Bug#969177: debmake: cannot create deb for nodejs modeule

2023-10-26 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 16:37:52 +0200 Pirate Praveen wrote: Control: reopen -1 Control: notfixed 4.4.0-1 On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 10:54:14 +0200 Pirate Praveen wrote: > Control: fixed -1 4.4.0-1 > > Looks like it is fixed in current version, closing this bug. Thanks! Seems like I was mistaken,

Bug#991815:

2023-10-11 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
I think with the latest version from upstream it would be easier to get the debian package working. With 1.5.7 version the build related issues are minimal. Here's what I've done presently. First, started from Rico's git. Then imported 1.4.7b after downloading it from debian source using

Bug#991815:

2022-12-23 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
I tried to do some work on this in here: https://salsa.debian.org/akshay/sfst/ Was facing issues with debian build not succeeding. That led to two PRs in the upstream repo. But once those were merged I didn't get a chance to try this again. I think with the latest version from upstream it

Bug#1011973: node-webpack-sources: autopkgtest failure TypeError: addMapping is not a function

2022-05-28 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
with node-source-map 0.7 built from salsa master branch, there is only 1 failure. 26 tests were failing earlier with node-source-map 0.6. This is a red herring. The autopkgtest fails aren't related to node-source-map at all. Specifically, the tests don't fail in gbp buildpackage, but

Bug#1004658: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#1004658: Bug#1004658: Help to compile a wasm package

2022-05-28 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
anywhere else). The job is done (see debian/rules), we just have to find the good dependencies and fix the build since built wasm isn't exactly what upstream embeds in node-source-map, maybe some unpublished work... I'm not exactly sure if the build is broken. The artifact generated by the

Bug#1009598: reassigned this bug to node-postcss-loader

2022-05-12 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
On Wed, 11 May 2022 11:23:52 +0200 Georges Khaznadar wrote: Hello, the errors raised during the build of node-ktex are due to an error which comes from node-postcss-loader I can confirm the bug is in node-postcss-loader It is because webpack 5 is required for this version of

Bug#1009245: ruby-autoprefixer-rails: broken build (TypeError: Cannot read property 'env' of undefined)

2022-05-03 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
On the other hand, the autoprefixer.js from the gem (about 1 MB) and the autoprefixer.js that's generated through build from the upstream repo (about 8 MB) seems to be different. This is unexplained by the dev. I was comparing an older version of the gem actually. Please ignore this

Bug#1009245: ruby-autoprefixer-rails: broken build (TypeError: Cannot read property 'env' of undefined)

2022-04-12 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
There is a possibility that this is related to the execjs version. https://github.com/ai/autoprefixer-rails/issues/203#issuecomment-838512342 On the other hand, the autoprefixer.js from the gem (about 1 MB) and the autoprefixer.js that's generated through build from the upstream repo (about

Bug#991815: RFA: sfst -- Stuttgart finite-state transducer tools

2021-08-16 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
I'm interested in adopting. This project is a dependency for https://morph.smc.org.in/ which is an initiative I care about. I have familiarity with the debian-js team's packaging workflow (gbp, pkg-js-tools, autopkgtest, salsa, etc). But I've never uploaded a package myself (yet). I have

Bug#992075: gitlab: download button for 2fa recovery codes does not work (coping works)

2021-08-10 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
Upstream issue: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/-/merge_requests/2271 Can be fixed with this commit: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ui/-/commit/3a4de98fecfe8e7808e3e83cd84a0639c1e6f33b

Bug#992008: ruby-google-protobuf: Missing lib/google/protobuf directory and fails require

2021-08-08 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
Package: ruby-google-protobuf Version: 3.17.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Dear Maintainer, I was trying to install gitlab to reproduce #966653 Installed ruby-google-protobuf from experimental The pg_query library was erroring at startup, with failure to require

Bug#990458: libjs-autosize is not fixed by node-babel-plugin-add-module exports update

2021-07-03 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/33505992/babel-6-changes-how-it-exports-default But most importantly https://kentcdodds.com/blog/misunderstanding-es6-modules-upgrading-babel-tears-and-a-solution 03-Jul-2021 16:56:56 Pirate Praveen : > Control: reopen -1 > > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 22:40:13

Bug#990458: Attaching the files from buster vs bullseye

2021-06-30 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
This is most likely due to babel-plugin-add-module-exports being broken. See https://github.com/59naga/babel-plugin-add-module-exports/issues/72 and https://github.com/59naga/babel-plugin-add-module-exports/issues/80 and https://github.com/59naga/babel-plugin-add-module-exports/issues/73

Bug#977900: node-autoprefixer: FTBFS: ENOENT: no such file or directory, open 'path'

2020-12-26 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
A few observations. 1) The commit https://github.com/rollup/plugins/commit/1459cf0ab5e5eb7beee46f52bc4dbbb88d3e4335#diff-c68d63c5e10e04a850c0ea8abd479dbb77c794b3aadecf91483dcf3df96156df which prevents exceptions from being silently ignored maybe the reason why this is starting to err. 2)

Bug#977781: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977781: Bug#977781: real issue is, it does not pull not-yet-cached modules

2020-12-21 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
gbp:error: upstream/1.22.10+_cs18.39.16 is not a valid treeish indeed your fork only has 33 tags, whereas js-team/node-yarnpkg has 37. Please pull those tags and push them to your fork, then force restart the CI pipeline. This would help us to see if your proposed fix works. Pushing

Bug#977781: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977781: real issue is, it does not pull not-yet-cached modules

2020-12-21 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
There are some 4 pipes before the finish event. I'm looking through each one of them to see if there's a mismatch. It seems to be tar-fs Please see https://salsa.debian.org/js-team/node-yarnpkg/-/merge_requests/4 I've just downloaded the latest version from the github of tar-fs and

Bug#977781: [Pkg-javascript-devel] Bug#977781: real issue is, it does not pull not-yet-cached modules

2020-12-21 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
> >I think the real issue is that it does not pull not-yet-cached modules. > I did some console.log debugging yesterday. The tarball-fetcher, for whatever be the reason, doesn't ever trigger the .on('finish' event

Bug#977781: yarnpkg: fails to download modules

2020-12-20 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
> Since yarnpkg add command did not return an error, the autpkgtest was > succeeding even though it did not add any modules to node_modules > directory. > I did a bisect (sort of). Removing cache is not an issue till commit 232ee703 (New upstream version 1.22.4+debian) But, it is an issue

Bug#977781: yarnpkg: fails to download modules

2020-12-20 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
> Since yarnpkg add command did not return an error, the autpkgtest was > succeeding even though it did not add any modules to node_modules > directory. > I did a bisect (sort of). Removing cache is not an issue till commit 232ee703 (New upstream version 1.22.4+debian) But, it is an issue

Bug#781220: Include README in diaspora-installer

2015-03-26 Thread Akshay S Dinesh
Package: diaspora-installer Version: 0.3 Please include a README in the diaspora-installer package because there is a lot of things going in the background and automation will deny the person who installs the package a chance to know all those tiny details which they will have to know if they run