Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 1:2.2.13-11
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I've had three attempts at installing dovecot on a fresh jessie install. Played
with various configurations to try to connect with/without ssl. The 1st
appended confile is before altering the configs.
--
Package: nvidia-legacy-304xx-driver
Version: 304.125-1
Followup-For: Bug #749264
Dear Maintainer,
Upgraded from Wheezy to Jessie - no problem except the nVidia GeForce 7300 card
- X barfed. Installed legacy-304xx driver as recommended but still wouldn't
load the legacy driver.
Ran sudo
Package: clamav-daemon
Version: 0.96.1+dfsg-1~volatile1
Followup-For: Bug #579960
Setting up clamav-daemon (0.96.1+dfsg-1~volatile1) ...
Installing new version of config file /etc/init.d/clamav-daemon ...
Starting ClamAV daemon: clamd clamd:
llvm/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCJITInfo.cpp:399: virtual
-
Subject:
trying to start cdrbq gives : /usr/bin/cdrbq: line 3: exec: wish: not
found
From:
Clive Menzies cl...@clivemenzies.co.uk
Date:
Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:22:03 +
To:
Debian Bug Tracking System sub...@bugs.debian.org
To:
Debian Bug Tracking System sub
The main topic of this bug resoved to be a broken mirror. The weird
error message has not appeared for quite a while. Hence closing.
Subject:
D-I RC2 image powerpc - qualified success
From:
Clive Menzies cl
The cups upgrade through aptitude now asks if you want to keep your
cupsd.conf file or replace it but still overwrites the printers.conf file.
In addition, prior to today's upgrade (22May09) the line:
AuthInfoRequired username,password appeared once for each printer
attached to a server. Now
Sorry, sent this to the wrong address
Original Message
Subject:print jobs not getting to printer after upgrade
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 17:55:52 +0100
From: Clive Menzies cl...@clivemenzies.co.uk
To: sub...@bugs.debian.org
CC: Maggie Dusnic mag
Package: cdrbq
Version: 1.23-1
Severity: important
This is a recent install of lenny on a thinkpad X61 tablet. The CD Writer is
external (USB). I haven't checked the source to see what line 3 contains.
I just can't seem to get cdrbq to run.
Thanks
Clive
-- System Information:
Debian
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst.iso CD (from external USB DVD drive)
Image version: lennyBeta2-i386-netinst.iso (downloaded 5 September 08)
Date: 7 Nov 08 circa 5pm
Machine: Tablet
product: ThinkPad X61
vendor: LENOVO
version: Tablet
Processor: Intel(R) Core(TM)2
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
I upgraded this machine a few months ago - apologies for not submitting
a report earlier. I've just most of the rest of the servers and submit
this for the sake of completeness.
The reason for upgrading this machine early was to run particular
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
This is one of 4 G4 servers I'm upgrading and it was all pretty
dramaless. I won't submit reports for the other three but one is
complete and OK. The other are proceeding as I write and so far so good.
Thanks for a great upgrade experience (the last
Package: upgrade-reports
Severity: normal
This is a SATA machine installed a couple of years ago before sarge
became stable running a later kernel to run mdadm properly. This
upgrade included the kernel and it's all working fine.
Great work!
Thanks
Clive
-- System Information:
Debian
On (12/03/07 21:34), Joey Hess wrote:
Your initial tasksel failures were due to a broken mirror:
Mar 12 17:37:39 in-target: Err http://download.mirror.ac.uk etch/main
xserver-xorg-video-all 1:7.1.0-12
Mar 12 17:37:39 in-target: 404 Not Found
This also resulted in tasksel installing a
On (13/03/07 13:36), Joey Hess wrote:
Tasksel should have shown the list of tasks and not gotten near the code
in question unless you removed a task or added a new task. I suspect it
might be outputting other stuff as well, even if it's not visible once
the UI is closed.
script
tasksel
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinstall
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/amd64/iso-cd/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 2007-03-12 16:00
Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi
Processor: AMD64 3400+
Memory: 512Mb
Partitions:
Disk
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: Netinstall
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/powerpc/iso-cd/debian-testing-powerpc-netinst.iso
Date: 2007-03-12 18:00
Machine: PowerMac G4
Processor: 800MHz
Memory: 768Mb
Partitions:
/dev/hda
#
On (12/03/07 21:10), Clive Menzies wrote:
~$ cat tasksel
u desktop Desktop environment
u web-serverWeb server
i print-server Print server
u dns-serverDNS server
u file-server File server
u mail-server Mail server
u database-server SQL database
u laptop
On (08/01/07 19:29), Clive Menzies wrote:
On (08/01/07 19:22), Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 18:04, Clive Menzies wrote:
However, if I pull the power supply and plug it back in, the machine
recovers fine except that eth0 doesn't come up; if I reboot the machine
eth0 comes
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst.iso CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: Sat 13 Jan 07 c. 3pm GMT
Machine: Acer Aspire 2003 WLMI
Processor:Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1600MHz
Memory:512Mb
On (12/01/07 18:21), Frans Pop wrote:
On Sunday 07 January 2007 22:13, Clive Menzies wrote:
Comments/Problems:
Apart from having to disable autodetect of the Cdrom to get the media
to boot,
Hmm. Can you elaborate on that a bit? This could possibly help other as
well.
Was this a BIOS
This is probably not in the domain of the installer but I'm not sure
where to report this.
Following the installation, I assigned a static IP address on the LAN to set
the box up as a server. All works fine.
However, if I pull the power supply and plug it back in, the machine
recovers fine
On (08/01/07 19:22), Frans Pop wrote:
On Monday 08 January 2007 18:04, Clive Menzies wrote:
However, if I pull the power supply and plug it back in, the machine
recovers fine except that eth0 doesn't come up; if I reboot the machine
eth0 comes up fine and ifconfig shows everything as normal
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: netinst.iso CD
Image version:
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_rc1/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 7 Jan 2007 circa 7pm
Machine: Desktop Computer
product: MS-6309
vendor: Fujitsu Siemens
Processor:Pentium III
Oops!
Forgot to attach output of lspci -vnn
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo
PRO133x] [1106:0691] (rev c4)
Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0
Memory at
Package: icedove
Version: 1.5.0.7-3
Severity: important
Hi
I've had icedove installed on the 64bit system for a while (since the
name change at least) and all has been working reasonably OK. A few
days ago I noticed when I entered my password to log in to the INBOX
specifically, icedove
Package: openoffice.org-writer
Version: 2.0.4-5
Severity: important
I first came across this in the 64bit 2.0.4-1 package. I've been using
OOo in a 32 bit chroot and most of my documents were created using this.
I've switched to 64bit recently and in the main it works well AFAICT.
However, if I
Hi Frans
On (01/11/06 06:32), Frans Pop wrote:
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 01:16, Clive Menzies wrote:
Comments/Problems:
VFS Cannot open root device hda13 or unknown-block(0,0)
Please append a correct root= boot option
Kernel panic - not syncing: VVVFS Unable to mount root fs
), Clive Menzies wrote:
On (01/11/06 06:32), Frans Pop wrote:
In general that means that the initrd fails to load the drivers needed to
access the hard disk, OR, if there are multiple disk controllers in the
system, that device names are assigned differently during the boot than
during
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: CD
Image version:
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/amd64/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 23:15 (GMT) 31 0ct 06
Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi
Processor: amd athlon 64 / 3400+
Memory:512Mb
Partitions:
Disk /dev/hda: 60.0 GB,
On (27/10/06 06:21), Bonnie Fassett wrote:
hey, i figured out my burning error now dealing wi t h trying to start my
graphical environment. i only downloaded the base system so im not even
sure if its on there. perhaps you know the command to installing the x
environment? thanks
You can
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.60
Followup-For: Bug #392017
Hi
To upgrade my system or install packages I have to remove
apt-listbugs; if installed, upgrades/installations fail:
Retrieving bug reports... 0% ... E: no block given
E: Sub-process if dpkg -s apt-listbugs | grep -q '^Status: .*
On (10/10/06 21:30), Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Can you all please do a better work this time and read README.Debian
and give me the output of the following command ? (preferrably after
upgrading to the latest version.)
Debugging apt-listbugs
==
When there is an error, to
On (10/10/06 22:32), Junichi Uekawa wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ls -1 /var/cache/apt/archives/netbase*.deb |
/usr/sbin/apt-listbugs apt -d
proxy configuration from APT.CONF: false
http_proxy: false :
http://bugs.debian.org:80/
indexdir = /indices/
On (10/10/06 22:41), Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Hi,
- unsupported proxy `false'
Exception: ArgumentError
Exception `LocalJumpError' at /usr/sbin/apt-listbugs:1086 - no
block given
... E: no block given
Setting Proxy to 'false' is 378868, already
On (07/08/06 21:12), Lukas Ruf wrote:
Clive,
have your defied a temporary environment variable? $TEMP and $HOME ?
Do the paths exist where these point to?
I didn't define anything ... not sure how or why I would :)
FWIW:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ printenv
SSH_AGENT_PID=9197
TERM=xterm
Package: muttprint
Version: 0.72d-5
Severity: important
I sent this from from reportbug but I don't think it went which may
indicate there's something else not right with this install. Sending
mail in mutt doesn't seem to be a problem.
Hi
I've just done a fresh install (etch beta3) and
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: debian-testing-amd64-netinst(3).iso
Image version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
downloaded 31/7/06
Install Date: 31 July 06 c.12noon
Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+
Memory: 512MB
Partitions:
Hi
Having completed a successful base installation, I thought I'd add X
etc. Everytime I install stuff it asks for the disk. Commenting out
the cdrom in the sources.list makes it OK. However, a newcomer to
Debian may take a while to work it out. I guess only installing the
base system missed
On (31/07/06 20:58), Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 05:47:36PM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
Hi
Having completed a successful base installation, I thought I'd add X
etc. Everytime I install stuff it asks for the disk. Commenting out
the cdrom in the sources.list makes
Package: installation-reports
Boot method: debian-testing-amd64-netinst(3).iso
Image version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/
downloaded 31/7/06
Date: 31 July 06 20:30
Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi
Processor: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3400+
Memory: 512Mb
Partitions:
Disk
Package: apt-listbugs
Version: 0.0.49
Followup-For: Bug #332442
Hi
This problem started a couple of days ago. I usually update daily but
now I get the following:
Fetched 3799kB in 21s (174kB/s)
Reading package fields... Done
Reading package status... Done
Retrieving bug reports... 0% [0/12]
On (08/02/06 10:07), Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
Il giorno mar, 07/02/2006 alle 19.33 +, Clive Menzies ha scritto:
Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 0.99.14-1
Severity: important
Refer to a bug report #351263 for mutt
A number of people accessing dovecot-imap (on sarge) using
On (08/02/06 08:03), Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2006, Clive Menzies wrote:
I'll try to find some time to try the unstable dovecot package some
where else.
Another alternative is to use a backport from www.backports.org. In the
next couple of days, I'll provide a backport
Package: dovecot-imapd
Version: 0.99.14-1
Severity: important
Refer to a bug report #351263 for mutt
A number of people accessing dovecot-imap (on sarge) using the latest
version of mutt /1.5.11+cvs20060126-1 can access their mail headers but
not the actual messages.
The upstream maintainer,
Package: razor
Version: 2.670-1sarge2
Followup-For: Bug #163248
I was having the same problem when running spamassassin but further
investigation indicated that each user needs to register for a razor
account as per:
/usr/share/doc/razor/README.Debian
However:
$ razor-admin --register
Error 202
Hi
The problem I was encountering was that the RAID array wouldn't assemble
on boot. It was due to SATA modules not being loaded before mdadm tries
to start RAID. Adding the required modules to /etc/modules solved the
problem.
Many thanks
Please close this bug.
Regards
Clive
--
On (15/11/05 06:54), Christian Perrier wrote:
Zeus:/var/log/samba# tail /var/log/samba/log.smbd
smbd version 3.0.14a-Debian started.
Copyright Andrew Tridgell and the Samba Team 1992-2004
[2005/11/14 19:46:20, 0] tdb/tdbutil.c:tdb_log(725)
tdb(/var/cache/samba/printing/HP895cxi.tdb):
Package: samba
Version: 3.0.14a-3
Severity: important
Hi
I have two samba servers with attached printers (epsonSC880 and
hp895cxi). Both have been printing fine (from Debian and Windows clients)
for several months however, in the last few weeks this machine with the
HP printer wouldn't print.
Oops sorry - I hit the return key before realising it had defaulted to
normal.
Thanks
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On (14/11/05 17:56), Christian Perrier wrote:
Could you please send a log excerpt by logging at level 3 temporarily?
(log level = 3 in the General section)
Please also post the [general] section of you smb.conf or at least
mention us the security= setting in it ?
Is the samba server
On (14/11/05 19:31), Christian Perrier wrote:
To: Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Christian Perrier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 19:31:54 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#339015: Bug classification should be important
Quoting Clive Menzies ([EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi
It would appear that pgadmin3 is uninstallable because of
version incompatibility between the two packages:
pgadmin31.0.2-7
pgadmin3-data 1.2.0-2
Is this likely to be resolved soon or is there a prescribed workaround?
Thanks
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for
Package: gftp-gtk
Version: 2.0.18-7
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
After connecting to a remote ftp server to upload a file, clicking on
the disconnect icon causes gftp to crash (disappears from the
workspace). It happened several times and once caused the system to lock
Hi Guys
Just to let you know, I've got a nubus machine (8100/80) sitting here
going spare. It's got woody on it currently but if you can make use of
it, you're welcome to it (I'm in North London)
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
...strategies for business
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
On (17/08/05 10:52), Sven Luther wrote:
Subject: Re: Bug#323182: debian-installer: boot.img for sarge doesn't, on PPC
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 09:51:49AM +0100, Clive Menzies wrote:
Hi Guys
Just to let you know, I've got a nubus machine (8100/80) sitting here
going spare. It's got
- Forwarded message from Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To: Cyril Brulebois [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Clive Menzies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:19:18 +0100
Subject: Re: xfce4-mcs-manager: Resolution settings not accessible through
Display
On (16/08/05 02:40
Hi
I'm looking to install imagemagick on sarge but apt-listbugs reports two
grave bugs outstanding:
grave bugs of imagemagick (- 6:6.0.6.2-2.4) done
#315013 - display command fails with error while loading shared
libraries
grave bugs of imagemagick (- 6:6.0.6.2-2.4) open
#268357 -
Package: xfce4-mcs-manager
Version: 4.2.2-1
Severity: important
I've been using xfce4.2 (from an unofficial source) for a few months and
when 4.2 entered sid recently, I removed the unofficial source from
sources.list.
After upgrading to the 'sid' version, my default resolution of 1280 X
800
On (23/05/05 18:03), astronut wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
[snip]
Further Comments/Problems:
126 packages failed to upgradesome are understandable, however
others should have... aptitude ouptut at end of message. I have a
complete log of the install proccess, however I didn't
On (18/05/05 12:34), Ewen McNeill wrote:
Package: upgrade-reports
Archive date: Tue May 17 20:00:01 UTC 2005
Upgrade date: 2005/05/18 12:30:00 +1200
Apologies for abusing this method to report a Sarge release documentation
issue, but it seemed the most likely to get to the relevant
Package: sa-exim
Version: 4.2-2
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Hi
Subject line says it all ;)
Suggest the following text in the sa-exim.conf file:
# Remove or comment out the following line to enable sa-exim
# SAEximRunCond: 0
be changed to:
# Remove comment in the following line and set to
Package: kernel-image-2.6.8-2-686-smp
Version: 2.6.8-13
Followup-For: Bug #268208
Hi
This is one of a pair of identical sarge production servers installed in
December 2004. The single processor kernel works fine but at the time
of the original install and this evening, I haven't been able to
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
sarge-powerpc-netinst.iso 16-Mar-2005 01:02 194M
uname -a: Apollo 2.6.8-powerpc #1 Thu Feb 24 14:15:19 CET 2005 ppc
GNU/Linux
Date: 17 Mar 05
Method: Netinstall after booting from the burnt CD
Proxied=no
Machine: Apple G4 Dual
- Forwarded message from Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
To: Clive Menzies CMA Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2005 20:04:46 +0100
Subject: Re: More questions
Clive Menzies CMA Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version: 11Jan05 sarge-amd64-netinst.iso from
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/
uname -a: Linux Darius 2.6.8-10-amd64-k8 #1 Sun Jan 9 18:25:28 CET 2005
x86_64 GNU/Linux
(original kernel from install: kernel 2.6.8-9-amd64-k8)
Package: rsync
Version: 2.6.3-2
Severity: grave
Justification: causes non-serious data loss
A cron job currently runs an automatic backup each night from the remote file
server (running rsyncd under inetd) to the backup server which runs the
following script without error:
#!/bin/bash
# This
On (17/01/05 16:40), Paul Slootman wrote:
To: Clive Menzies CMA Associates [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Paul Slootman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005 16:40:37 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#290892: rsync fails with syntax or usage error (code 1)
Reply-To: [EMAIL
Apologies
I'm afraid I resubmitted the report because I had't had an
acknowledgement or seen it in bug tracking. I feared I hadn't
configured exim4 properly and so reconfigured and repeated the bug
report.
There is some additional information included in the second report.
Regards
Clive
--
On (17/01/05 21:45), Thomas Wana wrote:
Hi,
ERROR: module is read only
quick question, are the permissions correct on the other end?
Hi Tom
I believe so:
$ ls -l /root/venus
drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 2005-01-03 09:46 backup
Regards
Clive
--
www.clivemenzies.co.uk ...
69 matches
Mail list logo
