On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 11:53:17 +0200 Adrien CLERC
wrote:
> Package: systemd-resolved
> Version: 255.5-1
> Severity: important
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> Since 255.5-1, resolvectl produces the following:
>
> ❯ resolvectl query --validate=yes www.youtube.com
> www.youtube.com: resolve call failed:
Package: systemd-resolved
Version: 255.5-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Since 255.5-1, resolvectl produces the following:
❯ resolvectl query --validate=yes www.youtube.com
www.youtube.com: resolve call failed: DNSSEC validation failed: no-signature
The domain is unsigned. It worked in
Source: rust-filetime
Version: 0.2.22-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 src:rust-notify src:rust-async-tar src:rust-cargo-util
src:rust-cp-r
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=rust-filetime=armhf=0.2.22-1%2Bb1=1714259218=0
...
error[E0308]: mismatched types
-->
Hi,
On 28-04-2024 9:34 a.m., Andreas Beckmann wrote:
What kernel is running inside the test environment and what is the best
way to install its headers?
Can you help me find the answer? I guess you don't mean "the current
kernel of the suite under test" but rather a flavor? We use
Source: rust-socket2
Version: 0.5.5-1
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs
Control: affects -1 src:rust-quinn-udp src:rust-oauth2 src:rust-nispor
src:rust-netlink-proto src:rust-nb-connect src:rust-debbugs src:rust-dns-lookup
src:rust-erbium-net src:rust-ethtool src:rust-genetlink src:rust-git2-curl
Package: linuxinfo
Version: 4.2.0-2
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: atzli...@sina.com
Hi,
I buy a new notebook, It's CPU is Intel i5-1340P.
Would linuxinfo support it?
Thanks!
xiao sheng wen
-- Package-specific info:
/proc/cpuinfo:
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
Hello Helmut, thank you for youe work. I uploaded the new revision of
bcron.
Best regards, Georges.
Helmut Grohne a écrit :
> Package: bcron
> Version: 0.11-21
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
>
> Hi,
>
> please stop using dh-sysuser. dh-sysuser is in operation since 7
Control: reassign -1 debputy
Control: affects -1 libcleri
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 14:06:18 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Source: libcleri
Version: 1.0.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: trixie sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-20240420 ftbfs-trixie ftbfs-t64-arm64
Hi,
Source: cbmc
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: debian-loonga...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: loong64
X-Debbugs-Cc: wuruil...@loongson.cn
Dear Maintainer,
The cbmc package compiled incorrectly on loongarch, the attached patch has
fixed it.
Please merge the code from the attached patch into the
On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 08:22:41AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> Here is a patch for bmusb to add Appstream metainfo XML announcing the
> hardware handled by this package.
Thanks for the patch. I assume this is also suitable for upstream?
> I was a bit unsure if it should be
> attached to
[Steinar H. Gunderson]
> Thanks for the patch. I assume this is also suitable for upstream?
Sure.
> It would probably be more useful I package v4l2proxy, which has been
> part of bmusb for a while; it would allow “anything” to go use it,
> although with some local setup. I believe Nageru is the
On 22/04/2024 19.46, Paul Gevers wrote:
you. In case you are not subscribed, this message again.
Thanks. Please keep me Cc:ed.
For this concrete case it may be as simple as adding dependency on
sudo. In case it is trivial for you to rerun the failing test with
Thanks for running the test.
Hi,
Сб 27 апр 2024 @ 22:35 Chris Hofstaedtler :
> Lev,
>
> * Sven Joachim [240427 19:48]:
>> On 2024-04-17 14:26 +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
>> > I've prepared an NMU for ed (versioned as 1.20.1-1.1) and
>> > uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
>> > should delay it
Hi!
This is fixed in https://salsa.debian.org/debian/alire on version 1.2.1-2
Now, I've put the `debian/1.2.1-2` tag only this morning.
It could explain why this was not yet whidely published ?
Regards,
Stephane
[Doug Beeferman 2023-11-22]
> Hello,
>
> I'm the author of Cyberbox and I grant permission for Cyberbox to be
> redistributed without any restriction, including with modifications or in
> derived works.
Thank you for letting me know. Is it the correct understanding that Cuberbox
is licensed
Followup-For: Bug #1066703
Control: tag -1 patch
Attached is a patch that fixes the missing prototypes.
Andreas
>From fe497acc8ee1883cd9d061e43c864eaf5e5c3e1c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andreas Beckmann
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 08:23:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] fix building with
[Norbert Preining 2009-05-16]
> Can you please add an info dir entry to the texinfo files of your package
> to fix these warnings.
The package is now orphaned. A patch to add such entry would be most
welcome. :)
--
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen
Hi,
[Release Team member hat on]
On 27-04-2024 11:48 p.m., Manny wrote:
As an aptitude user, I was bothered by the lack of aptitude ways of
doing things in the upgrade guide.
I anything, I prefer the Release Notes to move to using one tool in the
instructions, without insinuating that it's
Package: bmusb
Version: 0.7.7-1
Tags: patch
Here is a patch for bmusb to add Appstream metainfo XML announcing the
hardware handled by this package. I was a bit unsure if it should be
attached to the library or -dev package, but concluded that the -dev
package seem more useful for endusers
Followup-For: Bug #1066678
Control: tag -1 patch
Hi, attached are two patches to fix the missing declaration.
Furthermore the generated source code files lacheck.c and
lacheck.noflex.c need to be cleaned in order to fix building the package
twice in a row but I couldn't quickly inject that into
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
