Bug#902670: tomcat7: version number causes exception in osgi startup

2018-06-29 Thread EmTeedee
enough to release a new update or should I prepare to patch our other servers manually? EmTeedee

Bug#902670: tomcat7: version number causes exception in osgi startup

2018-06-29 Thread EmTeedee
simply isn't a valid version specification, see e.g. http://www.eclipse.org/virgo/documentation/virgo-documentation-3.7.0.M01/docs/virgo-user-guide/html/ch02s02.html#d0e341 The stable package must have set this version number independently. If this is actually 7.0.88, I suggest that that should be put

Bug#902670: tomcat7: version number causes exception in osgi startup

2018-06-29 Thread EmTeedee
Package: tomcat7 Version: 7.0.56-3+really7.0.88-1 Severity: important Tags: jessie jessie-security During startup the current version number causes an application using ecplise osgi to fail with an exception. Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: invalid version "7.0.56-3+really7.0.88":

Bug#781674: cryptsetup: Homepage moved

2015-04-07 Thread EmTeedee
Homepage move does affect apt-listchanges message and breaks the link there. In the case that you're affected by the whirlpool bug, please read section '8.3 Gcrypt after 1.5.3 breaks Whirlpool' of the cryptsetup FAQ at https://code.google.com/p/cryptsetup/wiki/FrequentlyAskedQuestions

Bug#642357: Connections from localhost in plaintext

2011-09-30 Thread EmTeedee
-conn_config, gnutls_module, ctxt); EmTeedee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#619384: preload: logrotate does not send HUP to running process

2011-03-23 Thread EmTeedee
Package: preload Version: 0.6.4-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch Hi, the logrotate script refers to /sbin/pidof, which should actually be /bin/pidof (don't know when it was moved, but definitely in squeeze). The result is that preload keeps writing to an already deleted log file. Regards,

Bug#570099: Fixed in 2:3.5.1~dfsg-1

2010-03-26 Thread EmTeedee
Package: samba Version: 2:3.5.1~dfsg-1 fixed 570099 samba/2:3.5.1~dfsg-1 Bug doesn't seem to appear in this version anymore. Regards, Tobias -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Bug#570099: samba: smbd segfaults when accessing printing preferences on XP client

2010-02-16 Thread EmTeedee
Package: samba Version: 2:3.4.5~dfsg-2 Severity: normal When trying to set printing preferences for network printers, the smbd server process segfaults. This is reproducible every time. We're using cups to print: ii cups 1.4.2-4 Common UNIX Printing System(tm) This

Bug#570099: same thing happening in 2:3.5.0~rc2~dfsg-1

2010-02-16 Thread EmTeedee
Package: samba Version: 2:3.5.0~rc2~dfsg-1 got the exact same thing happening in samba 2:3.5.0~rc2~dfsg-1 gdb: [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb7b536e0 (LWP 6391)] 0xe424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #0 0xe424 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0xb7db7193 in waitpid ()

Bug#287795: Patch to copy ssl certs in init.d script

2009-06-09 Thread EmTeedee
Package: postfix Version: 2.5.5-1.1 Followup-For: Bug #287795 I had the same problem on my systems. The attached patch will solve that problem. Since some of the certs are just symlinks to /usr/share/... I had to dereference the links to make it work in the chroot. TT -- No trees were harmed

Bug#516913: mimedefang reload fails with embedded perl

2009-02-24 Thread EmTeedee
Package: mimedefang Version: 2.64-6 Severity: normal After upgrading to the new version, mimedefang can't spawn new slaves when trying to reload. Calling /etc/init.d/mimdefang reload results in these mail.log entries: Feb 24 12:46:41 DebianBuild mimedefang-multiplexor[4464]: Re-initialized

Bug#515954: proftpd: mod_facl erroneously assumes no permissions, rather than all permissions, in some cases

2009-02-18 Thread EmTeedee
Package: proftpd Version: 1.3.1-17 Severity: normal Tags: patch This bug has been fixed upstream, please include the patch from bug #3150 ( http://bugs.proftpd.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3150 ) in the next release. From the original bug report: If an ACL for a directory or file does not include a mask