Bug#1064920: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures

2024-04-24 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
, Apr 22, 2024 at 8:00 PM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote: > > I created a pull request to fix the build issue. Please review > https://salsa.debian.org/bluefield-team/rshim-user-space/-/merge_requests/11 > -tai > > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:27 PM dann frazier wrote: > > >

Bug#1064920: FTBFS on 32-bit architectures

2024-04-22 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
I created a pull request to fix the build issue. Please review https://salsa.debian.org/bluefield-team/rshim-user-space/-/merge_requests/11 -tai On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 7:27 PM dann frazier wrote: > > Source: rshim-user-space > Version: 2.0.12+debian-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: ftbfs >

Bug#1054152: rasdaemon: frequent crashes of rasdaemon

2024-02-02 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi piorunz, The issue and the corresponding backport should have been included in the latest version in unstable/testing with version 0.8.0-2. If you have a moment, would you mind a try? Cheers, Tai On Sat, Jan 6, 2024 at 11:30 AM piorunz wrote: > > Hello Tai, > > Thanks for your reply. > >

Bug#1059484: rasdaemon: autopkgtest failure: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db'

2024-01-08 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
I am enlightened by Paul https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/01/msg0.html and Simon https://lists.debian.org/debian-ci/2024/01/msg4.html . I will try to resolve this issue by introducing iso-machine and more portable tests. -tai On Wed, Dec 27, 2023 at 9:46 PM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828

Bug#1054152: rasdaemon: frequent crashes of rasdaemon

2024-01-05 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi piorunz, Thanks for testing. I will work on bug 1059484 first, and don't have ETA of the backport. Feel free to send me a patch of the backport if you are interested. -tai On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 8:26 PM piorunz wrote: > > On 11/12/2023 14:20, Russell Coker wrote: > > We have 2 different

Bug#1059484: rasdaemon: autopkgtest failure: cannot access '/var/lib/rasdaemon/ras-mc_event.db'

2023-12-27 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi Paul, Thanks for reporting the issue. I will take a look. -tai On Tue, Dec 26, 2023 at 7:09 PM Paul Gevers wrote: > > Source: rasdaemon > Version: 0.8.0-1 > Severity: serious > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: fails-always > > Dear maintainer(s), > > You recently added an

Bug#1054152: rasdaemon: frequent crashes of rasdaemon

2023-12-11 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi Piorunz, Do you mind verifying if your issue is related to https://github.com/mchehab/rasdaemon/issues/77 ? If yes, we can consider to backport the corresponding upstream fix. Kind regards, Tai On Mon, Dec 11, 2023 at 10:15 AM piorunz wrote: > > On 11/12/2023 04:20, Russell Coker wrote: > >

Bug#1033060: BTS #1036959 rasdaemon: invalid Maintainer field

2023-10-14 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi Russel, Mattia, I think we can close this ticket if Russel is happy with his DDPO page now. Mine looks good. For the record: The release team "fixed" the bug by using one name for field Maintainer and the other name for Uploaders. See https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1036959

Bug#1018326: celery: build-depends on python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest

2022-12-04 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi, I checked the upstream source, and I found the upstream stopped using "nose" many years ago. Refer to this commit 29df527147514b3eab7fbc3dbf41ff181bf1dcd9 in the upstream repository https://github.com/celery/celery . Possible next step: Re-package the more recent upstream source to resolve

Bug#1025450: python-gssapi: enable testing when packaging python-gssapi

2022-12-04 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Source: python-gssapi Version: 1.8.2-1 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, The current debian package building process does not launch any testing when building python-gssapi. It will be great if the building process launches the corresponding upstream tests. FWIW: the upstream stopped using

Bug#985678: ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings

2022-12-02 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
to review my packaging and 2) has permission to upload the package after reviewing we can then resolve this issue. Cheers, Tai On Sun, May 15, 2022 at 10:00 AM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote: > > HI everyone, some updates for closing this issue: > > 1. The package has been repackag

Bug#1018505: python-gssapi: build-depends on python3-nose or uses it for autopkgtest

2022-12-02 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi, I checked the upstream source, and I found the upstream stopped using nose since v1.7.3 with the commit 5552513a47a636a4d956f76b498c6fa2e368cc98 . So I think we can re-package the more recent upstream to resolve this issue. -tai

Bug#985678: ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings

2022-05-15 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
to bump the version of rasdaemon to add "Closes: #985678" when the above tasks are done. [1] What I meant by "testing looks good": edac-fake-inject and edac-tests could inject fake events and caught by rasdaemon (via ras-mc-ctl --summary) -tai On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:36 AM Tai

Bug#985678: ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings

2021-12-07 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
If you are interested in testing the current package under development, you may clone it via the dev-packaging-upstream-0.6.7 branch: git clone https://salsa.debian.org/tai271828/rasdaemon.git -b dev-packaging-upstream-0.6.7 - tai On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 12:01 AM Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote

Bug#985678: ITA: rasdaemon -- utility to receive RAS error tracings

2021-12-07 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi, everyone, Even though it is slow, I still made some progress. Let me elaborate here so you may know the current status from my side: - The latest upstream v0.6.7 has been packaged. See my repository https://salsa.debian.org/tai271828/rasdaemon.git forked from ahs3's repository

Bug#947261: ITP: python-poetry -- Python dependency management and packaging made easy

2021-08-17 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
1 6:00 PM, Taihsiang Ho (tai271828) wrote: > > Hi Emmanuel, > > > > I can help as a poetry user for a while if you don't mind. It seems that > I > > could reproduce the pytest-mock issue by building this poetry deb > source[1] > > with Ubuntu 21.04. For better comm

Bug#947261: ITP: python-poetry -- Python dependency management and packaging made easy

2021-06-17 Thread Taihsiang Ho (tai271828)
Hi Emmanuel, I can help as a poetry user for a while if you don't mind. It seems that I could reproduce the pytest-mock issue by building this poetry deb source[1] with Ubuntu 21.04. For better communication, I am wondering the following items: - Is there any issue tracker for the