tag 839804 +moreinfo
thanks
Hello,
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> [CEST Sep 19 19:10:11] info : Adding event to the queue file
> /var/lib/monit/events/1474305011_1bbbd00 for later delivery
> [CEST Sep 19 19:12:11] error: Queued event file:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:50 AM, Martin Sebald wrote:
> I'm experiencing a bug in jessie-backports monit version 5.18-1~bpo8+1:
>
> /etc/monit/conf.d/memcached:8: Cannot activate service check. The process
> status engine was disabled.
>
> It looks like this bug:
>
>
Thanks, fixed in the repo.
Do you think this issue severe enough to do upload?
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Chris Lamb wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> monit: please make the build reproducible
>
> Fixed upstream with
>
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Martin Pala mart...@tildeslash.com wrote:
Actually the original behaviour was bug - the name used in the “check system”
was always intended to be visible in M/Monit, snip from Monit 5.9 manual (see
the last sentence in the snip):
—8—
=item 7. CHECK
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 07:08:42AM +0100, Volker Grabsch wrote:
Okay, so these are the exact steps how to reproduce this, using a
QEMU/KVM virtual machine running the latest Debian/Stable.
...
B.3. Install Apache, using just he default configuration
Ok, now I got it. It was too hard to
reopen 752540
severity 752540 important
thanks
Hello,
Time ago I asked upstream to change the license to 3.01 due
to DD's requirement (see forwarded message). Do you suggest me to
do this again?
#752532 was closed with resolution: If someone feels like they
should be re-opened, please restart
Closed as a duplicate of #755346
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 11:02 PM, Lucas Nussbaum lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net
wrote:
Source: parser
Version: 3.4.3-3
Severity: serious
Tags: jessie sid
User: debian...@lists.debian.org
Usertags: qa-ftbfs-20140830 qa-ftbfs
Justification: FTBFS on amd64
Hi,
Hello,
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Christian Dröge per...@christian-droege.de
wrote:
Am 19.02.2014 20:50, schrieb Sergey B Kirpichev:
The dh_installinit line was dropped in this patch, because it is not
needed anymore
Explain this, please.
update-rc.d does not support the start and
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Paul Wise p...@debian.org wrote:
I'll ask for the lintian text to be clarified but there is no reason
not to do the changes properly now, before the clarification
is added to lintian.
I hope, that's fixed in:
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: normal
Hello,
I'm looking for a sponsor for my package awstats:
http://mentors.debian.net/package/awstats
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/a/awstats/awstats_7.3+dfsg-1.dsc
I'm dm, but I don't have upload permissions for this
package in the new
Package: sponsorship-requests
Severity: wishlist
Dear mentors,
I am looking for a sponsor for my package auto-07p
Package name: auto-07p
Version : 0.9.1+dfsg-1
Upstream Author: Eusebius Doedel
URL: http://indy.cs.concordia.ca/auto/
License : BSD
Section
forwarded 724598 https://github.com/php-memcached-dev/php-memcached/pull/80
thanks
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 7:47 PM, Michael Fladischer
fladischermich...@fladi.at wrote:
due to an API break in libmemcached 1.0.9 php-memcached does no longer
build:
tags 692628 +upstream +pending
thanks
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:16 AM, Ansgar Burchardt ans...@debian.org wrote:
The upstream tarball contains files under the non-free JSON license:
% rgrep -l 'The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil.' .
./src/lib/json/JSON_parser.C
Fix is available in
tag 724598 +pending +upstream
thanks
25.09.2013 19:51 пользователь Michael Fladischer fladischermich...@fladi.at
написал:
Upstream has already a bugreport for this:
https://github.com/php-memcached-dev/php-memcached/pull/80
There is already a package for libmemcached-1.0.17-1 in
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Luciano Bello luci...@debian.org wrote:
Sébastien Bocahu reported to the security team:
patch that was applied by Debian exposes Apache to segfaults under specific
crafted requests.
The magick request is the following:
curl -H x-forwarded-for: 1'\5000 -H
tag 683984 +pending
thanks
06.08.2012 4:27 пользователь Luciano Bello luci...@debian.org написал:
Sébastien Bocahu reported to the security team:
(...)
A single request makes Apache segfault. On some of the environments I
tested,
it even kills all Apache processes (they become zombies).
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 03:13:32PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
Would be nice, if you take look on #556610 too.
Yes, but this one is a feature/enhancement. I'm not sure we ever want to
go this route -- the result smells too complicated.
What exactly? Every day we run 1/X'th part of job
#675452 ... So, if you do have some
time and are willing to help, that's where to look at :)
Comment was added.
Yes, I've seen these. But at this point before wheezy release I don't want
to enable asyncronous array processing like this. Â Once we enable that in
in the initramfs, we have
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
The upstream patch introduced by this change should be submitted,
naturally, upstream. Â Sergey, care to submit it to Neil as
appropriate, or should I do that myself?
Whoole changeset looks very minor. Probably, you can
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 12:47 AM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote:
I'll try to review this stuff while being in a sea beach,
maybe will commit something.
Would be nice, if you take look on #556610 too.
But to me, much more important issue is the timing issue we have
in initramfs. Â
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 4:16 PM, bug556...@arcor.de wrote:
According to the proposed patch I had a thought and 4 proposals to also cover
the case of systems that are not powered on for 24 hours 7 days a week.
(i.e. power saving policy in place)
Looks good, let's see.
0) Because checking an
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Daniel Pocock dan...@pocock.com.au wrote:
b) data is likely to be missed if it is logged between the time
update.sh finishes and the rotation of a file for any particular vhost
Why does the README insist on prerotate and not use postrotate?
Probably, because
forwarded 629896 https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=59876
thanks
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Tim Baldoni t...@clockwork.net wrote:
The source file memcache_pool.c contains FD_CLR, Â FD_ISSET, FD_SET,
and FD_ZERO.
Yep. It uses select, we know. And what?
I strongly disagree that fcgi is a
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:32 AM, David Kirchner d...@dpk.net wrote:
I'm not sure if this is related, but I found a similar problem. We've
also extended the memcached class with wrappers. We're getting
segfaults after the get call in some cases, double-frees and aborts in
other cases. However,
tag 629896 +confirmed
severity 629896 important
thanks
I'll lower down the severity of this bugreport. Clearly, this issue
does not makes the package unusable or mostly so.
Even for heavy-loaded websites (mass virtual hosting, actually) there
exists an alternative: using fcgi.
Please, explain
tag 556610 +patch
thanks
Just a more simple version of the
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=32;filename=checkarray.diff;att=2;bug=556610
Rough idea is to
1) setup crontab on a regular basis, e.g. weekly:
--8---
57 0 * * 0 root [ -x /usr/share/mdadm/checkarray ]
Hello,
As a variant to fix this issue, please consider using
attached patch. Hope, it's simple enough to be
accepted upstream.
On nonzero mismatch_cnt it makes log entry like this:
--8---
Dec 6 22:52:42 squeeze mdadm[2376]: RebuildFinished event detected on md
device /dev/md0, component
Package: debian-maintainers
Severity: normal
Please add my key as described in the attached jetring changeset to
the Debian Maintainer keyring.
Comment: Add Sergey B Kirpichev skirpic...@gmail.com as a Debian Maintainer
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2011 03:10:30 +0300
Recommended-By:
Raphael Hertzog
tags patch 334517
thanks
seems to be fixed in
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460066
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
29 matches
Mail list logo