Bug#525624: 0.5.2-1 needs versioned depends on apt-xapian-index

2009-04-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 04:40:08AM +0100, Matthew W. S. Bell matt...@bells23.org.uk was heard to say: Or, at least, I tried installing the above aptitude version and got errors with apt-xapian-index 0.16 and got some errors (sorry, no log attached) relating to the xapian index; I then

Bug#455220: aptitude: Reading package list percentage shown without % sign

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
I could reproduce this ten minutes ago in gnome-terminal. Now I can't. I checked the code, and aptitude is definitely asking curses to write out the progress percentage followed by a percent sign, flush right on the last row of the terminal. If I change the coordinates so it's one cell to the

Bug#455220: aptitude: Reading package list percentage shown without % sign

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:28:08PM +0200, Javier Serrano Polo jas...@terra.es was heard to say: unblock 455220 by 368916 thanks El dv 24 de 04 de 2009 a les 21:58 +0200, en/na Frans Pop va escriure: And does the issue go away if a correct TERM setting is used in Gnome? No. Ok,

Bug#455220: aptitude: Reading package list percentage shown without % sign

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 09:58:10PM +0200, Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl was heard to say: On Friday 24 April 2009, Javier Serrano Polo wrote: If you still believe this is an aptitude bug, please name another Curses application with a similar behaviour (updating text on the bottom right) that

Bug#525507: gnome-terminal shifts the last line to the right if it's updated twice in a row.

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: gnome-terminal Version: 2.22.3-3 Severity: normal When the last line of a gnome-terminal is updated twice in a row, once with a shorter string and once with a longer string, both displayed flush-right, the second string is displayed at the same starting location as the first one and

Bug#455220: aptitude: Reading package list percentage shown without % sign

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
I've attached a simple test case where curses / the terminal does the wrong thing. I'll file bugs against gnome-terminal and konsole: since the Linux console and xterm behave as expected, I'll assume for now that this is a terminal bug and not a curses bug. Daniel #include ncurses.h

Bug#525508: konsole corrupts the last line when it's written twice in a row.

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: konsole Version: 4:3.5.9.dfsg.1-6 Severity: normal When the last line of a konsole is updated twice in a row, once with a shorter string and once with a longer string, both displayed flush-right, the second string is displayed at the same starting location as the first one and

Bug#525507: Acknowledgement (gnome-terminal shifts the last line to the right if it's updated twice in a row.)

2009-04-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
I bet you'd like the test program. :-) Daniel #include ncurses.h #include string.h #include time.h int main(int argc, char **argv) { int width; int height; const char *msg1 = 0%, *msg2 = 50%; int msg1len, msg2len; WINDOW *root; WINDOW *child; msg1len = strlen(msg1);

Bug#524221: does not honour 1000 pins properly

2009-04-23 Thread Daniel Burrows
The version of aptitude I'm about to upload to experimental uses pins as tiebreakers when solving dependencies. In particular: in the default configuration, you won't see lower-pinned versions until aptitude has exhausted all the solutions that don't involve them. Hopefully this will solve or

Bug#375331: aptitude: more fine-grained control over strictness in conflict resolution

2009-04-23 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 05:46:42PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson sgunder...@bigfoot.com was heard to say: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 08:41:54AM -0700, Daniel Burrows wrote: I came across this bug while preparing the changelog for aptitude 0.5.2. aptitude has had a mechanism of resolver hints

Bug#524667: Bug#522881: aptitude: safe-upgrade stopped working after kde4 upload

2009-04-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
I've checked a fix for this problem into head. The fix is the most brutal one: it just disables package reinstatement. I have a few ideas about how to re-enable reinstatement without reintroducing this problem; it should allow packages to be reinstated except when they would trigger a

Bug#522881: aptitude: safe-upgrade stopped working after kde4 upload

2009-04-08 Thread Daniel Burrows
As I wrote to Sven on debian-user, there are really two bugs here: (1) aptitude, at least on my machine, takes way too long to compute a dependency solution in this case. (2) aptitude produces a solution that still has broken dependencies. I don't know about (1) yet, although

Bug#522532: Surprising interaction of groups, duplicate, and place text on path

2009-04-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: inkscape Version: 0.46-5 Severity: normal If text on a path and the path it is attached to are duplicated as a group, inkscape keeps the text connected to the original path, not the new path. IMO this is a surprising behavior and less useful than linking the text to the new path.

Bug#522537: Pagination loses some pages.

2009-04-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: graphviz Version: 2.20.2-3+b1 Severity: normal If I process the attached .dot file using: dot -Nshape=box -Gratio=auto -Efontsize=10 -Nfontsize=12 -Gpage=8.5,11 -Tps -o test2.ps test2.dot I get only two pages, containing the left half of the graph. The graph should take up four

Bug#522535: Non-constraint edges get lost in some graphs.

2009-04-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: graphviz Version: 2.20.2-3+b1 Severity: normal If I process the attached .dot file with the following command: dot -Nshape=box -Gratio=auto -Efontsize=10 -Nfontsize=12 -Gsize=8.5,11 -Tps -o test2.ps test2.dot then dot prints an error: Error: lost step6 step7 edge There should

Bug#522535: Acknowledgement (Non-constraint edges get lost in some graphs.)

2009-04-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
Sorry, forgot the attachments. Daniel test2.dot Description: MS-Word document cloud.eps Description: PostScript document

Bug#294471: closed by Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt (openoffice.org-bin has been removed from Debian)

2009-04-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 12:00:11AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System ow...@bugs.debian.org was heard to say: Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:58:07 GMT From: Marco Rodrigues goth...@sapo.pt To: 294471-d...@bugs.debian.org Subject: openoffice.org-bin has been removed from Debian Version:

Bug#522537: Acknowledgement (Pagination loses some pages.)

2009-04-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
My bug report was incorrect. Pagination does not lose pages. evince fails to display all the pages of the document. I'll reassign this. Example .ps file attached (bzipped). It should have two pages; gv shows both of them, but evince only shows one. Daniel test2.ps.bz2 Description:

Bug#522481: toResponse crashes the program if the response ID is 0 or less than -11.

2009-04-03 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: gtk2hs Version: 0.10.0-2 Severity: normal The code for toResponse reads as follows: toResponse :: Integral a = a - ResponseId toResponse (-1) = ResponseNone toResponse (-2) = ResponseReject toResponse (-3) = ResponseAccept toResponse (-4) = ResponseDeleteEvent toResponse (-5) =

Bug#522356: Using an image causes warnings regarding every node without an image in the graph.

2009-04-02 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: graphviz Version: 2.20.2-3 Severity: normal The attached .dot file is a simple demonstration of the problem. It looks like if one node in a graph has an image, dot assumes that all the other nodes have an invalid image name, instead of just no image name: dan...@emurlahn:/tmp$ dot

Bug#521524: Gets confused by a USB camera/microphone

2009-03-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: dosbox Version: 0.72-1.1 Severity: normal I own a Logitech USB camera with a built-in microphone; the microphone appears to the computer as an audio device. If the camera is plugged in and I run dosbox, it tells me that it's unable to find an audio device and sound is unavailable. If

Bug#520908: Allow changing the first line number.

2009-03-23 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libgtksourceview2.0-0 Version: 2.4.2-1 Severity: wishlist I'm developing a program that displays excerpts from a very large log file. It's not practical to load the whole file into memory, let alone into a SourceView, but it would be nice if I could show line numbers that correspond

Bug#520649: No profiling libraries for gtk?

2009-03-21 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libghc6-gtk-dev Version: 0.10.0-2 Severity: wishlist It looks like there aren't any profiling libraries for the GTK+ development package, which makes it tricky to profile a program using GTK+: Main.hs:15:7: Could not find module `System.Glib.Types': Perhaps you haven't

Bug#520474: Widgets should implement Eq and Ord.

2009-03-19 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libghc6-gtk-dev Version: 0.10.0-2 Severity: wishlist When using GTK+ from a typical imperative language such as C++, it's occasionally useful to use the object identity of a widget: for instance, you might want to create a set of main windows and terminate the program only when all of

Bug#519893: aptitude: aptitude attempts to resolve unmet dependencies by upgrading a package with itself

2009-03-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 11:49:40PM +0100, Alexey Feldgendler x...@pita.feldgendler.ru was heard to say: 1. apt-cache doesn't seem to realize that the 2.5.5-1 at file: and the one currently installed are the same. (Still doesn't realize even after aptitude has “upgraded” it with itself.) I

Bug#519906: use a database like MySQL to speed things up

2009-03-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 10:55:12AM +0100, Jens Seidel jenssei...@users.sf.net was heard to say: On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:00:09PM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org wrote: Maybe moving the guts to a database like MySQL (in addition to xapian?) might speed things up. Hmmm, true, aptitude would

Bug#519833: Dim display when idle shuts the screen off when not idle.

2009-03-15 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: gnome-power-manager Version: 2.22.1-4 Severity: normal This is on an Asus EEE 901. I just unplugged the machine for the first time in a while, and the screen shut off. Pushing keys and moving the mouse had no effect. I tried plugging it back in, and the screen turned back on. I

Bug#519425: aptitude: man page refers to Apt:: configuration, should be APT::

2009-03-12 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 09:41:50AM -0400, Eric Cooper e...@cmu.edu was heard to say: Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.11.11-1 Severity: minor The aptitude man page refers to several corresponding apt configuration variables as Apt::..., but they should be APT::... according to apt.conf(5).

Bug#518994: The obvious newbie command, 'aptitude upgrade', trashes system

2009-03-12 Thread Daniel Burrows
I've had a discussion in private email with Henry about this bug. It's not entirely clear what bit him, but it sounds like the problem is something I've seen scattered reports of on emailing lists and on the Web. Here it is: since aptitude removes unused packages by default and apt-get does

Bug#519308: aptitude: segfaults after CTRL-z and fg

2009-03-11 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 08:35:06PM +0100, Martin Hawlisch mar...@hawlisch.de was heard to say: I accidently put aptitude into the background by pressing CTRL-z. When using fg to get it back it segfaults. Were you doing anything in particular at the time? Does this happen whenever you press

Bug#488081: (no subject)

2009-03-10 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 11:00:11AM -0400, C Sights csig...@fastmail.fm was heard to say: Hi, On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:46:56AM -0500, C Sights csig...@fastmail.fm was heard to say: Aptitude is also ignoring the priority of the repositories: experimental=1 and unstable=500.

Bug#518994: The obvious newbie command, 'aptitude upgrade', trashes system

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 12:26:33PM -0700, Henry hking...@gmail.com was heard to say: Aptitude is so similar to apt-get, newbies assume the syntax is the same. Yet, the obvious choice, upgrade is not safe. It tries to remove all kinds of needed packages. Could you please post a transcript

Bug#488081: (no subject)

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 10:46:56AM -0500, C Sights csig...@fastmail.fm was heard to say: # LC_ALL=C apt-cache policy libgnutls26 libgnutls26: Installed: 2.2.5-1 Candidate: 2.2.5-1 Version table: 2.4.0-2 0 500 http://ftp.fr.debian.org unstable/main Packages

Bug#335615: Confirmed patch.

2009-03-09 Thread Daniel Burrows
I just wrote a simple test program (attached) and it indeed exhibits an infinite recursion. The attached patch fixes it (in my test case, it gets replaced by a crash because the queue is empty, but obviously that's expected :) ). Daniel #include apt-pkg/acquire.h int main(int argc, char

Bug#518650: The battery level tray icon could display the current level more clearly.

2009-03-07 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: gnome-power-manager Version: 2.22.1-4 Severity: normal The Gnome battery level icon displays its level as a cut-off cylinder: instead of being flat, the top of the bar is an oval. This makes it hard to estimate how much atter is actually available, since it's not clear whether the top,

Bug#517088: aptitude: Also seems to be present in etch

2009-03-04 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Mar 03, 2009 at 12:37:07PM +, Chris Butler chr...@debian.org was heard to say: aptitude also seems to be segfaulting in the same place on an etch machine I have: Could you post the sources.list, /etc/apt/apt.conf, and ~/.aptitude/config files from these machines? (this doesn't

Bug#517107: aptitude installed coq with unmet dependencies

2009-02-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 06:20:17PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.org was heard to say: On 2009-02-26 07:25:43 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: But of course the dependencies of the new coq are already installed, and apparently these don't supply what's needed for the old coq to run. I

Bug#517107: aptitude installed coq with unmet dependencies

2009-02-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:11:09AM +0100, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.org was heard to say: On 2009-02-25 19:34:02 -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: The problem is that the new version of coq that you were trying to install has an undeclared conflict with coq-libs. I'll reassign the bug

Bug#516823: W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 4D270D06F42584E6

2009-02-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:22:46AM +0100, Cs��nyi P��l csanyi...@gmail.com was heard to say: When I do aptitude update first time I get a Warning: W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 4D270D06F42584E6 W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems

Bug#517107: aptitude installed coq with unmet dependencies

2009-02-25 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Feb 25, 2009 at 05:50:44PM +0100, Vincent Lefevre vinc...@vinc17.org was heard to say: Unpacking replacement coq ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/coq_8.2~rc2+dfsg-3_amd64.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/lib/coq/contrib/interface/vernacrc', which is also

Bug#516719: Should probably Recommends: apt-xapian-index instead of Depends:

2009-02-23 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:19:47AM +, Enrico Zini enr...@debian.org was heard to say: thanks for aptitude! At #516254, it has been pointed out that apt-xapian-index is now getting installed on pbuilder build systems, which is a problem. At first I wonderer why, since I assumed that

Bug#516389: aptitude: aptitude why garbles output

2009-02-23 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 06:29:42AM +0100, zieg...@uni-freiburg.de was heard to say: On my system the command $ LANG=en aptitude -s why libsdl1.2debian-alsa outputs - i uq De libsdl1.2debian (= 1.2.10-1) m pe nd s i A li De

Bug#516655: aptitude: Segmentation fault in why-not

2009-02-22 Thread Daniel Burrows
This is probably the same as #511634, a segmentation fault with virtual packages. That's fixed in the experimental branch, but obviously that doesn't help lenny. (in fact, it looks like I forgot to mark this closed in 0.5.0...let's do that...) Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#516389: aptitude: aptitude why garbles output

2009-02-21 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 03:18:17PM +0100, Jens Seidel jenssei...@users.sf.net was heard to say: On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 06:29:42AM +0100, zieg...@uni-freiburg.de wrote: i A li De libsdl1.2debian-alsa (= 1.2.13-4) | libsdl1.2debian-all (= 1.2.13-4) |bsdl1. pe libsdl1.2debian-esd (=

Bug#516296: aptitude: slow navigation in packages list. 'j' and 'k' keys aren't responsively enough in ncurse mode

2009-02-21 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 02:42:18PM +0100, Javier Barroso javier.barr...@isotrol.com was heard to say: In aptitude 4.x, I hold j key a while and ncurses was responsive (package selector was down fast) Are you sure this is true? The problem seems to be caused by the why tab in the lower

Bug#516296: aptitude: slow navigation in packages list. 'j' and 'k' keys aren't responsively enough in ncurse mode

2009-02-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
Odd: it looks like certain packages take a long time to scroll over. 9base is an example. No idea why, but aptitude definitely sucks up CPU time to look at them. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#516131: aptitude: unmarkauto not working?

2009-02-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 02:01:52PM +0100, Francesco Potort� poto...@isti.cnr.it was heard to say: tucano:/tmp# aptitude unmarkauto glpk-doc glpk-utils Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information

Bug#516042: aptitude: Please add an 'upgrade plus install new dependencies' option

2009-02-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:38:53PM +0100, Uwe Storbeck u...@ibr.ch was heard to say: Hi Daniel Just to confirm: you filed this on a lenny machine, but you're talking about etch's aptitude, right? The described behaviour is from both etchs and lennys aptitude. There's no general

Bug#478970: aptitude + complete /var/lib/dpkg/availablea

2009-02-19 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 03:10:41PM +, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org was heard to say: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 09:09:40AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:08:41PM +, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org was heard to say: Then there's this: burnside:~ # ls

Bug#478970: aptitude + complete /var/lib/dpkg/availablea

2009-02-19 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 06:36:35PM +, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org was heard to say: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 07:18:43AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: The culprit seems to be dpkg itself; at the end of running dpkg --unpack ... (called from aptitude), the available file is updated

Bug#478970: aptitude + complete /var/lib/dpkg/available

2009-02-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:27:44PM +, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org was heard to say: On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 02:08:29AM +0200, nutzt...@web.de wrote: Package: aptitude Version: 0.4.11.2-1 Severity: wishlist /var/lib/dpkg/available is not created|updated complete with 'aptitude

Bug#478970: aptitude + complete /var/lib/dpkg/availablea

2009-02-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 04:08:41PM +, Julian Gilbey j...@debian.org was heard to say: Then there's this: burnside:~ # ls /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/ 01autoremove20archive 90rkhunter 10periodic 50unattended-upgrades 99-localepurge 15update-stamp 70debconf

Bug#516042: aptitude: Please add an 'upgrade plus install new dependencies' option

2009-02-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 12:31:58AM +0100, Uwe Storbeck u...@ibr.ch was heard to say: When upgrading from etch to lenny I had to go through several cycles of 'aptitude install package; aptitude safe-upgrade' before the final 'aptitude full-upgrade' run. Using 'aptitude full-upgrade' without the

Bug#515731: touch: setting times of `/var/lib/update-notifier/dpkg-run-stamp': Function not implemented

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 09:21:52AM +, Richard Kettlewell r...@greenend.org.uk was heard to say: E: Problem executing scripts DPkg::Post-Invoke 'if [ -d /var/lib/update-notifier ]; then touch /var/lib/update-notifier/dpkg-run-stamp; fi' E: Sub-process returned an error code Looks

Bug#515731: touch: setting times of `/var/lib/update-notifier/dpkg-run-stamp': Function not implemented

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 04:46:40PM +0100, Martin Michlmayr t...@cyrius.com was heard to say: * Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org [2009-02-17 07:31]: touch: setting times of `/var/lib/update-notifier/dpkg-run-stamp': Function not implemented waldi mentioned this on IRC today too

Bug#515532: minesweeper feature vs. UNIX philosophy

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 12:17:00AM +0100, David Orban dor...@skynet.be was heard to say: Because it was archived, I had no other possibility to reply than to fill it again. You need the unarchive command. The idea of removing useless game from a package manager software is there to

Bug#288778: Me too :-)

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel Burrows
I'd like to second this request. With the release of lenny, I've been seeing a lot of people posting messages about how their upgrades failed and they don't know why. Inevitably, they attach a long typescript of hundreds of irrelevant dpkg messages, with the one line that actually made it

Bug#514820: suboptimal dependency resolution for -f install after failing to install a .deb

2009-02-16 Thread Daniel Burrows
Martin and Uwe, Your messages happened to catch me while I was working on the resolver, so I have this stuff loaded into cache as it were. I think I finally have an idea that might address your problems (and the similar ones people have reported); I don't know whether I'll get around to

Bug#514540: aptitude: Option:Aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts and limits not playing nice together

2009-02-09 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 02:55:39AM -0500, Allan Wind allan_w...@lifeintegrity.com was heard to say: On 2009-02-08T22:44:32, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 12:08:07PM -0500, Allan Wind allan_w...@lifeintegrity.com was heard to say: If Option:Aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts

Bug#514540: aptitude: Option:Aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts and limits not playing nice together

2009-02-08 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Feb 08, 2009 at 12:08:07PM -0500, Allan Wind allan_w...@lifeintegrity.com was heard to say: If Option:Aptitude::UI::Minibuf-Prompts is set and you use a bad limit (l) like ~Abad you get an error. If you then search again, I used, ~Atesting you get the error and results from the first

Bug#513939: Please support exporting to non-experimental SVG.

2009-02-02 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: inkscape Version: 0.46-5 Severity: normal I've been trying to figure out why a number of SVGs I created in Inkscape display poorly in Firefox. A Firefox developer told me: cut here Parts of your svg file look like this... g flowRoot flowRegion rect /rect

Bug#513941: Convert to text doesn't preserve appearance.

2009-02-02 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: inkscape Version: 0.46-5 Severity: normal It appears that all (most?) Inkscape text objects use an experimental SVG feature, which causes the text to appear as a black box in Firefox. e.g., see http://algebraicthunk.net/~dburrows/blog/entry/images/apt-files-diagram-2.svg The remedy

Bug#498800: upgrade of aptitude before?

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
Out of curiosity, does it help if you add xserver-xorg-video-all to the command-line? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#498800: upgrade of aptitude before?

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 07:01:41PM +0100, Wolf Wiegand wolf.wieg...@web.de was heard to say: Hi, Daniel Burrows wrote: Out of curiosity, does it help if you add xserver-xorg-video-all to the command-line? You mean aptitude dist-upgrade xserver-xorg-video-all? Yes, this does help

Bug#513885: Some SVGs are rendered badly

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: iceweasel Version: 3.0.5-1 Severity: normal I've created some moderately complicated SVGs in Inkscape, and Firefox renders them really badly -- some objects are turned into big black boxes and/or moved to the wrong location. Here's a typical example:

Bug#513886: Problems rendering Inkscape-generated PDFs (gradients not showing up properly)

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libpoppler3 Version: 0.8.7-1 Severity: normal A PDF that I created from an SVG using Inkscape doesn't seem to display properly in poppler-based renderers (Acrobat renders it correctly). The file is available from:

Bug#508475: Ping

2009-02-01 Thread Daniel Burrows
Any word on this? Would it help if I sent an actual patch? Cheers, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#513472: aptitude: purging not installed sysvinit generated the Are you really sure message

2009-01-31 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:59:36PM +0100, q9 qqq...@web.de was heard to say: When i purged the config of all packages which aren't installed anymore, i got the messages sysvinit is an essential package! Are you sure ... i think this is not really necessary, since sysvinit is not

Bug#513759: Please provide logging macros that are not complete statements.

2009-01-31 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: liblog4cxx10-dev Version: 0.10.0-1 Severity: wishlist The log4cxx macros are complete statements (not needing a trailing semicolon) so you must use them like this: LOG4CXX_INFO(logger, This is a message) rather than like this: LOG4CXX_INFO(logger, This is a message);

Bug#513760: Incorrect header file name in documentation.

2009-01-31 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libsdl-gfx1.2-dev Version: 2.0.13-4 Severity: normal The name of the include file for the graphics primitives is wrong: it should be SDL_gfxPrimitives.h, but it's actually SDL_gfxPrimitves.h. Daniel -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy:

Bug#513337: [aptitude-gtk] crashes instantly

2009-01-29 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:25:12AM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: #6 0x005e in aptitude::apt::download_changelog_manager::prepare ( this=0x2023fc0, progress=value optimized out, acqlog=value optimized out, signallog=value optimized out)

Bug#513337: [aptitude-gtk] crashes instantly

2009-01-29 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 07:54:24AM -0800, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org was heard to say: On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 11:25:12AM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: #6 0x005e in aptitude::apt::download_changelog_manager::prepare

Bug#513337: [aptitude-gtk] crashes instantly

2009-01-28 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: simply crashes just after progess bars end moving. attached the bug-buddy log Can you install aptitude-dbg and regenerate the log file? Thanks, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#513337: [aptitude-gtk] crashes instantly

2009-01-28 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:04:05PM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:28:38AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: simply crashes just after

Bug#513337: [aptitude-gtk] crashes instantly

2009-01-28 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:04:05PM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:28:38AM -0800, Daniel Burrows wrote: On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 10:36:59AM +0100, Enrico Tassi gareuselesi...@debian.org was heard to say: simply crashes just after

Bug#513250: Annotate pins with their filename and location.

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libapt-pkg-dev Version: 0.7.20.1 Severity: wishlist For diagnostic purposes, it would be nice to be able to tell the user why a package has a particular pin priority. Part of that is being able to trace pins back to their physical location in the preferences file. As a first step, it

Bug#513248: Attach lexical information to configuration file entries.

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libapt-pkg-dev Version: 0.7.20.1 Severity: wishlist Sorry, no patch -- I wanted to jot this down before I forgot. Bug me if I haven't sent a patch in a few weeks. ;-) For the purpose of providing the user with diagnostic information, it would be nice if apt stored some extra data

Bug#509989: aptitude removes X without warning

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
I'm confused by this bug report. You said that aptitude removes X without warning, but your report shows it asking for confirmation. Did it skip / ignore the prompt and go on to remove X anyway? Thanks, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org

Bug#513254: Expose pin information to client code.

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: libapt-pkg-dev Version: 0.7.20.1 Severity: wishlist By way of explanation, I (as a frontend author) would like to support two extra functions: (1) interactively viewing and editing the pins file. (2) examining the priorities of versions and providing the reasons for

Bug#504063: Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
This is for everyone who can reproduce the bug. Could you build a libcwidget3 with the attached patch and see what's produced in /tmp/cwidget.input.log when you reproduce the bug? If I start aptitude, run dpkg once, and exit, I get this: Starting input thread Creating new input thread Input

Bug#504063: Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 08:12:36PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: reassign 479438 cwidget forcemerge 479438 348481 431054 431688 432323 434861 462923 466254 475368 thanks Thanks for the triage. Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#479438: Bug#504063: Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 09:46:22PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: 2009/1/27 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org: This is for everyone who can reproduce the bug. Could you build a libcwidget3 with the attached patch and see what's produced in /tmp

Bug#479438: Bug#504063: Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-27 Thread Daniel Burrows
and I can actually send this mail. Daniel diff --git a/src/cwidget/toplevel.cc b/src/cwidget/toplevel.cc index c912ad6..e0b6ab2 100644 --- a/src/cwidget/toplevel.cc +++ b/src/cwidget/toplevel.cc @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ // toplevel.cc // -// Copyright 1999-2005, 2007-2008 Daniel Burrows +// Copyright

Bug#479438: aptitude TUI blocking -- bug bisect - bad commit is 9f74cddf40e9

2009-01-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
:1b944a1d2100 user:Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org date:Sun Jun 17 21:25:59 2007 -0700 summary: Import upstream aptitude version 0.4.5.3 cut here [6/17/2007] Version 0.4.5.3 The Long Dark Tea-Time

Bug#506651: fixed in aptitude 0.5.1-1

2009-01-26 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:23:19AM +0100, Jiří Paleček jpale...@web.de was heard to say: On Mon, 26 Jan 2009 01:26:57 +0100, Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:50:54PM +0100, Jiri Palecek jpale...@web.de was heard to say: On Saturday 24 January 2009 16

Bug#506651: fixed in aptitude 0.5.1-1

2009-01-25 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 10:50:54PM +0100, Jiri Palecek jpale...@web.de was heard to say: On Saturday 24 January 2009 16:48:33 Daniel Burrows wrote: Source: aptitude Source-Version: 0.5.1-1 - Incremental search should work again in the curses UI. (Closes: #506651) I don't

Bug#512998: aptitude-gtk: terminates immediately after startup

2009-01-25 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Torsten Werner twer...@debian.org was heard to say: Package: aptitude-gtk Version: 0.5.1-1 Severity: important Hi, the main window can be seen for about 3 seconds before the application dies: $ aptitude-gtk terminate called after throwing an

Bug#512925: Snap gradient stops to guides

2009-01-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: inkscape Version: 0.46-5 Severity: wishlist While editing some gradients, I noticed that the stops appear as handles on the image, which you can drag around to change the gradient interactively. This is really cool. It would be even more cool if the stops snapped to guides so they

Bug#512926: Gradient stop drop-down doesn't update when a gradient color change is undone.

2009-01-24 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: inkscape Version: 0.46-5 Severity: minor In the gradient editor dialog, the dropdown to select stops shows the colors related to each stop next to the stop's name. However, when the stop colors are changed via the undo menu rather than using the sliders, the colors in the menu don't

Bug#504063: Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-20 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:45:37PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: I think I have found a lead after reading a comment from another user: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=504063#17 I installed lenny's kernel and with this kernel the bug is

Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-19 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 05:28:27PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: Package: aptitude found 511708 0.4.11-2 thanks 2009/1/17 Daniel Burrows dburr...@debian.org: Once we have a tighter range of versions, it might be worth trying bisect out, but it'll

Bug#512216: hg record breakage.

2009-01-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
Package: mercurial Version: 1.1.2-1 After today's mercurial upgrade, hg record no longer works: dan...@emurlahn:~/programming/aptitude/post-lenny$ hg record hg: unknown command 'record' This is a very useful piece of functionality and I don't see anything mentioning record in the changelog,

Bug#315329: Still present.

2009-01-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
I see this in current sid: dan...@emurlahn:~$ host -w google.com timer.c:723: INSIST(result == 0 || result == 2) failed. Aborted Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#507099: aptitude (experimental): Uncaught exception: match.cc:2741: cwidget::util::ref_ptraptitude::matching::structural_match [...]

2009-01-18 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 01:31:16AM +0100, Axel Beckert a...@deuxchevaux.org was heard to say: Package: aptitude Version: 0.5.0-1 Severity: normal When 0.5.1 is available, let me know if you see this problem there too. Segfaults on startup in text-mode: # env -u DISPLAY LANG=C aptitude

Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-17 Thread Daniel Burrows
I just had a realization. We don't need to mess around with bisect and recompiling; you can just grab old versions from snapshot.debian.net and see whether the bug shows up in them. Once we have a tighter range of versions, it might be worth trying bisect out, but it'll be easier too.

Bug#503175: [debianb...@jancm.org: Re: Bug#503175: aptitude shows false update count]

2009-01-16 Thread Daniel Burrows
To: Daniel Burrows dburr...@algebraicthunk.net You can close this bug. The problem arose from entries in my preferences file. (Which I now understand much better then when I first set it up). One thing I wasn't aware of (unless it's a bug, in which case a new one will need to be opened

Bug#511746: forbid-version, hold ignored upon full-upgrade

2009-01-15 Thread Daniel Burrows
I thought this bug was fixed by now. Apparently I missed a case. What do you get if you replace aptitude full-upgrade with aptitude -s -o aptitude::cmdline::resolver-debug=true full-upgrade? Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of

Bug#511366: full-upgrade requires its piece of meat

2009-01-14 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 09:25:47AM +0800, jida...@jidanni.org was heard to say: I have determined that if there is nothing left to do, then full-upgrade will require its piece of meat, else it's game over No more solutions available. aptitude specifically forbids the resolver from returning

Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-14 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian Etch and since the upgrade I have seen that aptitude's TUI interface blocks after any set of operations that is done with dpkg.

Bug#511708: aptitude: [etch upgrade] TUI consistently blocks after doing one set of operations

2009-01-14 Thread Daniel Burrows
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 03:23:55AM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: Daniel Burrows a scris: On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 08:28:21PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor eddy.petri...@gmail.com was heard to say: I just upgraded this system yesterday to Debian Lenny from Debian

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >