Hi,
same with zlib:
Package 'zlib', required by 'libxml-2.0', not found
(from https://ci.debian.net/packages/i/igraph/testing/amd64/47001876/)
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
Am 25.05.24 um 14:00 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags libxml-2.0
Package liblzma was not found in the pkg-config search path.
Perhaps you should add the directory containing `liblzma.pc'
to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable
Package 'liblzma', required
Package: libxml2-dev
Severity: serious
Version: 2.12.7+dfsg-1
root@frodo:/# dpkg -l | grep lzma
ii liblzma5:amd64 5.6.1+really5.4.5-1
amd64XZ-format compression library
root@frodo:/# pkg-config --cflags libxml-2.0
Package liblzma was not found in the
rchs anyway which we definitely
+ need to keep anyway (similar as libuuilo.so).
+- recommend kio >> 5.103.0-1 in -kf5
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Fri, 24 May 2024 21:06:45 +0200
+
libreoffice (4:7.4.7-1+deb12u2) bookworm-security; urgency=high
* debian/patches/add-notify-for-script-use.d
Hi,
Am 11.05.24 um 13:45 schrieb Emmanuel Charpentier:
In fact, both submission worked, but the second is but a duplicate of
the first.
My apologies for the noise...
No problem, I already merged them. :)
(Intestestingly 1070888 only made it to the BTS and not to the mailing
list where
severity 1070862 serious
thanks
Hi,
this is even worse. It looses the library file for the "non-main"
libraries after cleanup:
Clean testing chroot.
# apt install libpoppler-dev libpoppler-cpp-dev
[...]
# apt update
# apt dist-upgrade
The following packages were automatically installed
# splt up the LO and kio parts properly
clone 1069835 -1
reassign -1 kio
retitle -1 kio: Don't leak existing file handles to newly spanwed KIO
workers
block 1069835 by -1
# LOs part is done, at least for this one.
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
thanks
Am 03.05.24 um 10:54 schrieb Andreas B.
Hi,
Am 26.04.24 um 10:02 schrieb Sune Stolborg Vuorela:
https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kio/-/commit/
45b306dc0653fa42672e8a49afe8f42d24585ed4
is also needed for it to work.
Thanks for mentioning this.
As talked about on IRC this morning, that commit is only for kf6s kio.
So unless that
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 18:37 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 05:43:29PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing
Hi,
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
For now, we traced the issue back to libreoffice-kf5. If this package
is removed, neither the document disappears on closing libreoffice nor
the popup is shown when 'nobrl' is removed from the mount options.
Which doesn't do IO itself
close 1069835 4:24.2.2-1
forwarded 1069835 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
tag 1069835 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 25.04.24 um 17:03 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
Package: libreoffice-kf5
Version?
Severity: grave
Come on... Not downgrading just yet, but I don't believe
Hi,
Am 24.04.24 um 21:35 schrieb Peter B:
Why is it bad? The nogui's are lighter dependencies than the gui
packages.
Exactly. That#s why they should be used in package building for
converting stuff.
One or the other is needed. Surely better to use the nogui if its
available?
It is
Hi Lucas,
this is no bug in the package AFAICS.
libreoffice-draw-nogui is clearly only in Build-Depends-Indep:
Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13),
fpc,
libgtk2.0-dev,
lcl,
lcl-qt5,
Build-Depends-Indep:
libreoffice-draw-nogui,
libreoffice-writer,
So it's only needed for _all builds.
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
The following packages are cruft:
$ rmadison -s experimental -S libreoffice | grep -v 24\.2\.3
fonts-opensymbol | 4:102.12+LibO7.5.4~rc2-1 |
experimental | all
fonts-opensymbol | 4:102.12+LibO7.5.5~rc1-2 |
experimental |
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
please remove
rene@frodo:~$ rmadison -s unstable libuno-sal3 libuno-cppu3
libuno-salhelpergcc3-3 libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 libuno-purpenvhelpergcc3-3
libuno-cppu3 | 4:24.2.0-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386,
ppc64el, s390x
libuno-cppuhelpergcc3-3 |
Package: ftp.debian.org
Hi,
The following packages have been ANAIS for loong (sincd 7.6.x times.).
$ rmadison -s unstable ure-java libofficebean-java
libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb libreoffice-report-builder
libreoffice-report-builder-bin | grep -v 24
libofficebean-java | 4:7.5.9~rc1-1 |
{mysql,firebird}.ucf: add
* debian/control.in: add Breaks: -sdbc-{mysql,firebird} (<< 4:24.2.2-2)
to libreoffice-common
-- Rene Engelhard Sat, 30 Mar 2024 09:30:30 +
even though -2 was never attempted on armhf due to that build-dep (-3
was built then)
Hi,
for the sake of this bug (since it misses the mail history) this is the
FTBFS:
Test name: testContentGnumeric::TestBody
assertion failed
- Expression:
xServiceInfo->supportsService("com.sun.star.sheet.SpreadsheetDocument")
Failures !!!
Run: 64 Failure total: 1 Failures: 1 Errors:
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Tags: trixie ftbfs
Hi,
Am 30.03.24 um 12:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 30.03.24 um 08:49 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
That would mean a bin-NMU of liborcus would work and then a rebuild
of libreoffice (gb, but I need a new upload anyway
Hi,
Am 07.04.24 um 20:59 schrieb José Luis González:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/before".
tag 1068595 + moreinfo
thanks
Am 07.04.24 um 20:02 schrieb José Luis González:
Space insertion is missing in the insert menu.
Huh? What?
Normal space is "Space".
Non breaking space is Insert -> Formatting Mark -> Non breaking space if
you want to use the menu. One can argue that it's
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png
Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German:
[...]
And the first
Hi again,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:31 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
See https://people.debian.org/~rene/libreoffice/1068479-works.png
Just for avoidance of doubt since the screenshot is in German:
That is the second part "Absatz".
First is "above&quo
Hi again,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:11 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 11:03 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format -> Paragraph has spacing "after/befor
tag 1068479 + moreinfo
tag 1068479 + unreproducible
severity 1068479 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 06.04.24 um 00:34 schrieb José Luis González:
The setting for spacing between paragraphs is missing in the spacing
and indentation tab of the paragraph dialog.
?
It's definitely there. Format
severity 1036805 important
thanks
Hi,
> Serious severity because it has a major effect on the usability of the
> package without rendering it completely unusable, not minor
No, it's not.
"serious" has it's own meaning though and that's not it.
At most it's important but I don't buy this
Hi,
Also see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977857
Regards,
Rene
reassign 1068023 libreoffice-gtk4
thanks
Hi,
Am 29.03.24 um 21:04 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Package: libreoffice
if it happens only with gtk4, isn't it better suited at libreoffice-gtk4?
I use other gtk applications (e.g. evince, audacity, inkscape, firefox)
in this same environment
Package: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: Daniel Kahn Gillmor
I have qtwayland5 5.15.10-2+b1 installed. I do not have XWayland
installed at all. I'm running from within a Wayland session, using sway
1.9-1 as a compositor.
When i try to launch libreoffice using
Hi,
Am 25.03.24 um 19:17 schrieb Julian Gilbey:
* Reading and writing file formats (like CSV, Apache ORC, and Apache
Parquet)
liborcus supports this (Apache Parquet) if built with Apache Arrow. And
thus makes LibreOffice being able to handle it.
I didn't invest any time in Apache
block 1058545 by 1058653
tag 1058545 + patch
thanks
Hi,
This is due to
> dh_installdocs: error: Cannot find (any matches for) "doc/Esnacc.pdf"
(tried in .)
which is due to
(cd /home/rene/esnacc-1.8.1/doc && unzip eSNACCManuals.zip &&
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf Esnacc.doc)
Source: esnacc
Version: 1.8.1-3
Severity: serious
Justification: FTBFS
Tags: sid ftbfs
User: lu...@debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs-impfuncdef
Hi,
esnacc FTBFS:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -Wdate-time -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -I./asn1specs
-I./asn1specs -I./c-lib/inc -g -O2
tag 1066473: + pending
thanks
Hi,
Am 13.03.24 um 12:53 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
on amd64.
Interesting. I almost wanted to tag it unreproducible since it didn't
happen in my already-existing chroot... But it definitely
Hi again,
Am 10.03.24 um 19:59 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
BTW, What is the replacement for it? setuptools._distutils? As in the
following patch?
OK, so discussion on IRC gave:
19:51 < tumbleweed> _rene_: distutils is removed in 3.12
19:51 < tumbleweed> if you need distutils, tr
Hi,
Am 10.03.24 um 19:44 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
and similar stuff in upstreams configure.
python_include=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sysconfig;
print(distutils.sysconfig.get_config_var('INCLUDEPY'));"`
python_version=`$PYTHON -c "import distutils.sy
tag 1065893 - ftbfs
tag 1065893 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 10.03.24 um 18:49 schrieb Graham Inggs:
Severity: important
Tags: ftbfs
Nope. As demonstrated below it does NOT FTBFS if I ran it to the end.
Actually did once.
This package has dependencies, build-dependencies and/or autopkgtest
Hi,
Am 05.03.24 um 00:47 schrieb Andreas Beckmann:
Preparing to unpack .../libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb ...
Unpacking libreoffice-common (4:24.2.1-3) over (4:24.2.0-1) ...
dpkg: error processing archive
/var/cache/apt/archives/libreoffice-common_4%3a24.2.1-3_all.deb
:28.0 +0100
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+winff (1.6.3+dfsg-1.1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
+
+ * only build-depend on needed libreoffice-draw, libreoffice-writer;
+remove extraneous libreoffice, ure-java, default-jre
+
+ -- Rene Engelhard Mon, 04 Mar 2024 20:50:28 +
+
winff (1.6.3+dfsg-1
forwarded 1065448 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160033
thanks
Hi,
Am 04.03.24 um 21:58 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
Then you should have filed it upstream :). Didn't write the reportbug
text
Package: libreoffice-common
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: normal
Tags: upstream
X-Debbugs-Cc: pe...@pblackman.plus.com
Dear Maintainer,
When creating pdf files from odt files, soffice writes a CreationDate field
which contains the actual build date/time. This varies with every build.
For an
Hi,
Am 02.03.24 um 18:42 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
So as this library is now libxmlsec1t64-openssl this Build-Depends: is
now unfullfillable.
At least for 32bit archs like armel/armhf (which don't have Provides:
libxmlsec1-openssl) or a future package-named package due to ABI changes
(like
Source: lasso
Severity: serious
Version: 2.8.2-1
Tags: patch
User: debian-...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: time-t
Hi,
I just saw lasso has
libxmlsec1-dev,
libxmlsec1-openssl,
in Build-Depends. What for? If this was versioned this could be
understandable, but it isn't.
And
Hi,
Am 27.02.24 um 11:43 schrieb Andreas Beckmann via debian-xml-sgml-pkgs:
Package: libxmlsec1-dev,libxmlsec1-doc
Version: 1.2.39-2
Severity: serious
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: piuparts
Hi,
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package failed to install
because it tries
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:24.2.0-1
Severity: serious
Control: close -1 4:24.2.0-3
Am 23.02.24 um 17:14 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 23.02.24 um 08:02 schrieb HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai):
Sorry, resending to BTS, not to debian-openoffice.
No problem, that -1 redirects the bug
Hi,
Am 23.02.24 um 08:02 schrieb HIGUCHI Daisuke (VDR dai):
Sorry, resending to BTS, not to debian-openoffice.
No problem, that -1 redirects the bug reports to debian-openoffice is a bug.
(Fixed in later versions but those are stuck after the t64 transition.)
Regards,
Rene
Hi,
Am 11.02.24 um 22:10 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I just tried a rebuild of libreoffice with
DEB_HOST_MAINT_OPTIONS="abi=+time64" to actually see what happens.
DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS of course. I set the correct one (and
libreoffice and xmlsec1 did pick it up) but just "th
Source: gpgme1.0
Version: 1.18.0-4.1~exp1
Severity: important
[ let's no get into a discussion on the sense of this transition. I
actually believe this isn't needed and we can leave 32 bit die in 2038
but anyways...
The transition is ongoing now in experimental. So be it ]
Hi,
I just
Source: gnutls28
Version: 3.8.3-1.1~exp1
Severity: important
[ let's no get into a discussion on the sense of this transition. I
actually believe this isn't needed and we can leave 32 bit die in 2038
but anyways...
The transition is ongoing now in experimental. So be it ]
Hi,
I just tried
Package: java-common
Version: 0.75
Severity: minor
Hi,
$ grep java_unsupported_architectures /usr/share/java/java_defaults.mk
java_unsupported_architectures = hppa hurd-i386 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 hurd-i386 powerpcspe s390 sparc
[...]
hurd-i386 is here twice.
Regards,
Rene
tag 1020482 + pending
thanks
Am 24.01.24 um 23:44 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
Control: tags -1 + patch
I submitted an MR at:
https://salsa.debian.org/libreoffice-team/libreoffice/libreoffice-dictionaries/-/merge_requests/6
Hi,
oops.
Am 21.01.24 um 15:35 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Here the new libxml2 removes functions and symbol versions used by
gazillions of packages over the whole of the Debian archive.
And no, the exact point of Debian library package names is that they
HAVE to change on ABI changes
Hi,
Am 21.01.24 um 15:27 schrieb Eric Valette:
On 21/01/2024 14:49, Rene Engelhard wrote:
Exactly that is the point of #1059040. The binary packages have to be
renamed. (Then rebuild against libxml2-WHATEVERNEW). Then a rebuild
LO will have a proper dependency on libxml2-WHATEVERNEW.
I
Hi,
Am 21.01.24 um 14:44 schrieb Eric Valette:
ii libxml2 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
And this one *from experimental* changed ABI (see
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1059040). Don't
install it on systems you don't want breakage in.
Bingo you got it. However this means that
Hi,
Am 12.01.24 um 17:56 schrieb Thorsten Glaser:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2024, Rafael Laboissière wrote:
experimental, the configure script does detect the absence of the
xmlNanoFTPNewCtxt function in the libxml2 library (version
2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1) and disables the call to the xmlNanoFTP* functions.
Am Sat, Oct 14, 2023 at 11:50:25AM -0700 schrieb Soren Stoutner:
> Would you be interested in a patch to implement this functionality?
You can do that, for sure.
(Actually during debconf last year I did a quick and dirty solution to
this - excluding the special-case-needed ones, but dropped the
tag 1060255 + unreproducible
tag 1060255 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.01.24 um 11:32 schrieb Артём:
Package: libreoffice-l10n-ru
Version: 4:7.4.7-1+deb12u1
Severity: |important|
|Tags: ||l10n|
|
|
For example, in LibreOffice Start Center, some text in the options
Which "text in the
Hi,
Am 07.01.24 um 04:38 schrieb Steve Langasek:
The ordering here would be:
- dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default
flags
- the source packages which need an ABI change
("source-packages"+"lfs-and-depends-time_t") and do not already have
versions in
Hi,
Am 07.01.24 um 02:01 schrieb Steve Langasek:
If you say you are going to fix eventual breakage (and not ignoring
the test
results!) and if that means fixing asm on all affected archs, then it's OK
:)
Well, yes; though I hope we would see some help from e.g. arm porters if
there were
Hi,
Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek:
- dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default
flags
[...]
What about the suggestion to not push changes to experimental for packages
that already have new versions in experimental, and do the binary package
Hi Steve,
Am 06.01.24 um 06:51 schrieb Steve Langasek:
- dpkg will be uploaded to experimental with 64-bit time_t in the default
flags
I think at that point in time one should know what breaks and whatnot.
Archive rebuild?
(Probably in stages)
What kind of breakage are you looking to
Hi,
Am 05.01.24 um 09:17 schrieb Steve Langasek:
- Packages that could not be analyzed for whatever reason are still
assumed to have an ABI that's sensitive to time_t and have to be included
in the transition. Happily, due to improvements in this run of the number
of packages that
forwarded 974220 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140652
tag 974220 + upstream
thanks
Am 05.01.24 um 15:01 schrieb Claudio Ferreira:
Yes. I have this software. Is common in the Brazilian market.
I tried now to past a text and it works as expected. For me, this bug
can be
Hi,
Am 03.01.24 um 16:47 schrieb James Addison:
Source: clucene-core
Followup-For: Bug #1059805
X-Debbugs-Cc: r...@debian.org, thorsten.behr...@allotropia.de
On Mon, 1 Jan 2024 18:24:19 +0100, Rene wrote:
LibreOffice created a patch to clucene to make their help pages
reproducible. Maybe we
Source: clucene-core
Version: 2.3.3.4+dfsg-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps randomness
Affects: libreoffice-help-en-us libreoffice-help-ca libreoffice-help-cs
libreoffice-help-da libreoffice-help-de libreoffice-help-dz
Hi,
Am 27.12.23 um 19:15 schrieb Benjamin Barenblat:
Although doing a transition now will break some packages in sid, I
believe waiting is likely to cause more issues. Upstreams (LibreOffice
in particular) are starting to use features from the new version of
Abseil,
Actually it's not
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
I didn't file it for the plain build issue. Nevertheless, if it broke so
many projects you probably should do a full-fledged rebuild and send
Well, mitigated by 2.12.3, but still.
But again, this is completely off-topic to what I filed
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 22:33 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
The tests are still failing and there is no patch anywhere yet, see
Sorry, link got lost:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158423
and c) you ignore the actual issue here at hand and that is that the new
libxml2 breaks
Hi,
Am 25.12.23 um 16:31 schrieb Aron Xu:
Hi Rene,
On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:39 AM Rene Engelhard wrote:
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with
retitle 1059158 libreoffice-core-nogui: Can't open a spreadsheet from
python uno on 32bits because libforuilo.so is missing.
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille:
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
So this is even
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 11:43 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
And yes, I also noticed that the FreeSans.ttf is at fault. Indeed I
Hi,
Am 23.12.23 um 02:40 schrieb Bastian Germann:
graph_legend.dot should have quotes around the font name references.
Ah, thanks. Unfortunately this is a generated file...
This is probably a doxygen bug.
Probably. That's why there's no action here. TBH I don't think this is
the only
[ please keep the bug in CC to record discussions like this ]
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 21:08 schrieb Gerard H. Pille:
I chose core-nogui since I found the missing lib in libreoffice-core.
I found no info on libforuilo.
Internal LO component-
User Interface for LibreOffice?
Yes.
And the "for"?
forwarded 1059158 https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158795
thanks
Hi,
Am 20.12.23 um 18:42 schrieb Gerard Henri Pille:
Package: libreoffice-core-nogui
So -calc-nogui. Since with only -core-nogui nothing seriously should open at
all anyway :)
Version: 4:7.4.7-1
You
Am Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 08:03:56PM +0100 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
> LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
"... but doesn't yet succeed the tests with 2.12"
> S=/home/rene/LibreOffice/git/libreoffice-24-2 && I=$S/instdir && W=$
Package: libxml2
Version: 2.12.3+dfsg-0exp1
Severity: serious
Dear Maintainer,
Hi,
LibreOffice builds (patch available), but doesn't yet build with 2.12.
But that is not the point of this issue.
While test building current 24.2 snapshot which will become 24.2 rc1
later this week I get
[build
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 07:57 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 06:01 schrieb tony mancill:
A FTBFS bug [1] cropped up in gpredict recently that appears to be to a
change in libreoffice-writer-nogui. The build step that fails is:
$ soffice --strace --writer --headless --convert-to pdf
Hi,
Am 14.12.23 um 06:01 schrieb tony mancill:
A FTBFS bug [1] cropped up in gpredict recently that appears to be to a
change in libreoffice-writer-nogui. The build step that fails is:
$ soffice --strace --writer --headless --convert-to pdf gpredict-user-manual.odt
Warning: failed to launch
Hi,
Am 13.12.23 um 16:19 schrieb Andreas Tille:
Control: tags -1 help
Am Tue, Dec 12, 2023 at 09:52:48PM +0100 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
/usr/bin/install: cannot stat './parallel_cheat_bw.pdf': No such file or
directory
This file is (re-)created via
libreoffice --headless --convert-to pdf
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext: NUMBERTEXT() gives Err: 504
thanks
Am 05.12.23 um 18:56 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in Libreoffice Calc, you get an
'Err: 504' error in those cells.
Confirmed..
Cause is
$ debdiff libreoffice-numbertext_1.0.11
tag 1057434 + confirmed
retitle 1057434 libreoffice-numbertext 1.0.11-3 is broken; NUMBERTEXT(5)
gives Err: 504
thanks
Hi,
Am 05.12.23 um 02:27 schrieb Alexandre Bonneau:
Package: libreoffice-numbertext
Version: 1.0.11-3
Severity: grave
When trying to use the =NUMBERTEXT(5) formula in
Source: libreoffice
Version: 4:7.5.9~rc1-1
Severity: serious
Tags: wontfix trixie
Hi,
apparently mdds 2.1/liborcus 0.19 migrated to testing even though
Build-Depends clearly say
libmdds-dev (<< 2.1~),
libmdds-dev (>= 2.0),
and
liborcus-dev (<<
tag 1056104 + wonffix
thanks
Hi,
Am 17.11.23 um 18:30 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
So it would boil down to
rene@frodo:~/LibreOffice/git/master/debian$ git diff rules
diff --git a/rules b/rules
index e7152c60..ed7a8157 100755
--- a/rules
+++ b/rules
@@ -2247,6 +2247,7 @@ config_host.mk
severity 1056104 wishlist
thanks
Am 16.11.23 um 23:52 schrieb Cyril Brulebois:
LibreOffice features a prompt that pops up every now and then, asking
users to get involved or to donate. I'm not sure asking repeatedly is
reasonable,
Not sure.
We need people who care about portability.
Hi,
Am 03.11.23 um 13:18 schrieb Gabor Karsay:
Rene Engelhard schrieb am 03.11.23 um 06:12:
Am 02.11.23 um 23:25 schrieb Gabor Karsay:
I haven't uploaded it yet, I don't know if I should target
experimental or unstable?
unstable, please.
I've uploaded to https://mentors.debian.net
Am 02.11.23 um 23:25 schrieb Gabor Karsay:
thank you, I tried your fix with experimental libreoffice and pushed
it to https://salsa.debian.org/gkarsay/parlatype-libreoffice-extension
I haven't uploaded it yet, I don't know if I should target
experimental or unstable?
unstable, please. It
Hi,
Am 01.11.23 um 16:37 schrieb John David Anglin:
The attached change fixes orcus_test_xml_mapped test on hppa hardware:
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=liborcus=hppa=0.17.2-4=1698851675=0
Erm? Please don't tell me you apply stuff on packages extra to what's in
the archive
Hi,
I just saw that you uploaded parlatype fixing its RC bug [1]
Can you fix this bug, too? I just uploaded the last LibreOffice of 7.5.x
series ever to unstable. I think we should move to LibreOffice 7.6 asap,
especially since 24.2 is around the corner too and we need experimental
to test
tag 1055048 + moreinfo
Thanks
Am 30. Oktober 2023 09:12:05 MEZ schrieb Nicolas Patrois
:
>Package: libreoffice-writer
>Version: 4:7.5.8~rc1-2
>Severity: normal
>Tags: upstream
>
>Dear Maintainer,
>
>I have problems when I try to create overlapping lines in tables.
(...)
Since 7.5.8 is
Hi,
Am 23.10.23 um 00:10 schrieb John David Anglin:
The build fails on real hppa hardware (i.e., not qemu):
[...]
Exactly the same binary runs successfully under qemu.
Maybe there is a timing issue in the orcus::file_content::~file_content
destructor?
That is something for you as hppa porter
Hi,
Am 19.10.23 um 19:08 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Source: libixion
Version: 0.17.0-3
0.17.0-3
Severity: serious
Tags: ftbfs trixie sid patch
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libixion=i386=0.19.0-1=1697292545=0
So not 0.17.0.
Or does it also happen on sid? Yes, it does..
tag 1053670 + unreproducible
tag 1053670 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.10.23 um 15:08 schrieb Kerstin Hoef-Emden:
Probably an update of libreoffice and its components.
Probably?
The last update of "libreoffice and its components" was for 12.1 in July.
If it appeared recently I'd guess
Source: libreoffice-parlatype-extension
Version: 3.1.1-1
Severity: important
Dear Maintainer,
I see parlatype-libreoffice-extension failing with the new upstream
release of libreoffice in experimental (see
severity 1051968 wishlist
reassign 1051968 tasksel
retitle 1051968 please make task-mate-desktop install libreoffice-gnome
thanks
Hi,
Am 15.09.23 um 04:33 schrieb Charles Boling:
Package: libreoffice
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Dear Maintainer,
(Sorry if wrong pkg; had trouble finding
severity 1051474 important
thanks
Hi,
Am 08.09.23 um 19:19 schrieb Bastien Roucariès:
Source: libreoffice
Severity: serious
Tags: security
Justification: Document embdeded code copy + copyright
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian Security Team
Since when is that serious? It isn't. There have been no
fixed 1045940 0.18.1-1
thanks
Am 14.08.23 um 20:09 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
Am 14.08.23 um 18:05 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_autoreconf_clean
dh_clean
rm: cannot remove './doc/_doxygen': Is a directory
rm: cannot remove './doc/tmp': Is a dir
reassign 1045940 src:libixion
found 1045940 0.16.1-3
severity 1045940 minor
thanks
Am 14.08.23 um 18:05 schrieb Rene Engelhard:
make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>'
dh_autoreconf_clean
dh_clean
rm: cannot remove './doc/_doxygen': Is a directory
rm: cannot remove './doc/tmp': Is a dir
reassign 1045940 debhelper
affects 1045940 src:libixion
severity 1045940 normal
thanls
Hi,
Am 13.08.23 um 21:20 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
Source: libixion
No.
> This is probably a clear violation of Debian Policy section 4.9
(clean target),
but this is filed as severity:minor for now,
tag 1042994 + unreproducible
tag 1042994 + moreinfo
thanks
Hi,
Am 04.08.23 um 01:22 schrieb Thomas Florek:
Launching LO Draw (and also LO Impress) did not work, either from the
plasma desktop or from the console.
Works fine here. (Clean sid VM with experimentals LO)
Even tried extra in
1 - 100 of 5573 matches
Mail list logo
