Control: tags -1 patch
Bastian,
Attached is a patch to implement this which I hope you will find useful.
Thanks for considering including it.
Mark
>From e5ac80638456ca5cf5da69a1699d016b380ab0a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2021 17:59:09 +0100
Subject: [PA
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 03:30:56PM +0200, deb...@nilux.be wrote:
> > I have addressed most of these, however I don't have any systems with
> > systemd
> > on. If you would like to write and send me a service file, I will
> > happily
> > include it.
> >
>
> Looking at the git repo, it seems that
On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 01:30:42PM +0200, deb...@nilux.be wrote:
> I built it locally, there are few lintian messages (at first look, they seem
> to be relevant), see: https://paste.debian.net/1198090/
I have addressed most of these, however I don't have any systems with systemd
on. If you would
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:11:54PM +0200, deb...@nilux.be wrote:
> > I also work on Devuan and already have seatd packaged there[1]. I have
> > just
> > updated it to version 0.5.0. I was planning on uploading to Debian once
> > Bullseye
> > is released.
>
> Actually, it would be great if it
Henry-Nicolas,
Thanks for following up with this.
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:26:58PM +0200, Henry-Nicolas Tourneur wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> libseat will become a dependency for wlroots as of version 0.14.0 of the
> latter.
> Would you need any help working on this package?
I also work on
).
+
+ -- Mark Hindley Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:16:00 +0100
+
openrc (0.42-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.links.in
openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.links.in
--- openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.links.in1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
+0100
+++ openrc
package symlinks in /usr/lib target shared libraries in
+/lib. (Closes: #985509).
+
+ -- Mark Hindley Fri, 02 Apr 2021 11:16:00 +0100
+
openrc (0.42-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
diff -Nru openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.links.in
openrc-0.42/debian/libeinfo-dev.links.in
Control: tags -1 pending
Helmut,
Many thanks for this.
Queued for the next upload.
Mark
Helmut,
Thanks for this.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 07:11:01PM +0100, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> Source: elogind
> Version: 246.9.1-1+debian1
> Tags: patch
> User: helm...@debian.org
> Usertags: rebootstrap
>
> elogind participates in dependency loops relevant to architecture
> bootstrap. Instead of
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:49:36AM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Mark Hindley writes:
>
> > pdiff_files_regexp = (?:^|[/-])2\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}\.\d{2}\.gz$
>
> Yeah, that may well suffice after all; I just threw together a quick
> tweak on the basis of aptitude's t
Aaron,
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 11:05:52AM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > pdiff_files_regexp =
> > (?:^|[/-])2\d{3}-\d{2}-\d{2}-\d{4}\.\d{2}\.(?:gz|pdiff.*)$
>
> Looks reasonable to me. Thanks for the suggestion.
Actually shouldn't it be
pdiff_files_regexp = (?:^|[/-])2\d
Control: tags -1 pending
Aaron,
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 09:33:40PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> Package: apt-cacher
> Version: 1.7.21+nmu1
> Severity: normal
>
> AFAICT, metadata deltas now have filenames along the lines of
> T-2021-01-13-2000.21-F-2021-01-13-2000.21.pdiff, which don't match
>
Simon,
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 08:03:18PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> I wouldn't want to give a ruling that would be interpreted as precedent to
> (effectively) overrule multiple maintainer decisions (whether they're
> decisions by a single maintainer in multiple packages, or multiple
>
Sven,
Sorry about the slow reply with this.
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 08:41:41PM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > But, instead of removing, you can change:
> > Recommends: libpam-systemd
> > to
> > Recommends: default-logind | logind
> >
> > which works nicely with elogind.
>
> Makes sense.
Elana,
Thanks for passing this on.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 03:36:45PM -0800, Elana Hashman wrote:
> Less than 1% of users are installing sysvinit-core, with a steady
> downward trend.[1]
I accept that the number of users is small, although the figures referenced omit
users of openrc and runit.
Sean and Simon,
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 01:17:30PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
> > In the cases where the regression was accidental, ideally, the answer
> > would be someone calmly and politely offering a tested patch, but it
> > sadly seems equally likely to result in hostility, and I think it's
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 09:51:56AM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Dec 2020 at 22:56:57 +0100, Philip Hands wrote:
> > Could I just check if there's a point of common acceptability which both
> > sides of this discussion could live with?
> >
> > libpam-systemd |
Control: tags -1 wontfix
Maxim,
Thanks for this.
On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 08:00:53PM +, Maxim Chintalov wrote:
> Package: libelogind-dev
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: maximchinta...@mail.ru
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> I am attempting to install
Josh,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 04:24:28PM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> If (hypothetically) network-manager upstream
> decided to remove those legacy fallbacks, the maintainer would then be
> in a position of either:
But that is not what this particular discussion is about. Personally, I have no
Simon,
Thanks for your clear and insightful comments.
On Sun, Nov 29, 2020 at 11:58:15PM +, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2020 at 17:33:26 +, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > #921012 is about changing network-manager to Depend upon "default-logind |
> > logind" rather than
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Mark Hindley
* Package name: seatd
Version : 0.4.0
Upstream Author : Kenny Levinsen
* URL : https://git.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/seatd
* License : Expat
Programming Lang: C
Description : Flexible user, seat
Lorenzo,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:30:08PM +, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > However in the log I see
> > /etc/elogind/logind.conf:14: Unknown section 'Login'. Ignoring.
> > /etc/elogind/logind.conf:38: Unknown section 'Sleep'. Ignoring.
> >
> > Not sure if it's
Thanks everybody for testing and reporting back.
Lorenzo,
On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 04:52:23PM +0100, Lorenzo wrote:
> * no longer sends log to the kernel ring buffer (#964006)
>
> However in the log I see
> /etc/elogind/logind.conf:14: Unknown section 'Login'. Ignoring.
>
Joerg,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 12:42:32PM +0100, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> I'd be able and willing to test it, even experimental builds.
Thanks.
I have just built 246.0~rc2-1 for Devuan experimental[1]. The dependencies in
Devuan are slightly different, but I think it should install and work in
Control: forcemerge 968379 -1
Joerg,
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 11:59:05AM +0100, Joerg Dorchain wrote:
> Package: libelogind0
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
>
> Hello,
>
> since rsyslog Version 8.2010.0-1 has a versioned dependency on libsystemd0
> (>= 246), I cannot install it and the current
Control: reassign -1 src:colord 1.4.5-1
Of course this would be better assigned to the source package.
Mark
Package: colord
Version: 1.4.5-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Dear Maintainer,
colord 1.4.5-1 fails to build from source on (at least) i386.
Summary of Failures:
1/4 colord-test-private FAIL 2.94s (killed by signal 6 SIGABRT)
Thanks.
Mark
On Sat, Nov 07, 2020 at 06:05:18PM +0100, Trek wrote:
> searching for info, I found this assertion, that made me think the
> issue could be outside of elogind:
>
> This appears to be that Debian in user space tries to trigger the
> resume when the system is falling to hibernation.
>
Thorsten,
On Fri, Nov 06, 2020 at 12:03:36AM -0800, Sven Eden wrote:
>However, the behavior reported when the user hit the Hibernate key is
>absolutely unsuspected.
>"PM: Image not found (code -22)" sounds like the kernel tried to
>hibernate, but whatever was configured, or deemed
Paul,
Many thanks for this.
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 11:51:18AM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Your package is only blocked because the arch:all binary package(s)
> aren't built on a buildd. Unfortunately the Debian infrastructure
> doesn't allow arch:all packages to be properly binNMU'ed. Hence, I
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/elogind/elogind/issues/177
Thorsten,
Many thanks for this.
On Sun, Oct 04, 2020 at 01:30:53AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
> Severity: critical
> Justification: causes serious data loss
> X-Debbugs-Cc:
Dmitry,
With the upload of systemctl/1.4.4181-1.1, this issue is no longer evident.
Are you happy for me to reassign #959920 to systemctl so it can be closed with
the appropriate fixed version?
Thanks
Mark
Control: tags -1 fixed-upstream
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:09:01AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/elogind/elogind/issues/168
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:35:46AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > Package: elogind
> > Version: 243.7-1
Harald,
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 07:53:13AM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> Package: initscripts
> Version: 2.96-4
> Severity: wishlist
>
> To reduce friction between systemd and "non-systemd" systems I
> would suggest to mount croupv2 very early at boot time, similar
> to systemd.
>
> Could be
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/elogind/elogind/issues/170
Balint and Thorsten,
On Fri, Aug 14, 2020 at 08:43:31AM +0200, Balint Reczey wrote:
[…]
> libelogind0 provides only libsystemd0 (= 243.7) which I understand
> since keeping up with systemd upstream is hard, but other packages
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 11:47:34AM +0200, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
> > However, one thought that occurs to me is whether apparmor is causing this?
> > Does
> > disabling it[1] restore predictable behaviour?
>
> Bingo!
>
> Jul 27 09:47:25 pcale kernel: [ 1569.887279] audit: type=1400
>
Control: reassign -1 apt-cudf
Dear apt-cudf maintainers,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:43:52PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 17:45 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I am struggling to understand how libelogind0 came to be installed in the
> > build
> > in the firs
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Thu, Jul 02, 2020 at 04:33:36PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, Ansgar wrote:
>
> > package), so the problem might also be the `Provides: logind` in
> > libpam-elogind.
>
> Shouldn’t the package dependencies on default-logind | logind
> handle
Michael,
These dependencies are not updated. Please don't close and archive unresolved
bugs without notification or explanation.
Mark
Package: network-manager
Version: 1.25.91-1
Severity: important
Dear Michael,
I notice that today's upload of network-manager has had the init script removed.
I understand that you do not use it your self and do not want to have it around,
but other users do.
Active removal of working scripts
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 12:35:18PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Is it still the case that the buildds use aptitude for resolving
> dependencies on experimental builds? Because aptitude might be even
> more "creative" than apt in that regards.
Thanks. That is one for
Ansgar,
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 07:43:52PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> On Tue, 2020-06-30 at 17:45 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I am struggling to understand how libelogind0 came to be installed in the
> > build
> > in the first place. Can you help me understand that?
>
&
Ansgar,
Thanks for this.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 06:27:20PM +0200, Ansgar wrote:
> Package: libelogind0
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
> Severity: serious
>
> libelogind0's `Provides: libsystemd0` causes unrelated packages to
> fail to build due to unmet dependencies. See [1] for an example.
>
>
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/elogind/elogind/issues/168
On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 10:35:46AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 243.7-1+debian1
> Severity: normal
>
> elogind pretends it’s the kernel. It must log to syslog instead.
Thorsten,
Thanks for this.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 05:10:24PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 at 14:20:47 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > A patch with the required changes is attached for your consideration.
>
> Thanks, I'll apply this.
Thank you.
> > The test attempts to d
rom 949b271aa5ab0f4bec6afc9c8eed21fa668b059f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 11:58:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix system-bus autopackage test detection of systemd as PID1
---
debian/tests/system-bus | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/debian/te
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020 16:00:17 +0100 Klaus Ethgen wrote:
> Source: gparted
> Version: 1.0.0-0.1
> Severity: normal
I tried this version of gparted this morning. I have a practical suggestion of a
way to resolve this.
gprted works fine running in a terminal as a normal user using sudo for
Matti,
Thanks for this.
Certainly pulseaudio does work with elogind. libelogind0 provides libsystemd0 so
the dependencies do work:
> dpkg -l|egrep 'pulse|logind'
ii elogind 241.3-1+debian3
amd64user, seat and session management daemon
some more work on it and come up with attached. It seems
more likely to be portable to me.
What do you think?
Best wishes
Mark
>From 18b33cd84862f453fca8b71450d36f58cd8b141e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 10:29:10 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix mountpoint
Dimitry,
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 09:52:18AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> However, that does not help in this case. elogind has to conflict with systemd
> as they include some duplicate files. I have to admit to being less convinced
> by
> the systemctl Provides: systemd. I underst
Axelm,
Thanks for this.
I haven't used systemctl myself, but it clearly has similar usage case to
elogind so it would be ideal if they were coinstallable. I am very happy to work
to find a solution that provides that.
On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 04:38:26AM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Axel
rk
>From b4f6561938e5920d3b72788937242d1fc9d7c448 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 15:01:35 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Fix for misc/fallocate test build failure.
This was already a known possible failure case. However, in the migration to a
clearer separation of
Source: util-linux
Version: 2.35.1-1
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
Thanks for packaging the new version of util-linux.
Unfortunately the testsuite fails when building in a pbuilder/cowbuilder
chroot. In particular misc/fallocate and misc/mountpoint.
The
Control: tags -1 patch
On Sat, Apr 25, 2020 at 10:09:29AM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> The solution would seem to me for cgroupfs-umount to only try to unmount the
> mountpoints it created, ie those derived from /proc/cgroups.
This patch fixes the issue for me.
Mark
diff -u /usr/bin/cg
Tianon,
I bumped into this issue recently.
The problem appears to be that cgroupfs-umount tries to unmount all
/sys/fs/cgroup subdirectories, even if the mount wasn't originally created by
cgroupfs-mount. elogind mounts /sys/fs/cgroup/{elogind,unified} and is still
using them.
The solution
Hello,
Just a gentle nudge on this.
On Sun, 14 Jul 2019 12:59:32 +0100 Mark Hindley wrote:
> Patches implementing both of these approaches are attached.
I would be grateful if you could adopt one or other of these so that they can be
more widely tested well in advance of the freeze.
Tha
Package: lxsession-logout
Version: 0.5.4-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
Hello,
lxsession-logout currently Recommends consolekit | systemd.
According to the git commit[1], the systemd recommendation was introduced to
close bug #764305. However, that bug asked for a dependency on
Package: python3-debianbts
Severity: normal
Version: 3.0.2
Bastian,
Whilst reportbug can already be used with different debbugs installations,
python3-debianbts has a hardcoded URL to Debian's soap.cgi.
It would be very useful to make the SOAP URL configurable so that
python3-debianbts could
Control: severity -1 important
Thorsten,
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 10:10:03PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> > This behaviour is configurable via RemoveIPC in /etc/elogind/logind.conf.
> > See
>
> > Perhaps you could confirm that this configuration change provides the
> > behaviour
> > you
On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 08:32:46PM +0100, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Package: elogind
> Version: 241.3-1+debian2
> Severity: critical
> Justification: breaks unrelated software
>
> I’m using a scheme in which I store ssh-agent and gpg-agent information
> across all logins (local X session or ssh or
Control: tag -1 patch
Package: debbugs
Version: 2.6.0
Followup-For: Bug #644242
Don,
As we discussed recently on #debbugs I have just been bitten by the original
issue reported here (that debbugs-upgradestatus does not work). However, the bug
report rather drifted away from that topic!
The issue appears to be that
Niels,
Thanks for working on this so swiftly.
On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 11:25:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I have attached the following patch that passes the provided test and
> (AFAICT) does what we want. Please feel free to review it; I will come
> back to this in a few days.
I have
rom src:elogind are manually installable
into bullseye and satisfy the necessary dependencies of essential packages.
Thanks very much for looking at this.
Let me know if there is anything else I can do to help.
Mark
>From e7e78b251beaba5182377a15f6af226ccf950710 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From
Neils,
On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 07:03:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Hi Mark
>
> Thanks for the investigative work and the patch.
>
> I have not had time to review the patch yet in details and hope to have
> a look this weekend.
Thanks.
> Could I convince you to add a small test case for
: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
>From d910a47311ba001976f90c5add8dcd0b518ccad7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Hindley
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 12:35:57 +
Subject: [PATCH] Only block negative dependencies of essential packages
themselves.
The behaviour of _check_inst() to exclude considerat
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 04:37:00PM +1100, Brian May wrote:
> Mark Hindley writes:
>
> > Since this upload was an LTS NMU, I should have copied you in.
>
> Thanks for the report. It looks like the fix for CVE-2019-10871 might be
> broken, and I might have to revert this chan
Package: libpoppler46
Version: 0.26.5-2+deb8u12
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
Dear Maintainer,
I have just upgraded to libpoppler46 version 0.26.5-2+deb8u12 (from +deb8u11)
which has just appeared in jessie-security.
The new version causes xpdf to segfault.
Starting
Simon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Simon,
>
> I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is apt's
> invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
This is now resolved in apt version 1.8.4 which is in both sid and bullseye.
I c
Cristian,
On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 11:41:56AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Sep 2019, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
>
> > 1. install sysvinit-core; that removes systemd-sysv but nothing else
> >systemd related
>
> > Souldn't that work?
>
> It would, if but for libpam-systemd
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:19:10AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> So one thing I think we should ensure is we don't end up uninstalling
> systemd without an explicit user choice.
Julien,
I appreciate that you are suggesting some
Julien,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> So one thing I think we should ensure is we don't end up uninstalling
> systemd without an explicit user choice.
>
> The "init" package has the "Important: yes" control field which as I
> understand it tells apt to behave
Sam,
On Fri, Sep 27, 2019 at 09:19:10AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Hindley writes:
>
> Mark> Sam, Since I cannot get a working and robust dpkg-divert
> Mark> solution, I feel the need to revisit the validity of these
>
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:52:27PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > It is possible to get APT to attempt a solution by specifically requesting
> > 'apt
> > install libelogind0 sysvinit-core'. This removes systemd-sysv and t
Sam,
Since I cannot get a working and robust dpkg-divert solution, I feel the need to
revisit the validity of these concerns.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:03:57PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Hindley writes:
> >> If we are going to use
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 12:11:47AM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > Thanks. Triggers may be an answer to the libsystemd soversion issue.
>
> Mind that anything that runs between unpacking the new libsystemd0
> and running
On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 10:09:15PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > libelogind0 can be coninstalled with libsystemd0. However, it is fragile
> > because
> > the file that needs to be diverted out of the way
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 04:16:05PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Mark> Anyway, I am happy to try to work up a dpkg-divert solution if
> Mark> that is likely to be more acceptable.
>
> I don't know if it will be.
> I'm trying to be a facilitator here and make sure all sides understand
> each
Ian,
Thanks for this.
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:28:29AM +0800, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 10:16 +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Would it be any help at all of the "dbus client-ish" bits and the
> "direct API-ish" bits of the two libraries were
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:34:50PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Hi.
> I've looked a bit at the systemd code as compared to the elogind code.
>
> One of the major reasons that libsystemd0 cannot be used as a
> replacement for libelogind0 is that elogind does not have compatible
> cgroup naming.
>
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 03:03:57PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Foo-package depends on the latest libsystemd0. I'm running unstable or
> testing. The latest libsystemd0 isn't building on my arch yet. But
> elogind is simpler and has build fine on my arch. I install foo-package
> and suddenly
Sam,
Many thanks for this.
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 11:58:18AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
Mark> I have tried the approach suggested by Laurent of using
Mark> elogind with libsystemd0 and I could not get the sd-*(3) APIs
Mark> to function correctly.
> What trouble did you run into?
That
Simon,
On Sun, Sep 22, 2019 at 09:05:32PM +0200, Simon Richter wrote:
> Package: dbus
> Version: 1.12.16-1
> Severity: important
>
> Hi,
>
> /etc/init.d/dbus is hanging pretty much exactly 90 seconds on either boot
> or manual start:
[snip]
> Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)
[snip]
> ii
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 06:51:16PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > Would you, please, start a new bug for this unless you really think
> > it is the same issue (apt being broken by continuing to uninstall
> > libsystemd0 after systemd prerm fails) and I will be happy to help.
>
> I
Cristian,
On Sat, Sep 21, 2019 at 04:35:39PM +0200, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> I'm interested in this, but my systems (unstable and testing) are in a
> slightly different state. Let's take unstable, for example:
Thanks for this. However, I really don't see it as relating to Simon's
Control: tags -1 - pending
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:30:00PM +0200, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2019, Mark Hindley wrote:
>
> > On irc he also said there was little point in adding the Breaks: as apt
> > doesn't
> > rexec itself.
>
> Yes, even a
Julian,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:28:55PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I don't think it's reasonable to ship this package with C/R/P
> > libsystemd0.
>
> I understand that you don't like it. However, for libelogind0 to export the
> same
> symbols as libsystemd
Laurent,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:06:57AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I looked I elogind a while back I was able to build a package without
> having a public libelogind0, I basically had that in my debian/rules file:
>
> # We only build the libelogind0 and
Laurent,
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 01:29:43PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Can't this be stubbed or mocked on the elogind side?
I presume you mean slices here? (I am not sure that slices are the only
difference in implementation, but let's ignore that for now).
To be honest, I am not sure.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:06:57AM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote:
> Hello,
>
> When I looked I elogind a while back I was able to build a package without
> having a public libelogind0, I basically had that in my debian/rules file:
>
> # We only build the libelogind0 and libelogind-dev if we
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 08:36:53PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: tags -1 pending
>
> Simon,
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is
> > apt's
> >
Control: tags -1 pending
Simon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 05:46:32PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I think I have finally got to the bottom of this. As you suspected it is apt's
> invocation of dpkg. See #935910.
This has now been fixed in apt 1.9.4 (experimental).
I propose to add
Break
Control: tags -1 pending
Adrian,
On Thu, Sep 19, 2019 at 01:13:20AM +0200, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Source: elogind
> Severity: normal
>
> Hello!
>
> Currently, elogind unconditionally build-depends on libseccomp-dev despite
> the fact
> that not all supported architectures in
Julien,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:07:51PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> I would hope we can all accept those. If so, there is no requirement for a
> manual block: at the moment there are RC bugs which prevent migration. If or
> when they are resolved migration can occur based on the rele
Sam,
Thanks
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 09:15:58AM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I reached out to jcristau to talk about his block hint.
> Based on our IRC discussion, it sounds like he was having trouble
> bringing himself to remove the hint presumably because he doesn't think
> the broader issue was
Julien,
Thank you.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:48:19PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> -UID: 41176
>
> Package: libelogind0
> Version: 241.3-1+debian1
> Severity: serious
>
> I wrote this in #934132 but that is being ignored so I'll repeat here.
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:10:52AM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Anyway, I marked this wishlist, wontfix as the dependency is there for a
> reason. libpam-systemd is non-functional without systemd as PID 1, so
> this dependency will stay and is not optional (recommends)
Michael,
I would like to
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 05:03:37PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: lightdm
> Version: 1.26.0-5
> Severity: important
>
> I have a machine still using sysvinit, and systemd-shim has been
> replaced by elogind for such machines. The dependencies have been
> updated in lightdm 1.26.0-4. But
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 06:44:26PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Julien,
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:03:42PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> > Control: severity 934491 serious
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:34:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > > An
Julien,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:03:42PM +0100, Mark Hindley wrote:
> Control: severity 934491 serious
>
> On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 09:34:51PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Anyway, I guess if #934491 is upgraded to RC then I can drop the block
> > hint.
#934491 is now
201 - 300 of 793 matches
Mail list logo
