Hi Andrea,
thanks for raising my attention and thanks for the detailed analysis.
Would it help to move that symbol to FUSE_3.13 in the version script
(for example in libfuse-3.17?)?
Thanks,
Bernd
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
Dear Debian maintainers,
unfortunately I don't have time anymore to maintain unionfs-fuse. There
hadn't been any updates from me for the last years and I'm afraid it
does not get any better.
To my excuse I actually tried to upload a new version some time ago (1
or
Hi Brett,
I'm currently preparing a new version upload. If you should be DD and
would have some time, would you mind to upload the current version in
mentors? I'm probably going to do another to add a man page for the old
binary name 'unionfs-fuse', just pointing to 'unionfs'. And another man
On 07/15/2015 05:28 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
* Bernd Schubert bernd.schub...@fastmail.fm [2015-07-15 11:06]:
I'm currently preparing a new version upload. If you should be DD and
would have some time, would you mind to upload the current version in
mentors?
I've uploaded the package
On 08/05/2014 08:21 AM, Frank Heckenbach wrote:
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.24-2.2
Justification: renders package unusable
Severity: grave
# mkdir 1 2 3
# unionfs-fuse 1:2 3
fuse: warning: library too old, some operations may not not work
According to the dependencies it requires libfuse2
On 03/18/2014 03:10 PM, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.24-2.1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch upstream
Hi,
I've compiled unionfs-fuse with extended attribute support and now I'm
getting errors on ls:
ls -lh union/
ls: union/stats: No such file or directory
total
Hello Eduard,
On 02/24/2011 09:11 AM, Eduard Bloch wrote:
#include hallo.h
* Bernd Schubert [Wed, Feb 23 2011, 02:14:15PM]:
a) unionfs-fuse -ocow repdir=RW:/var/cache=RO testdir -ononempty
chmod -R a+w testdir
b) unionfs-fuse -ocow repdir=RW:/var/log=RO testdir -ononempty
echo foo
, then you will need to wait for 0.25, which has a new flag
-o relaxed_permissions for
non UID=0 or GID=0 users. And it is a wish-list bug then.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
aa...@fastmail.fm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Hello,
could you please tell me what is the outcome of this bug report?
Lintian reports for my unionfs-fuse:
W: unionfs-fuse: manpage-has-errors-from-man
usr/share/man/man8/unionfs-fuse.8.gz Invalid or incomplete multibyte or wide
character
[...]
N:To test this for yourself you can
I really sorry Raphael. All my fault. I introduced this bug and I'm also
responsible for the huge delay to upload a new package. Unfortunately, I had
been more than busy over the past months. While I fixed it seem, I always
wanted to investigate other issues on the mailing list before
Hi all,
I updated the packages on my home page and also made it mostly lintian clean
now. I'm going to upload it to Debian-Mentors now.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Hello Christopher,
On Wednesday 01 July 2009, Simmons, Christopher wrote:
Package: collectl
Version: 3.3.4
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-de...@lists.debian.org
*** Please type your report below this line ***
I wish to work on creating a debian package for collectl-3.3.4
I
Package: network-manager-kde
Version: 1:0.7~~svn931033-1
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
The new version in Sid refuses to connect to my wlan network, but
gnome-network-manager works fine. The version in Lenny also did worked fine.
I get these error messages on the
Guus Sliepen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:31:43AM +, Guy Coates wrote:
* Package name: libibumad
Version : 1.2.3
Upstream Author : Voltaire, Inc.
* URL : http://www.openfabrics.org
I do not see a libibumad tarball there, I did find OFED-1.4.tgz which
Hello Vincent
On Monday 02 February 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
Bernd Schubert wrote:
On Sunday 01 February 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed this RC bug: 511995. Are you still in need for a sponsor
for unionfs-fuse 0.21-3 ? If yes, would you like me
Hello Vincent,
On Sunday 01 February 2009, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
Hello,
I've noticed this RC bug: 511995. Are you still in need for a sponsor
for unionfs-fuse 0.21-3 ? If yes, would you like me to sponsor you ?
(that would probably happen only tomorrow).
I didn't find a sponsor yet,
Hello Mark
On Saturday 31 January 2009, Mark Poks wrote:
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.21-2
Severity: wishlist
i have very fast SSD disk, but it's very small. i would like to have
part of /home directory here (a config files) and another part on
typical SATA drive (usual files), so i
Sorry for the delay, I was busy all the time. I upgraded the bug to serious
and uploaded a new package to mentors. Once it is in unstable I will write a
mail to the release team.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Hello Raphael,
On Friday 16 January 2009, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.21-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi again,
It took me a little while to track it down, but here it is:
When using relative paths unionfs-fuse wasn't allocation enough memory thus
the
Hello Jörg,
On Saturday 10 January 2009, Jörg Sommer wrote:
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.21-2
Severity: normal
Hi,
# mkdir /tmp/{a-c}
# for i in /tmp/{a,b}; do mount -t tmpfs none $i; done
# unionfs-fuse /tmp/a=RW:/tmp/b=RO /tmp/c
# df G /tmp/.
none 315M 0
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 22:17:07 Raphael Geissert wrote:
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.21-2
Severity: minor
--help should not write to stderr, it should better write to stdout; just
like the majority of commands out there.
Cheers,
Thanks, commited upstream.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
.
sorry my fault, we do use unionfs-fuse for NFS clients for /etc and /var, and
I entirely forgot it also might be used for other purposes ;) So thanks a lot
for noticing that, I have pushed the installation to bin/ instead of sbin/
upstream.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks
On Wednesday 07 January 2009 22:07:49 Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hello Bernd,
2009/1/7 Bernd Schubert b...@q-leap.de:
[...]
Hmm, I'm afraid though, this is more a missing feature. Everything I did
for RO/RW branches I did to properly support copy-on-write. And actually
I thing
.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Hello Jörg,
thanks for spotting and reporting this bug. I have commited a first patch
to my branch, which should fix the issue with one rw-branch, but it needs
more work when there are several rw-branches.
http://podgorny.cz/~bernd/hg/hgwebdir.cgi/radek-trunk-bernd-merge/rev/94df00cfbff6
I
Hmm, I see my previous description was a bit terse, so here in detail:
read-only branch: some_path/sub_path
read-write branch: empty or some_path, but NOT sub_path
== union: some_path/sub_path
Creating a new file in the union directory some_path/subpath will now fail
without the bugfix, since
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+keytouch (2.3.2-2.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * fix xsession shutdown problem
+ * (closes: #487629)
+
+ -- Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed, 20 Aug
Hello Neil,
I already uploaded a fixed version to mentors.debian.net, which only fixes
this bug and therefore should be o.k. as freeze exception.
Unfortunately, I'm only a package maintainer without any upload rights.
Would be great if you could do that for me.
The package can be found on
Package: unionfs-fuse
Version: 0.21-1
Severity: grave
Tags: patch
Justification: renders package unusable
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oops, somehow deleted the bug descripton when I submitted the bug.
Last week a user reported on the mailing list that creating new files will
fail the the writable branch doesn't have the directory path. So clearly a
copy-on-write bug. I already submitted patch to the upstream repository:
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-60
Severity: important
In /etc/init.d/umountfs all filesystems except tmpfs are umounted with the
force -f flag. While I already think it is a bad idea to use the
special force flag for everything, it causes real trouble with
fuse-filesystems. For
On Friday 16 May 2008, Daniel Baumann wrote:
how does it compare to funionfs?
Compare the sources yourself ;) Funionfs has all code in a very few files,
only a very few comments and then some of these in French...
On the other hand, unionfs-fuse is well structured, has many comments, uses
lots
Package: udev
Version: 0.114-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello,
sg*|*)
NAME=generic
;;
So for sg* _and_ all targets so far without a rule NAME=generic is used.
On the specific system we have a tape-library attached and the ch.ko driver
uses ch* as device names.
When the
Package: e2fsprogs
Version: 1.39+1.40-WIP-2006.11.14+dfsg-2
Severity: normal
In unix.c: PRS() the function atoi() is used to convert strings to integers,
however, atoi() does not check for errors and therefore shouldn't be used
for human input.
Yesterday I wanted to create the lustre mds and
subsystem here is in case if it is using bitmaps,
but that's different issue.)
Yep, thats exactly what I'm talking about and its not only limited to usb, but
happens with sata as well.
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
for mdadm?
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
Q-Leap Networks GmbH
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 09 May 2007 15:14:50 martin f krafft wrote:
also sprach Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007.05.09.1417 +0200]:
Problem-1) When the disk fails, udev will remove it from /dev.
Unfortunately this will make it impossible to remove the disk or its
partitions from /dev/mdX device
I'm on amd64 using 2.0.4.dfsg.1-1 in my i386-chroot I got the older
2.0.3-something Version where OUOTIENT is working fine. Thus I'm not sure
whether this is amd64 or 2.0.4 related.
Works fine on i386 and has the bug on AMD64 (both just tested with
2.0.4.dfsg.1-1).
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI
On Monday 04 December 2006 01:40, you wrote:
Bernd Schubert wrote:
do you know at which openoffice.org version the problem first occurded?
In the institut we are running 2.0.3-6~bpo.1 and there's everything on
nfs (even the root filesystem) without any problems.
2.0.4. The first report
Hi Stephen,
Stephen Benning wrote:
I, too, have been given fits by this bug. However, I have restarted my
portmapper multiple times, and the problem was *not* fixed. I have this
problem whether or not my NFS is firewalled (in fact, the problem first
showed up on my non-firewalled machines
I'm also working on a fix for ubuntu (not ready yet) and therefore moved the
directory, new sources.list line:
# my Openoffice build
deb http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/openoffice/sid ./
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120
Package: moinmoin-common
Version: 1.5.3-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Hi Jonas,
I just wanted to ask why there's in Sid/Etch still moinmoin-1.5.3 and
not 1.5.6? As far as I can see it from the upstream changelog most updates
are just bugfixes. I also did a quick test with 1.5.6 backported to sarge
and
For those who are interested, I have uploaded openoffice.org packages
including my patch. Just add this line to your sources.list
deb http://www.pci.uni-heidelberg.de/tc/usr/bernd/downloads/openoffice/ ./
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120
that.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120 Heidelberg
--- openoffice.org-2.0.4~rc1.old/ooo-build/build/ood680-m3/vcl/source/glyphs/gcach_ftyp.cxx 2006-09-24 00:23:00.0 +0200
+++ openoffice.org-2.0.4~rc1.new/ooo-build/build/ood680-m3/vcl
:)
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120 Heidelberg
Hello Rene,
I think I found the reason why the bytecode interpreter is not used, see here:
http://www.openoffice.org/servlets/ReadMsg?list=devmsgNo=17880
Now, there are two ways to resolve this bug:
1.) Quick'n dirty. Simply replace FT_LOAD_TARGET_LIGHT in
vcl/source/glyphs/gcach_ftyp.cxx by
Hello,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Rene Engelhard wrote:
Ah, it's in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=378619
where you didn't refer to..
You are referring to
Package: latex-xft-fonts
Version: 0.1-5
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
in cmex10.ttf there is a missing opening bracket '[' of character number #138.
I created this missing character by using fontforge and copying and
flipping the closing bracket ']' of character #139.
I'm attaching the new
Oops, I mean #183 (missing '[') and #184 (template ']' used to create the
missing character).
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian bugs.
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120 Heidelberg
The attached patch was accepted upstream. Please apply it, if etch will be
shipped with the current kde version.
Thanks,
Bernd
diff -ru kdebase-3.5.4/kxkb/extension.cpp kdebase-3.5.4.new/kxkb/extension.cpp
--- kdebase-3.5.4/kxkb/extension.cpp 2006-03-17 11:17:41.0 +0100
+++
Hi,
svgalib-1.9.25 is in experimental, but there's still no kernel module package.
The module builds and insmods without any problems on 2.6.17.
Any chance for an official package?
Another question, svgalib-1.9 is a prerelease since ages and I don't see it
will ever declared stable. How about
Package: kdebase-bin
Version: 4:3.5.4-2
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
kxkb creates {layoutname}.xkm files in /tmp. Now think of a
multi-usersystem as with xdmcp. Since those *.xkm files won't be
deleted, only one user can create them. For all other users there's a
problem.
I already have
Hello Matej,
On Sunday 13 August 2006 06:21, Matej Vela wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
this bug report is part of a mass-bugfiling. Your package
tidev-modules-source
is calling depmod in its postinst and/or postrm scripts.
[...]
As far as I can tell, no, it isn't. Where's the
On Sunday 13 August 2006 21:58, Matej Vela wrote:
retitle 381761 tidev-modules-source: update-modules deprecated
thanks
Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sorry, tidev-modules-source got probably by accident into the list.
Anyway looking at I see that it is calling 'update-modules
Hi Nicolas,
On Monday 07 August 2006 00:38, Nicolas Boullis wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 11:55:30PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Package: em8300-source
Hi,
7
this bug report is part of a mass-bugfiling. Your package
em8300-source
is calling depmod in its postinst
to the corresponding module-source packages? All packages manually
one by one or is there an automatic way?
Thanks,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120 Heidelberg
() in
ovsec_kadmind.c.
Cheers,
Bernd
--
Bernd Schubert
PCI / Theoretische Chemie
Universität Heidelberg
INF 229
69120 Heidelberg
diff -ru krb5-1.4.3.orig/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c krb5-1.4.3-7/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c
--- krb5-1.4.3.orig/src/kadmin/server/ovsec_kadmd.c 2004
Package: tvtime
Version: 1.0.1-2.2
Severity: minor
The suid bits become overwritten by chown root:root /usr/bin/tvtime,
therefore the suid bit is first set and then removed again.
--- tvtime.postinst.old 2006-05-28 01:56:42.528132901 +0200
+++ tvtime.postinst 2006-05-28 01:54:31.853586239
Package: krb5-admin-server
Version: 1.4.3-6
Severity: important
While testing kerberos on my home system I noticed that
krb5-admin-server hangs on almost each system startup. After pressing randomly
some keys the boot process goes on. While this is already annoying on my
desktop system, it is
On Saturday 22 April 2006 18:58, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bernd Schubert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Package: krb5-admin-server
Version: 1.4.3-6
Severity: important
While testing kerberos on my home system I noticed that
krb5-admin-server hangs on almost each system startup. After pressing
On Thursday 06 October 2005 11:52, you wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 05:50:59PM +0200, Bernd Schubert wrote:
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Severity: important
We are running Sid within a chroot environment and from time to time I
update the packages there. Since about apt-0.6.40
Package: apt
Version: 0.6.41
Severity: important
We are running Sid within a chroot environment and from time to time I
update the packages there. Since about apt-0.6.40 the 'apt-get update
command' causes problems. It just leaves zero byte files in
/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/, e.g.:
Package: udev
Version: 0.060-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hello Marco,
the function make_extra_nodes() in /etc/init.d/udev is only executed
properly when the current working directory is '/'. This is just due to
a missing slash on checking for /etc/udev/links.conf (in the script this
is
Package: sntop
Version: 1.4.3-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
I just found out there is something like sntop (so far only knew iftop)
and immediately believe that the package has a bug ;)
Just installing sntop without further configuration results in this
message
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~sntop
65 matches
Mail list logo
