Bug#732259: Acknowledgement (mutt: Special character in the recipient's display name overrides my name config'd in mutt)

2013-12-16 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Sheesh, my bad. Thanks :) --srs (htc one x) - Reply message - From: C. Meissa carsten.mei...@gmx.de To: Suresh Ramasubramanian sur...@hserus.net Cc: 732...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#732259: Acknowledgement (mutt: Special character in the recipient's display name overrides my name

Bug#732259: Acknowledgement (mutt: Special character in the recipient's display name overrides my name config'd in mutt)

2013-12-15 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Forgot to addthe relevant bits from my .muttrc - set reverse_name set from=sur...@hserus.net alternates s...@savitr.info srs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Bug#684340: exim tls fails: Diffie-Hellman prime too short

2013-09-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Package: exim4 Version: 4.80-7 Followup-For: Bug #684340 This issue is still around in 4.80-7 on wheezy. Longish thread on postfix-users as well, with an exim developer (Phil Pennock) discussing this bug with Wietse and Viktor Dukhovni. 66_enlarge-dh-parameters-size.dpatch in gnutls is the

Bug#684340: exim tls fails: Diffie-Hellman prime too short

2013-09-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 12-Sep-2013, at 1:18, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: I suppose the simplest mitigation would be to avoid ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key agreement altogether, that is, remove it from the cipher suite default. Dispensing with gnutls and using openssl like most other distros do would

Bug#684340: exim tls fails: Diffie-Hellman prime too short

2013-09-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
On 12-Sep-2013, at 1:18, Florian Weimer f...@deneb.enyo.de wrote: I suppose the simplest mitigation would be to avoid ephemeral Diffie-Hellman key agreement altogether, that is, remove it from the cipher suite default. By the way this ticket is a dup of #676563 --srs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#624670: exim4 dkim plugin - % in dkim signature logged to paniclog

2011-04-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Package: exim4 Version: 4.72-6 Severity: normal Exim wrongly interprets % in a dkim sig, and logs to the paniclog This issue has been reported upstream to the exim maintainers and a fix pushed http://bugs.exim.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1106 thanks --srs -- Package-specific info: Exim version 4.72

Bug#564832: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4-base 4.71.3 - start and stop runlevels changed, warnings ..

2010-01-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
/etc/init.d/exim4 was only modified to make the queue interval 15m instead of 30m. What I did next was to execute update-rc.d exim4 default and it seems to have stopped throwing that error. Strange. Andreas Metzler [24/01/10 15:58 +0100]: On 2010-01-12 Suresh Ramasubramanian sur...@hserus.net

Bug#564832: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4-base 4.71.3 - start and stop runlevels changed, warnings ..

2010-01-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Andreas Metzler [24/01/10 16:18 +0100]: Ok. Would you mind sending it to the bts, so we have a complete file when I re-assign to insserv. Below. Only change is QUEUEINTERVAL was changed to 15m from the default 30m srs #! /bin/sh # /etc/init.d/exim4 # # Written by Miquel van

Bug#564832: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4-base 4.71.3 - start and stop runlevels changed, warnings ..

2010-01-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Andreas Metzler [24/01/10 16:11 +0100]: On 2010-01-12 Suresh Ramasubramanian sur...@hserus.net wrote: Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.71-3 Severity: important Doing an apt-get dist-upgrade to the latest exim4-daemon-heavy [...] Was this a dist-upgrade from lenny? nope. fresh

Bug#564832: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4-base 4.71.3 - start and stop runlevels changed, warnings ..

2010-01-24 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Marc Haber [24/01/10 16:36 +0100]: It is not necessary to modify the init script to override these settings, just override them from /etc/default/exim4. Which I did, already once I remembered. Didnt modify the initscript back to the default though. Both those files say 15m now. -- To

Bug#564832: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4-base 4.71.3 - start and stop runlevels changed, warnings ..

2010-01-12 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
* Marc Haber [Tuesday, 12 January 2010 3:58 PM]: On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 10:01:29PM -0800, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Setting up exim4-base (4.71-3) ... Installing new version of config file /etc/cron.daily/exim4-base ... insserv: warning: current start runlevel(s) (empty) of script `exim4

Bug#564832: exim4-daemon-heavy: exim4-base 4.71.3 - start and stop runlevels changed, warnings ..

2010-01-11 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Package: exim4-daemon-heavy Version: 4.71-3 Severity: important Doing an apt-get dist-upgrade to the latest exim4-daemon-heavy I got these warnings, and then exim4 did not restart automatically. /etc/init.d/exim4 start did start it after that. Setting up exim4-base (4.71-3) ... Installing new

Bug#483756: insist ssh-vulnkey -a be run by the administrator upon upgrade

2008-05-31 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Having a compromised key in ~/.ssh/authorized_keys (if that's what it was) is effectively equivalent to allowing access to that account from the entire Internet. Obviously. Which is why I found it. Removed it. Told him to reupload it. He seems to have uploaded a new compromised key. Told him

Bug#483756: insist ssh-vulnkey -a be run by the administrator upon upgrade

2008-05-30 Thread Suresh Ramasubramanian
Colin Watson [31/05/08 00:31 +0100]: Sure, but that's a problem with *their* machine (i.e. it allows access from unauthorised persons) rather than a problem with your machine. The sshd blacklisting will prevent this problem on their side - you might send them an updated key but you won't be able