Bug#775689: Do NOT use unetbootin for Debian CD images

2016-05-22 Thread Geza Kovacs
Hi I'm the maintainer of unetbootin, I just stumbled upon this bug report, sorry you have been having issues. The underlying issue appears to be that some of Debian's ISO files violate the Joilet standard - the standard does not permit filenames exceeding 64 characters in length, as you can see at

Bug#721947: ITA: unetbootin -- Installer of Linux/BSD distributions

2013-10-02 Thread Geza Kovacs
Hi, I'm the upstream maintainer of UNetbootin. Karim hasn't made any progress on this for the past month; I contacted him several weeks ago, and more recently two weeks ago, but no indication of progress in either instance. Maintainence of this package is extremely easy; I even have an updated git

Bug#650635: unetbootin: Android x86 gives missing operating system error

2011-12-05 Thread Geza Kovacs
Hi, could you try using the new upstream version 565 ( http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/unetbootin-linux-latest ) and seeing if you get the same issue (slightly changed the way partitions are marked bootable in that version, which I think should fix your issue)? 2011/12/1 Jonathan Lane

Bug#573729: unetbootin: no icon in .desktop file

2011-03-22 Thread Geza Kovacs
As of the latest upstream release (506), an icon has been added. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#576124: vlfeat: changing back from ITP to RFP

2011-02-19 Thread Geza Kovacs
Should anyone be interested in maintaining vlfeat, my packaging work is located at http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/vlfeat.git it builds and works correctly, but has a few warnings from dpkg-shlibdeps and a sharedobject-in-library-directory-missing-soname lintian error that I was unable to

Bug#611663: RM: nodejs/testing -- ROM; NPOASR; RC-buggy; outdated

2011-01-31 Thread Geza Kovacs
renamed due to policy reasons These will only confuse users, who will search to install a backport or testing version. Please read this rc-bug, where i've been more verbose : http://bugs.debian.org/611657 Reversed dependencies : coffeescript 0.7.0-1 Maintainer : Geza Kovacs gkov...@mit.edu

Bug#611657: executable name is confusing, software already outdated

2011-01-31 Thread Geza Kovacs
], and while it was all right for testing purposes, it is now not acceptable : [...] Hence it is much more preferable to remove nodejs 0.2.0 from squeeze, instead of having an unusable and confusing version. Concerned source packages are nodejs 0.2.0-1 and coffeescript 0.7.0-1. The maintainer Geza

Bug#611701: coffeescript: should no longer patch nodejs executable but instead depend on nodeje = 0.2.6

2011-01-31 Thread Geza Kovacs
Proposed fix uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/c/coffeescript/coffeescript_1.0.0-2.dsc On 01/31/2011 09:30 PM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: Package: coffeescript Version: 1.0.0-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Nodejs packaging for Debian stopped

Bug#603306: ITP: f-sharp -- Microsoft F# programming language

2010-11-13 Thread Geza Kovacs
Note that there seems to already be a Debian packaging effort for F# at http://fsxplat.codeplex.com/ Additionally, you may wish to call the package fsharp instead of f-sharp since fsharp more widely used, according to Google Trends. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Bug#577848: Progress with LCM Debian package

2010-10-27 Thread Geza Kovacs
Sorry, I slightly forgot about this after filing an ITP. I believe I was having issues getting the Java binding generator correctly packaged, though I no longer remember the specific issue. You are welcome to take over; the debian directory in the SVN repository on http://code.google.com/p/lcm/

Bug#581913: cakephp-scripts and coffeescript: error when trying to install together

2010-05-19 Thread Geza Kovacs
This bug is assigned to both packages. If you, the maintainers of the two packages in question, have agreed on which of the packages will resolve the problem please reassign the bug to that package. I was here first ;) Agreed, I've fixed this in the 0.6.2-1 coffeescript package release

Bug#577848: ITP: lcm -- Lightweight Communications and Marshalling library

2010-04-14 Thread Geza Kovacs
Package: wnpp Owner: Geza Kovacs gkov...@mit.edu Severity: wishlist * Package name: lcm Version : 0.4.1 Upstream Author : Albert Huang alb...@csail.mit.edu * URL : http://code.google.com/p/lcm/ * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C Description: Lightweight

Bug#576124: ITP: vlfeat -- A library of popular computer vision algorithms

2010-03-31 Thread Geza Kovacs
Package: wnpp Owner: Geza Kovacs gkov...@mit.edu Severity: wishlist * Package name: vlfeat Version : 0.9.7 Upstream Author : Andrea Vedaldi veda...@robots.ox.ac.uk * URL : http://www.vlfeat.org/ * License : GPLv2 Programming Lang: C Description

Bug#575603: unetbootin does not overwrite _all_ files

2010-03-27 Thread Geza Kovacs
I wasn't able to reproduce this bug, but based on the empty syslinux.cfg file I believe it's probably caused by the fact that I remove syslinux.cfg and recreate it immediately afterwards, without doing a sync in between; Linux tends to have issues with that. Anyhow, I've made a new release 424

Bug#575437: ITP: coffeescript -- Interpreter and compiler for the CoffeeScript language

2010-03-25 Thread Geza Kovacs
Package: wnpp Owner: Geza Kovacs gkov...@mit.edu Severity: wishlist * Package name: coffeescript Version : 0.5.6 Upstream Author : Jeremy Ashkenas jer...@documentcloud.org * URL : http://coffeescript.org/ * License : MIT/X Programming Lang: CoffeeScript

Bug#533582: unetbootin doesn't sync after finishing

2009-06-19 Thread Geza Kovacs
Alex Roper wrote: When unetbootin tells you it's all done and gives an option to quit or reboot, it should sync before this. If the user reboots or unmounts before pulling it, everything will work, but I just wasted 20 minutes to remake one after pulling it to boot a dead server only to find

Bug#531574: unetbootin: Application hangs - filesystem size suspected

2009-06-14 Thread Geza Kovacs
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've added filesystem-full checking has been added in the latest upstream release (356), please see if that fixes this issue. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -

Bug#500842: unetbootin: binary and Windows components

2008-10-03 Thread Geza Kovacs
-= unetbootin.qrc make For reference, the final product should thus look something like this (sorry, not nicely debianized or anything) http://downloads.sourceforge.net/unetbootin/unetbootin_283_amd64.deb Geza Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: Geza Kovacs wrote: All the binary components are from syslinux