On 26.05.2024 23:46, Karl Berry wrote:
Hello Karl,
FYI, I sent in a report to bug-help2man. If the output can be made
usable, I'll add it to TL, else maybe give up on help2man and just fix
it by hand as Bjarni wrote originally. We'll see what happens. -k
Thanks for the report. Do they have a
Control: reassign -1 python3-ipywidgets
Control: found -1 8.1.1-5
Control: affects -1 src:sagetex
On 25.05.2024 19:22, Santiago Vila wrote:
Hello,
If this is really a bug in one of the build-depends, please use
reassign and affects, so that this is still visible in the BTS web
page for this
On 24.05.2024 22:35, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hello Bjarni,
mflua --help | groff -man -ww -b -z
Not sure, what you're trying to do here. To use help2man you have to
call something like "help2man -N mflua > mflua.1"
This gives you a file:
hille@rasppi2:~ $ file mflua.1
mflua.1: troff
Control: tags -1 - patch
On 23.05.2024 22:18, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 09:32:32AM +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
On 23.05.2024 00:24, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hello Bjarni,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment
On 23.05.2024 00:24, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hello,
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
Unfortunately the patch not match to the manual page from TL204 [1].
Could you adapt to that version? Thanks!
Hilmar
[1]
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 23.05.2024 01:07, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hello,
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
Applied.
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: block -1 by 1005961
On 03.05.2024 21:47, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hi,
nq 0.5 was released March 26, 2022 and contains several bug fixes and
improvements.
nq 0.3.1 was released March 7, 2018, and is what is in all of stable, testing,
and unstable.
Please update this package.
Upon
On 04.12.2023 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
As the maintainer of Debian's poppler source package, I would like to
drop poppler's Qt6 packages on i386.
I just uploaded texworks 0.6.9 and for i386 the status on the buildd is
Dependency installability problem for texworks on i386:
On 11.05.2024 09:08, Tobias Frost wrote:
Hi,
Please also announce the NMU / RFS to the package maintainer,
preferable as bug reported against it. Thanks!
The package is flagged
On 10.05.2024 08:07, Manny wrote:
X-Debbugs-Cc: cont...@mychemistry.eu
Hello Manny,
normally I don't have time to care about issues like this. Are you willing
to report this issue to the upstream author?
The upstream project is in MS Github which is a non-starter for
me. I’ll go as far as
09.05.2024 14:12:32 Manny :
Hi Manny,
normally I don't have time to care about issues like this. Are you
willing to report this issue to the upstream author?
Hilmar
Package: texlive-latex-extra
Version: 2022.20230122-4
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc:
09.05.2024 14:12:32 Manny :
> Package: texlive-latex-extra
> Version: 2022.20230122-4
> Severity: normal
> Tags: upstream
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.texlive-latex-ex...@sideload.33mail.com
>
> After an upgrade from Bullseye to Bookworm, the acro package breaks
> compilation even if no acronyms are
Control: block -1 by 1005961
On 03.05.2024 23:45, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hi,
That would be necessary - although I don't know how to solve this in a
sensible way.
Sorry for disturbing your best intentions to bring nq back in shape -
but this problem will not disappear by ignoring it.
Control: found -1 fq/0.9.0-2
Control: found -1 nq/0.3.1-4
On 18.02.2022 08:39, Axel Beckert wrote:
Hello,
Trying to install fq fails for me as follows:
Preparing to unpack .../archives/fq_0.0.4-2_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking fq (0.0.4-2) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
On 03.05.2024 22:29, Christoph Biedl wrote:
Hilmar Preusse wrote...
Hi Christoph,
Changes since the last upload:
nq (0.5-0.1) unstable; urgency=medium
.
* Non-maintainer upload.
.
* New upstream version (Closes: #1038937).
* Bump Standards and dh compat version, no
Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries
Control: severity -1 important
On 01.05.2024 00:19, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Hi all,
Since the 2023.20240207-1 release, there is a major performance
regression when running the tex-common postinst hook in an arm64
chroot on amd64 host.
I assume this
Control: forwarded -1 https://gitlab.com/latex-rubber/rubber/-/issues/15
On 02.05.2024 10:22, Pierre Letouzey wrote:
Hello,
Issue already reported upstream: https://gitlab.com/latex-
rubber/rubber/-/issues/15
The provided 2-line patch appears to solve this issue.
Thanks for the report.
On 01.05.2024 22:46, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Hi,
May 01 14:28:46 catcodes, registers, parameters,
May 01 14:28:46 LaTeX2e <2024-06-01> pre-release-0 (develop 2024-5-1
branch)
May 01 14:28:46 (/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/l3kernel/expl3.ltx
May 01 14:51:15
Control: reassign -1 context-modules
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 30.04.2024 18:28, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
Hi *,
I'll upload a context-modules package to Debian experimental, which will
contain the legacy mkii packages. This will bring back metafun.mpii, but
won't
On 23.02.2024 23:31, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
On 27.10.23 22:31, Siep Kroonenberg wrote:
Hi Stéphane,
The standalone context is mostly free from mkii, but cont-tmf.zip
still has most of the legacy stuff, which will mostly be added back
in, in the form of a context-legacy package for TL. I find
On 04.12.2023 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
As the maintainer of Debian's poppler source package, I would like to
drop poppler's Qt6 packages on i386.
I filed Bug#1068672 and you probably should be able to drop poppler-qt6
on i386. My package will turn either into "not-installable"
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 26.01.2024 23:01, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi,
Please move /lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.rules into /usr/lib before
srcpd reaches testing.
hille42@hz:~/devel/srcpd$ dpkg-deb -c srcpd_2.1.6
On 08.04.2024 00:08, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 20.12.2023 15:25, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 6:02 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
As no package depend on texworks, I'll drop i386 as requested. If you
have a patch for me I'll be glad.
My plan
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
On 24.03.2024 18:29, Manny wrote:
Hi Manny,
thanks to Norbert for explaining, why we can't solve this issue. I tag
that bug wontfix.
If only the Debian-specific bug is worked and the rest of this report
is closed, perhaps that’s fair enough. I’ve gone as far as
On 20.12.2023 15:25, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
On Sat, Dec 16, 2023 at 6:02 PM Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi,
As no package depend on texworks, I'll drop i386 as requested. If you
have a patch for me I'll be glad.
My plan is to first get a newer poppler from Experimental into
Unstable. After
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 04.04.2024 21:57, Peter Green wrote:
Hi,
After being rebuilt for the time64 transition, perdition
depends on both libvanessa-socket2 and libvanessa-socket2.
As a result it is uninstallable.
Interesting in this case, the uninstallability seems to apply to all
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 10.03.2024 17:28, Diego Caraffini wrote:
Hi,
I have a paper written in LaTeX that the publisher required to not
contain any user macro, so I used de-macro to produce a distributable
version with a Makefile target.
Fixed in git, will be part of next upload.
H.
On 03.04.2024 12:54, Julian Gilbey wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:07:56PM +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Hi Julian,
nice. However, it first builds the program and then tests that,
rather than the package from the archive. This is not very useful,
as changes in reverse dependencies could cause
On 12.03.2024 21:59, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi Aurelien,
Starting with glibc 2.31, support for NIS (libnsl library) has been
moved to a separate libnsl2 package. In order to allow a smooth
transition, a libnsl-dev has been added to the libc6-dev package.
This dependency has been temporarily
Control: affects -1 context,texlive-binaries
Control: merge -1 1064402
On 06.03.2024 23:23, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: reassign -1 luametatex
Control: merge -1 1064402
Next try.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description
Control: affects -1 texlive-binaries,context
Control: merge -1 1064402
On 06.03.2024 23:23, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: reassign -1 luametatex
Control: merge -1 1064402
Next try.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: reassign -1 luametatex
Control: merge -1 1064402
On 27.02.2024 19:06, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Hi,
after the latest standard "apt upgrade" I was left with an unconfigured
tex-common, due to the following reported error:
lua error : startup file:
Control: tags -1 + fixed-upstream
On 29.02.24 19:33, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hi,
Dear Maintainer,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
Karl Berry told me "I installed the pdftex.man patch, with a few minor
adjustments for the current source." I tag as fixed in
On 01.03.2024 23:33, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi Aurelien,
This can be fixed by adding an explicit Build-Depends on
libtirpc-dev. The glibc change will likely be reverted in the short
term, but given its a change we want to do for Trixie, this will only
lower the severity of the bug.
I do not
Control: forwarded -1 https://tug.org/pipermail/tldistro/2024q1/000474.html
On 29.02.2024 19:33, Bjarni Ingi Gislason wrote:
Hello,
here are some notes and editorial fixes for the manual.
The patch is in the attachment.
I've forwarded to tldistro for now.
Hilmar
--
sigfault
On 27.02.2024 19:06, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Hello Giacomo,
Indeed, mtxrun.lua uses texlua, as an interpreter, and that is provided
by texlive-binaries, which was also upgraded a couple of days ago.
Gotcha! I downgraded texlive-binaries to the previous version, and now
tex-common configures
Control: merge -1 1064918
On 27.02.2024 21:56, Giacomo Mulas wrote:
Sorry for sending the same bug report twice, I thought the first one did
not
get sent. Please feel free to remove one of them, or to merge them,
whichever is easier.
Done.
Hilmar
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Control: affects -1 texlive-binaries
Control: merge -1 1064402
Control: affects -1 context
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Control: reassign -1 luametatex
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: merge -1 1064402
Control: affects -1 context
On 26.02.2024 18:50, julien.pu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
since a few days, I saw a configuration issue with the tex-common
package. (What I don't get is why it actually needs
On 27.10.23 22:31, Siep Kroonenberg wrote:
Hello,
The standalone context is mostly free from mkii, but cont-tmf.zip
still has most of the legacy stuff, which will mostly be added back
in, in the form of a context-legacy package for TL. I find sorting
things out and creating / modifying the
On 23.02.24 16:31, Moritz Mühlenhoff wrote:
Hello Moritz,
The following vulnerability was published for texlive-bin.
CVE-2024-25262[0]:
| texlive-bin commit c515e was discovered to contain heap buffer
| overflow via the function ttfLoadHDMX:ttfdump. This vulnerability
| allows attackers to
On 21.02.2024 16:15, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Indeed, I can reproduce the problem on another machine, only with
luametatex 2.11.01+ds-2:
qaa:~> mtxrun --generate
lua error : startup file: /bin/mtxrun.lua:2438: attempt to assign to const
variable 'i'
You'll see the failure in an
On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Hi,
Please move /lib/udev/rules.d/10-liusb.rules into /usr/lib before
srcpd reaches testing.
hille42@hz:~/devel/srcpd$ dpkg-deb -c srcpd_2.1.6-2_amd64.deb|grep usb
-rw-r--r-- root/root 151 2024-01-26 21:45
Control: severity -1 serious
On 26.01.2024 09:35, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Source: srcpd
Version: 2.1.6-1
User: helm...@debian.org
Usertag: dep17m2
Severity: important
Not sure, when I'll have time to fix the issue. Set to serious for now
to prevent migration.
H.
--
sigfault
On 19.01.2024 17:11, Sven Joachim wrote:
Hello,
Your package has a test suite that probably should be run at build time,
but it is not. I looked at the git repository and found that it has
been disabled since at least 2015:
Fix is implemented in git and will be in next upload.
H.
--
On 19.01.2024 17:23, Sven Joachim wrote:
Hello,
Your package's autopkgtest runs the upstream test suite which is
nice. However, it first builds the program and then tests that,
rather than the package from the archive. This is not very useful,
as changes in reverse dependencies could cause
On 19.01.2024 18:04, Sven Joachim wrote:
On 2024-01-19 17:11 +0100, Sven Joachim wrote:
Hi Sven,
Your package has a test suite that probably should be run at build time,
but it is not. I looked at the git repository and found that it has
been disabled since at least 2015:
,
| $ git
On 15.01.24 20:32, John Lines wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch allows an argument of
--type=journald:identifier='postfix/smtp'
to be specified.
The patch can't be applied as it is: the check_logfiles file is
generated during build. I moved the code to the appropriate source
files, new
Control: affects -1 + src:texworks
On 03.01.2024 23:45, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1059943:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059943.
Affects texworks. Due to this issue the
On 13.08.2023 21:21, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
Hi,
dpkg-source: info: local changes detected, the modified files are:
texinfo-7.0.3/doc/info-stnd_html/variable_002dassignment.html
texinfo-7.0.3/doc/texinfo_html/xref.html
That stuff below doc/info-stnd_html & doc/texinfo_html is now deleted,
On 29.12.2023 11:20, andrei wrote:
Hi andrei,
I successfully compile (by pdflatex) the file:
But I get an error when compile this file with uncommented rows:
! Extra alignment tab has been changed to \cr.
\endtemplate
l.28 &1&2 &1&2 &1&2 &1&2 &1&
Control: severity -1 important
On 21.12.2023 00:18, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Hi,
If you wish to submit further information on this problem, please
send it to 1059...@bugs.debian.org.
Bumping to important to fix the security issue CVE-2023-48795 in trixie
too. Currently the proftp
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 04.12.23 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Hi,
texworks is the only package that uses poppler's Qt6 in Debian. Please
let me know if it's ok with you if texworks is no longer built for
i386 in Debian.
The debian-devel-announce of today[1] reads:
"Maintainers who wish
Control: reassign -1 texlive-formats-extra
On 13.12.2023 15:10, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Is it fine to close the case?
Actually no, the packages should have proper dependencies that this
cannot happen.
Hilmar,
On 13.12.2023 15:10, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Wed, 13 Dec 2023, =?UTF-8?Q?Preu=C3=9...@buxtehude.debian.org wrote:
Hi Norbert,
Is it fine to close the case?
Actually no, the packages should have proper dependencies that this
cannot happen.
Hilmar, please bump the minimal dep on tl-base
On 13.12.2023 13:38, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
Upgrading the texlive-base (2023.20231007-1 => 2023.20231207-1)
(suggested by Hilmar Preuße) has resurrected them.
-Sanjoy
Is it fine to close the case?
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 12.12.2023 14:07, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
Hi Andreas,
thanks for the report, I'll remove the manual page and the perl script
from texlive-bibtex-extra .
Hilmar
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries to overwrite other packages files without
On 12.12.2023 12:06, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
I've attached /tmp/fmtutil.amiyTgkU
The relevant lines may be its last lines:
fmtutil [WARNING]: inifile pdfxmltex.ini for pdfxmltex/pdftex not found.
fmtutil [WARNING]: inifile xmltex.ini for xmltex/pdftex not found.
fmtutil [INFO]:
On 11.12.2023 21:30, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 02:57:35PM +, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi,
Severity: normal
This bug blocks the migration for now, I'll close
it, once the other two packages tend to migrate.
Pretty sure severity: normal does not block => raising.
On 04.12.2023 14:43, Jeremy Bícha wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
texworks is the only package that uses poppler's Qt6 in Debian. Please
let me know if it's ok with you if texworks is no longer built for
i386 in Debian.
I personally stopped using i386 about 9 years ago, so in my personal
opinion it is
Control: clone 1057234 -1
Control: reassign -1 schroot
Control: retitle -1 schroot: Generates weird messages in /var/log/syslog
On 02.12.2023 08:30, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues wrote:
Quoting Hilmar Preusse (2023-12-01 23:10:36)
Hi,
I run sbuild as following:
sbuild --no-run-lintian
Control: forwarded -1 https://bitbucket.org/surmann/tikzposter/issues/44
On 17.03.2021 11:15, Braun Gábor wrote:
Package: texlive-pictures
Version: 2018.20190227-2
Severity: normal
File: /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/tikzposter/tikzposter.cls
Dear Maintainer,
Forwarded.
H.
--
Control: severity -1 wishlist
Control: retitle -1 fmtutil should ignore TEXINPUTS set in root env
On 28.11.2023 00:27, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Processing control commands:
severiy -1 wishlist
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.
title -1 fmtutil should ignore
Control: severiy -1 wishlist
Control: title -1 fmtutil should ignore TEXINPUTS set in root env
On 27.11.2023 01:06, Norbert Preining wrote:
Hello Norbert,
Since I am not using Debian, nor developing for Debian, I think I
stop arguing here. No need to discuss my opinion on that matter
further.
On 25.11.2023 01:20, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
I didn't break anything. Any user, including root, may have his own
environment variables for his own use. This should never interfer
with package installation.
Why not unsetting TEXINPUTS in the postinst script?
The specific file
On 24.09.2023 23:29, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 28.08.2023 21:59, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
On 23.07.2023 23:21, Preuße...@buxtehude.debian.org, Hilmar wrote:
Hi Peter,
I've uploaded the revision -8 to unstable, which is a prereq for
having a fix
On 24.11.2023 03:50, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
If I understand correctly, /var/lib/texmf/web2c/pdftex/pdflatex.fmt is
generated by fmtutil, but its man page does not say that $TEXINPUTS is
used.
Well, fmtutil in turn calls the TeX interpreters / compilers, which then
read $TEXINPUTS and
On 11/23/23 15:53, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-11-23 15:44:17 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi Vincent,
\documentclass{article}
\pagestyle{empty}
\begin{document}
$x'$ ; $\oplus$ ; $\ominus$ ; $\otimes$ ; $\ell$ ; OK.
\end{document}
I get the following:
x0 ; ⊕ ;
Control: tags -1 + pending
Control: tags -1 + patch
On 22.11.2023 07:59, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hi,
This patch passed all my testing. Pavel
Great! Patch is in repo and will be in next upload.
H.
--
sigfault
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 21.11.2023 01:11, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-11-20 22:53:06 +0100, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
Currently I'm now able to reproduce the issue, I guess b/c we're in winter
time. I guess I have to break the time on my test box...
No need to break the time. Try with "TZ=Australia/Can
Control: tags -1 - pending
On 21.11.2023 10:42, Pavel Sanda wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 11:21:19PM +0100, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
Hi,
I plan to push it into CTAN, so it will hopefully get fixed in trixie
(or bookworm if some cares to backport the fix).
Thanks for the patch! I did
On 20.11.2023 11:34, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi all,
Right now the autopkgtests block zlib migration to testing since they
test zlib/unstable with texlive-binaries/testing - this is permitted
by the dependencies.
And this is not just a test issue:
Anybody has opened #1056312, I add my statement
Control: tags -1 - wontfix
Control: tags -1 + pending
On 20.11.2023 16:46, Pavel Sanda wrote:
Hello Pavel,
You can try proposed fix on your current setup.
https://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg220760.html
I plan to push it into CTAN, so it will hopefully get fixed in trixie
On 21.07.2023 16:46, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2023-07-21 16:36:21 +0200, Preuße, Hilmar wrote:
On 21.07.2023 16:28, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
Hi,
The "CreationDate:" field in the generated PDF file is incorrect by
1 hour in the Europe/Paris CEST timezone (= UTC + 2).
I've uploa
Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries
Control: block -1 by 1056204
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: forcemerge -1 1056183
On 20.11.2023 14:18, Grégory Mounié wrote:
Hi,
When trying to compile a Latex file with lualatex, lualatex fails immediately
with the following messages:
Just bug
On 20.11.2023 13:11, Luca Boccassi wrote:
Hi,
This looks like an undeclared versioning dependency issue. If there are
such constraints, please consider declaring them appropriately in the
package control file by defining a dependency on the exact upstream
version of zlib (e.g.: >= 1.3~ and <<
On 20.11.2023 10:43, Friedrich Beckmann wrote:
Hi,
i noticed a failure in our CI pipeline for pspp probably due to this bug. The
problem occurs when I try to install "apt install texlive-plain-generic“. The
install fails with
A new package is on the way. Another adaption to zlib is
On 20.11.2023 01:13, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi,
I just noticed that we had this issue already 13 years ago. [2]
And from then zlib1g still has the
Breaks: texlive-binaries (<< 2009-12)
that will also require updating again.
No, that's younger:
zlib (1:1.2.6.dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
Control: reassign -1 texlive-binaries
Control: block -1 by 1056204
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: forcemerge -1 1056183
On 20.11.2023 10:29, Eric Marsden wrote:
Hi,
% lualatex
PANIC: unprotected error in call to Lua API (zlib library version does not
match - header: 1.2.13, library:
On 11/19/23 00:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Adrian,
A proper fix would be either to:
1. patch the version check out of texlive-bin (preferred), or
Did so, see [1]. I did not remove the check completely, I just
un-tightened the version. I can confirm that a texlive package linked on
testing
On 19.11.2023 18:09, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
Hi Davide,
I have not yet digged into it, but it looks similar to #1051243.
What do you think?
Actually it is #1056210 and friends. The root cause of #1051243 has been
fixed long ago, just the phenomenon looks similar to #1056210, hence
On 11/19/23 00:40, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2023 at 11:51:15PM +0100, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi all,
nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new
zlib"
Thanks for filing the NMU bug.
S
Control: severity -1 important
Control: block 1056183 by -1
On 11/18/23 20:18, Samuel Thibault wrote:
Hi Samuel,
nmu texlive-bin_2023.20230311.66589-7 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against new
zlib"
Thanks for filing the NMU bug.
So a binnmu of the texlive-bin source package seems
Control: severity -1 grave
Control: merge -1 1056186
On 18.11.2023 16:19, Andreas Metzler wrote:
Hi,
trying to install texlive-latex-base+texlive-plain-generic to fullfill a
build dependency resulted in:
8X--
Setting up tex-common (6.18) ...
Running mktexlsr. This may take
On 18.11.2023 15:42, Jerome BENOIT wrote:
Hi,
To clarify things,
the message is not only irritating but also aborting:
the package tex-common cannot currently configure.
I'm aware of this: the other user reported a core dump and in our output
an aborted message is visible. Therefore I'm
On 18.11.2023 14:57, Jerome Benoit wrote:
Hi,
Hi, the issue appeared to me within a Sid schroot environment
at postinstallation time of tex-common.
I traced it back to texlive-binaries by looking the logfile at
the fmutils stage. The issue seems to originate from the recent migration
from zlib
On 18.11.2023 11:51, Davide G. M. Salvetti wrote:
Hello Davide,
please, let me have some more time. I plan to release a new version
within a fortnight.
Many thanks for fast response! I'll leave the ITS bug open, but I won't
drive the salve process forward. In case I can help somehow, let me
On 11/13/23 23:20, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hilmar Preusse (2023-11-13):
Hi,
the package fails to install on my system. I simply assumes that /boot/firmware
is a
mount point and fails if this is not the case. If /boot/firmware is expected to
be a
mount point the installer should have
Control: severity -1 normal
On 11/12/23 15:55, Vincent-Xavier JUMEL wrote:
Hi,
While I wanted to give spix a try
(https://spix.readthedocs.io/en/latest/install/) I've trusted Debian to
package it in this specific package, which is reported by
`apt show texlive-extra-utils |
On 11/13/23 23:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Hi,
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1055901:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1055901.
Here is the error message I get:
hille@rasppi1:~ $ sudo apt -f install
On 9/4/23 22:10, Jeremy Lecour wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
After upgrading to Debian 12, my SFTP client stopped working with
errors when connecting.
I've opened a GitHub issue and the problem has been solved.
https://github.com/proftpd/proftpd/issues/1694
It will even be backported to the 1.3.8
On 10/30/23 11:52, Hilmar Preuße wrote:
Hi Stuart,
I was told not to use that URL, so here is a new one
https://freeshell.de/~hille42/debian_1054218/
Did you find the time to test the fix?
Hilmar
--
Testmail
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 11/2/23 16:17, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
Hello Kumar,
I've inserted a begin-math/end-math symbol since I think you left one out.
Proceed, with fingers crossed.
mtx-context | fatal error: return code: 1
Please let me know what I can do to help. I am downgrading temporarily though.
I
Control: severity -1 important
Control: tags -1 + patch
Control: retitle -1 autopkgtest fails since texinfo 7.1
On 10/30/23 23:53, Hilmar Preusse wrote:
Hi all,
No, I don't have a patch for this yet. I'll try to look into this, but can'
promise anything.
Patch is attached, tagging.
H.
--
On 10/31/23 17:21, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi,
https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=ffmpeg=7%3A6.0-8
...
makeinfo --html -I doc --no-split -D config-not-all --init-file=/<>/doc/t2h.pm
--output doc/ffmpeg.html /<>/doc/ffmpeg.texi
makeinfo: error parsing /<>/doc/t2h.pm: Undefined
On 10/13/01 23:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
Hi Florian,
texi2dvi includes the source file directory in the TeX search path.
This is quite unusual for programs processing -I options (such as C
compilers), and even makeinfo doesn't do that. Furthermore, it's not
possible to remove that directory
On 10/13/01 23:21, Florian Weimer wrote:
Hi Florian,
texi2dvi includes the source file directory in the TeX search path.
This is quite unusual for programs processing -I options (such as C
compilers), and even makeinfo doesn't do that. Furthermore, it's not
possible to remove that directory
Hi,
I was told not to use that URL, so here is a new one
https://freeshell.de/~hille42/debian_1054218/
Hilmar
29.10.2023 18:12:25 Hilmar Preuße :
> On 10/19/23 14:20, Stuart Prescott wrote:
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
>> The unittests of the 'plastex' package run pdflatex to genera
On 10/19/23 14:20, Stuart Prescott wrote:
Hi Stuart,
The unittests of the 'plastex' package run pdflatex to generate some
figures, and then extract the text from the figures to verify that
various implementation details of the package are working. These tests
pass on all release architectures
On 26.09.2023 23:00, Karl Berry wrote:
Hello all,
The files are not in the "minimal distribution" (which includes binaries,
fonts etc.), but they are still present in the context zip itself.
Mojca - by the "context zip" do you mean cont-tmf.zip? I'm guessing not
.. please advise.
1 - 100 of 1442 matches
Mail list logo
