On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 06:44:36AM +0400, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
03.04.2014 00:50, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Public keyservers aren't expected to provide verification of key
authenticity. The signatures on the keys themselves do that. The
Debian Live CD key is signed by Daniel, whose key
On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 11:01:38PM +0400, Evgeny Kapun wrote:
02.04.2014 07:45, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I don't actually think it's appropriate that this key lives in the
debian-role-keys keyring (and in general I think that keyring needs
to go away). The key should be present
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 05:52:25AM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 03/21/2014 09:27 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Please submit these keys for inclusion...
how?
Sorry, I assumed you already knew. I just looked for a documentation
page to describe this, but no useful results
I think the problem is the test:
if [ -x /etc/init.d/udev ] pidof udevd /dev/null; then
I hit this problem installing tpm-tools today and found this bug, so
tried the commands in the most recent comment:
root@pot:/# ls -l /dev/tpm0
crw--- 1 root root 10, 224 Mar 12 20:17 /dev/tpm0
Package: blktap-dev
Version: 2.0.90-2
Severity: normal
blktap-dev does not pull in uuid-dev which results in the following
error when including vhd/libvhd.h:
/usr/include/vhd/libvhd.h:37:23: fatal error: uuid/uuid.h: No such file
or directory
#include uuid/uuid.h
^
Package: systemd
Version: 204-5
Severity: normal
This could be a gnome-power-manager (3.8.2-1) or upower (0.9.23-2+b1)
issue, but it seems to have started at the point a GNOME upgrade pulled
in systemd for logind.
Since this time my laptop's sleep button no longer works correctly.
Pressing it
Control: reassign -1 gnome-settings-daemon 3.8.5-2
On Sat, Dec 07, 2013 at 09:38:06PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 07.12.2013 21:17, schrieb Jonathan McDowell:
Package: systemd
Version: 204-5
Severity: normal
This could be a gnome-power-manager (3.8.2-1) or upower (0.9.23-2+b1
I think this is the same issue; it certainly seems very similar. When I
lock my screen I will often come back to find that icedove is visible
(but not accepting mouse or keyboard input) even though the rest of the
desktop is correctly hidden. I can't quite remember when this started
happening -
On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 03:48:03PM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Thu, 2013-08-15 at 14:26 -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 at 15:48, Dave Kleikamp wrote:
This patch replaces the one I posted yesterday. I like this better since
it doesn't require fixing existing on-disk
tags 710665 pending
thanks
On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 01:43:51PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
a test with piuparts revealed that your package uses files from
/usr/share/doc in its maintainer scripts which is a violation of
Policy 12.3: Packages must not require the existence of any files in
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 10:31:02PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013 01:13 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:52 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 10 June 2013 08:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
For the record, the window for getting fixes in
On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 12:54:56PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2013-06-09 at 17:18 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Sunday 09 June 2013 05:28 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I can't see anything on
http://packages.qa.debian.org/m/multipath-tools.html so I'm assuming
this isn't
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 12:55:33PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Saturday 25 May 2013 05:13 AM, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I've just hit this myself upgrading a server to wheezy and can't see any
sign of more recent packages in the archive yet. Is it likely this will
happen in time
tags 699661 wontfix
thanks
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 03:11:09PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
Note that signature date is part of the information
contained in the gpg signature block.
Rethinking this, I suppose that could be faked with a compromised key.
So, really the trust path would
On Monday 8th April 2013 22:04 PM, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Monday 08 April 2013 02:43 PM, Guy Roussin wrote:
Just to re-confirm, is the actual bug, that was initially reported by
Guy, is that also resolved?
Yes the bug is resolved. No more errors when update-initramfs -u
Thank you,
On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 11:51:42PM -0500, Michael Gilbert wrote:
package: debian-keyring
version: 2012.11.15
severity: important
Signature verification currently fails on source packages that were
signed by keys that are no longer present in the active keyrings.
This can easily lead to the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:30:24AM -0800, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'd like to report success with my HP EliteBook 8560w sporting an nVidia
GF106 video card and the 3.2.0-4.drm-amd64 kernel. The stock 3.2.35-2
kernel image results in a black screen once KMS kicks in and I've been
following
I'd like to report success with my HP EliteBook 8560w sporting an nVidia
GF106 video card and the 3.2.0-4.drm-amd64 kernel. The stock 3.2.35-2
kernel image results in a black screen once KMS kicks in and I've been
following the linux-image trunk packages from experimental instead. The
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 10:56:54PM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
[Subject: Seeing this with wheezy kernel; any ETA for fix?]
Please keep in mind that these appear as emails in a crowded inbox, so
the subject line can be a good place to put valuable context.
Sorry
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 09:54:45AM -0800, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Sorry, yes, though further investigating I can see this happening on
exports that are JFS on the server side, so I'm not sure the patches
already in this bug report are applicable.
Do you have
I'm seeing this on a set of machines running squeeze with the wheezy
(2.6.32-46) kernel on the client + server, as well as a client running
3.6.0 taking to a wheezy kernel server. Any indication of whether the
fix will hit wheezy, or the reasons why not (i.e. will it cause me
problems if I do a
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:57:24PM -0800, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'm seeing this on a set of machines running squeeze with the wheezy
(2.6.32-46) kernel on the client + server, as well as a client running
I mean 3.2.32-1 here; I still have the squeeze kernel installed and
looked at the wrong
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:25:48PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-11-05 00:04 +0100, Paris Liakos wrote:
I updated libcairo to latest version in sid repos and
xserver-xorg-core to the version mentioned above text scrambling with
black glitches as described above is fixed but now there
On Sun, Oct 28, 2012 at 07:11:37PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2012-10-27 02:33 +0200, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Just as an extra data point (and I'm not sure this is the only bug this
is appropriate for as there are several cairo2/nouveau related bugs) I
recently built an xserver-xorg
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:46:17PM -0400, Samuel Bronson wrote:
Package: debian-keyring
Version: 2012.06.01
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
The debian-keyring package seems to be getting a little stale; your
usual at-least-monthly updates stopped abruptly at the beginning of June
Just as an extra data point (and I'm not sure this is the only bug this
is appropriate for as there are several cairo2/nouveau related bugs) I
recently built an xserver-xorg-video-nouveau based off the 1.0.3
upstream release and have found it to significantly improve things on my
Quadro 2000M
Package: src:linux
Version: 3.2.30-1
Severity: important
I had a fibre channel path go down on my host (running Squeeze but with
the kernel from unstable) and hit the following backtrace in dmesg
repeatedly, resulting in having to reboot the machine as it became
unresponsive. I've seen the same
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 05:54:35AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 16:52 -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Package: src:linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-46
Tried to do an install on an HP Gen8 blade server today which has a SAS
RAID controller. This wasn't detected during d-i
Package: src:linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-46
Tried to do an install on an HP Gen8 blade server today which has a SAS
RAID controller. This wasn't detected during d-i; I got at:
hpsa :03:00.0: unrecognized board ID: 0x3355103c, ignoring.
error in dmesg. I flipped to a console and tried:
#
I saw this multiple times yesterday, sometimes on startup, sometimes
during a call (I only had gdb attached once, but it clearly showed the
fault being in libopal). It makes ekiga unusable for me. Was the
downgrade in severity from grave due to this not being reproduced by
Gregor?
J.
--
/-\
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+nfs-utils (1:1.2.2-4squeeze3) stable; urgency=high
+
+ * Fix rpc.idmapd dying.
+
+ -- Jonathan McDowell nood...@hp.com Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:44:20 -0700
+
nfs-utils (1:1.2.2-4squeeze2) stable; urgency=high
* Fix CVE-2011-1749: Avoid leaving a corrupt mtab file (Closes
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 01:47:06PM -0700, Grope Fruit wrote:
Also seeing this when having just DISCONNECTED (no users remain on affected
server):
CRIT-3-65283 Error sending data out tunnel: Operation not permitted
(udpfd=9, buf=0x7fffa3220810, len=62, dest=x.x.x.x)
CRIT-3-65283 Error
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 12:41:10PM +0400, Boris Pek wrote:
Sorry to disturb you. But I have a question.
Few days ago my bug report #655761 was closed with comment:
These keys have all been added to the active DM keyring.
But I do not see any changes in bzr repository [1] and
there is
fixed 650544 0.4.0-1
thanks
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 07:59:48PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Package: onak
Version: 0.3.8-1
Severity: serious
Justification: Policy 10.8
The onak package creates /var/log/onak.log, but this file is never
rotated. Instead it grows indefinitely. Rotation is a
Package: libnss3-dev
Version: 3.13.1.with.ckbi.1.88-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch upstream
I've hit the following compile error trying to build a more up-to-date
pidgin-sipe package:
/usr/include/nss/pkcs11n.h:365:26: error: __GNUC_MINOR is not defined
[-Werror=undef]
Compiler is:
gcc
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 05:24:34AM +0200, Devid Antonio Filoni wrote:
Please note that my key is not in Debian keyring right now, I'm not a
DM ATM, so this is not a key replacement...
Apologies; from your mail about the 4096 bit key it looked like it was
just a replacement.
J.
--
/-\
Package: gnome-keyring
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I debated over whether this should be grave or just important, but the
inhumanity of having to type my SSH passwords first thing on a Monday
morning rather than being able to use my SSH key led me to
On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 10:03:52AM -0700, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Package: gnome-keyring
Version: 3.0.0-3
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
I debated over whether this should be grave or just important, but the
inhumanity of having to type my SSH passwords first
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 10:50:34AM +0200, Stefano Rivera wrote:
Hi Christoph (2010.10.12_14:09:31_+0200)
I'm not 100% sure, but as far as I can see, keyserver.kjsl.com is in
the meantime also an SKS and no longer a PKS keyserver. Therfore
this makes probably no longer sense.
I agree
an upstream
release in the next week or two, at which point I'll also do an upload
to Debian.
J.
--
Revd. Jonathan McDowell, ULC | How I wish, how I wish you were here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas
On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 09:33:00PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: normal
Hi. My key expired, so I'm attaching a jetring changeset for an updated
key. Consider this an annual ping as well.
To update your key you need to send it via HKP to
On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 06:10:59PM +0100, Christoph Haas wrote:
Following step 3 of http://wiki.debian.org/DebianMaintainer/Tutorial I
hereby request and support the replacement of Michael's old key
Ah. These instructions are long out of date. Requests for key
replacement need to be sent to RT
On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 11:24:42PM +0100, Francesco Namuri wrote:
I'm sorry Jonathan,
I sent it only to keyring.debian.org, thinking that it was enough, and I
forgot to send it to others keyservers, now I've sent it to:
the.earth.li
pool.sks-keyservers.net
keyserver.linux.it
Sending it
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 07:57:46AM +0100, Francesco Namuri wrote:
Hi,
I've send my updated key to keyring.debian.org, but something must gone
wrong. I see that in last upload is still present my old key.
I don't know where is the mess, I haven't received any error after the
gpg
I'm seeing this on a machine recently upgraded to Squeeze. Seems to be
due to vsftpd (see #601456). Upstream mainline removed this message in
commit 2fdc1c8093255f9da877d7b9ce3f46c2098377dc.
J.
--
Revd. Jonathan McDowell, ULC | I don't tip.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:00:51PM +0100, Francesco Namuri wrote:
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: normal
Please update my public-key, I've changed the expiration date.
You should send your updated key to keyrings.debain.org via HKP:
gpg --keyserver keyring.debian.org --send-key
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please consider unblocking package debian-keyring
This doesn't fix any RC bugs, but does add the debian-nonupload keyring,
remove the PGPV3 keyring (currently an empty file to ease
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 06:33:23PM +0100, Javi Merino wrote:
Package: debian-maintainers
Version: 1.38
Severity: normal
Hi, can you please change the e-mail address in the debian-maintainers
keyring for 6B1BAEC2CA5D4EA7439803612DCE3F2836D4E4F5 to
cibervi...@gmail.com
This email address is
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 09:22:14PM +0200, Julien Valroff wrote:
Package: debian-keyring
Version: 2010.08.01
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I have just noticed there is nothing in the README about the
debian-maintainers.gpg keyring.
A short note in the What the keyrings are section should be
Package: linux-2.6
Version: 2.6.32-23
Severity: wishlist
Please consider adding the patch at:
http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/mcgrof/ethernet/0001-add-AR8152-and-AR8152.patch
to the 2.6.32 kernel. It enables support for the AR8151/AR8152 Atheros
ethernet chipsets. Applying this patch
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 05:24:15PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 09:20:54AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
[fixing corrupt indexes in openguides]
This /seems/ to have done the trick. Most odd; I'm pretty sure the
point of breakage was around the sarge-etch
On Mon, Oct 04, 2010 at 11:25:31AM +0200, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl
wrote:
Am 04.10.2010 08:59, schrieb Stefan Bauer:
This is really not a nice way howto treat volunteer contributors.
You did notice, that the ftp team consist of volunteers, too. Did
you?
If there is a lack of
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 05:26:35PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
Jonathan McDowell nood...@earth.li writes:
keyring-maint ignores the jetring update; most probably what happened is
that when I did the update the keyserver I used provided some updated
sigs but didn't update the expiry
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 10:46:23AM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 10:43:57PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
* Package name: plconfig
Description : a tool for configuring HomePlug powerline bridges
I dimly remember that plconfig is the traditional name
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
* Package name: plconfig
Version : 0.0.2
Upstream Author : Manuel Kasper
* URL : https://neon1.net/prog/plconfig.html
* License : 2 clause BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : a tool for configuring HomePlug powerline
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 07:25:34PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote:
On Thursday 08 Apr 2010 03:34:25 you wrote:
I decided that given the fact that I already maintain already a lot
of packages, I will no longer offer co-maintainership.
If you want the package please go ahead or contact
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 05:12:07PM +0200, Ognyan Kulev wrote:
Package: debian-maintainers
My Debian key expired more than an year ago and finally I'm moving to
more participation in Debian. Please upload my new key that is attached.
It's signed by one DD: zinov...@debian.org. I've read
Package: microcode.ctl
Version: 1.17-13
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Please consider applying the attached patch to this package. It changes
the init script to use the logging functions in lsb-base, which allows
for easier customisation of system boot message format. I've also
corrected a
Package: acpi-support
Version: 0.130-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi.
Please consider the attached patch for inclusion with your next update;
it changes the init script to use the log_action_* class of logging
functions rather than just log_*. In particular this means that when
uinput is not
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 11:42:32AM +0100, Giacomo A. Catenazzi wrote:
On 06.01.2010 10:35, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Please consider applying the attached patch to this package. It changes
the init script to use the logging functions in lsb-base, which allows
for easier customisation of system
I'm using sg3-utils quite a bit in work so I might possibly be
interested in taking over maintenance. Not retitling until I've had a
closer look at what's involved, just registering interest at present.
J.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:50:23PM +0200, Resul Cetin wrote:
Package: debian-keyring
Version: 2009.05.28
Severity: grave
Debian keyring 2009.08.27 provides debian-maintainers and Conflicts with
debian maintainers. Please use more specific conflict with version number =
2009.08.24
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 10:13:22PM +0200, Resul Cetin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:50:23PM +0200, Resul Cetin wrote:
Package: debian-keyring
Version: 2009.05.28
Severity: grave
Debian keyring 2009.08.27 provides debian-maintainers and Conflicts with
debian maintainers.
Package: drm-snapshot
Version: 2.4.11+git+20090630+de1ed01-1
Severity: wishlist
Please update the version of drm-snapshot in experimental to something
that's actually more recent than the released version in
unstable/testing. :) Also please include libdrm-radeon to facilitate
building a KMS
On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:28:48AM -0400, xavier renaut wrote:
once i load onak with a few keys, lookup works fine for 10 times at most,
then segfaults.
db4.6_recover -v seems to fix the problem.
to reproduce :
user=onak
sudo su -m $user -c 'rm -f /var/lib/onak/*'
sudo su -m $user -c
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:12:56PM -0800, Ross Boylan wrote:
Package: remote-tty
Version: 4.0-12
Severity: normal
remote-tty seems to take different arguments than given in the man page.
Its help lists different options:
usage: remote-tty [-s ServSpec] [-l LoginName] [-7] [-r] [-x
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 06:32:14PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
This is a significant problem for me as well.
There are reasonable circumstances where a system administrator would
want users to always have access to a system-maintained keyring. The
users should of course also have no
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 02:02:24PM +0200, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Dear Jonathan,
please see #498901 for a patch. I just created one patch because it's
quite short and understandable.
Thanks. I haven't dealt with this bug because we're in freeze and the
script is in
I'm a bit confused by the statement that kernel-package does not work
with the current set of kernels; I built a 2.6.27-rc4 kernel from
vanilla upstream sources using it over the weekend (on i386) and tend to
build the latest vanilla kernels as they come out on my AMD64 box. I
haven't hit any
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 01:04:36AM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 10:15:24PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:15:33PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Running grub-install will wipe the grub1 install and leave me
with grub2, right? Is that more
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 07:15:33PM +0200, Felix Zielcke wrote:
Running grub-install will wipe the grub1 install and leave me with
grub2, right? Is that more likely to work than the existing chainloading
grub2 from grub1 approach?
Yes, grub-install will replace grub-legacy with grub2.
I
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:04:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:11:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:55:22AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
It's not fixed
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 02:17:06PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:29:40AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 04:04:07PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 01:16:58PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 05:20:58PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 02:56:09PM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:39:13PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System
wrote:
The submitter address recorded for your Bug report #467501: cannot
boot when
Package: w3m
Version: 0.5.2-2+b1
Severity: normal
I get errors like the following:
Jul 14 13:06:50 soba w3m: *** info
Jul 14 13:06:50 soba w3m: /dev/gpmctl: No such file or directory
Jul 14 13:06:50 soba w3m: *** err
Jul 14 13:06:50 soba w3m: Oh, oh, it's an error! possibly I die!
logged to
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 02:11:51PM +0200, Robert Millan wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:55:22AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
It's not fixed, but behaviour appears to be slightly different.
root is getting detected as (hd0,1) while prefix is ending up set to
(hd0,1)(md0)/boot/grub
On Sat, Jul 05, 2008 at 12:39:13PM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
The submitter address recorded for your Bug report
#467501: cannot boot when /boot is in RAID
has been changed.
Er, WTF?
If this bug is fixed then it would be nice if the package maintainer
could close it so I know
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 02:51:30PM -0400, Matthew James Goins wrote:
Some adventurous programmers I know are working on a system that uses
PGP certificate user ids in unusual ways. Some of the userids are
essentially URIs in this system. The system needed to talk to a local
keyserver, so we
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 11:03:48AM +0200, Colin Alston wrote:
Package: l2tpns
Version: 2.1.21-1
Severity: important
l2tpns does not appear to route packets from/to ranges not within that
which is allocated to the tunnels themselves.
Consider for example
severity wishlist
retitle documentation could do with much improvement
thanks
On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 12:01:08PM +0200, Colin Alston wrote:
Colin Alston wrote:
I don't have a Frame-Route, no. From RADIUS documentation that attribute
suggests it is a route to pass along to the LAC. I'm
Package: exim4
Version: 4.69-4
I started seeing the A TLS packet with unexpected length was received.
error yesterday, with connections from a box running Etch (exim4
4.63-17) and using the box running testing as an SMTP relay with auth
over TLS. At the time I was running 4.69-2+b1 but I've since
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:35:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
I have attached said patch, maybe it should be included in the
Debian package?
Jonathan, does the patch fix things for you?
Yes, with the patch in #462154 mdadm --monitor --scan no longer
segfaults and operates as expected.
J.
On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 06:28:40PM +0200, Sven Arvidsson wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 11:17 +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Using rhythmbox to listen to local Oggs results in erratic scrobbling of
these tracks to last.fm; very rarely does it succeed. I believe this is
an upstream issue
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:57:02PM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 10:55:54PM +0100, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:19:54PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
While trying to ftp some firmware to a router, I get the following
Package: ftp
Version: 0.17-17
Severity: normal
While trying to ftp some firmware to a router, I get the following. It
seems to be repeatable, but given that involves reflashing a device I'm
not overly keen on trying it lots. :)
ftp put openwrt-ar7-squashfs.bin fs mtd5
local:
can either upload 0.13 now, or
hold off until 5.10 hits unstable if it's not expected to be that far
off.
J.
--
Revd. Jonathan McDowell, ULC | This screen intentionally left blank.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 04:40:32PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 02:23:17PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
I'm currently at work and the machine is my home box, but I'll try
rebooting tonight to see if it now boots without intervention.
Don't bother, it won't boot
On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 01:22:00PM +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
Please provide the output of the following commands:
sudo dd if=/dev/sda bs=1 count=2 skip=76 | od -tx1
meepok:~# dd if=/dev/sda bs=1 count=2 skip=76 | od -tx1
000 ff 00
002
2+0 records in
2+0 records out
2 bytes (2 B)
Package: grub-pc
Version: 1.96+20080219-2
Severity: important
I have installed grub-pc on my shiny new AMD64 box. After verifying it
loaded fine when chainloaded from legacy grub I typed
upgrade-from-grub-legacy and rebooted. I was rewarded with the grub
rescue shell.
For some reason it has
I noticed a new version of Exim4 had hit testing, so I tried a
dist-upgrade pulling in that new version, and libpq5 8.3~rc2-1+b1. So
far it seems to be working ok - mailq doesn't segfault and mail is
getting delivered successfully.
J.
--
Web [ 101 things you can't have too much of : 16 -
Package: exim4
Version: 4.68-2
Severity: important
After upgrading libpq5 from 8.2.6-1 to 8.3~rc2-1+b1 last night I started
to experience exim4 segfaults; log entries like:
2008-02-03 23:51:21 1JLocK-PR-OM appendfile transport process returned
non-zero status 0x000b: terminated by signal 11
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:42:20PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 09:33:28AM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
After upgrading libpq5 from 8.2.6-1 to 8.3~rc2-1+b1 last night I
started to experience exim4 segfaults; log entries like:
2008-02-03 23:51:21 1JLocK-PR-OM
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 02:55:38PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:24:35PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x2ba2de5c6cc0 (LWP 2944)]
0x2ba2dc19eb6b in free () from /lib/libc.so.6
(gdb) bt
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 09:59:07PM +, Jonathan McDowell wrote:
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: important
| pot:~# mdadm --monitor --scan
| Segmentation fault
I found some further information on:
http://www.rigacci.org/wiki/doku.php/doc/appunti/linux/sa/raid
Which states
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 04:29:17PM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
tags 459113 + pending
thanks
On 24/01/08 at 17:55 -0300, Miguel Angel Ruiz Manzano wrote:
Package: opensrs-client
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
I'm sending a patch to fix the problem.
I have sponsored this
Package: mdadm
Version: 2.6.4-1
Severity: important
| pot:~# mdadm --monitor --scan
| Segmentation fault
Building from the source package and running under GDB:
| (gdb) set args --monitor --scan
| (gdb) run
| Starting program: /home/noodles/mdadm/mdadm-2.6.4/mdadm --monitor --scan
|
| Program
Package: rhythmbox
Version: 0.10.1-1+b3
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Using rhythmbox to listen to local Oggs results in erratic scrobbling of
these tracks to last.fm; very rarely does it succeed. I believe this is
an upstream issue; there is some discussion at:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:52:14AM -0400, Clint Adams wrote:
Package: onak
Version: 0.3.3-1
User: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usertags: db4.2 oldbdb
Please update onak to build against db4.5 so that we can get rid of
db4.2.
I assume, given the amount of time that's passed since you raised this
bug,
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 07:41:58PM +0100, Jan Prunk wrote:
Package: onak
Version: 0.3.4-1
Severity: critical
Justification: breaks unrelated software
Please clarify this justification; what unrelated software is broken?
onak fails to install on lenny platforms tested were sparc i386.
201 - 300 of 358 matches
Mail list logo
