. (As an example of
On 2022-05-26 15:47:12, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> So that's pretty good. Anything else in there has < 500ms run time on
> its own, so I'm getting diminishing returns now, so that's what i got
> for now. :)
And after all that awesome optimisation, nothing works at all of course:
sbuild (Debian
severity 958853 serious
title 958853 anki: old version beginning to fail with newer Python releases
thanks
Dear all,
At the current time, the version of anki in Debian is now over 1.5
years behind upstream, and we have had at least one bug report which
is related to Python 3.10; there may well
Control: tags 1010313 + patch
Control: tags 1010313 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for python-stem (versioned as 1.8.0-3.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/05. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
I've also pushed the changes to GitLab.
Regards.
diff -Nru
Source: libexternalsortinginjava-java
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java17
libexternalsortinginjava-java fails to build with OpenJDK 17, the tests make
illegal
reflective accesses into java.base/java.lang:
Control: owner 900874 !
Guilherme de Paula Xavier Segundo wrote...
> Do you want me to return the bug to your property or orphan it?
It will be better I take it back then. Luckily, somebody offered to be
co-maintainer, and we'll starting working on this the next days.
Christoph
On 26/05/2022 20:52, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: node-domutils
Version: 3.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Source: trilinos
Version: 13.2.0-1
Severity: serious
This is a side-product of a rebuild test against libtbb-dev/experimental
==> CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log <==
Performing C++ SOURCE FILE Test
Package: pypy
Version: 7.3.9+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Tags: bookworm sid
Control: block -1 by 983470 938168 937510 932820
After all the pain influcted on developers and users by pushing the
Python2 removal before bullseye, it feels absurd that we still ship
at least two Python2 interpreters in
Package: pgmodeler
Version: 0.9.4-1
Severity: normal
Hi, online mechanism for checking for updates does not belong in a
proper Debian package that is update by other means.
We also have uscan to notify maintainers of new versions to package.
Can you please build the package with NO_UPDATE_CHECK
Source: tiles-autotag
Version: 1.2-3
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java17
tiles-autotag fails to build with OpenJDK 17, the tests make an illegal
reflective access into java.base/java.lang:
[INFO]
Source: capsule-nextflow
Version: 1.1.0+dfsg-4
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java17
capsule-nextflow fails to build with OpenJDK 17, the pack200 API has been
removed
and a new FileSystems.newFileSystem() makes the existing call
Control: tags 1005145 + patch
Control: tags 1005145 + pending
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for oz (versioned as 0.17.0-5.1) and uploaded
it to DELAYED/14. Please feel free to tell me if I should cancel it.
cu
Adrian
diff -Nru oz-0.17.0/debian/changelog oz-0.17.0/debian/changelog
---
Source: ice-builder-gradle
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java17
ice-builder-gradle fails to build with OpenJDK 17, Gradle breaks on an illegal
reflective access:
make[1]: Entering directory '/<>'
gradle
Package: file
https://bugs.astron.com/
1. Says 'Warning: "admin" directory should be removed, or access to it
restricted.'
2. Says my password is wrong.
3. Has no way to retrieve a lost/forgotten password.
Hence I will report bugs to Debian.
Package: file
Version: 1:5.41-4
$ file 111D2012841-01.txt
111D2012841-01.txt: ISO-8859 text, with CRLF line terminators
Test further. It is big5!
交通部公路總局第二區養護工程處人民陳情案件處理情形調查表
親愛的民眾您好:
這是一項我們對人民陳情案件處理情形滿意度調查，主要目
的在瞭解您對我們處理情形的寶貴意見，以作為改進參考依據，
謝謝您的協助，並祝行車平安。(請寄回thb...@thb.gov.tw 信箱)
For what it's worth, I tried booting the kernel without an initrd at
all, by setting root=/dev/sda1 and rootfs=ext4 as per:
https://freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/Optimizations/
... and that fails miserably:
[0.899628] List of all partitions:
[0.900512] No filesystem could mount
Source: uncommons-watchmaker
Version: 0.7.1-1.1
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs sid bookworm
User: debian-j...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: default-java17
uncommons-watchmaker fails to build due to javadoc errors:
:swing:assemble
Skipping task ':swing:assemble' as it has no actions.
Source: ktimer
Version: 4:21.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: libmojolicious-plugin-authentication-perl
Version: 1.37-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-pbkdf2
Version: 3.1.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: poolcounter
Version: 1.1.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: haskell-pango
Version: 0.13.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-swish
Version: 0.10.1.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: lsof
Version: 4.95.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: node-mimic-response
Version: 3.1.0-7
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pkg-php-tools
Version: 1.42
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: haskell-warp
Version: 3.3.13-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-glob-parent
Version: 6.0.2+~5.1.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-css-what
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: networking-baremetal
Version: 5.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-rollup-plugin-commonjs
Version: 21.0.1+repack-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-gulp-concat
Version: 2.6.1+~0.0.15+git20190329.179bb8c+~1.0.3-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Source: libvirt-python
Version: 8.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: prismatic-plumbing-clojure
Version: 0.5.5-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: interimap
Version: 0.5.7-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[2]: Entering
Source: php-twig
Version: 3.3.9-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-browserify-cipher
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-gtk3
Version: 0.15.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: gnome-boxes
Version: 42.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-y18n
Version: 5.0.8+~5.0.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: rbac-client-clojure
Version: 0.9.4-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-immutable
Version: 4.0.0-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-rollup-plugin-sass
Version: 1.2.6~dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-tldr
Version: 0.6.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: python-libzim
Version: 1.0.0+ds-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: orthanc-dicomweb
Version: 1.7+dfsg-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: python-lunr
Version: 0.6.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]: Entering
Source: node-define-lazy-prop
Version: 3.0.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: php-dapphp-radius
Version: 2.5.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: coffeescript
Version: 1.12.8~dfsg-6
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-wcwidth
Version: 0.0.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> fakeroot
Source: ordered-clojure
Version: 1.5.9-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-browserify-sign
Version: 4.2.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: rust-compiler-builtins
Version: 0.1.52-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-glib
Version: 0.13.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: ring-basic-authentication-clojure
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: gnome-connections
Version: 42.1.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: golang-github-opencontainers-runtime-tools
Version: 0.9.0+git20220423.g0105384-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on
Source: puppetlabs-ring-middleware-clojure
Version: 1.3.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: libnet-server-mail-perl
Version: 0.28-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: hscolour
Version: 1.24.4-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-rollup-pluginutils
Version: 4.2.1~ds+~2.8.2-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: trapperkeeper-status-clojure
Version: 1.1.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-core-js
Version: 3.22.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: golang-github-containers-buildah
Version: 1.23.1+ds1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
Source: node-cbor
Version: 8.1.0+dfsg+~cs5.2.0-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: kmouth
Version: 4:21.12.3-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: haskell-base-prelude
Version: 1.3-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: tools-reader-clojure
Version: 1.3.4-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: trapperkeeper-metrics-clojure
Version: 1.3.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-des.js
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: imbalanced-learn
Version: 0.9.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: haskell-gio
Version: 0.13.8.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: prismatic-schema-clojure
Version: 1.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: test-check-clojure
Version: 0.9.0-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: clj-digest-clojure
Version: 1.4.9+dfsg-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-browserify-des
Version: 1.0.2-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: pathetic-clojure
Version: 0.5.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> make[1]:
Source: node-sparkles
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
> debian/rules
Source: node-dom-serializer
Version: 1.3.2-4
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part (hopefully):
>
Source: node-change-case
Version: 0.0~git20210510.c24a0e1-5
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: bookworm sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20220525 ftbfs-bookworm
Hi,
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Relevant part
1 - 100 of 346 matches
Mail list logo
