tags 589784 wontfix
thanks
On 07/21/2010 05:24 AM, Vincent Blut wrote:
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: SRWare Iron
Version : 5.0.381
Upstream Author :
* URL : http://www.srware.net/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C++, Assembly
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu chromium-browser_5.0.375.99~r51029-4 . i386 amd64 . -m Rebuild against
libv8 = 2.2.24-2
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
tags 589468 unreproducible moreinfo
thanks
On 07/18/2010 01:30 AM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
chromium doesn't alert even if user see some phishing sites.
step to rerproduce)
On 06/25/2010 07:44 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
While a given page is loading, the favicon in the tab bar turns into a
flickery blue square.
I only started noticing this recently, but even version
5.0.342.9~r43360-1 displays the same problem. Looks like my
expectations increased.
On 07/18/2010 03:12 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
Maybe my ~/.config/chromium/Safe Browsing Bloom* is not updated somehow.
What's the output of ls -la ~/.config/chromium/Safe* ?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 07/18/2010 03:32 PM, Hideki Yamane wrote:
henr...@babytalk:~/.config/chromium$ ls -al Safe\ Browsing\ Bloom*
-rw-r--r-- 1 henrich henrich 19012608 2010-07-18 21:28 Safe Browsing Bloom
-rw--- 1 henrich henrich 1425253 2010-06-04 01:40 Safe Browsing Bloom
Filter 2
Can I force to
On 07/18/2010 05:35 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I assume the patch from upstream will work.
Over the last three days I almost[1] have the chromium package built for the
first time (this computer is not very fast) so hopefully I should be
able to start writing and testing patches soon.
I
On 07/18/2010 05:59 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
I already committed[1] the fix.
Nice. By the way, is there a simple way to rebuild the package after
making a small code change?
I tried “rm debian/stamp-makefile-build” a couple of days ago and the next
“debian
Package: libv8-dev
Version: 2.2.18-1
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
chromium 6.x requires v8-profiler.h, please install it in the -dev package.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
tags 586356 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:32:33 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Added
tags 586724 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 12:45:32 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Remove old
On 06/22/2010 01:59 AM, Jan Muszynski wrote:
This shows up, on my system, when trying to build the modules for virtualbox
(PUEL). There are 3 modules, and they need to be built in a specific order
(the others depend on the first to build correctly). If dkms processes the
modules in sorted
tags 588585 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:06:18 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload
tags 589308 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Sat, 17 Jul 2010 13:15:39 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Promote lsb
On 07/17/2010 03:50 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
You should not specify a `Pre-Depends' entry for a package before this
has been discussed on the `debian-devel' mailing list and a consensus
about doing that has been reached.
Did you do that?
No I didn't, I'm doing that now.
dkms
On 07/17/2010 05:49 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
This looks to me like a missing dependency on lsb-release in
nvidia-kernel-dkms, not in dkms. And I don't understand why a
Pre-Depends would be necessary anywhere. Care to explain?
nvidia-kernel-dkms postint runs /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu protobuf-c_0.12-3 . ALL . -m Rebuild against protobuf = 2.3.0-2.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu mumble_1.2.2-4 . ALL . -m Rebuild against protobuf = 2.3.0-2.1
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers
tags 498693 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:18:23 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Install
Hi,
On 07/12/2010 08:54 PM, Jakub Wilk wrote:
gyp doesn't start on kfreebsd-*:
$ gyp
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/gyp, line 18, in module
sys.exit(gyp.main(sys.argv[1:]))
File /usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/gyp/__init__.py, line 316, in main
'sunos5':
tags 582158 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:12:20 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Set state
tags 583386 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:32:21 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Don't warn
tags 588134 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Tue, 13 Jul 2010 12:40:55 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fixed
On 07/11/2010 01:51 AM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. The jdk is *not* used during
the binary build, except for unittests (if present). The jdk *is* used
during the indep build, for the java part. What do you see here as an
abuse?
Sorry, let me rephrase a bit.
On 07/11/2010 11:45 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 09:05:49 +0200, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
If you put openjdk-6 in b-d-i, protobuf can't be built on those archs
that hasn't openjdk-6, and imho this can be considered an FTBFS even if
the binary build works.
No, it can't
On 07/11/2010 12:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Because there's no requirement anywhere that says arch:all packages need
to be buildable on all architectures.
The binary target must be all that is necessary for the user to build
the binary package(s) produced from this source package.
So I think
On 07/11/2010 12:55 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
Giuseppe, you didn't answer my other question. Can you confirm the
package builds fine and the java parts work with gcj?
Yes I can.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: security
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
nmu tuxonice-userui_1.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libpng = 1.2.44-1
libpng 1.2.44-1 fixes security issues and
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the PTS shows randomically chromium-browser as not part of any Debian
distribution:
This package is not part of any Debian distribution. Thus you won't find much
information here. The package is either
+1,11 @@
+protobuf (2.3.0-2.1) unstable; urgency=high
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * Build-depends on on default-jdk and set JAVA_HOME to
+/usr/lib/jvm/default-java (Closes: #587732)
+
+ -- Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org Sat, 10 Jul 2010 18:37:19 +0200
+
protobuf (2.3.0-2) unstable
Hi Iustin,
On 07/10/2010 08:39 PM, Iustin Pop wrote:
I was planning to revert the move of the openjdk-6 from b-d-i to b-d, as
an alternative to depend on default-jdk. The move was done simply to
have 'jar' available during the build time for a few optional unittests
which need it.
I think
Well, since the problem is somewhere in Quesoglc, I built a version of glc
with
debug symbols, to see where exactly the error is. And surprise, that version
worked. The locally rebuilt package without debug symbols also works. Not sure
what exactly is the problem, maybe libglc0 was built on
Since openjdk-6-jdk was available before on those arches, I hoped it
will come back. Do you think it won't?
It wasn't available, protobuf was built in those archs because you had
openjdk-6-jdk in Build-Depends-Indep instead of Build-Depends
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description:
reassign 584562 libv8
thanks
Hi Mattia,
On 07/07/2010 09:05 AM, Mattia Monga wrote:
Dear Jonathan,
I attached to this message a minimalistic failure test case. You
should be able to reproduce the failure with the following recipe
$ LANG=C chromium-browser test.html
# select 'inspect
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows
Package: lxr
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr.
CVE-2010-1625[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in LXR Cross Referencer
| before 0.9.7 allows remote
Package: lxr-cvs
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Giacomo,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for lxr-cvs.
CVE-2010-1448[0]:
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in lib/LXR/Common.pm in LXR
| Cross
clone 587293 -1
retitle -1 3d patch breaks non-3d video
found -1 5.0.375.86~r49890-3
thanks
On 06/28/2010 10:01 AM, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
After you reported this bug fixed, the videos now plays, but are messed up.
The videos worked fine for me before this stopped working due to this
tags 585922 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
On 06/14/2010 11:21 PM, Thue Janus Kristensen wrote:
When I
1) click on the magnifying glass
2) move the mouse cursor over a HTML element so that it lights up blue
3) click
nothing happends. I would expect that it would actually work like
On 06/27/2010 04:08 PM, Sam Morris wrote:
Hm, this is not sufficient to persuade chromium-browser that it is the
default browser. Setting 'Chromium' in
gnome-default-applications-properties makes chromium start prompting to
make it the default browser again!
If I acceed to chromium's
On 06/27/2010 04:36 PM, Giuseppe Iuculano wrote:
damn, I can't reproduce this anymore on my local installation.
Ok, maybe I got the inspiration.
Could you please edit /usr/share/applications/chromium-browser.desktop
and change the Exec line in:
Exec=/usr/bin/chromium-browser %U
and after
On 06/25/2010 10:31 PM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
For the future: wouldn’t security fixes like this warrant urgency=medium?
with urgency medium or high we speed up the migration to testing.
chromium isn't in testing, so this isn't necessary for now :)
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description:
On 06/26/2010 09:30 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
It also speeds up the passage through buildds afaik
No, I think this doesn't happen.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Timo,
On 06/25/2010 05:41 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
version 5.0.375.70~r48679-2 seems to start on openmoko!
I can use the menus but trying to load any page results in a dialog
that shows an error message that can not be copypasted. It says
something about The following page(s) have
On 06/25/2010 06:50 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
Giuseppe Iuculano giuse...@iuculano.it writes:
Could you try version 5.0.375.86~r49890-1 when it will be available in
armel please?
Sure but the blx instructions in libv8 will still be a problem, right?
Yes, please open a bug against
Hi Joey,
On 06/18/2010 03:38 AM, Joey Hess wrote:
resolved immediately in either of two ways; by moving chromium to
experimental until ffmpeg reaches unstable, or moving ffmpeg 0.6 to
unstable now. I've seen no rationalle given against doing either.
html5 works with the ffmpeg experimental
tags 585950 upstream
severity normal
thanks
Hi,
On 06/15/2010 07:34 AM, Michael Gilbert wrote:
/usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser-sandbox has the suid bit
set. this is usually seen as a poor security practice, so this should
be unset.
The sandbox model is not a poor security
Hi Jonathan!
On 06/14/2010 12:28 AM, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Packages are supposed to get the target cpu type from
dpkg-architecture -qDEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU
rather than relying on dpkg-buildpackage to provide them. As a bonus,
this command yields the correct answer when cross-compiling and
block 581265 by 583826
thanks
On 05/18/2010 10:21 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
The situation has changed a bit: Chromium might still be part of Squeeze.
Guiseppe is currently checking with upstream on the feasibility of a
upstream support lifetime suitable for the lifetime of Squeeze.
tags 584562 moreinfo
thanks
Hi Mattia,
On 06/04/2010 05:42 PM, Mattia Monga wrote:
When I try to debug a javascript program, the tab where the web page is
loaded crashes if a breakpoint is activated.
My /var/log/messages reports
chromium-browse[3488]: segfault at 0 ip 7fddd5b3f8a0
severity 584946 serious
thanks
Hi Timo,
On 06/07/2010 09:32 PM, Timo Jyrinki wrote:
Confirming. I was able to install chromium-browser-dbg and here is
a bit more full backtrace from chromium-browser -g:
Could you report[1] this in the upstream bug tracking system please?
On 06/07/2010 01:16 PM, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
What are the major outstanding issues and development plan?
Fixing bugs (for example #584946, #581507), remove the latest embedded
libs (glew, gtest, etc.), and discuss if we can support it in squeeze
(I'm waiting for an access to chromium
On 05/31/2010 10:58 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
How about grouping with the webkit team, already ?
Yes, this could be a good idea.
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/06/2010 06:16 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
Thanks for caring.
I've tried and fix the most obvious problems reported by lintian and
update the changelog, and have re-uploaded an updated package to
mentors. If you can upload it for me, many thanks in advance.
Best regards,
I've added a
Package: ghostscript
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for ghostscript.
CVE-2010-1628[0]:
| Ghostscript 8.64, 8.70, and possibly other versions allows
| context-dependent
Package: phpgroupware
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for phpgroupware.
CVE-2010-0404[0]:
| Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in phpGroupWare (phpgw) before
| 0.9.16.016
Package: phpgroupware
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for phpgroupware.
CVE-2010-0403[0]:
| Directory traversal vulnerability in about.php in phpGroupWare (phpgw)
| before
Hi Christian,
On 06/04/2010 11:24 AM, christian bac wrote:
-the unstable version : 1:0.9.16.016+dfsg-1 that is uploaded on
mentors.
do you need a sponsor ?
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 06/04/2010 12:44 PM, Olivier Berger wrote:
Here :
http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-pkglist?action=details;package=phpgroupware
Please add the Closes entries for the security bugs and add the source
format (W: phpgroupware source: missing-debian-source-format).
Cheers.
Giuseppe.
tags 564988 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:12:23 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fix ftbfs
tags 581280 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 4 Jun 2010 13:05:09 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Remove
Package: mysql-dfsg-5.1
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for mysql-dfsg-5.1.
CVE-2010-1626[0]:
| MySQL before 5.1.46 allows local users to delete the data and index
| files
Package: mysql-dfsg-5.0
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for mysql-dfsg-5.0.
CVE-2010-1626[0]:
| MySQL before 5.1.46 allows local users to delete the data and index
| files
Package: gnustep-base
Version: 1.19.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for gnustep-base.
CVE-2010-1620[0]:
| Integer overflow in the load_iface function in Tools/gdomap.c
Package: gnustep-base
Severity: serious
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for gnustep-base.
CVE-2010-1457[0]:
| Tools/gdomap.c in gdomap in GNUstep Base before 1.20.0 allows local
| users to
forcemerge 581507 584397
thanks
Hi,
On 06/03/2010 06:09 AM, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
chromium gives the aw, snap message when visiting th following page:
http://www.fastcompany.com/video/why-change-is-so-hard-self-control-is-exhaustible
I've run it with the following command line, with the
On 01/06/10 05:55, paul.sz...@sydney.edu.au wrote:
Dear Kartik,
I don't think this bug is correct for recoll. recoll only 'suggests'
ghostscript and don't use code from ghostscript. Filing bug at 'gs
package seems right.
I'm slightly puzzled by your mass-bug filing. Why you opened bugs
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I request assistance with maintaining the chromium-browser package.
In reality, the team mentioned in the Maintainer field currently consists of me.
This package really needs a team to work on it.
Alioth project:
Il 28/05/2010 14:35, Wilfried Goesgens ha scritto:
If you've got a system 'grown' across time (which is pretty usual for
debian installations) theres no reason why libicu36-dev shouldn't be
there. This box has been running etch and lenny without reinstall for
example
You need to run deborphan
tags 582709 unreproducible
thanks
Hi Jonathan,
Il 23/05/2010 00:50, Jonathan Nieder ha scritto:
Visiting http://www.nytimes.com/, first the page is rendered, and
then (after a few “Waiting for www.nytimes.com” events), the
“Aw, Snap!” message comes.
Run with --debug --single-process, the
tags 582323 unreproducible
thanks
Hi Pierre,
thanks for your bug report.
Il 20/05/2010 00:50, Pierre Habouzit ha scritto:
Package: chromium-browser
Version: 5.0.375.38~r46659-2
Severity: important
Forwarded: http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=44607
Go to a large build
Il 12/05/2010 10:18, Andres Mejia ha scritto:
I was getting that message with the
current chromium in experimental as well. I guess this patch is a
start to figuring out that issue at least : /
Looking the build log[1], now there is a relevant FFmpeg failed test.
Have you noted that?
[
Il 13/05/2010 13:29, Cyril Brulebois ha scritto:
How the hell “therefore”? Imagine a second libv8 is available, the
build will crash at the very same place. From what you wrote, *this*
bug is *not* fixed, and build-depending on an extra package is *not*
going to fix this bug.
Please get
severity 580947 serious
retitle 580947 do not use the system ffmpeg headers
thanks
Aside from allowing it to build with system ffmpeg 0.5.1, the
packaging is updated to make use of the shlib files for the ffmpeg
libs, to acquire proper entries for the Depends field.
Many thanks for your
severity 580947 important
thanks
Il 11/05/2010 10:44, Reinhard Tartler ha scritto:
checking [2], reveals that I'm partly wrong. There is an in-source copy
of ffmpeg, that there is an option 'use_system_ffmpeg=1' passed to the
buildscript. This indicates that I indeed missed that upstream now
Il 11/05/2010 17:35, Ben Hutchings ha scritto:
How can you expect this to work? The ABI of the system ffmpeg libraries
is not going to match the ABI defined by the bundled headers. You must
patch chromium to work with the system ffmpeg headers.
chromium doesn't link against the ffmpeg
tags 580947 wontfix
thanks
Hi Ansgar,
Il 10/05/2010 05:52, Ansgar Burchardt ha scritto:
When trying to use the video tag, I get a Aw, Snap! message.
How to reproduce:
Visit http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/demos/simpleVideo/video.html,
click any of the buttons (Play, Pause, ...).
tags 580695 unreproducible
thanks
Hi,
Il 07/05/2010 22:41, green ha scritto:
I am trying to get chromium to use a polipo caching proxy running locally
(localhost:8123), but it seems to ignore environment variables and options.
I
am not running Gnome or KDE; just awesome wm. I have tried
Package: glew
Severity: wishlist
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
please package the new 1.5.4 upstream version.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkvnAWEACgkQNxpp46476aomQgCgjTKiDZshlWaSCUSkG8L31oaz
Il 08/05/2010 16:31, Julian Andres Klode ha scritto:
Just for reference, this only happens on amd64 (the maintainer's
architecture). You can add debian-multimedia.org to sources.list
until the package is fixed.
Giuseppe: please build the package in a clean chroot consisting
only of packages
tags 580608 moreinfo unreproducible
thanks
Il 07/05/2010 09:05, Jonny ha scritto:
Hello, it doesn't start at all.
$ /usr/bin/chromium-browser
Illegal instruction
Please paste the output of:
reportbug --template chromium-browser
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
severity 580608 serious
thanks
Hi,
Il 07/05/2010 13:28, michael hatzold ha scritto:
Am 07.05.2010, 12:51 Uhr, schrieb Debian Bug Tracking System
ow...@bugs.debian.org:
$ /usr/bin/chromium-browser
Ungültiger Maschinenbefehl
could you try the previous version please?
tags 580474 unreproducible
thanks
Hi Adrian!
Il 06/05/2010 10:52, Adrian Lang ha scritto:
Package: chromium-browser
Version: 5.0.342.9~r43360-1
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Steps to reproduce:
* Open Chromium
* Maximize Chromium
* Move Chromium window from one screen to
reopen 580535
tags 580535 moreinfo
thanks
Il 06/05/2010 20:20, Faheem Mitha ha scritto:
I just can't build using
debuild binary
which errors out at the beginning.
Ok, so please send the full error log
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Il 06/05/2010 22:03, Faheem Mitha ha scritto:
fah...@orwell:/usr/local/src/chromium-browser-debian/chromium-browser-5.0.342.9~r43360$
debuild binary
debian/rules:65: unsupported target arch - continuing anyway
/usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk:72: parsing
reopen 580535
tags 580535 - moreinfo
thanks
Il 06/05/2010 23:15, Faheem Mitha ha scritto:
Policy disagrees. From IRC #debian-devel on oftc...
Right, reopening then.
Cheers,
Giuseppe
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.83
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm trying to fix #580535, debian/rules binary FTBFS
I think this is a bug in cdbs, in /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/buildcore.mk there is:
binary: binary-indep binary-arch
IMHO to fix this issue it
Package: memcached
Severity: grave
Tags: security patch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for memcached.
CVE-2010-1152[0]:
| memcached.c in memcached before 1.4.3 allows remote attackers to cause
| a denial
Hi,
Il 23/04/2010 22:55, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
That's great news guys, I'm really looking forward for chromium browser
in unstable ... and if you need a beta tester, ping me :-)
Preliminary i386/amd64 Debian packages can be found here:
http://people.debian.org/~iuculano/chromium/
Il 26/04/2010 15:58, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
(You might want to sign the .dsc though, so that people can have a trust
path to the .deb-s.)
Signed, thanks!
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi Alexander,
Il 23/04/2010 14:10, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl ha scritto:
I've prepared an NMU for kompozer (versioned as 1:0.8~b3.dfsg.1-0.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/7. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
thanks for your NMU!
I'm currently busy, please go ahead, and
Package: git-buildpackage
Version: 0.4.65
Severity: normal
File: /usr/bin/git-import-dsc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
It seems git-import-dsc fails with chromium-browser in ubuntu:
# git-import-dsc chromium-browser_5.0.342.9~r43360-0ubuntu2.dsc
No git repository found,
Il 22/04/2010 12:25, Stefano Zacchiroli ha scritto:
Regarding security issues, I duly notice that Giuseppe is a full member
of the Debian security team, so I believe we should trust his judgement
on that.
webkit related security issues are real and I'm well placed to know about
it.
I
owner 520324 !
thanks
Il 27/03/2010 17:14, Giuseppe Iuculano ha scritto:
Hi Alexander,
Il 26/03/2010 12:24, Alexander Sack ha scritto:
Just pull and build the ubuntu package.
Is there a specific reason why you (Chromium team) uploaded
chromium-browser in Ubuntu two months ago and not yet
The failure to start seems to have been fixed (or at least, fixed) by the
0.9.21-1.2+b1 binNMU on amd64.
Yes, the problem was that the touch config.h.in didn't have any effect
probably because it was built in a very fast buildd and ext3 only has a
1 second resolution.
It's a timing/resolution
tags 577002 + pending
thanks
Hello,
The following change has been committed for this bug by
Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org on Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:06:31 +0200.
The fix will be in the next upload.
=
Fix a FTBFS
Package: zabbix
Severity: grave
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for zabbix.
CVE-2010-1277[0]:
| SQL injection vulnerability in the user.authenticate method in the API
| in Zabbix 1.8 before
Package: libnss-db
Severity: important
Tags: security
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the following CVE (Common Vulnerabilities Exposures) id was
published for libnss-db.
CVE-2010-0826[0]:
| The Free Software Foundation (FSF) Berkeley DB NSS module (aka
| libnss-db) 2.2.3pre1
. (Closes: 575740)
+ * Makes src/slave/kpropd.c ISO C90 compliant (Closes: #574703)
+
+ -- Giuseppe Iuculano iucul...@debian.org Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:11:50 +0200
+
krb5 (1.8+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream version
diff -u krb5-1.8+dfsg/src/slave/kpropd.c krb5-1.8+dfsg/src/slave/kpropd.c
Hi,
a binNMU (pulseaudio_0.9.10-3+lenny2+b1 on amd64) was uploaded some
minutes ago and this now should be fixed.
Could you confirm this please?
Cheers,
Giuseppe.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
201 - 300 of 963 matches
Mail list logo
