So I had a look and think there may be an easier way to handle this. What
if the ' at ' was removed from the memory regex in
https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/blob/1.5.5/sphinx/util/inspect.py#L23
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:54 AM, Justin Cappos <jcap...@nyu.edu> wrote:
> Okay, I
Okay, I will try to get this fixed further upstream in celery.
Justin
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Sun, May 07, 2017 at 11:39:50AM -0400, Justin Cappos wrote:
> > Okay, I have opened a new bug about this
Okay, I have opened a new bug about this in sphinx:
https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/issues/3722
Thanks,
Justin
On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 6:38 AM, Dmitry Shachnev <mity...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
>
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 06:01:22AM -0400, Justin Cappos wrote:
> &g
found 774274
forwarded 774274 https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490
done
The changelog doesn't seem to indicate that the upstream patch was
applied. This seems to be fixed in upstream master on November 16th, 2016
as per ( https://github.com/fontforge/fontforge/issues/2490 ).
This
[Resending to the list. The bug was archived so the initial email was
rejected]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Justin Cappos R<jcap...@nyu.edu>
Date: Fri, May 5, 2017 at 6:01 AM
Subject: Memory addresses still seem to appear in sphinx docs...
To: 822...@bugs.debian.org
Cc:
Package: Apt, Aptitude, Synaptic
Version: all
Cross-posting from:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/synaptic/+bug/247445
apt and possibly other Debian package managers capable of downloading
packages are vulnerable to two kinds of attacks.
1. Replay attack, where an attacker, by
6 matches
Mail list logo
