Bug#1016091: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 [RC] -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > * Package name: tinymux > >Version : 2.12.0.10-1 > > > tinymux (2.12.0.10-1) unstable; urgency=medium > > . > >* New upstream release > > + fixes ftbfs with GCC-12. (Closes: #1013053) > >* Updat

Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library

to an external libmux or random and unintended reference to libxbase64 or .la files. On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:18 PM Stephen Dennis wrote: > Could it be a naming collision between the private libmux and an > official libmux package? > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:13 PM Stephen Dennis > wrote:

Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library

Could it be a naming collision between the private libmux and an official libmux package? On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 9:13 PM Stephen Dennis wrote: > How can I reproduce what you are seeing? The package doesn't use libtool, > and no .la files are produced or included. There should be no ref

Bug#1015968: RFS: xbase64/3.1.2-14 -- xbase compatible C++ class library

How can I reproduce what you are seeing? The package doesn't use libtool, and no .la files are produced or included. There should be no reference to libxbase64. I'm not even sure what that is. On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:30 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 04:53:52PM +0200, Jörg

Bug#1016091: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 [RC] -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

. And, likewise, I won't know for certain that it is fixed without someone without enough cores. Stephen On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 8:03 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 03:29:03PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > * Package name: tinymux > >Version : 2.12.0.10-1

Bug#1016091: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 [RC] -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: important Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux": * Package name: tinymux Version : 2.12.0.10-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis * URL : http://www.tinymux.org/ * License : BS

Bug#866945: tinymux: please make the build reproducible

Oh. Darn. We are talking about different issues. Sorry, Chris. Your patch has been included in my package submitted to mentors, but that submission has stalled. On Fri, Dec 11, 2020, 10:58 AM Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > > It builds for me several different ways. I've never been able to

Bug#866945: tinymux: please make the build reproducible

It builds for me several different ways. I've never been able to not build it the way it was described. I don't know what else to do except keep the submitted package up to date and see if it gets in eventually. If anyone has a advice, I'm open. On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 11:03 AM Chris Lamb wrote:

Bug#866945: tinymux: please make the build reproducible

Yes. This is obviously a good thing. I'll include it in my pending mentors submission. On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:09 PM Chris Lamb wrote: > Dear Maintainer, > > > Source: tinymux > > Version: 2.10.1.14-1 > > Tags: patch > > There hasn't seem to be any update on this bug in 1164 days, in which >

Bug#968153: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

Thanks. I've setup pbuilder, re-built (without issue), and uploaded the signed package again with dput. On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 4:04 AM Baptiste BEAUPLAT wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On 8/12/20 7:22 AM, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > It builds and rebuilds for me on two differe

Bug#968153: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

Current status: It builds and rebuilds for me on two different clean Debian environments. I have never gotten the '/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lmux' error. Adam hasn't responded in two days and is probably waiting for me to fix an error I cannot reproduce. Can anyone else build it? Am I building

Bug#968153: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

is part of the base system _except_ for libpcre3 so that must be called out explicitly in Build-Depends? Thanks for your help. Stephen On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 6:38 PM Adam Borowski wrote: > On Sun, Aug 09, 2020 at 04:32:31PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > * Package name: tinymux >

Bug#968153: RFS: tinymux/2.12.0.10-1 -- text-based multi-user virtual world server

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: wishlist Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux": * Package name: tinymux Version : 2.12.0.10-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis * URL : http://www.tinymux.org/ * License : Ar

Bug#877604: tinymux: drop binutils from Build-Depends

Andrey did a great scrub. Much appreciated. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Helmut Grohne <hel...@subdivi.de> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 07:53:41AM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > This is addressed with a new package in mentors ( > > https://mentors.debian.net/pac

Bug#877604: tinymux: drop binutils from Build-Depends

This is addressed with a new package in mentors ( https://mentors.debian.net/package/tinymux) waiting for a sponsor. I can update my changelog to say that it closes this bug and re-upload a new package to mentors. On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 5:36 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote: > Source:

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

The latest package at mentors has the version restriction removed. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 01:00:21PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > > > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, a

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Control: tags 871693 - moreinfo On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 2:16 PM, Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> wrote: > The latest package at mentors has the version restriction removed. > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> > wrote: > &g

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Thank you for the feedback and for the effort it takes to review these packages. On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 12:40 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 12:05:26PM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

On Tue, Aug 15, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: > Are you sure you need autotools-dev? > Removing. > By the way, binutils (>= 2.28.0) is wrong, as 2.28-1 is not >= 2.28.0. > Fixing. > So now to talk about the dpkg-shlibdeps warningsI think the problem > is

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Found a way to suppress/fix the warnings. On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 2:55 PM, Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah. missed the compat level because I changed the it to version 10 in the > debian/control file. Next upload will have debian/compat of 10, and > debian/con

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Ah. missed the compat level because I changed the it to version 10 in the debian/control file. Next upload will have debian/compat of 10, and debian/control has "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10.0.0), binutils (>= 2.28.0), autotools-dev (>= 20161112.1)" So now to talk about the dpkg-shlibdeps

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Control: tags 871693 - moreinfo On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 12:11 PM, Andrey Rahmatullin <w...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: severity -1 important > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:32:54AM -0600, Stephen Dennis wrote: > > Package: sponsorship-reque

Bug#871693: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.14-1 [RC]

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [RC bug will auto-remove package on the 20th] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux" * Package name: tinymux Version : 2.10.1.14-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmai

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:32 AM, Tobias Frost wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > BTW, you're using the tar.gz .. Can you use the tar.bz2 for the > packaging as it compresses better? This is also the one that is picked > up by uscan... (Just use uscan --force-download to get

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

Thanks for the starting point. I had worked out the d/watch file enough that it works locally (mentors.debian.net still complains), but I like your wildcards better, so I'm using that one (mentors.debian.net still complains). The simple short d/rules is very much appreciated. I only just begin to

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

I've never been able to get the watch file to work right, and it is mis-behaving like it always has. I think I've made all the other changes requested except I'm still a total loss as to how to migrate to the short debhelper format. On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Tobias Frost

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

Very much appreciate the feedback. Willing to learn, but overwhelmed by the Debian machinery. Stupid question at the top: If I dput another package, does it update this one or do I need to delete the currently uploaded package from mentors first? - d/changelog. A lot has changed. Here are

Bug#849918: RFS: tinymux/2.10.1.13-1

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux". I am the upstream maintainer, and there is already an ITA from me against the package. * Package name: tinymux Version : 2.10.1.13-1 Upstream Author : Step

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Looking forward to more packaging. Maybe become a Debian maintainer one day if I can afford the time. On Mar 10, 2016 7:39 PM, "Martin Michlmayr" <t...@hpe.com> wrote: > * Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> [2016-03-10 19:47]: > > I'll keep trying to uploa

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

I'll keep trying to upload it, but all four of the files are removed. They weren't part of the debian/patches/series file anyway. It was all cruft. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> wrote: > 403 forbidden > On Mar 10, 2016 7:38 PM, "Mar

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

403 forbidden On Mar 10, 2016 7:38 PM, "Martin Michlmayr" <t...@hpe.com> wrote: > * Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> [2016-03-10 19:31]: > > Removed that cruft and re-submitted package. > > I don't see it yet but maybe it just takes some time. >

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Removed that cruft and re-submitted package. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:10 PM, Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, all that cruft got through. Tried the templates. Didn't work. Need > them now. > > At the airport. Will touch tonight. > On Mar 10, 2016 7:07

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Oh, all that cruft got through. Tried the templates. Didn't work. Need them now. At the airport. Will touch tonight. On Mar 10, 2016 7:07 PM, "Martin Michlmayr" <t...@hpe.com> wrote: > * Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> [2016-03-10 18:07]: > > * I did not a

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

, and there are these other more pressing problems. On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 4:47 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@hpe.com> wrote: > * Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> [2016-03-10 12:18]: > > Trying my hand at the package because I think Noltar has moved on: > > > > http://mentors.debi

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Trying my hand at the package because I think Noltar has moved on: http://mentors.debian.net/package/tinymux

Bug#817804: RFS: tinymux/2.6.5.34-1 NMU

Package: sponsorship-requests Severity: normal [important for RC bugs, wishlist for new packages] Dear mentors, I am looking for a sponsor for my package "tinymux" Package name: tinymux Version : 2.6.5.34-1 Upstream Author : Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gm

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Thanks for the report. Installing experimental Debian now. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Martin Michlmayr wrote: > Package: tinymux > Version: 2.6.5.28-1 > Severity: important > User: debian-...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: ftbfs-gcc-6 gcc-6-narrowing > > This package fails to

Bug#811780: tinymux: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

, Stephen Dennis <brazilof...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the report. Installing experimental Debian now. > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Martin Michlmayr <t...@hpe.com> wrote: > >> Package: tinymux >> Version: 2.6.5.28-1 >> Severity: impo

Bug#417539: tinymux: Buffer overflow in fun_ladd of funmath.cpp with security implications.

Package: tinymux Version: 2.4.3.31-1 Severity: grave Tags: security Justification: user security hole http://nvd.nist.gov/nvd.cfm?cvename=CVE-2007-1655 Overview: Buffer overflow in the fun_ladd function in funmath.cpp in TinyMUX before 20070126 might allow remote attackers to cause a denial