Bug#965282: wpasupplicant: fails to create /var/run/wpa_supplicant control interface in Debian 10

2020-08-06 Thread APT Gatuno MX
close 965282 thanks The bug is not in Debian packaging, so I'm closing this bug. -- Atte. Félix Arreola «Sin firma GPG»

Bug#965282: wpasupplicant: fails to create /var/run/wpa_supplicant control interface in Debian 10

2020-07-29 Thread APT Gatuno MX
Finally found the issue. Looks like the ctrl unix sockets are not created if network-manager is not installed. Not sure about the complete work-flow, but goes like this: * wpa_supplicant inits. It doesn't create any unix socket on normal startup * network-manager ask for something in the

Bug#965282: wpasupplicant: fails to create /var/run/wpa_supplicant control interface in Debian 10

2020-07-18 Thread APT Gatuno MX
El 18/07/2020 3:40 pm, Andrej Shadura escribió: Hi, Could it be that /var/run is for some reason not a symlink to /run? Please note that the socket directory is in fact in /run. It would be strange, but let's eliminate that before we go deeper in the investigation :) Nice check. /run and

Bug#965282: wpasupplicant: fails to create /var/run/wpa_supplicant control interface in Debian 10

2020-07-18 Thread APT Gatuno MX
El 18/07/2020 2:59 pm, Andrej Shadura escribió: Hi, Thanks for the bug report, but could you please provide more details? Not sure what extra info is needed. But, let's check some examples: Machine with Debian 9 and wpa_supplicant service running: root@nohost:~# systemctl status

Bug#965282: wpasupplicant: fails to create /var/run/wpa_supplicant control interface in Debian 10

2020-07-18 Thread APT Gatuno MX
Package: wpasupplicant Version: 2:2.7+git20190128+0c1e29f-6+deb10u2 Severity: minor Dear Maintainer, I was trying to make use of the control interface of wpasupplicant, but found out that it was not created. The service is running and no default options (or configurations have been changed),

Bug#876703: schroot: Can't run schroot as normal user

2017-10-03 Thread APT Gatuno MX
The problem lies in the created chroot itself. The root directory had '0700', so I fixed by entering chroot and changing permissions. The bug doesn't apply to schroot itself Special thanks to Roger for pointing the permissions problem. -- Atte. Félix Arreola «Sin firma GPG»

Bug#876703: schroot: Can't run schroot as normal user

2017-10-03 Thread APT Gatuno MX
El 03/10/2017 3:57 pm, Roger Leigh escribió: What are the permissions on the root directory of the chroot? You might have permission to access it as root for the chroot call, but that might not apply to the user after we call setuid/setgid to switch the user and group. But does the user or

Bug#876703: schroot: Can't run schroot as normal user

2017-10-03 Thread APT Gatuno MX
Ok, I went further with the dbug messages. I added more debug messages to schroot and found that after calling chroot (and the call was successful) executing chdir fails with the error "EACCES". So, I removed the "chdir" for loop part, and tried to execute the shell, and the following "stat"

Bug#876703: schroot: Can't run schroot as normal user

2017-10-03 Thread APT Gatuno MX
Ok, I still can't schroot as normal user, but adding some debugging messages to schroot found that a chdir call fails, even if the directory exists (example /, /tmp). Running getcwd BEFORE doing the chdir return "/". That means that the chroot call actually worked, but the next calls to chdir

Bug#876703: schroot: Can't run schroot as normal user

2017-09-24 Thread APT Gatuno MX
Package: schroot Version: 1.6.10-3+b1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, Can't run schroot as normal user in the schroot stretch version. I've done the following: I've installed a new, clean Debian stretch installation, without any graphical interface. Next, created a normal user, and then