Package: anubis
Version: 4.1.1+dfsg1-3
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: antennavis
Version: 0.3-6
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: arts
Version: 1.5.9-3
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: aqualung
Version: 0.9~beta10-2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: bbrun
Version: 1.6-5
Severity: normal
gcc -Wall -g -o bbrun bbrun.o ../wmgeneral/wmgeneral.o ../wmgeneral/misc.o
../wmgeneral/list.o -L/usr/lib -L/usr/X11R6/lib -
lXpm `pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0`
/usr/bin/ld: bbrun.o: in function main:bbrun.c:86: error: undefined reference
to
Package: audit
Version: 1.7.13-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: bickley
Version: 0.4~git20090814-3
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
Package: bacula
Version: 3.0.2-3
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: ayttm
Version: 0.6.1-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: bluez
Version: 4.56-2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: ario
Version: 1.3-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: aview
Version: 1.3.0rc1-8.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: audex
Version: 0.72b1-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: bfm
Version: 0.6.4-3
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: awesfx
Version: 0.5.1a-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. It
doesn't allow to define a symbol multiple times and interprets it as collision.
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./include -Iinclude-Wall -O2 -MT
setfx.o
Package: bb
Version: 1.3rc1-8
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: beast
Version: 0.7.1-5.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: artha
Version: 0.9.1-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: basket
Version: 1.0.2-8
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: audacity
Version: 1.3.9-6
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: bomberclone
Version: 0.11.8-2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: asymptote
Version: 1.88-2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: anyremote
Version: 4.18.1-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: avarice
Version: 2.9-1.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: blktrace
Version: 1.0.1-2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
So why does the regular ld not require the -lX11 ?
It also requires -lX11. The only difference is that the old linker has --add-
needed as default behavior and binutils-gold --no-add-needed. This means that
it tries to search for missing symbols in libraries which are linked by
libraries which
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
I thought people were supposed to discuss it on -devel@ before starting
a MBF?
What is a MBF?
Anyway, ways you could have made it better:
- provide a step by step guide to reproduce the problem
- use a usertag to follow all the bugs
- provide a link to a wiki page
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
What is a MBF?
mass bug filing.
thanks
I am not sure but do you think that it is a good way to link against a
library without specify that you link against it?
The question is not about what I think. The question is whether it's
reasonable to expect A LOT of
Kartik Mistry wrote:
Thanks for your hardwork for binutils-gold testing. Can you provide me
more hints to fix the package. Probably, entry in wikipage like,
http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/FTBFS will be helpful while doing
mass FTBFS bugs filing.
Thanks for the info a draft entry can be
Yavor Doganov wrote:
forcemerge 526536 553940
thanks
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold.
It fails to build with the default linker as well. This is fixed in a
new upload, waiting for a sponsor. I haven't tested it with the gold
linker, though, but
Zdenek Kabelac wrote:
I tried it and got following failure.
/bin/bash ../../libtool --tag=CXX --mode=link g++ -Wall -g -O2
-ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -o avibench benchmark.o
../../lib/libaviplay.la
libtool: link: g++ -Wall -g -O2 -ffast-math -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe
I will make further tests later and just gather problematic packages.
Segfaults with bopm 3.1.3-1.1
/bin/bash ../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O0
-o test test.o libopm.la compat.o
x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -g -O0 -o .libs/test test.o compat.o
Package: cdrkit
Version: 9:1.1.9-1
Severity: serious
Build with current versions from unstable
[ 18%] Building C object wodim/CMakeFiles/wodimstuff.dir/cd_misc.o
In file included from
/home/peter/rebuild/build/cdrkit/cdrkit-1.1.9/wodim/cd_misc.c:38:
Package: caudium
Version: 3:1.4.12-12.1
Severity: serious
Build in current unstable
/home/peter/rebuild/build/caudium/caudium-1.4.12/src/tools/../..//smartlink
/home/peter/rebuild/build/caudium/caudium-1.4.12/smartlink x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc
-fPIC -s -I./ -I. -o htpasswd ./htpasswd.c -
lcrypt
Package: cadaver
Version: 2.1.8-release-1
Severity: serious
checking for struct tm.__tm_gmtoff... no
configure: zlib not supported
checking whether to enable ACL support in neon... no
checking for libgnutls-config... no
configure: error: could not find libgnutls-config in $PATH
make: ***
Package: bsdgames
Version: 2.17-16
Severity: serious
gcc -g -O2 -Wall -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith
-Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -
DNEW_STYLE -Iinclude -Iboggle/boggle -c boggle/boggle/bog.c -o
boggle/boggle/bog.o
In file included from
Package: checkinstall
Version: 1.6.1-9
Severity: serious
Build using newest versions from unstable
installwatch.c: In function '__instw_printdirent64':
installwatch.c:886: warning: format '%lld' expects type 'long long int', but
argument 4 has type '__ino64_t'
installwatch.c:886: warning:
Package: chise-base
Version: 0.3.0-1.1
Severity: serious
Build using current versions from unstable
sysdep.h:15: error: conflicting types for 'strnlen'
/usr/include/string.h:404: error: previous declaration of 'strnlen' was here
chise.c: In function 'CHISE_DS_open':
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Yavor Doganov wrote:
Thanks, that's clearly a separate issue; and 3 more binaries from
avifile-utils are affected. I re-uploaded the package to mentors.d.n
with these fixes included.
Good work. I have tried it and seems to work.
Best regards,
Peter
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
w.goesgens wrote:
Now this realy sucks.
until very recent, debian build complained if a library was linked twice,
once by a library, and a second time by the binary linking.
since citadel uses libcitadel which in term uses libz according to the
previous complaint citadel shouldn't link
Package: binutils-gold
Version: 2.20-2
cc -g -O2 -g -Wall -O2 -o courierpassd courierpassd.o xmalloc.o getopt_long.o
-L/usr/lib/courier-authlib /usr/lib/courier-
authlib/libcourierauth.so -lcrypt ./replace/libreplace.a -Wl,--rpath
-Wl,/usr/lib/courier-authlib -Wl,--rpath -
tags 553387 + patch
thanks
Too help you a little bit more: The default behavior for GNU ld is to read
DT_NEEDED and then trying to load these files to get symbols which couldn't be
resolved yet. For GNU gold it is standard to use --no-add-needed. So you must
really specify to which libraries
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.189
Severity: normal
I tried /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/rebuild and noticed that some
packages failed due to download problems. A package was for example 9base and
the log shows following:
curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404
dget: curl
Package: a52dec
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your executables.
Package: abakus
Version: 0.91-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: pbuilder
Version: 0.189
Severity: normal
I tried /usr/share/doc/pbuilder/examples/rebuild and noticed that some
packages failed due to download problems. A package was for example ack and
the log shows following:
dget: curl ack_1.3.2.2-2.dsc
Package: cowbuilder
Version: 0.57
Severity: normal
I noticed a quite bad behavior when building multiple packages at the same
time. The problem seems to be /var/cache/debconf/config.dat. Multiple packages
want to install x11-common which uses these file over debconf. This means that
this file
Package: adesklets
Version: 0.6.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: adplay
Version: 1.6-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: aeolus
Version: 0.8.1-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: aewm
Version: 1.3.12-2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: akonadi-googledata
Version: 0.9.3-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
Package: airstrike
Version: 0.99+1.0pre6a-4
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
Package: alltray
Version: 0.69-1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: adept
Version: 3.0~beta7.2
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: ams
Version: 1.8.8~rc2-3.1
Severity: normal
Tried to build your package and it fails to build with GNU binutils-gold. The
important difference is that --no-add-needed is the default behavior of of GNU
binutils-gold. Please provide all needed libraries to the linker when building
your
Package: binutils-gold
Version: 2.20-1
Severity: normal
I've tested many packages with gold linker and noticed that it creates a
unknown symbol for every library I tested. I don't know for what it is but
either dpkg-gensymbols has to stop to add it to the symbols file or binutils-
gold has to
Package: binutils-gold
Version: 2.20-1
Severity: normal
I tested different packages in debian and noticed that it always links against
some libraries which aren't used and I never specified. I also tested to use
--as-needed and it didn't change that weird behavior. This doesn't happen with
the
Stephen Gran wrote:
I think I see slightly more clearly (now that I've slept a bit :)
The problem is twofold - radeapclient needs to specify libradius as
something it links to in order to be technically correct. Also, it
looks to me like gold is ignoring the dependency-libs line that is
Package: sysv-rc
Version: 2.87dsf-8
Severity: wishlist
CONCURRENCY is currently in /etc/init.d/rc and is always overriden when I
upgrade the package. This makes these configuration quite useless.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64
Debian
Package: initbinfmt-support
Severity: normal
insserv warns about that init script. Please correct that:
insserv: warning: current stop runlevel(s) (0 1 6) of script `binfmt-support'
overwrites defaults (empty).
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.31-1-amd64
I have updated it, but you haven't written your update correctly. It only
works when you install it and not when updating the package.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: binutils-gold
Version: 2.20-1
Found following blog entry of the Gentoo folks which reports the same problem:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/04/11/about-gold-and-speed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: binutils-gold
Version: 2.20-1
Found following blog entry of the Gentoo folks which reports the same problem:
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/04/11/about-gold-and-speed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 03:53:33PM +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
I have updated it, but you haven't written your update correctly. It
only works when you install it and not when updating the package.
/etc/init.d/binfmt-support is a configuration file. By design
Colin Watson wrote:
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 06:16:58PM +0100, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
Colin Watson wrote:
It would have been considerable effort for me to arrange things such
that it only worked on fresh install and not on upgrade (in the case
where the file was not changed locally
Package: binutils-gold
Version: 2.20-1
Severity: normal
Forwarded: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10880
A simple
echo int main() {return 0;} testme.c
gcc -Wl,--as-needed testme.c -o testme -lglib-2.0
will link against glib-2.0 even if it is not used. So
readelf -d
Package: pkg-config
Version: 0.22-1
Severity: normal
There are different libraries which uses glib2.0 for data definition and
internal. This means that they add glib2.0 to their required, but don't need
the glib2.0 for linking. It -lglib2.0 will be added and they would link
against it without
Package: freeradius
Severity: normal
$ ld --version
GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Debian 2.20) 1.9
Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of
the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) a later version.
Stephen Gran wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Peter Fritzsche said:
Package: freeradius
Severity: normal
$ ld --version
GNU gold (GNU Binutils for Debian 2.20) 1.9
Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms
completely fails with
'Cannot determine upstream version from'
Regards,
Peter Fritzsche
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
linux-modules-nonfree-2.6 is gone now. Please provide a dkms version of the
package instead.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Package: libcwiid-dev
Version: 0.6.00+svn201-1
Severity: normal
$ pkg-config --list-all|grep -i cwii
Variable 'debroot' not defined in '/usr/lib/pkgconfig/cwiid.pc'
$ pkg-config cwiid --cflags
Variable 'debroot' not defined in '/usr/lib/pkgconfig/cwiid.pc'
$ pkg-config cwiid --libs
Variable
Package: mupen64plus
Version: 1.5+dfsg1-4
Severity: normal
Please don't enable executable stack as this disables an important security
feature on many platforms if a flaw is found that allows an attacker to fill
stack memory with executable code.
--- Package information. ---
Depends
Package: liblzma0
Version: 4.999.8beta-1
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I noticed that this package is in extra. This is fine because xz-lzma
conflicts with lzma. But I see the problem that liblzma0 is also in extra.
This means that all packages which would want to link against it must also go
into
Package: multiget
Version: 1.2.0-3
Severity: wishlist
Hi, i noticed that your package doesn't follow the xdg basedir specification
described at
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
There is also a library called libxdg-basedir1 in debian which helps to
Package: psi
Version: 0.12.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi, i noticed that your package doesn't follow the xdg basedir specification
described at
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
There is also a library called libxdg-basedir1 in debian which helps to
implement
Package: mednafen
Version: 0.8.9-1+b1
Severity: wishlist
Hi, i noticed that your package doesn't follow the xdg basedir specification
described at
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
There is also a library called libxdg-basedir1 in debian which helps to
Package: marble
Version: 4:4.3.0-2
Severity: wishlist
Hi, i noticed that your package doesn't follow the xdg basedir specification
described at
http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html
There is also a library called libxdg-basedir1 in debian which helps to
I know that feature request should be send to forum.psi-im.org, but I can only
write to it after registration. This means I must register first - and the
VeriWord feature is broken right now. This means I cannot register and so I
cannot send this feature request to it.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Package: libgl1-mesa-dri
Version: 7.5.1-1
Severity: normal
I've here a bigger program which worked in previous (cannot tell which)
version of this package, but currently it seems to crash when it calls
glReadPixels. I tried to create a similar testcase for the bug report and
noticed that it
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed
it already)
Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
Did your machine crash/lose power during an upgrade?
No, never had a crash or a hard power down since I switched
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed
it already)
Hm, only started dpkg. So I suspected it.
Did your machine crash/lose power during an upgrade?
No, never had a crash or a hard power down since I switched
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-24
Severity: grave
I tried to rebuild some packages and they all fail with
dpkg-shlibdeps: error: no dependency information found for /lib/libc.so.6
ls /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs
ls: cannot access /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs: No such file or directory
Package: libc6
Version: 2.9-24
Ok, tried again and it seems to be that the first time it gets installed it
exists. The next time it is removed and doesnt appear again.
So
$ /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.9-24_amd64.deb
would install /var/lib/dpkg/info/libc6.shlibs
and
$
tags 541077 + unreproducible
thanks
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Peter Fritzsche wrote:
Ok, tried again and it seems to be that the first time it gets installed
it exists. The next time it is removed and doesnt appear again.
What removes it? I suspect it's not dpkg... (or we would have noticed
Package: binutils
Version: 2.19.51.20090805-1
Severity: important
Tags: patch
Other packages fail due to a wrong entry in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/binutils.shlibs. It says following:
libopcodes 2.19.51.20090723 binutils
but the libopcodes is /usr/lib/libopcodes-2.19.51.20090805.so
dpkg-shlibdeps will
Package: kdebase-workspace-bin
Version: 4:4.2.4-1+b1
I am am a little bit confused. Why is the severity of this bug grave? When I
read http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities it doesn't fulfill the
severity for grave in my opinion. Maybe important.
Isn't nm aka
reopen 536109
thanks
But it is still not build for amd64[1,2] - so this bug isn't resolved. Please
don't mark bugs as resolved only because you are in a bad mood and one _guess_
isn't right inside the whole bug report.
No one wants to annoy you. We are all (more or less) friendly people who try
Package: cuneiform
Severity: important
The source package says that is can be build on i386 and amd64. It is also
marked as XS-Autobuild, but buildd hasn't considered to build it. Maybe the
instructions given at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/11/msg00012.html
weren't
Package: git-core
Version: 1:1.6.3.1-1
Severity: normal
When I do a bisect and want to skip a commit (maybe because it doesn't
compile) I have to say `git bisect next` and not as the manpage states it `git
bisect good/bad`.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux
retitle 533821 [git-core] git-bisect skip next but manpage good/bad
thanks
On Saturday 20 June 2009 17:45:56 you wrote:
Package: git-core
Version: 1:1.6.3.1-1
Severity: normal
When I do a bisect and want to skip a commit (maybe because it doesn't
compile) I have to say `git bisect next` and
forwarded 530016 https://roundup.ffmpeg.org/roundup/ffmpeg/issue998
tag 530016 + patch
thanks
Patch attached
From cb19913ea9c58242ac5505da7c8097de4c2084c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Fritzsche peter.fritzs...@gmx.de
Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 05:55:29 +
Subject: [PATCH] fix qtrle
Package: cuneiform
Hi, I just wanted to mention that there is still not a build of cuneiform on
amd64.
--- System information. ---
Architecture: amd64
Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-2-amd64
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
500 unstableftp.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
101 - 194 of 194 matches
Mail list logo
